Community | November 05, 2009 | 56 comments

18% - 6.3 Million people who didn't vote (NYC 2009)

Image
SageRockandRoll
UPDATE

An estimated 8.3 million people live in New York City. And 18% of them voted this past Tuesday.

Here are the results from tuesday nights election:
Mike Bloomberg (I) - 557,059 - 50.6%
Bill Thompson (D) - 506,717 - 46 %

557,059 + 506,717 = 1,063,776 total votes

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE

From the US Census Bureau website:

2000 Census estimate - 8,008,278 people living in NYC.

2000 Census estimate of people under 18 - 24.4% of total population

24.4% X 8,008,278 = 1,954,020 under 18 (rounded up)

8,008,278 - 1,954,020 = 6,054,258 people who are eligible to vote in NYC

6,054,258 - 1,063,776 = 4,990,482 people who did not vote... IF THIS WERE THE YEAR 2000

But it 2009. So lets try this all again with a educated guess.

2008 Census estimate - 8,363,710 people living in NYC

Considering growth lets say 25% of the total population is under 18

25% X 8,363,710 = 2,090,928 people are under 18 (rounded up)

8,363,710 - 2,090,928 = 6,272,782 total people who did not vote.

So my original math (7.2 million if you didn't see it) is off by about 1 million. Remember that these are estimates from the US Census Bureau. Close to 6.3 million people is a very very large number.

An estimated 6,272,782 people did not vote in Tuesdays election. This means around 18% of the city showed up at the polls. 82% of a city of 8.3 million people did not vote.

For a title and position as powerful as mayor, of New York City no less, shouldn't more people have voted? Does this number shock anyone? How do we get people to the polls? How do we educated people on the importance of voting?
  1. groups:
    Community,   US Politics
  2. tags:
    New York City Elections NYC Voting 5 more
  3.     
    |

56 comments // 18% - 6.3 Million people who didn't vote (NYC 2009)

  • J_Jammer
  • hammernails
  • bigloutech
  • artemis6
  • becktionary83
    • 0
      becktionary83  
    • That's pretty pitiful. Proportionally even Detroit out voted New York imagine that. Woot woot!!!

      I believe Detroit's official voter turnout percentage was 20%. They were expecting between 20% and 25%

    • 3 years ago
  • ksutherland27
    • 0
      ksutherland27  
    • It was a vote between a douche and a turd ... but yeah the republicans got out n voted, that is the plague of urban areas... but hey if u don't vote then u cant bitch...
      U kinda over shot the estimate.. but indeed i get the ponit

    • 3 years ago
  • Maven_25
    • 0
      Maven_25  
    • I believe people are starting to feel helpless and why vote if the system is broken. Wall Street and the banks really screwed a lot of people and there has been no legal recourse only gov. aid to the banking systems, but not to the people who've lost jobs or their homes.

      Words don't count anymore--there needs to be action.

    • 3 years ago
  • extracrazykiwi2008
  • somogibbs
    • 0
      somogibbs  
    • Voters have no confidence in government. It is every where. Google my city, East Chicago, Indiana. Or as it is know here in the region, "The People's Republic of East Chicago" The level of local government corruption has simply changed hands through the different candidates. New Yorkers probably feel the same way.

    • 3 years ago
  • s0uthc0ast
  • SageRockandRoll
    • 0
      SageRockandRoll  
    • Okay. These number are going to be a bit off because they're from nine years ago. From the US Census Bureau website:

      2000 Census estimate - 8,008,278 people living in NYC.

      2000 Census estimate of people under 18 - 24.4% of total population
      24.4% X 8,008,278 = 1,954,020 under 18 (rounded up)

      8,008,278 - 1,954,020 = 6,054,258 people who are eligible to vote in NYC

      6,054,258 - 1,063,776 total votes from 2009 = 4,990,482 people who did not vote... IF THIS WERE THE YEAR 2000

      But it 2009. So lets try this all again with a educated guess.

      2008 census estimate - 8,363,710 people living in NYC

      Considering growth lets say 25% of the total population is under 18

      25% X 8,363,710 = 2,090,928 people are under 18 (rounded up)

      8,363,710 - 2,090,928 = 6,272,782 people total who did not vote.

      So my original math is off by about 1 million. And this is all with a guess. But 6.3 is still a very very large number.

    • 3 years ago
  • Jane_Flies_Free
  • SageRockandRoll
  • craigsaid
    • 0
      craigsaid  
    • I don't understand what the big deal is. Wasn't this country founded on the disenfranchisement of ethnic minorities? He's a billionaire for Pete's sake isn't he supposed to rig elections!? I hope less people vote everywhere next year and they sell the rights to our SS #s to a Chinese real estate securities trading company.

    • 3 years ago
  • Michael_Feher
    • 0
      Michael_Feher  
    • Technically speaking, the author should clarify if the 8.3 million is the total number of residents, or total number of eligible voters. This would make a difference.

    • 3 years ago
  • SageRockandRoll
    • 0
      SageRockandRoll  
    • Michael_Feher:

      Read the whole post please.

      Okay. These number are going to be a bit off because they're from a nine years ago. From the US Census Bureau website:

      2000 Census estimate - 8,008,278 people living in NYC.

      2000 Census estimate of people under 18 - 24.4% of total population
      24.4% X 8,008,278 = 1,954,020 under 18 (rounded up)

      8,008,278 - 1,954,020 = 6,054,258 people who are eligible to vote in NYC

      6,054,258 - 1,063,776 total votes from 2009 = 4,990,482 people who did not vote... IF THIS WERE THE YEAR 2000

      But it 2009. So lets try this all again with a educated guess.

      2008 census estimate - 8,363,710 people living in NYC

      Considering growth lets say 25% of the total population is under 18

      25% X 8,363,710 = 2,090,928 people are under 18 (rounded up)

      8,363,710 - 2,090,928 = 6,272,782 people total who did not vote.

      So my original math is off by about 1 million. 6.2 is still a very very large number.

    • 3 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • If I am right, this can be a great sign.
      This can look like most people are lacking a political conscience, however it might be the very opposite. I want to see it as a great sign of independence or a start of "think with your own mind", dropping "the sheeple".

      A possible explanation to this is that people know that voting for a "stranger" won't change things as learned from the past.
      They might get involved, take some kind of action, volunteer, march in protest rather than voting for no more or less than a last name.
      People are understanding more and more the difference between politic and politicians.

      The day I see a proportional decline in participation like this one but for a protest march or a campaign, than I will think something is wrong and we might be getting numb and/or isolated from true politics.
      Until then I wouldn't worry, instead let's make the "change" a public domain, that's where it belongs.

    • 3 years ago
  • jaflores85
    • 0
      jaflores85  
    • By not voting the citizens of NYC are showing they were not content with any of the candidates running for Mayor. They saw it as a waste of their time. Most Politicians have shown us time and time again that they will say exactly what you want to hear, but will never have any intentions on acting on those promises.

    • 3 years ago
  • Future_America
  • conservativelyliberal
    • 0
      conservativelyliberal  
    • it's the way we have set up the voting system in america. We need to move voting day to a saturday and give people more straight forward information or give people the day off on election day like they do in most democratic countries in the world.
      This is another way our goverment is letting us know that our vote dosent count.

      An hourly employee ( which is most people) cannot afford to lose precious time no matter how important voting is, eating/shelter/healthcare becomes more important. So their voices never get heard although they are the ones that get hurt in the long term from the bad decisions made by our government.

    • 3 years ago
  • loupetho
  • loupetho
    • 0
      loupetho  
    • In Australia it is mandatory to vote, but I don't see it being law in the US.

      This may sound dumb but look at the figures ... 1,063,776 voted 7,236,224 didn't vote and it took 557,059 votes to win. Now ... say that only 10% of those who didn't vote refused because they thought the system was corrupt ... if that same small percentage had an alternative candidate that would be a victory.

      In the nicest possible way, I say ... if you don't agree with the system that you have to live in day in, day out then get off your asses and do something about it ... find good people ...start a website, build up numbers through an email campaign and change things ... start it off as a hobby, I bet you it'll get serious pretty quickly.

    • 3 years ago
  • denport
  • lyter
  • Fatih
    • 0
      Fatih  
    • Don`t understand why they want everyone to wait on lines while they could just vote trough the Internet !
      A Website should be established where everyone can log in with there SSC number to make sure that the person is real and legal to vote .
      Example : most of my Friends were working and no employee is going to tolerate to give a day off for voting .
      That`s reality .

    • 3 years ago
  • SageRockandRoll
    • 0
      SageRockandRoll  
    • Fatih:

      Voting does not take all day. And it's important. Just as important, maybe more so, then a persons job. As for voting on the internet I like the idea, I'm all for making the process simpler. I'd think fraud would be an easy thing to achieve thought.

    • 3 years ago
  • Stradius
    • 0
      Stradius  
    • What the what!? Don't you New Yorkers give a damn about your future? How about the total BS about Bloomberg taking out term limits to allow himself to run?

    • 3 years ago
  • SageRockandRoll
  • animalia_libero
  • Jambusil
  • dondonyen
  • Dire_Wolf
  • Wharf_Rat
  • wetpass2
  • lionessgrrl
  • SageRockandRoll
  • zphoenixdownz
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • Sad, isn't it? In my district/precinct we have over 300 people registered to vote. That's just the ones that bothered to register to vote. Only 64 people showed up to vote on Tuesday.

    • 3 years ago
  • SageRockandRoll
  • unclecharlie
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • nursediesel:

      I admit I love football but my responsibility I vowed to do decades ago came first!
      I'm the minority inspector every six monthes.
      Living in a historically democrat union area; I have noticed that more people are changing to republican at every election over the last ten years!!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • unclecharlie
    • 0
      unclecharlie  
    • nursediesel:

      Actually, nursediesel, I was being facetious. I am unable to vote in town, because I live an hour west, and am still registered to vote in Louisiana- I'll probably head back there for a few months, thus keeping my registration in Looziana!

    • 3 years ago
  • nursediesel
  • Maeveeo
  • SageRockandRoll
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • People in NY are more worry about jobs and what's happening to their homes. I can't speak for all of the people that didn't vote, but let's be realistic here, neither candidate offer much in change and help.

    • 3 years ago
  • SageRockandRoll
    • 0
      SageRockandRoll  
    • KSirys:

      True, but I'd rather vote for someone who didn't re-write a law so he could run again. My question then is how do we get people to think progressively. How do we get it to be as important as a job.

    • 3 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • KSirys:

      Offer people an incentive, if voting is that necessary and you're looking for ways to get people to vote, offer them something that will get them in to the booths.

      It doesn't have to be monetary, but there's always something that people would like as an incentive.

    • 3 years ago
  • tangibleparadox
  • Betico
  • SageRockandRoll
  • SageRockandRoll
  • SageRockandRoll
    • 0
      SageRockandRoll  
    • This election was close. Much much closer then people predicted. If two million more people had got to the polls the out come would have been different.

    • 3 years ago
  • SageRockandRoll
  • SageRockandRoll
more from Community:

top videos