Community | October 07, 2009 | 47 comments

Afghanistan: It's been 8 years - what's next?

Image
afitzgerald
Obama met with Congressional leaders yesterday and ruled out a sharp reduction in troop levels in Afghanistan. He was also hesitant about a large increase in troop levels. From the NY Times:
"Mr. Obama seemed to be searching for some sort of middle ground, saying he wanted to “dispense with the straw man argument that this is about either doubling down or leaving Afghanistan,” as White House officials later described his remarks."

Meanwhile, the Taliban released a statement on their website asserting that they do not want to fight Western countries, but will continue to oppose foreign troops in Afghanistan. From Reuters:
“We had and have no plan of harming countries of the world, including those in Europe … our goal is the independence of the country and the building of an Islamic state,” the Taliban said in a statement on the group’s website www.shahamat.org. “Still, if you (NATO and U.S. troops) want to colonize the country of proud and pious Afghans under the baseless pretext of a war on terror, then you should know that our patience will only increase and that we are ready for a long war.”

This will be a challenging few weeks for the Obama Administration as they puzzle out what their next steps will be on Afghanistan. Looking to the public, a new poll suggests they have suport for the war, but not necessarily for a large increase in troop levels. From AFP:
"Sixty-five percent of US voters “are willing to have American soldiers ‘fight and possibly die’ to eliminate the threat of terrorists operating from Afghanistan,” according to the Quinnipiac University poll. Only 28 percent said otherwise."

Today is the anniversary of the beginning of the Afghanistan War. US soldiers have been there for 8 years now, and there doesn’t seem yet to be a clear exit. What do you think the next steps in Afghanistan are? Anyone out there in the military who’s back from Afghanistan? Maybe you can shed a little light on the situation on the ground for us?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight,   News_Featured,   Afghanistan War
  2. tags:
    News Obama Barack Obama Afghanistan 7 more
  3.     
    |

47 comments // Afghanistan: It's been 8 years - what's next?

  • samthesixth
    • 0
      samthesixth  
    • US come home. We are through there unless the Taliban reseizes power. At that point we can knock them from it as we did in retaliation for their having harbored AQ.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • NEWS FROM REALITY

      Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
      http://www.rawa.org/index.php

      WAR AGAINST HUMANITY
      Let’s rise against the war crimes of US and its fundamentalist lackeys!

      War
      Most Victims are Children

      As wars have developed in the twentieth century, the ratio of civilian deaths to military deaths has changed radically. One hundred years ago 5% of war casualties were civilians. In World War I civilian deaths were about 10%. In World War II, 65%. Tactics of modern wars have shifted casualties to 90% civilians. More than half of these civilian casualties are children less than 14 years of age. This is only the direct casualties from bombs, bullets and landmines.

      Add to this indirect and long-term casualties caused by destroyed infrastructure and a fractured society. resulting in disease, starvation, homelessness and the numbers become even more grim.

      On top of this add the long term effects of highly toxic armaments rained down upon the victim country – Agent Orange in Viet Nam, Depleted Uranium in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan – and the result is generations of suffering borne by civilians, mostly children.

      Your tax dollars pay for this.
      Your politicians vote for it.
      Your media obscures it.
      And a few profit from it.
      Do something.
      Learn more.
      Talk about it.

      "War, we must realize, is the massive and indiscriminate killing of human beings. War, is always fundamentally a war against children. And therefore, whatever just cause is presented to us, whether true or invented, whatever words are thrown at us about fighting for liberty or democracy or against tyranny, we must reject war as a solution." -- Howard Zinn

      http://www.questionwar.com/children.html
      http://www.nomorevictims.org/
      http://antiwar.com

      Executive Resume
      RATIONALIZING MURDER STINKS !

    • 2 years ago
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • Bomb I don't know where this "Well since almost every major military analyst says that it usually takes at least 15 years to solve a conflict like this my guess is another 8" is coming from but if you are smart enough to understand that Bush was a liar and a fraud of a president you should be smart enough to understand that every general after Eisenhower is nothing more than a general MacArthur looking to make a name for himself while propping up a defunct military industrial complex dedicated to continuous conflict. Eisenhower won us the European theater in less than 4 years and if it had not been for MacArthur and his theatrics in the Pacific theater we would have been out of that much sooner. Point is that a World War was finished in 4 years because the generals where not playing fort and went out and confronted the enemy in strategically sound ways. All I have seen in this conflict is what I studied and heard from my father, a Marine in conflict through the worst years of the Vietnam war, lots of sending troops on foot to "Patrol" in enemy occupied territory and placement of bases in unfortified and unprotected valleys where the enemy can take the high ground and shoot our troops like fish in a barrel. Oh and one last thing I know you and those like you hate Islam and the people who practice it because you think or believe they will come all the way over here on the burrows I suppose and kill us all but risking our soldiers lives over your hyper-inflated fears is not justifiable. If you and the rest who think the Afghani people are a threat to you want to go and wage a war over there do it with your own money and risk your own lives don't ask others to go fight because you are afraid someone might try to hurt you or those you love some day ....that is called life, try learning to live with it.

    • 2 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • Image
    • As usual in American politics, NOBODY talks about the elephant in the room !

      Afghanistan now supplies over 90 percent of the world’s heroin, generating nearly $200 billion in revenue. Since the U.S. invasion on Oct. 7, 2001, opium output has increased 33-fold (to over 8,250 metric tons a year).

      The Spoils of War: Afghanistan's Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade
      http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=91

      Who benefits from the Afghan Opium Trade?
      http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=3294

      The Golden Crescent Drug Triangle

      The history of the drug trade in Central Asia is intimately related to the CIA's covert operations. Prior to the Soviet-Afghan war, opium production in Afghanistan and Pakistan was directed to small regional markets. There was no local production of heroin.

      In this regard, Alfred McCoy's study confirms that within two years of the onslaught of the CIA operation in Afghanistan, "the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the world's top heroin producer, supplying 60 percent of U.S. demand. In Pakistan, the heroin-addict population went from near zero in 1979... to 1.2 million by 1985 -- a much steeper rise than in any other nation"

      Afghanistan: Drug Addiction Lucrative for Neolib Banksters, CIA
      http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=2488

      EXECUTIVE RESUME

      PS: JUST AS IN VIETNAM BTW

      CIA, Heroin Still Rule Day in Afghanistan

      “U.S. Army planes leave Afghanistan carrying coffins empty of bodies, but filled with drugs.”

      http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2008/11/24/cia-heroin-still-rule-day-in-afghanis...

      WAKE UP AMERICA !

      IRAK FOR WAR PROFITEERS & OIL
      AFGHANISTAN FOR DRUG LORDS

      & WE THE PEOPLE FOOT THE BILL !!!

      CAN YOU SAY PATHETIC ?

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • Well since almost every major military analyst says that it usually takes at least 15 years to solve a conflict like this my guess is another 8.

      We are still in this war Mainly because the President who started it in the first place couldn't find his own ass with both hands and GPS tracking. That does NOT mean that walking away, sitting in the corner, and pretending the problem will go away is the answer. Have the North Koreans gone away? That was a best case scenario too. The Koreans never talked in any meaningful way about trying to export their government, much less unilaterally and repetitively attempting it through violence.

    • 2 years ago
  • Tyr
    • 0
      Tyr  
    • Anybody seen that light at the end of the tunnel? Or maybe we need to reintroduce the domino theory, or how about this infamous remark.." in order to save the village, we had to destroy it" I spent 13 months in Vietnam and the one thing that became very clear to me was this, you cannot outlast people in their own country. the Romans couldn't do it, the Napoleon's Grand Armee couldn't do it, Hitlers Wehrmacht couldn't do it, the Soviet Union couldn't do it and we sure as Hell couldn't do it in Vietnam ...so why in God's name are we attempting to do it again? Are we as a nation that bone headed?...From what I've seen at these tea baggers cluster f**ks I guess the answer is yes we are. I would venture a guess that Al Qaida spent far less than a couple of million to pull off the twin tower strike...we've spent close to a trillion so far in response...our nation has bankrupted itself to what end? If his plan was to bring us down the way the soviet Union collapsed I'd say he is close to his goal. a few more years of this kind of monetary bleeding out and we'll be just a shadow of what we once were financially.

    • 2 years ago
  • LadybugLady
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • LadybugLady:

      Oil?! In Afghanistan?

      ROFL! "..cause. ya know... it's the middle east right? .. and they have all the oil an' stuff right..?"
      Show me the oil in Afghanistan. Better yet read "Charlie Wilson's War" It discusses the nuts and bolts of the origin of the conflict.

      No. It's because they launched a proxy war on the United States and on western civilization in general.

      This is an imperfect analogy, but look up the rise of the British empire. They want to be England and they want us to be Spain. Britain fought a proxy war with Spain for years until they got an incompetent Spanish leader to launch a war badly, then run away like a bitch when it didn't go well.

    • 2 years ago
  • LadybugLady
    • 0
      LadybugLady [removed]  
    • LadybugLady:

      What was Iraq about? Halliburton went right in and started getting the oil. Afganistan has a large pipe going from Russia. You think because a few wakos flew planes into buildings they have started war on us. Thats not right. We need to just chalk it up to another one of Bushs F ups.Get the hell out before more of us and them are killed.

    • 2 years ago
  • vladbox
    • 0
      vladbox  
    • Are we forever link to wars? for they support our economic engine. The end of one of these two wars will open the doors to an economic depression?

    • 2 years ago
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • The point of Afghanistan to me was always the disruption of Al Qaeda in that country and around the world. By documented fact our espionage and law enforcement has done most of the work here not our military and they have been very successful at doing so. To paraphrase and intelligence source I read “Osama and his higher ups have no real operational capacity and exist now as just an ideological center for other terrorist groups around the world”. The whole argument at this point for staying in Afghanistan is to "Defeat" the Taliban. This is nothing more than a repeat of the false and costly assumptions we made in the Vietnam conflict.
      That A: we would be able to find a sufficient number(mind you not even a majority just a sufficient number) of individuals willing to fight to the death, as is the real necessity of any successful soldier, for a cause against their own country men.
      And B: that it is actually possible to defeat in any true since of the word a group large or small that is indigenous to that geographical location with out basically committing genocide and killing every man woman and child.
      These are the same assumptions that led us to lose far to many in Vietnam, the only question here is will we learn from our past and let the Afghani people have what ever government they want and go back to the old way of running the world by imposing economic sanctions on these otherwise insignificant third worlds countries. Or are we going to keep letting these generals who are just making their name in this conflict keep lining up our men and women to be targets in under fortified and strategically vulnerable positions. Funny thing to me is the in bedded interviews we are getting from Afghanistan have the soldiers in them sounding more and more like Nam vets in their war ...hell they where even playing the same music "we gotta get out of this place. if it the last thing we ever do......" maybe we should take the soldiers and the songs advice.

    • 2 years ago
  • capt_ayhab
    • 0
      capt_ayhab  
    • Breaking news
      We are now planing to invade yet another country - Iran - for which the war party and AIPAC have started fabricating all kinds of lies about non existing nukes. The same bloody way they started the Iraq war, which killed 1000,s of our brave soldiers.

    • 2 years ago
  • CopyThatAgentK
  • lukea925
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • lukea925:

      Oh? We do a lot of kidnapping non combatants and deliberate attacks on civilians then? You need to look up the meaning of the word I think.

      The phrase "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" is still true, but it doesn't apply here.

    • 2 years ago
  • s0uthc0ast
    • 0
      s0uthc0ast  
    • Right, eight years and 0 doesn't have a plan?
      Where hell has this dim bulb been?
      What the hell was he doing while he was in the senate?
      So, while he stood in the well of th house and lied to us, soldiers have been dying in Afghanistan.

      0bama lied, Soldiers died.
      0bama lies, Americans die.

    • 2 years ago
  • Reaper26
    • 0
      Reaper26  
    • s0uthc0ast:

      a lesson in grammar would help you.

      the same can be said for Bush when he lied in iraq above 4k of our soliders / americans died and whats the number that have died in afganistan when bush was in office???

      do you see the validity of your arguement b/c i dont. it's like the beck and limpburger saying obama is a racist when he's half white and half black.

    • 2 years ago
  • Null81
    • 0
      Null81  
    • s0uthc0ast:

      Rather than complaining about Obama, use some actual reasoning, or look at the big picture.

      Obama is left with a bit, no alot more than spilled milk. Its like all the cows in the US simultaneously just leaked all their milk, like all the milk in the US simultaneously spilling. And pricks like you expect him to do it with a roll of paper towel, and you bitch when He has to buy more, yeah we can't afford it, your right, yes in short term it hurts us, but come the hell on, things ALWAYS get worse before they get better, and if your blockading the paper towel route then how can anything be cleaned up.

      And why are you saying Obama lied, he hasn't. In fact you should be thankful we have a president that thinks before he acts, rather than going gun'ho at the guy that doesn't look like him.

    • 2 years ago
  • PajamaDan
    • 0
      PajamaDan  
    • What's next?! What, you mean we're not going to end this war immediately, bring the troops home, focus on defense, forget about juvenile revenge, stop killing and dying and actually try to strive for PEACE instead??!!??!! If these things aren't starting to happen right now,... then this war will be even longer-lasting and even more devastating. At least until our next self-righteous venture.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ares
  • PajamaDan
    • 0
      PajamaDan  
    • PajamaDan:

      Our only interaction with our country's brethren doesn't have to have gunfire and death. It's called cooperative peace. And you must reside in a similar false reality, if you think war is acceptable or a good thing.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ares
    • 0
      Ares  
    • I'm guessing the next move will be for Current to be infested with people whining and complaining about how long we've been there, and then screaming until they're blue in the face about how we must withdraw and focus on wiping all of the "underprivileged" asses in our own country.

      Can't wait.

    • 2 years ago
  • Reaper26
  • Ares
    • 0
      Ares  
    • Ares:

      Would you prefer me to launch into the reasons we need to stay in Afghanistan, and have all these people jump down my throat? You can't have your cake and eat it too.

    • 2 years ago
  • Reaper26
    • 0
      Reaper26  
    • Ares:

      this was the mission in afganistan find and kill bin laden have we done that hell no we let the bastard stroll over to pakistan. all we need to do is let spec ops do it and this would have been done and over with. we decided by the idiot we call former president bush to send thousands of troops to find one guy and his group. as for the taliban we pretty much put them in power during the soviet invasion of afganistan. the military is for fighting, the un and state department are for reconstruction of what they feel is safe infastructure (includes govt.) for that country.

      btw that was a bad analogy why would u have cake if you cant eat it.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ares
    • 0
      Ares  
    • Ares:

      I honestly can't tell if you're joking or not. Have you never heard the turn of phrase "have one's cake and eat it too?" I won't explain it to you.

      The "idiot" we call former President, eh? Then what do you call the current President who is continuing to send troops into Afghanistan? Are you so foolish as to think there aren't special operations units chasing Bin Laden in other nations?

      Good luck getting into the Air Force, mate.

    • 2 years ago
  • Reaper26
    • 0
      Reaper26  
    • Ares:

      well ares if you can phrase it correctly may be i can understand it better.

      and to answer some of the questions in order for you yes bush was dumb, and obviously you didnt here me or read much in the begin before the war/ Operation we should have sent them in and we did along with the CIA special activities division but they were allowed to take him out even though they made a positive id of him.

      next your other question i call em a guy who got stuck with the crap. if you want history of afganistan its gonna be hard to win if were giving the military a track down a militia leader and rebuild a country what his decision means is that they gonna send more kids, wives sons daugthers husbands and so on just to track one guy and also make sure the people we helped combat the SU in their invasion doesnt come back and give us more grief since we took em out of power. so in essence its not good but the previous one did the same last i remember they were told to stay in the populated areas.

      to answer your last question they're doing many things they if you not notice that then you pretty foolish your self they're in countries like the philipines, the horn of africa and others just to help you out so they are getting streched a bit next to looking for the hide and seek king. even though they are denied access to pakistan they still go in and out of it.

      and thanks for that i think be pretty good. when you need more answers let me know.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • Ares:

      >"Would you prefer me to ..."< Yes actually it would have been better IMHO.

      The argument for withdrawal from Afghanistan is extremely weak. Most of them are merely fuzzy emotional grunting. Slapping them down should be trivial if you actually know what you are talking about.

    • 2 years ago
  • mrbliss1
    • 0
      mrbliss1  
    • Oh, and our surrounding of Iran is becoming an interesting situation for they are proliferating atomic energy while us and the U.N. request for them not to. How long will it be before we engage and perform operations within their borders, or at least in the Southern AfPac region are being carried out?

    • 2 years ago
  • mrbliss1
    • 0
      mrbliss1  
    • The president will commit more ground forces to the AfPac situation and it may not be 40,000 but a middle way of 25,000 I'm thinking because this war is a right one and it's not over so, we need to finish what we started, which is to; stabilize the region and develop trust with Pakistan for addressing all hostile forces on either side of the border while not arousing their nuclear capability.

    • 2 years ago
  • clownpuncher
    • 0
      clownpuncher  
    • Now we send in all of our environmentalists and liberals and have them bake the Taliban and AlQaeda chocolate chip cookies and give them foot massages by the camp fire.

    • 2 years ago
  • Reaper26
  • larrysnotes
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • clownpuncher:

      No clown we are actually sending them you .... it all they wanted all along was to torture you endlessly and the rest of us figured sure we wont miss him. Have fun the NSA or CIA will be by to black bag you soon.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
  • franksalot
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • franksalot:

      yeah because a rousing round of kumbaya is going to solve it for people who are quite wiling to set your children on fire as a punishment when you don't do what they tell you to. Good luck with that.

    • 2 years ago
  • lordsbassman
  • PirateSauce
    • 0
      PirateSauce  
    • I hope everyone knows that these wars were designed from the beginning to never end. 'They' are fighting a war on terrorism, which is not a specific group of people. It can be anyone at any time, in any place.. and yes that means you. War is a business and military contractors reap the rewards.

    • 2 years ago
  • James_Ranton
  • tommytripper
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • PirateSauce:

      Designed to never end? By whom? some Shadow conspiracy group? The Space aliens?

      This war wasn't designed, it was stupided into by an incompetent looking for quick ratings who thought it would be over in a couple months and was dumb enough to actually declare victory.

    • 2 years ago
  • vladbox
    • 0
      vladbox  
    • I love, when a bunch of white men sit around a table and decide how the lives of some diametrically different people should be shape 10K miles away. Cant they learn from History?
      Cant they understand that the more they bomb, the more polarized the opinion will be, the farther from a solution they will be?

    • 2 years ago
  • samthesixth
  • Null81
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • vladbox:

      I must be confused. We supported Afghans in their fight against Russian troops. Then the Taliban turned on the U.S. choosing us as their next enemy. Are they criminals or genetic retards, suffering from generations of inbreeding? Or does the answer lie in blind obedience to a religion espousing death to infidels? Afghanistan has been a problem area for thousands of years. There is not one thing of value in that god forsaken country that is worth a single drop of American blood.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos