Community | November 08, 2009 | 19 comments

Sen. Joe Lieberman calls Fort Hood massacre a 'terrorist' act

source: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/11/08/2009-11-08_top_army_official_fears_retal...

Image
kennymotown
  1. groups:
    Community
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

19 comments // Sen. Joe Lieberman calls Fort Hood massacre a 'terrorist' act

  • 2hellnwait
    • 0
      2hellnwait  

    • It is what it is, a "good" Muslim answering the call of Allah, killing kuffar because that is what must be done to those that deny the "religion of peace."
      Ignore it if you will, yet the violent truth of Islam cannot be willed away, nor will it go away because it is denied. . . Islam feeds upon ignorance. . . fear of being ostracized muzzles the truth, and p/c multi-culturism is its cover and feeding ground, because none dare call it what it is. . . a blight on mankind.

    • 2 years ago
  • mrEddie
  • samthesixth
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  

    • It WAS a terrorist act. It is a plain as the nose on your face, except to a lib.

      What was despicable was the Kenyans description of the shootings. Called it everything but what it was but, then again, he is an idiot so what do we expect.

    • 2 years ago
  • existentialist
    • 0
      existentialist  

    • That's funny. I called it a terrorist act yesterday. The fact is that the definition of terrorism is broad and could be applied to the Fort Hood incident. I can't see someone going on a rampage without wanting to prove some point. Even if the point was, "This is what could happen when you mistreat people, so people better think twice before they are assholes." Which seems to be the possible social message this terrorist was trying to get across.

      Even though I see how it could be called a terrorist act, I disagree with the fear-inducing connotation when Joe used the word. I doubt he would fairly apply the word to the actions of the US army.

    • 2 years ago
  • clownpuncher
  • FishaHouse777
  • kennymotown
  • clownpuncher
  • RonenA
  • 2hellnwait
    • 0
      2hellnwait  
    • clownpuncher:

      Yeah, right. . . in Allah's name he is a murdering Muslim Jihadi none the less. . . