Daily Show Under Fire from Pro-Israel Lobby

thats what trut does, hit and run literary vandalism.
so the jews of 6 thousand years feed on thier own, yet still remain over 6 thousand yrs seems a theory that condradicts itself nicely done.
lol the best part is that in the face of world evils, the best you came up with was bernie freakin madoff.
timothy mcvey was a christian nationalist who blew up innocent people in oklahoma but bernie madoff is savage?lol priceless not to mention bernie madoffs victims where mostly gentile.classic

Well I am sure glad the old hag is dead.

@trut: That's such a dumb and disrespectful comment in response to someone speaking with absolute sincerity and passion, putting the record straight and refuting lies and libel. Haven't you got anything better to do?

Just full of hate, hey glory.

If you're intersested in a plagiarised document that takes facts out of context and belies Jimmy Carters perpetual failure (as Habitat for Humanity homes fall apart and people get stuck with he bill) Read Peace not Apartheid by Jimmy Plagiarizer and out of context Carter

People who call Israelis human rights vilators while ignoring what the Palestinians have done with aid money (corruption, weapons instead of food, giving land to relatives instead of rightful owners) and what they had done to Jews for millenia before Israel are ignorant of the indigenous Arab History of Judaism and Jewish people as a whole and they should go the fuck back to school. The Holocaust influx does not excuse 3000 years of Jew bashing. Nor does it excuse the millions of dunams stolen from Jews by Muslims throughout the ME which comprise a nation much larger than tiny ass Israel. This is just reverse racism and you don't even fucking know it because you are IGNORANT.

Apparently brainwashed by Carter, this person who has laid down this little misguided history apparently doesn't realize that Palestine has been supported by Russia and created a Cold War Proxy situation, therefore without Russia there would be no terror, and the formation of Israel only brought a few hundred thousand holocaust survivors while the majority came from ARAB lands as they were being persecuted. With 50 miles wide of land, it is impossible for you to make the case that Apartheid is NOT happening to Israelis who are racially banned from working in most RACIST Arab states. GET A GRIP ON REALITY. It's called Peace not Plagiarism Carter!!! That president was a loser who cost AMERICAN lives as much as Bush.

Two wrongs don’t make it right. The third option is peace but that gets the same media coverage than Palestinians ;)
the exact topic of this exchange...

glad you pointed out the data WN, meaning showing people here that almost every Non-Muslim or Non-communofascist country either voted against or abstained. The UN votes on racial and religious lines.
You have human rights violators hiding behind scapegoating Israel. Plus the only source you have there that isn't completely questionable as propoganda would be the NY Times. Which is questionably honest at best.

i dont see any zoinist asking for american support. not yet once has any zionist yielded to a foriegn power. the notion is divisive slander aimed at spreading the idea that jews are trying to rule the world.through spreaimg thier influence despite history and current events proving otherwise

wow - u guys went soooooo off topic - really interesting - but talk about pushing it. this was an entertainment point of view topic- its amazing what u guys can argue into.

Ha you know Milch Man, it's really sad when you rely on news from the worlds greatest Human Rights abuser for your arguments. I'll believe Chinese reports when my cheap plastic shit stops falling apart only to find childrens fingerprints inside.
The Chinese and all communists in general invented propoganda. The Dalai Lama does not advocate Jihad! And neither do Native Americans. The holes I dig bury people who are full of commie bullshit.

Artemis, that is what I am saying, we are getting one perspective at the UN and a different perspective at Obama's office and in congress. There has been no other conflict investigation that is as significantly marred with vested interests from oil production to religious issues to the grand old Cold War. BOTH the Palestinians and Israelis are being used as pawns in proxy.
And using international law to bash the nation for which international law was developed after the Holocaust is quite an interesting, ironic and viscious way to a final solution.
The most important issue is that we have a defacto prosecution going on who's investigators made pre-determined findings and minimised one side of the story (mainly 8000 rockets).
At Nurembourg and many HR trials after, war criminals walked. There were sympathies for the German people and for soldiers who knew better. Even today, we see WWII criminals walk free. Because a case like this in a conflict is really hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
What we are saying is that a certain group of people who are investigating have no intention of sticking to the international law of innocent until PROVEN guilty. It's a farce that never mentions all of the vested interests, proxy nations, and ACTUAL genocide committed by Hamas' allies in Sudan where people are rounded up and burned!
WE as Israelis built bomb shelters and hospitals in Gaza!
They were used by Hamas' soldiers instead of children.
This is not an investigation, it is an attempt to paint the guilty in an innocent light of liberation.
There are many "liberated," Muslims with full rights inside Israel and these people are there for one reason only, because they hate Jews and want us dead.
It started pre-WWII with Hitler himself coming to Palestine.

Give me a fucking break Nidal Hasan, the Native Americans deserve a whole continent yet they do not insist on behaving like barbarians and sexist morons!
There is no excuse for the behavior of the general Arab population towards other cultures for the last 3000 years either. Jews never enslaved Africans, and in South Africa we fought against Apartheid and treated people well.

Finally, about Chinkin's supposed criticism of Hamas, which we are supposed to believe makes the letter either irrelevant, or somehow Kosher. Our legal brief from this summer, summarily dismissed by Goldstone, anticipated the specious argument that the letter’s single-line lip service on Hamas sanitizes her preemptive guilty verdict against Israel. We wrote:

The end of the statement includes one passing sentence on Hamas crimes, immediately followed by the qualifier that Israel’s “operations in Gaza amount to an aggression and is contrary to international law, notwithstanding the rocket attacks by Hamas.” No reasonable person could read the statement without concluding -- as the Sunday Times headline writer did -- that the crux of Prof. Chinkin’s joint statement was that “Israel’s bombardment of Gaza is not self-defense, it’s a war crime.”

In note 5 of the legal brief we added:

Some will no doubt seize upon this one sentence to exculpate Prof. Chinkin. This is to no avail. First, no reasonable person can read her statement in its entirety and deny that its central thesis is that Israel is an aggressor and war criminal. Second, even if the one sentence on Hamas were to be given weight, the gross abuse of due process arising from Prof. Chinkin’s commitment to a preconceived outcome regarding individuals on one side of the conflict -- her absence of an open mind on the question put before the Mission -- is hardly assuaged by an additional prior determination regarding individuals from the other side.

I salute the Brandeis student who raised the Chinkin matter tonight with Goldstone. While it was good of her to use our legal brief’s argument invoking the 2004 Sesay precedent, where an international war crimes judge had to step down due to remarks related to some of the parties, it also gave Goldstone a chance to access one of his previously-used escape routes. That precedent from the Sierra Leone tribunal, said Goldstone, dealt with a judicial panel, whereas his was something distinct.

But this is a distinction without a difference. Our arguments never relied on the Sesay precedent. Rather, we showed that international fact-finding missions (and not only judicial tribunals) are subject to the fundamental obligation of impartiality. In fairness, the Brandeis student did also remind Goldstone of his promise that the mission would be impartial, but he ignored this.

And so the question for Goldstone comes back to this: Was your fact-finding mission subject to the legal standards applicable to international human rights fact-finding missions? If so, given that impartiality is Rule #1 under those standards, and given that you concede that “[the] letter she’d signed would have been a ground for disqualification” in a judicial context, what is it about your own inquiry that renders Chinkin's impartiality deficit suddenly acceptable?

Goldstone has consistently evaded any accountability under the law applicable to international fact-finding missions, by repeatedly declaring that his panel was “not judicial.”

But this is a red herring. The simple truth is that his fact-finding mission was legally subject to a well-established set of standards. Sadly, however, these were ignored.

http://blog.unwatch.org/?p=514

In tonight's Brandeis University debate with former Israeli ambassador Dore Gold, Judge Richard Goldstone, author of the UN report on Gaza that bears his name, conceded that, had his UN inquiry been considered “judicial,” the prior statement of his colleague Christine Chinkin concerning Israel would have been sufficiently problematic as to disqualify her.

Recall that in a joint statement published on January 11, 2009 in the Letters section of London’s Sunday Times, entitled “Israel’s Bombardment of Gaza is Not Self-Defense -- It’s a War Crime,” Chinkin declared that Israel was guilty of committing acts during Operation Cast Lead that were “contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law,” and of committing “prima facie war crimes.”

Goldstone’s concession on this point echoes what he told South Africa’s Business Day in an August 2nd interview: “If it had been a judicial inquiry, that letter she’d signed would have been a ground for disqualification.”

However, in the same breath as he effectively admitted the obvious—that her impartiality was irreparably compromised—Goldstone contradicted himself by defending Chinkin’s letter as being entirely irrelevant.

First, argued Goldstone, her letter was signed also by a number of eminent international law scholars.

Second, as he argued to Congress in his failed attempt to block this week’s House denunciation of the Goldstone Report, he said that Chinkin’s letter only dealt with the “technical” issue of whether Israel enjoyed the right to self-defense under international law, and not with the specific issues bearing on the inquiry.

Third, argued Goldstone tonight, Chinkin also condemned Hamas.

All of these arguments he has made before, several of which are documented in our legal brief. (See more at www.unwatch.org/goldstone.) Yet each is specious, misleading and without any basis in law. I believe that the jurist Goldstone knows this full well, but apparently believes that the ends (his desire to save Israel from itself) justify the means (accepting a biased colleague on his inquiry panel, just as he accepted to work under the UN Human Rights Council's biased S/9-1 mandate that was never changed as a matter of law).

First, what probative value the existence of co-signatories has on Chinkin’s real or apparent bias is beyond me. But it is worthy of note that among the signatories so respected by Goldstone is one Richard Falk, the UN Human Rights Council’s permanent investigator of alleged Israeli violations, a man who has repeatedly accused the United States government of being behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Second, putting aside that the issue of whether Israel enjoys the legal right of self-defense is hardly “technical,” Chinkin’s remarks bear directly on the subject matter of the inquiry. Even had Chinkin only limited herself to accusing Israel of “aggression,” without opining at all as to the manner in which Israel conducted the war, this would have been clearly sufficient to create the appearance of bias on any matter related to Israel and the war.

But it’s worse: contrary to what she insisted during a May briefing with Geneva NGOs, and contrary to what Goldstone keeps saying, Chinkin’s letter also stated on the record—prior to her seeing any evidence—that Israel was guilty of committing acts during Operation Cast Lead that were “contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law,” and of committing “prima facie war crimes.”

That means she spoke on both jus ad bellum (whether the war was just) as well as jus in bello (how it was conducted). That Goldstone keeps getting away with saying she only addressed the former is testament to the culture of impunity that has surrounded this mission from its inception. (And, it is again important to note, even her comments on the former amounted to a sufficient disqualifier.)

Both sides must be heard . John stewart is doing a great job - where else can you hear this ? It certainly isn't mainstream .

PARDON ME! Pseudo religious fascism without the Capitalism (more of a Staliinist version complete with moustaches) to be exact. And as for my politics, I voted Obama. But I hate them all! Not one of them isn't bought and Ron Paul and Ralph Nader are just confused. They seem to think you don't have to fight against people who's laws are anti-personal liberty unless it involves pot.
I am all for pot, but not for Neda's murderers and their whole culture of death.
Israel is the only socially and ecologically progressive nation in the ME. If you want to hold us to the standards we created at least admit that!
There is no version of Haaretz in Iran and Al Jazeera has never stayed open 100% in any country OTHER than Israel.
Believe me, if anything, I'm over educated. I have seen it all. The failure of all isms'.

Anyone who saw the damage in Sderot, the war in Darfur, and the honor killings of the West bank would be bitchy about having thier "relatively progressive," culture lambasted for trying to protect themselves from it. Yes there are fundamentalist Jews who are wrong, the difference is we don't arm them, we throw them in jail. (most orthodox do not fight in the IDF and many Muslims DO)
As for who owns the land, there are thousands of disputed properties world wide and the disputers don't have to bomb cafes and innocents on BOTH sides to prove their point. If the Palestinians had the grace of the Lakota or the innocence of the Tibetan monks their cause might be legitimate. As it stands it is grounded in the subjugation of women like Neda and Genocide in Darfur. A viewing of certain "rich," areas in the WB and Gaza proves that conditions are based upon what the Palestinian chooses to do with his life. I know many who chose better for themselves and live in relative quiet. The wages of terror are death and fascism.
Palestinians cannot run from thier own culpabilities as the "progressive," community has encouraged.
Would you at least agree that sometimes one has to defend himself? And that the history is quite imbalanced as to who has been doing the opressing for the last 3000 years? (hint, it's not the Jews)

UNLESS YOU ACTUALLY WANT TO BE A LIBERAL HYPOCRITE

White Noise, your posts here are embedded with people who smuggle arms to kill civilians in direct violation of law, the proof is on the ship! Won't you learn the "real," facts and stop suporting Achmadenjad in opressing his own people? 3000 years of Arab Opression on INDIGENOUS Jews and 50 miles across is all we get for it? Your sense of justice boggles my mind. Do unto others? Then shouldn't Hamas expect 8000 indiscriminate rockets? Or only Israel has a responsability to the law, as always. My people invented human rights with our faith. You have no basis to argue without our product. You should focus on ending slavery,homophobia, religious discrimination, and murder of dissidents, and sexism in ARAB lands before you attack the most progressive nation among them. Being a pro-Palestinian progressive is an OXYMORON! You cannot be progressive and support a fascist racist culture who hates their neighbors for being Jews and throws acid on thier daughters. You cannot be anti-Darfur genocide and support their ally Hamas.

Are you worldpeastv's doppelganger? The axe grinding and bombardment of obsessive propaganda is somewhat familiar......and oh so tiresome.

Facts? That's a good one.

Silence is sooo eloquent ;)

Cut & paste is so underrated...please give us your source, now tell us...wadaya really think ;)

11. A travel guide to Palestine and Syria was published in 1906 by Karl Baedeker; The book estimated the total population of Jerusalem at 60,000, of whom 7,000 were Muslims, 13,000 were Christians and 40,000 were Jews.
12. As the Jews came and drained the swamps and made the deserts bloom, Arabs followed. They came for jobs, for prosperity, for freedom. And, they came in large numbers.
13. In 1922, with what was widely acknowledged as the illegal separation of Trans-Jordan, the Jews were forbidden to settle on almost 77% of the Palestine, while Arab settlement went unrestricted and encouraged by British mandatory authority.
14. Prior to the Second World War Mojli Amin, a member of the Arab Defense Committee for Palestine, proposed the idea "that all the Arabs of Palestine will leave and be divided up amongst the neighboring Arab countries. In exchange for this, all the Jews living in Arab countries will leave and come to Palestine."
15. Did you know that Saudi Arabia was not created until 1913, Lebanon until 1920? Iraq did not exist as a nation until 1932, Syria until 1941; the borders of Jordan were established in 1946 and Kuwait in 1961. Any of these nations that would say Israel is only a recent arrival would have to deny their own rights as recent arrivals as well. They did not exist as countries. They were all under the control of the Turks. Over 80% of the original British Mandate land was given to Arabs without population transfer of Arabs from the land designated for Jews.
16. In 1947, the Jewish state huddled on 18% of the original British Mandate land. The Jews accepted it gratefully. The Arabs rejected it with a vengeance and seven Arab states immediately declared war against Israel.
17. In 1948, the Arab refugees were encouraged to leave Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge the land of Jews. Most of them left in fear of being killed by their own Arab brothers as traitors.
18. Some 850,000 Jewish refugees were forced to flee from Arab countries, due to Arab brutality, persecution and pogroms.
19. The number of Arab refugees who left Israel in 1948 is claimed to be around 630,000 (where did they get this number?). Based on population census, estimated number of Arabs who left Israel was around 460,000. They were ordered to leave by Arab leaders at the time.
20. From 1948 till 1967 Arabs made no attempt to create a Palestinian state. Under Jordanian rule, Jewish holy sites were desecrated, 58 synagogues in Jerusalem were destroyed and the Jews and Christians were denied access to places of worship. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian sites have been preserved and made accessible to people of all faiths.
21. Arabs began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1964 only, on the initiative of Egyptian-born Yasser Arafat. The idea became popular Arab propaganda tool after Israel re-captured Judea, Samaria and Gaza in the defensive 6-Day War of 1967,

The term "Palestinian" is itself a masterful twisting of history. To portray themselves as indigenous, Arab settlers adopted the name of an ancient Mediterranean tribe, the Philistines (“Invaders” in Hebrew), that disappeared out over almost 3000 years ago. The connection between this tribe and modern day Arabs is nil. Romans, in order to conceal their shame and anger with rebellious regions, changed the references to Judea and Samaria by naming them Palestine.
1. Nationhood and Jerusalem - Israel became a nation in the 14th century B.C.E. Two thousand years before the rise of Islam.
2. Since 1272 B.C.E. the Jews have had dominion over the land for up to 1,000 years with a continuous Jewish presence in the land for the past 3,300 years.
3. The only Arab dominion since the Arab invasion and conquest in 635 C.E. lasted no more than 22 years.
4. King David founded the city of Jerusalem. Mohammed never came to Jerusalem.
5. For over 3,000 years, Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital. Jerusalem has never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even when the Jordanians occupied Jerusalem, they never sought to make it their capital and Arab leaders did not come to visit.
6. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in Tanach, the Jewish Holy Scriptures. Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran.
7. Jews pray facing Jerusalem. Muslims pray facing Mecca (often with their backs toward Jerusalem).
8. In 1854, according to a report in the New York Tribune, Jews constituted two-thirds of the population of that holy city. (The source: A journalist on assignment in the Middle East that year for the Tribune. His name was Karl Marx. Yes, that Karl Marx.)
9. In 1867, Mark Twain took a tour of Palestine. This is how he described that land: A desolate country whose soil is rich enough but is given over wholly to weeds. A silent, mournful expanse. We never saw a human.
10. In 1882, official Ottoman Turk census figures showed that, in the entire Land of Israel, there were only 141 000 Muslims, both Arab and non-Arab.

The Top 10 facts you need to know.


1.
In the summer of 2000, Israel offered the Palestinian Arabs 97% of the land they claim to be fighting for, making Israel the first and only country ever to offer the Palestinian Arabs a homeland. This offer was rejected with no counter-offer from the Palestinians.

2.
Like the United States, Israel is a democracy. Israel's Parliament includes men, women, Jews, and Arabs.

3.
Israel ensures complete equality of all individuals irrespective of religion, race or sex. These civil rights are granted in Israel's Declaration of Independence and Declaration of Establishment.

4.
The West Bank and Gaza Strip are disputed territories, claimed by Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. (UN Resolution 242)

5.
Israel gained control of the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza (sometimes referred to as the "disputed territories") in 1967 after defeating Egypt, Syria and Jordan in a pre-emptive strike after those countries surrounded Israel with troops, launched repeated terrorist attacks, and threatened to "put an end to Israel."

6.
Three major attempts to destroy Israel have been carried out by the Arab World: in 1947, 1967, and 1973. Although many neighboring Arab countries today still wish to destroy Israel, Israel still seeks peace. Israel has forged peace agreements with Egypt (1979) and Jordan (1994), and has lived in peace with these countries ever since.

7.
The West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza were never controlled by any Palestinian government or organization until 1993, when Israel agreed to give the Palestinian Authority certain controls under the Oslo Peace accords.

8.
Israeli Settlements in the West Bank are not illegal under any international law.

9.
There have been roughly as many Jews displaced from Arab Nations as Arabs displaced from Israeli territory. Israel has absorbed the Jewish refugees, yet the Arab world refuses to accept the Palestinian Arabs into their countries.

10.
The combined land size of Arab countries is 650 times the size of Israel -- i.e., Israel is the size of New Jersey, and the Arab countries are the size of the United States, all of Central America, and Mexico combined.

3. You believe that all cultures are equally valid. This particular piece of hare-brained logic has its roots in secular multiculturalism. The loss of belief in God, particularly in oh so enlightened Western Europe, has resulted in a loss of societal values and along with that has gone the ability to differentiate good from evil and right from wrong. Cultural relativism dictates that equality is the order of the day and that all cultures are equally good. What a complete load of bollocks. If I go to Saudi Arabia I will behave exactly in accordance with their culture and customs, understanding all the while that they have certain harsh punishments for crimes that if they were committed here would result in a slap on the wrist compared to a complete loss of the wrist over there. If a Saudi comes here and enslaves his house keeper, beating her along the way such as is reported from time to time then he should expect to be given time in jail for something that isn't even considered a crime over there. But, oh no, cry the cultural relativists. We can't offend people with cartoons! We must respect their culture and bend over backwards to accommodate their disgusting values even if it means allowing Muslim women to wear the profoundly demeaning mask of oppression, the burqa, when in public here, giving moral support to the obnoxious and evil Sheik 'cat meat' Al Hilaly or agreeing to replace our own symbols for fear of offending a violent and backward religion. It demeans us and cheapens our culture. Congratulations, if you believe that all cultures are equally valid then you're a Moral Idiot.

We live in an age of cognitive dissonance, of inverted values and of true Orwellian doublethink. The Left believes in, amongst other things, gay rights, women's rights and rehabilitation for thieves while also offering moral support to radical Islam, which hangs gays, stones errant women to death and chops the hands off thieves. The rest of us stand in bewilderment wondering why nobody has learned the lessons of the evil of socialism throughout the last century or understands the threat of totalitarianism in this one.

Given all of this topsy turvey-ness it seems to me that we need some sort of test, a guide, in order to establish whether your moral compass is tuned correctly. Here are the 3 signs that you're a Moral Idiot and let's hope that it helps guide you towards good, solid values in life.

1. You can't tell the difference between Israel and her enemies. This really is the ultimate test. If you are so dozy, so hopelessly indoctrinated with University-educated ignorance that you equate a democratic (and extremely left wing!) Israel, a country that has had to defend itself from attack for all of its existence, in which a million Arabs live peacefully alongside Jews, in which Arabs have the highest standard of living (by miles) of any country in the Middle East, in which Arabs serve on the judiciary, in which Arabs stand for, and are voted into, the Knesset (their parliament) with the suicide bombing, fanatical, genocidal, death cults known as Hamas, Hezbollah or Fatah then you are definitely a Moral Idiot and there's no hope for you.

2. You believe that the United States is the greatest threat to world peace. This sign is similar to the first sign about Israel. In order to hold this view you must forget that America fought a civil war to eradicate slavery, costing a huge number of lives, proving the moral strength that underpins its values even to this day. You must forget about America's role in saving the Allies in WWII, rebuilding the Japanese and European economies afterwards and defeating socialism during the Cold War (probably something you're still not too thrilled about anyway) and then going home afterwards when it could have annexed half of Europe. You must forget about the fact that the US is the largest provider of humanitarian aid on the planet, exceeding all other nations combined and is the first and only non-Imperial superpower in history (even France still has greater imperial influence than America). You must forget that its free market approach and entrepreneurship have driven the economies of the world forward in a way unlike the collective efforts of all nations through history. China is on the rise because of it, as is India and many others. The result? Vastly increased living standards and hugely longer life expectancy. How appalling! You must forget about the positive outcome of the civil rights movement that, while divisive and momentarily destructive, has led to equality of opportunity for all citizens of the United States. You must forget about the threat of the deranged regime of North Korea or the completely round the bend Islamic Revolution in Iran building nuclear weapons and you must laugh off their threats to annihilate their neighbours and Israel because 'they're not really serious'. You must forget about Al Qaeda's declaration of war in 1996 on the US (before 9/11, imagine that!), as well as the Lebanon peacekeepers bombing, the attack on the USS Cole, the attacks on the embassies in Africa that left hundreds dead and the first World Trade Centre attack - and you must recast all of those events into a "it's all due to US policies in the Middle East" and "we've brought it all onto ourselves" framework.

Israel is the great litmus test. Anyone who cannot accept an Israeli democracy is too far gone.

The 'palestinians' do not have a country or a language because they don't exist. They are an invention. They are Arabs who are illegally occupying Jewish land and have been ever since they brutally invaded and plundered it following the deranged and fascist teachings of the psychopath Mohammed.

Israel has occupied Palestine. Are you saying they are not then you need to get your ass over there and see what is happening. This is a horrible occupation of a country and people. No water food housing no language no country NO PALESTIANS! NOT RITE!

Good vs evil
Kindness vs cruelty
Freedom vs submission

The gift of the Jews.

Every religion should be indicted and prosecuted for taking all babys and young people and poisoning their minds by brainwashing them in the senseless realm of absolute hate. How else can you explain the hatred between Zionism and Islam, Protestants and Catholics? What intelligent Extra terrestrial would want to come here to study or mingle with violent earth people. The government would first capture or kidnap them and rush them of to some government la boratory to examine and to disect them piece by peace to see what makes them tick. That is the mindset of a barbarian race of animals or more descriptive is monsters. The human race is just plain disgusting for letting government keep them inn a stupor for life.

Provided a link toward it earlier in this post ;)

The Christians/Zionist bunch are the most pathetic chess pieces of the equation.

Their "Give the Jews a last chance before the Rapture throws them (with all of us unbelievers) in hell for eternity" is the single most sick narrative around indeed ;)

" The shepherd always tries to persuade the sheep that their interests and his own are the same" - Marie Beyle

Foreign nations are not supposed to lobby OUR government. Israel, itself, does not have a lobby but there is a JEWISH lobby, presumably American Jews who, in fact, lobby on behalf of Israeli interests.

Secondly, other foreign nations have, likewise, figured out how to SKIRT this issue, and maintain well-financed lobbies on K-street. The US government is ROUTINELY pimped on K-Street to the detriment of US citizens to whom the US government feels increasingly less responsible. Even the pernicious liars of the US gun lobby have more right to set up shop in the DC 'red light district' (K-Street lobbies) than have foreign nations.

Is there a quick fix ? No --EVERYONE, it seems, gets a bigger piece of the US government than the 'people' to whom it is by Constitution and law responsible.

We are basically screwed!

stewart always falls on the left in this area.

The Palestinians hatred against the Israeli's is not worthy of being deemed a "grievance." It is what it is, a desire for complete genocide of the Jews.

Everybody should have the chance to spaek if peace is what is talked about.

Hey Lay offf John Stewart! We have free speech here. If you don't like it, move to Israel. This is our country.

This reminds me of a discussion with two of my friends in high school. One was pro-Israel and another was Lebanese. During the Israel-Hamas incident, my pro-Israel friend said, in front of my Lebanese friend, that the people in Lebanon deserved to be attacked because Hamas attacked. She said this despite the fact that my Lebanese friend said that people in Lebanon absolutely hate Hamas.

Israel sure isn't making itself look good by flipping out every time the Palestinians try to speak. It's not as if the Palestinians came on the show and openly supported terrorist bombings in the west bank. They just came on to give their side of the story . I applaud the daily show for being one of the few shows to buck the Pro Israel club in the media.

John Stewart and his show are great!

So what is wrong in hearing both sides, good for the Daily show

Isn't john stuart jewish?

So now it's The Daily Show? Is there anyone that Israel doesn't hate?

I want to thank everyone here who has posted in favor of the Palestinians. I thank you from the bottom of my heart and would like to invite you to the website my village in the West Bank has set up.
This is the link:
http://www.hcsn.org/aboudyouth/main_en.html
Please keep defending our rights. Take care.

Have they ever watched the Daily Show BEFORE that interview Pro-Israeli People?!? EVERY time in the past he's mentioned the conflict to me he's displayed an Anti-Israeli stance. Literally, every single time.

Pro-Israeli Morons: "But he's a Jewwwwwwwww!!!!!!!"

SHOCKING HUH!?! A Jew who can think for himself. Jon Stewart isn't going to support you because you share a common ancestor and he's not going to support you illegal ass war.

I find it appalling how they edited out Ms. Baltzer from the television broadcast. Israel is an Apartheid government and a greivous violator of the Geneva Convention and International Law. The truth can be hidden but for so long.

You know in parts of the Middle East the enemy of my enemy is considered a friend. If we backed the Palestinians in this we wouldn't have to worry about terrorism or oil for a good long time.

The Israeli lobby is an overwhelming force in American politics. Foreign government lobbies are normally tightly controlled, but Israel does such a good job of conflating itself with both the religion and the ethnic group to the point that it can more or less avoid these controls.

Agenda.....check.
"facts" and seriousness.....check.
controversial to make a point....check
thinking he's right......check
can't take criticism......check
defensive....check
interviewing.....check
"care" for an issue.....check

How is he not a news program?

Oh because of "wit" like this:

"Apparently we have Joe Wilson with us tonight."

Revealing anger, bitterness and total agenda baring views.

If either side was realistic they would know that democratically speaking that all it would take is one side to kill a few and any talks of diplomacy would fall through. their eye for eye mentality is totally childish.