Community | October 16, 2009 | 70 comments

House health bill likely to include public option

Image
current89
WASHINGTON - Early estimates from congressional budget umpires show that House Democrats are close to President Barack Obama's $900 billion target for health care legislation, a spokesman for Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Friday.

The House versions, including a government-run insurance plan as an option for consumers, would cost under $900 billion over 10 years, said Brendan Daly, a spokesman for Pelosi, D-Calif. But, he said, "No final policy decisions have been made on how to proceed."

Preliminary cost estimates from the Congressional Budget Office show the evolving legislation is already within range of Obama's target. The numbers remain in flux, however, because House leaders are still tinkering with details and sending in new policy ideas to budget analysts.

The ballpark figure of $900 billion reflects the cost of expanding coverage by providing tax credits to help people buy health insurance, and also by broadening the Medicaid health program to reach more low-income people, Daly said.

It does not include some $240 billion over ten years that lawmakers want to spend to address a shortfall in Medicare payments to doctors. The White House says those costs should not be included in the pricetag for the health care overhaul. But the Medicare provision was part of the original House bill.

The final House bill is expected to include a government-sponsored insurance plan that would compete with private health insurers. Leading Democratic lawmakers say support is building for a Medicare-like plan in which the government would set the payment levels for medical providers, instead of negotiating.

end of excerpt

Source: MSNBC

Details of the proposals can be found here. http://ow.ly/uQEl
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight,   US Politics,   Progressive America,   3 more
  2. tags:
  3. recommended by:
    eldamon
  4.     
    |

70 comments // House health bill likely to include public option

  • coleslaw
    • 0
      coleslaw  
    • Ok so im trying to figure this out.
      Goverment wants to put there hands in the medical business like china has with all of it's businesses? ha
      help me out :D

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • I think it's amazing that congress is not full of doctors but they sure the hell think they are as smart as them and know health better than....

      You go congress our know it alls in charge.

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
    • 0
      cmdinc  
    • and also Hammy,
      i compared average auto worker to average american worker, you brought in the exec crap. Why can't you repsond to the fact, auto workers make more...WHY? And though you would never admit it if you could get the job of exec getting paid the big ones you would take it in a heartbeat. That makes you a hypocrite. Judging by your thoughtless comments you never need to worry about the exec job, those boys are f...ing smart.

    • 2 years ago
  • akamaial
    • 0
      akamaial [removed]  
    • President Obama’s view of how to control health care costs:
      ~ We’re only talking about eliminating care that is unnecessary, he told a national television audience at the ABC infomercial in June.

      ~ Here’s the bottom line. Barack Obama really does want to come between you and your doctor. More precisely, he wants to change the way your doctor practices medicine. In the Administration’s ideal world, you would get all the health care you need. Only unnecessary or futile care would be eliminated. But that’s what the Canadian government, the British government and just about every other government in the world says. To state the obvious, the public clearly does not trust the Administration to get it right.

      source: http://www.john-goodman-blog.com/the-r-word/#more-5051

    • 2 years ago
  • UndoInfluence
    • 0
      UndoInfluence  
    • akamaial:

      John Goodman is an Anarcho-Capitalist employed by the insurance industry, should we be surprised he's against policy that will inevitably injure his employer and take power away from corrupt corporations?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • JJ settle down, nobody said all unions are good! but you have pretty much blasted unions here in a broad brush stroke! And if you haven't paid attention to history of unions then you have no real point in any debate about labor.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • kennymotown:

      First I have to be unsettled. You stating otherwise means nothing.

      I know a lot of good people who turned bad. Does that mean that I should still like them even though they murdered their father-in-law?

      Past good does not absolve the present badness.

      And if you're so into Government being perfect enough to run health care let them deal with issues that unions deal with-with laws. Screw unions and their in ability to be useful any more.

      It's time to reform them.

    • 2 years ago
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • The most powerful woman in the world. She's raking' in the dough. Maybe Nancy can fix your massive head injury in the ER for minimum wage, Futuregen. She's so smart. She'd know better than the neurosurgeon that has more than a decade of intense education.Or Mr. Moore he'll patch you up let you live off of him for the next 50 yrs.
      Let's see who you'd want to do a serious life altering surgery on one of your children in ten -15 years, one that has no chance of advancing anywhere financially or career wise after spending 10-15 years in school or the one totally invested in curing your child's malady with no financial burdens weighing him down to worry him and keep his mind clear and fingers steady?
      Which one?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • YES $900 Billion Dollars.

      How many Americans?

      300 million (about).

      900,000,000,000

      300,000,000 - population

      $3,000 a person (not including illegals)

      Spread out over a year -- $250

      And that's all we ever have to pay to get health care is that amount of money---for the rest of our lives?

      I just want an itemized list of what is costing 900 Billion dollars.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • J_Jammer:

      that is true.

      As you see the numbers I did work with is as good as I really get with numbers. That would make the cost rise to probably more like $350 a month.

      I wonder how many people just want to pay for mine. I don't feel like it. who'll pick up that tab?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • artemis6
  • PhilistineTheArtLuvr
  • CarlosIsDown
    • 0
      CarlosIsDown  
    • GM embeds about $1000 per car to pay for health insurance for their employees. Toyota adds $0 dollars to their cars to cover healthcare.

      It's simple economics that car company A and B makes the same car. Company B's car is more expensive but its' the same car that company A produces. Which car company will eventually fail?

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      They do not "tack on" anything for healthcare. When the auto Union negotiates a contract...the company does not pay for the employees Health Benfits. It is a part of the WAGE package, and they put a large portion of that into their OWN Health Care. If the UAW reduced their total wages by 50% it would save the average car buyer $500 per car. The UAW is not the reason GM and Ford and the like could not compete.

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
    • 0
      cmdinc  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      they sure are one of the reasons hammy. Average salary for a UAW worker is $60,000. Average american worker is $36,000. How are they more skilled than the rest of us? I certainly do not blame the individual, they are getting everything they can. I balme unions in general, they are just another layer in corruption

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      Average salary for a GM Executive is how much? You think they "earned" their money while the guy on the Assembly line deserves 100-300 TIMES less money? It is not Unions that are corrupt, there would be no need for Unions if companies like Wal-Mart (which makes 3.5 billion in PROFITS a quarter) would pay their employees a decent wage.

      You want to end Union Corruprtion...tell executives, and shareholders (Incidentally shareholders contribute NOTHING to a company) not be such greedy assholes.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      Yes they are corrupt.

      Honda and Toyota don't have unions, their employees are just fine and they have not gone under in America.

      It might not be that they are the only problem, but they are part of the problem. Yes execs shouldn't be paid bundles upon bundles but they are the reason the company wins or fails as is union use. Unions, 95% of the time, serve no use just like Homeowners Associations. They just take money.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      JJ why would they need unions at toyota or honda they have socialized medical as a country and on average Japanese CEO's only make 8 times as much as the lowest paid employee. If you can't understand that and why in this country we have had the need for unions just to secure medical benefits. Man sometimes I think you know nothing. this is such a blatant misunderstanding by you and anyone else that thinks the playing field is even as either stupid or just don't care!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      JJ then why did you bring toyota and honda up, was that a slip on your part. If not then it should be obvious to everyone if we had a national health plan we would be able to compete in everything whats wrong with that the single biggest shot in the arm for our economy unless you truly want AMERICA to fail!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      The assembly plants in the US by Toyota and Honda, those vehicles are actually ENDORSED by the UAW as vehicles one can safely buy them without screwing American auto workers.

      The reason is that Toyota and Honda pay nearly the EXACT same wage scale as the UAW gets. So no, Toyota and Honda are not doing better because they are not Union...they are doing better because they produce a better, cheaper product while paying the SAME pay and benefits scale.

      Do some research before you mouth off JJammer. If Unions are "bad" so are corporations. Because all a UNION is, is a "corporate" body of WORKERS. There is NO difference.

      LABOR PRODUCES ALL WEALTH.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      well said hammywill, and when you think about a UNION is as close to having a democracy in the work place, why wouldn't we all want a democracy in the work place and everyone would reap the rewards. JJ I am amazed you know nothing about the history of the american unions. Do you really hate America that much and union workers and the middle class!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      History of them has nothing to do with what they are now. Don't BS me.

      And Toyota and Honda have NOTHING to pass onto the costumers because of how much Unions cost.

      Speaking of unions...do tell me if they are all good how does one fire a Teacher? Teachers that touch children or teachers who sleep with students...who gets rid of them? Why does it take so long?

      Don't worry I have an answer to your all unions are good crap.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      Like your weekends? UNION people DIED for you to have it.

      Like your 8 hour day? UNION people DIED for YOU to have it.

      Like your benefits? UNION people DIED for YOU to have them.

      It does NOT take long to fire a teacher who has molested children. That is the stupidest, most ignorant thing I have EVER heard. Toyota and Honda plants in the US pay UNION SCALE WAGES! So it is not the UNION costs that drive GM out of business because the labor cost is the SAME. You have NO idea what you are talking about JJammer.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      It does take long. Teacher Unions make it very difficult to fire a teacher no matter what they have done. They treat it as an accusation and they look into it.

      For someone that knows everything about unions why don't you know the dark side?

