Community | October 14, 2009 | 46 comments

H1N1 Flu Shot Propaganda - Get Your Shot, Shut Up or Die!

mindcontrol
Yo! Check out this video an ad agency "Martin Williams" made for their employees urging them to get the flu shot and educate them. I don't know seems like sugar coated propaganda to me.

I don't trust the pharma companies enough to start pumping me full of their chemicals, especially when they probably created the damn H1N1 to begin with!

Be sure to check out the original post because there's more than the video, they also did a print campaign.

http://casualtyofdesign.com/2009/10/h1n1-flu-shot-propaganda-is-here/

Peace
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight
  2. tags:
    News Virals Propaganda Viral 9 more
  3.     
    |

46 comments // H1N1 Flu Shot Propaganda - Get Your Shot, Shut Up or Die! // Video

  • mindcontrol
  • Nephwrack
  • mindcontrol
  • hollyMiamiFla
    • 0
      hollyMiamiFla  
    • Wait just a minute. Is Donny Rumsfeld working for Baxter now????????? The plot thickens.

      Just kidding, I think it's a bunch of crap, too.
      New York nurses are being mandated to take both vaccines or find a new job. I have a friend working in Manhattan right now who was given an ultimatum this week. Looks like she'll be comin back to the 305, holla!

    • 2 years ago
  • mindcontrol
  • zack
    • 0
      zack  
    • Mutha fuckin pigs created H1N1 it's Bio warfare tested on the masses and the. this propaganda is funny tho!

    • 2 years ago
  • S3th
  • neonbunny
  • mindcontrol
    • 0
      mindcontrol  
    • S3th:

      Awesome, thanks for posting the links... information is key to living a healthy and happy life. Never take anything for granted... question EVERYTHING.

      I would bet 90% of people don't even bother to educate themselves before getting one of these shots.

      The truth is I DON'T KNOW if the dang flu shot is good or bad for you. I DO KNOW I'm not getting one... ever, my personal choice.

      I don't trust the pharma industry or any government especially when we live in a society based on a monetary and profit system.

      Please don't ask me what the alternative is to a monetary system, I don't have the answers but I know the monetary system corrupts and poisons what would otherwise be loving human beings (for the most part).

      So long as there is money involved EVERYTHING within that system is compromised... EVERYTHING.

      Peace.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • Image
    • "WARNING!!! YOU MUST READ THIS!!! Klaxon, the internet Chicken Little, raises the alarm for each and every paranoid conspiracy theory, Federal Big-Brother scheme, internet hoax, and latest computer virus. No black helicopter alert is so ludicrous, no urban legend so implausible, that he will not pass it along as accepted fact (in ALL CAPS with multiple exclamation marks). Congratulations, you are recipient 16,747 of today's Urban Myth. CAUTION: Often Klaxon knowingly posts false alarms to foment mischief."

    • 2 years ago
  • grannysquare
    • 0
      grannysquare  
    • My daughter is expecting a baby in March, and all this talk on tv about it scares you. If we didnt have the media would we know what kind of flu it is? The flu is one thing, but if babies and small children and young pregnant mothers die from it, it is scary. What is in the vaccine?? Being prepared for the symptoms is key. And staying home if you are sick. 3 days from work, will not cost you your job, if you are sick. People going to ER's with the flu are just spreading it. Stay at HOME unless you are dying!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • mindcontrol
  • grannysquare
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • grannysquare:

      Yes grannysquare there was a swine fraud "pandemic" in 1976.

      In fact I just spoke to my aunt yesterday who is a nurse and even she remembers taking a vaccine she said at the beginning of 1977 because her job to her it was mandatory. She didn't remember that it was for the swine fraud, but she remembers being bed-ridden and sick for two weeks.

    • 2 years ago
  • mindcontrol
    • 0
      mindcontrol  
    • FYI when you reply to someone Falconeio you click the green reply link under that comment so you reply to that person and not the main message board. It's cleaner and easier to navigate.

      I didn't figure it out for a couple months after joining current last year but anyways... now you know.

    • 2 years ago
  • Falconeio
  • mindcontrol
  • Falconeio
    • 0
      Falconeio  
    • I love how you just ignore the facts placed in front of you and suddenly move on to a different tact. You are trying to tell me that a company that has had 2 recorded issues over a period of nearly 30 years should be shut down. Then what about all the car companies that put cars every year, year after year with defects that kill people. We hve the produce and meat plants that constantly distribute contaminated foods that kill. The baby supply companies that put out products every year that kill babies, such as defective cribs and car seats. You didn't mention cigarettes, they put out a product that kills millions every year. What about the mexican candy companies that keep selling us candies with lead in them. So far, I will give you that Baxter has committed two serious mistakes, when you compare it to other companies on a global scale that have made mistakes as well and many more in a much shorter time scale, I don't think you can say that Baxter is doing that bad. Nothing and no one is perfect, mistakes will happen, the fact that they've only had the two in 30 years, says something.

    • 2 years ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • Falconeio:

      You put facts stating that the vaccines were not for human but it was still a live virus sent from Baxter and obviously the virus could have infected humans regardless if it was not intended for them or not. Based on prior events, Baxter had was sited for sending live virus' before, and that is what you are ignoring.

      And also, your analogy comparing cars to vaccines is completely irrelevant.

      No one from government is recommending that you buy sub par Ford and Cheverolet vehicles. It's your choice if you want to buy crap vehicles, but I don't see government officials recommending any Ford SUVs.

      The government and the media, however is gearing up to implement a mass vaccincation scheme to vaccinate the entire US population, much like the did during the 1976 swine fraud which maimed and killed dozens of peope after they took swine fraud vaccines.

    • 2 years ago
  • iamfree
  • maasanova
  • grannysquare
    • 0
      grannysquare  
    • Falconeio:

      But, these mulit-million dollar companies have to be responsible. Yes, mistakes do happen, but drugs should be tested and tested.
      Our meats and vegtables should be tested, and suppliers made to adhere to the rules implemented by the Health Council. Come on, its common sense.
      Money though will be the reason for wishy-washy inspections.

    • 2 years ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • The settlement offer comes as the death toll continues to mount in the United States and other nations from a cruel link between acquired immune deficiency syndrome and hemophilia. It has been estimated that roughly half the 20,000 hemophiliacs in the United States are HIV-positive.

      "This is a major development." said Corey Dubin, of Goleta, president of a national organization representing HIV-positive hemophiliacs. "It is the first serious offer ever put on the table."

      But Dubin, 41, a Los Angeles native who contracted the AIDS virus in the early 1980s from blood during a transfusion, cautioned that the offer has some major flaws that may make it unacceptable. Dubin said his group, the Committee of Ten Thousand, has told drug makers that an offer of $800 million would be acceptable.

      If accepted, the companies' offer could provide payments of roughly $100,000 to every American hemophiliac who contracted the virus. The amount of the payment would depend on how many claims are filed. Bayer estimates 6,000 people in the U.S. are covered by the settlement. But plaintiffs have claimed the number is closer to 10,000.

      The settlement offer also includes a $40-million fund to pay plaintiffs' lawyers fees.

      "This gives us an opportunity to bring an end to all this litigation now, and it also offers the opportunity for persons who are HIV infected as a result of this tragedy to receive some quick and certain financial relief," said Thomas Kerr, assistant general counsel for Bayer, noting that the companies make no admission of wrongdoing.

      About 750 hemophiliacs and their families have sued the companies, saying that they should have treated the clotting factors with heat to kill the AIDS virus. Dubin said the drug makers have prevailed in 13 court cases while the plaintiffs have won two cases now under appeal. However, Dubin said new evidence has emerged.

      "We've uncovered their plasma collection policies, their violations of Food and Drug Administration rules and that they were collecting blood from prisoners who had hepatitis" and were intravenous drug users, Dubin said.

      Dubin said the settlement offer is coercive because it would force nearly every hemophiliac to accept it. He said Bayer has threatened to withdraw the offer unless plaintiffs agree that no more than 100 individuals be allowed to opt out of the settlement.

      The offer is less than one-quarter the amount that some of the same companies agreed to pay Japanese hemophiliacs last month.

      "The burden of proof is different in Japan... in my view unfairly," Kerr said. In addition, he said, the cost of living in Japan is higher.

    • 2 years ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • I'm going to reiterate my statement and say that Baxter should not be in the business of creating vaccines since there have been at least two instance of them sending out live deadly virus in their products.

      http://articles.latimes.com/1996-04-19/business/fi-60236_1_settlement-offer

      TOKYO Baxter International Inc. agreed today to negotiate an out-of court settlement with the Japanese government and other companies to compensate Japanese infected with the AIDS virus by tainted blood products.

      Baxter Chairman Vernon R. Loucks Jr. agreed to come to a settlement in a meeting with Japanese Health and Welfare Minister Naoto Kan, said ministry spokesman Makoto Okano.

      Baxter's subsidiary, Baxter Ltd., was one of several medical supply companies sued along with the Japanese government for providing tainted blood to hemophiliacs. About 2,000 Japanese became infected with HIV when they received tainted blood transfusions in the early to mid-1980s. Activists say more than 400 ...

    • 2 years ago
  • Falconeio
    • 0
      Falconeio  
    • Yes mindcontrol, money does control most of the world. Its a sad fact, though you can't tell me that even you haven't done things in the name of money. No matter how small it was, everyone here has done things in the name of money. Its not even greed at times, some times its necessity, but its still done in the name of money. If you don't want to deal with money, I'd suggest a nice little shack in the deep woods with no human contact ever again. The pharmaceutical companies do it for money, the so called organic farms cheat people for money, even the curch does it for money. There are so few organizations that don't do it for money these days.

    • 2 years ago
  • Falconeio
    • 0
      Falconeio  
    • Yes, except for the little detail you are leaving out. The contaminated batch was never meant for human use. It was an experimental that was being tested on live animals in clean labs. So even if it was intentional it never could have left the lab and infected anyone. In fact it was never even sent to public facilities. It was sent to a single research company who then spread it to sub contractors. In other words, it was being tested for just the contamination they found.

    • 2 years ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • Falconeio:

      What's your source on this statement Falconeio, because the sources that I have read suggested that this "test" came as a bit of a surprise to the lab when all of the ferrets died. Apparently that wasn't supposed to happen and the fact that live flu virus was used caused huge red flags. So where does the spin that this was supposed to happenb come from?

    • 2 years ago
  • mindcontrol
    • 0
      mindcontrol  
    • It doesn't matter if it was in the 1880's, 1980's or 2080 greed and corruption will always compromise this system.

      The reason... this system is a MONETARY system. There's no 2 ways about it, if we continue to live in a world where people profit from others getting sick I bet my LIFE there is always going to be corruption, bad meds, designer viruses, etc.

      God I just got a check about 6 months ago from AIRBORNE result of a class action suite filed against the company for misleading the public saying that AIRBORNE can prevent cold and flu.

      That's a small petty example but don't doubt for one second this isn't happening with other people where life and death are in the balance.

      Actually I remember a story from a year or two ago about that guy giving fake chemotherapy to cancer patients. Dozens of people died because they didn't get the care they needed. WHY... BECAUSE OF MONEY!

      Peace.

    • 2 years ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • Baxter was caught sending out live flu virus just a few months ago, just like they were caught sending out live AIDS virus back in the 80s.

      Perhaps this organization should be considered a criminal operation, should not be in the business of "creating" vaccines and their owners be brought up on criminal charges. What do you think?

    • 2 years ago
  • lu7cky
    • 0
      lu7cky  
    • maasanova:

      I think you're paranoid
      Baxter wasn't "caught" at anything. There was a case of some cross contamination that ocurred a few months back when samples were sent to a research facilty. There was no danger since the samples affected were destroyed and the two seperate flu viruses would have to have infected someone simultaneously and been allowed to incubate in a living host to become a more powerfull virus.
      My work vaccinates about 350 employess every year against the flu virus and I have heard of no bad reactions, I expect the same this year.

    • 2 years ago
  • neonbunny
  • Falconeio
    • 0
      Falconeio  
    • That is actually quite easy. If you were to actually take the time to do a little research and read the patent itself, you would find that A New Calcdonia (NC,H1N1) appeared back in May of 1999. H1N1 is a classification for a variety of flues. NC, H1N1 is a form human Flu A. Unfortunately the media picked up on the term H1N1 and spread it like a plague itself. Swine Flu - H1N1 is genetically different from NC,H1N1 and is no way the same flu.

      As for the oddities and why Baxter got swooped on to deal with the flu vaccine, it is because their process actually creates a vaccine faster than any other company can at the moment. They had their flu vaccine out months before the competition. Which in itself doesn't imply that a conspiracy was occurring it just means that they have a faster process.

    • 2 years ago
  • maasanova
  • Falconeio
    • 0
      Falconeio  
    • First off, the babies and women that have died, died from the flu itself, not from the shot. No one has died from the vaccine, there haven't even been reported side effects yet as the vaccine has barely been out. As for the Bayer HIV scandal, that was back in the 80's and the reason much stronger laws now exist. H1N1 was not created in a lab, if that were the case, the independent labs would have picked up on it and reported it. There is no way ever single lab in the world can be silenced from reporting a lab created virus. Which brings me to my next point, it is actually very easy to detect when a virus is man made or not due to genetic markers left behind. There is no way to remove those markers without destroying the virus. So unless any of you can show me a single independent lab saying otherwise, then you are flapping your lips with no proof.

    • 2 years ago
  • mindcontrol
    • 0
      mindcontrol  
    • Falconeio:

      What's your point... do you have one?

      Basically all I'm saying is DO YOUR RESEARCH. You don't go and just sit down and let someone stick a needle in your arm and pump you full of God knows what.

      People are IGNORANT or better yet they simple choose to ignore and tacitly agree that everything is going to be okay even though most people are crossing their fingers hoping this doesn't come back to bite them in the ass 10 or 15 years down the line.

      Go ahead get you shot if you like... enjoy, but if you think for one second the government and pharma companies really have our/your best interest in mind... good luck with that.

      Peace.

    • 2 years ago
  • lu7cky
  • S3th
    • 0
      S3th  
    • lu7cky:

      Watch the video two comments above....As well as many others which prove that people have been harmed by products pushed by big Pharm.

      Do a simple search for all the lawsuits against drug companies for killing and harming people with their drugs.

      Do you require a tinfoil hat to keep yourself deluded, or is it all the ammunition you can muster up in any debate?

    • 2 years ago
  • DreSandoval
    • 0
      DreSandoval  
    • Image
    • After watching this I started drooling on myself then had the serious need to get the H1N1 and flu shot...

      This shit is a scam by the drug sompanies to make more money...There has already been serval cases of babies and woman dieing...

    • 2 years ago
  • mindcontrol
    • 0
      mindcontrol  
    • Yeah... people in the world (corporations) really are this corrupt anyone who says otherwise is living under a rock. A nice rock maybe... but still a rock.

      PEOPLE will do ANYTHING for a buck!

    • 2 years ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • H1N1 was made in a lab, that's how they had the patents for the vaccines and the vaccines themselves all ready to go at least a year ago.

    • 2 years ago
  • neonbunny
  • mindcontrol
    • 0
      mindcontrol  
    • neonbunny:

      Ignorance is bliss. No offense but if you don't think corporations are capable of creating a virus to profit from it by selling the vaccine... you're ignorantly mistaken.

      Seriously... I'm not peddling fear I'm telling you how it is. People will do ANYTHING for money... wake up!

    • 2 years ago
  • neonbunny
    • 0
      neonbunny  
    • neonbunny:

      Notice how I didn't say "No" I said "I doubt it". Trust me I'm entirely sure they are capable, in fact I think the idea is genius and I wouldn't blame them if they did. However, viruses mutate all the time, and the story that this came from pigs (I believe they've traced it back to Asia now) is completely plausible. All this talk of the H1N1 vaccine patents being filed a year ago are retarded. H1N1 does not stand for swine flu (well, according to the media it does). It is an influenza virus subtype that is the most common cause of the flu in humans. There are many strains of H1N1, swine flu simply being a new one.

      ie. Influenza > A > H1N1 > Swine Flu Strain

      Better yet think about this: It would take some intense research by a lot of scientists to make sure that this engineered virus didn't wipe out 90% world, and yet have just enough effect for it to make people want a vaccine. At the same time they would have had to make sure that existing vaccines did nothing to combat it. They would also have to test it, on people. Furthermore, how do you keep all those people who worked on it quiet? Pay them? Maybe, but someone always talks eventually. Trust me, it wouldn't be easy. But again that's not to say it isn't possible.

      I'm not saying they didn't do it, I'm just saying that they probably didn't do it. I'm going to have to go with Occam's razor here and say that it makes more sense that it just mutated. It's not like it hasn't happened before; the 1918 flu pandemic was also subtype H1N1, do you think they engineered that one too? Obviously not.

    • 2 years ago
  • S3th
    • 0
      S3th  
    • neonbunny:

      "the story that this came from pigs (I believe they've traced it back to Asia now) is completely plausible"

      THE STORY, is the key to this sentence. It is a story being told to the PUBLIC. You call it plausible. Yet there are many, who unlike you, have degrees in the arena, who state that the mutation as it stands, is not plausible without having been created in a lab situation.

      So, let's just agree that we don't know, but what do we KNOW, for a fact.

      1. The media is hyping this thing WAY out of proportion. We know this by checking simple facts, such as the fact that the regular ole flu kills way more then the H1N1. And yet we saw no huge campaign to vaccinate everyone for it. No mandatory vaccinations until now, with the H1N1. Yes, in New York now, health workers are required to get both the seasonal and H1N1 flu vaccines. Or perhaps you missed that story?

      A critical thinker would ask WHY. Especially knowing that the vaccines do not stop the SPREAD of a flu. Or guarantee that you will not get the flu. All it guarantees is record profits for vaccine manufacturers.

      Now, let's take this a step deeper shall we. With the advent of new strains of viruses, comes new vaccinces. With more vaccines, comes more profit. With more vaccines, comes more side-effects, causing more health problems. With more health problems comes more money for more medicines, doctor visits, hospital stays....etc....etc....etc....

      Now, you don't have to be a math genius to do the necessary computation to figure out how this could corrupt many facets of the health industry, now do you?

      I think it's completely naive for anyone to believe that everyone in the world, from government, to big pharma, to medical industries, are completely full of nothing but benevolent beings who would never think of harming the general public for the sake of PROFIT.

      Just like it's completely naive for anyone to believe that certain factions in society make big bucks off of selling their weapons to both sides of a conflict.

      So, let's be reasonable, and just say, we aren't sure, but anytime any industry that stands to make huge profits tells you that you have to use their product, CAUTION is a sane persons stance. Where blind obedience is the fools!

    • 2 years ago
  • neonbunny
    • 0
      neonbunny  
    • neonbunny:

      "So, let's be reasonable, and just say, we aren't sure, but anytime any industry that stands to make huge profits tells you that you have to use their product, CAUTION is a sane persons stance."

      I completely agree, I was just weighing the odds based on what I know.

      "Yet there are many, who unlike you, have degrees in the arena, who state that the mutation as it stands, is not plausible without having been created in a lab situation."

      I'll have a Biomedical Science degree in 8 months, if that counts for anything. Could you give a reference for this? Any mutation to its genome would theoretically be able to occur naturally. The sequence must have looked pretty suspicious for someone to say that it could only be done in a lab.

    • 2 years ago
  • S3th
more from Community:

top videos