      As for infiltrating this conversation with past good...that doesn't make them good now. That makes them pats their usefulness.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      Seriously? They have the same thing in the Criminal Justice System. It is called the presumption of innocence. Everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty. If a teacher is accused, or charges are brought..they are not kept in a TEACHING position, they are on leave pending the outcome. And IF they are convicted, they are fired. If they are NOT then a Civil investigation is done to determine whether the person should still teach.

      If waiting to see if a person is ACTUALLY guilty before punishing them is a BAD thing, then I guess the Teachers Union is evil. Can you cite an instance in which a teacher was CONVICTED of molestation and the Teacher's Union defended the teacher, insisting they be allowed to continue teaching?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      they could have blood on their hands and said they did it and the Union would still be slow to act.

      Pick any incident in the past and look it up and see how not right you are.

      The other problem is that THEY ARE NOT ON THE GROUNDS. The principle is. They should have the ability to fire who they want and then the Union deals with it. But they can't. The union who isn't there and doesn't know what is going on decides if one should be fired.

      Fair? ha.

      They are not worth the money it cost to be in one. They decide when to go on strike and if you don't strike with them you're bad. They are not healthy for anyone when they are greedy. Wanting what's fair..psh.

      The only unions that are still good are the acting union and writing guild.

      How long did it take the Auto unions to compromise to make it where the business could function this year? Too long. Even though I still think the auto industry should have been allowed to FAIL big time. If unions are so good then failure shouldn't surround them now days.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      The Auto Unions had no effect on whether the Auto Industry could make it. That assertion is not based on any facts.

      So, since you made the assertion, you provide the evidence. Cite a source in which a Union Defended the job of a convicted killer or molester.

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
    • 0
      cmdinc  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      Bullshit Hammy,
      I havn't had an 8 hour day since i started my own business, nor a weekend off. And guess what, if one of my employess fucks up and causes damage to a clients property, i fi...ng pay for it, but he gets his check every week.
      Don't give me the bullshit about unions dying for the 8 hour day etc.
      Labor produces all wealth my ass. My wealth came from my own ass aches, no one elses. Try being the one who takes the risk, risking EVERYTHING. you really have aggrevated me so just shut the hell up.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      Right, your wealth came from your LABOR! I never said if you take a risk you should not be paid for it. Did !? When did I endorse that? I am saying executive pay that is on AVERAGE 500 times higher than the LABORER who produces all the wealth is ridiculous and THEFT.

      You bring your "capital" and your "ideas" and "risk" I will bring Labor...let's see which one produces more...sound like a plan? THINK about what you are saying and try to use some logic. I NEVER once said executives don't deserve higher pay...I never ONCE said that YOU as a business owner who took all the risk should not enjoy compensation...did I? Try to be rational.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      http://www.edutopia.org/poll-tenure

      I'm not the only one that says it's difficult.

      OHNOSE what did this Principal say?

      http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-teachers3-2009may03,0,679507.story

      Joseph Walker, former principal of Grant High School in Van Nuys, says that because of the uphill battles that administrators face in terminating teachers: "You'’re not going to fire someone who's not doing their job. And if you have someone who'’s done something really egregious, there's only a 50-50 chance that you can fire them"

      Egregious: extraordinary in some bad way.

      http://theamericanscene.com/2009/05/06/awful-teachers-awfully-hard-to-fire

      Oh no more stating how hard it is to fire teachers. No way.

      -------
      ....L.A. Unified officials were also unsuccessful in firing a male middle school teacher spotted lying on top of a female colleague in the metal shop, saying the district did not prove that the two were having sex.

      The district fared no better in its case against elementary school special education teacher Gloria Hsi, despite allegations that included poor judgment, failing to report child abuse, yelling at and insulting children, planning lessons inadequately and failing to supervise her class.

      Not a single charge was upheld. The commission found the school's evaluators were unqualified because they did not have special education training. Moreover, it said they went to the class at especially difficult periods and didn't stay long enough.
      -------------
      http://reason.com/blog/2009/05/04/the-difficulty-of-firing-teach

      Now I given you proof. Funny that you ask for it but did not give it when you were saying all these things about unions. Don't ask for proof when you can't do it yourself.

      And don't doubt me when I say i know what I'm taking about.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
  • cmdinc
    • 0
      cmdinc  
    • CarlosIsDown:

      i can only be rational w/ rational people.
      "You bring your "capital" and your "ideas" and "risk" I will bring Labor...let's see which one produces more...sound like a plan? " wtf
      no, i don't need your labor. I can sell my service without you. Could i sell more product? yes but not proportional. It should be if i double my woirkforce i double my sales, that is not the case, i only get about 80% for your labor. Why? mostly your labor comes with a hint of entitlement, and to put it point blank you don't give a shit.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
  • J_Jammer
  • JonRaymond
    • 0
      JonRaymond  
    • Single Payer is not off the table. Nancy Pelosi said it was. The problem with that is that it's not her table. Its the American people's table, and the American people want a single payer system. There will be continued unrest, demonstrations, sit ins, and push back from the people (hopefully voting out the Dems and Repubs for independents) as long as we have the health insurance for profit system holding us all hostage to pay for health.

      This fight will not end. I'm talking to you Pelosi.

    • 2 years ago
  • samthesixth
  • kennymotown
  • Chique
  • cmdinc
  • samthesixth
  • futuregen
  • futuregen
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • During this interview, Dr. Joel D. Wallach, makes the comment that the corporations are leaving America so they won't have to cover health benefits for their employees. In other countries, the government covers the people through their taxes so the corporations don't have to pay. Maybe we would have more jobs in this country if we had single payer. Posted interview is part 1 of 3.

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
  • hunzedog
  • occhipij
  • slovelett
    • 0
      slovelett  
    • occhipij:

      No one is expecting you to pay for it, unless you buy it.

      Any public insurance plan will be funded solely from it's own premiums. Any many health care economists believe a public plan is one of the best ways to drive down costs for everyone.

    • 2 years ago
  • Chique
    • 0
      Chique  
    • That is one of the things doctors don't have control over, even if this alternative treatment was available in the US, the insurance companies would most likely deny coverage and stamp it "experimental". Then even if individuals were given the choice, which I would agree to a great extend they should, they'd have to come up with the money to cover it.

    • 2 years ago
  • futuregen
  • Chique
  • Darevalo
  • larrysnotes
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • There are a lot of things that American doctors don't like but that doesn't mean they aren't good for the public. Like this alternative cancer treatment which is currently illegal in the U.S. (See movie Healing Cancer From the Inside Out). The healthcare reform bill should include alternative care and the public should be able to make the choice what kind of treatment their body receives. I am against mandatory coverage for all as I don't want to pay to uphold the current system.

    • 2 years ago
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • Doctors should not be in the business of healthcare to make money. Micheal Moore interviewed a doctor from, I believe, Canada and he was quite well taken care of.

    • 2 years ago
  • larrysnotes
  • brit50
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • futuregen:

      brit50, listen to the interview with Dr. Wallach posted below. There is a lot of waste in the present system. It is based on poisoned DRUGS. Bad and good in the system but a lot of waste and little compassion. It manages the symptoms but does not cure the disease.

    • 2 years ago
  • Chique
    • 0
      Chique  
    • Not all Larry, many support reform because of their problems with the current health care system. Many may not but maybe it's the insurance companies that REALLY hate this.

    • 2 years ago
  • larrysnotes
  • Darevalo
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • Appropriate song for the health care debate. I'm for single payer. I'm tired of the rocks obstruction. I've seen their ways to often for my liking...

      Crown of Creation Jefferson Airplane

      "You are the Crown of Creation
      You are the Crown of Creation
      and you've got no place to go.

      Soon you'll attain the stability you strive for
      in the only way that it's granted
      in a place among the fossils of our time.

      In loyalty to their kind
      they cannot tolerate our minds.
      In loyalty to our kind
      we cannot tolerate their obstruction.

      Life is Change
      How it differs from the rocks
      I've seen their ways too often for my liking
      New worlds to gain
      My life is to survive
      and be alive
      for you."

    • 2 years ago
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • futuregen:

      Thanks for the blast from the past. Won't matter to these guys, both are senior citizens now.
      Grace is selling her art work in the hills of California. She doesn't need the government help for her health care!
      Besides a bunch of rich, druggies from the sixties don't care what the government does to or for us peons that bought their music.
      But Grace is still one of the only female vocalist in rock/pop music that has a distinctive sound. You will always hear her vocals in any tract she's on.

    • 2 years ago
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • Image
    • I don't know if anyone posted this info or not but found out about this through the UrbanSuvival website. This is the senate side of the controversy:

      "PRESS RELEASES

      McConnell Statement on Finance Committee Proposal
      from the Office of Senator Mitch McConnell

      Tuesday, October 13, 2009

      ‘The fact is, this proposal will never come before the Senate’

      WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell made the following statement Tuesday regarding the Finance Committee vote on partisan health care reform:

      “Sen. Snowe called me this morning to let me know that while she continues to have serious, substantive policy reservations with this proposal, she wanted to keep the process moving. I share her concerns about the direction of this bill once it leaves the committee, and her call for transparency before we vote to proceed to any bill on the floor.

      "The fact is, this proposal will never come before the Senate. "

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos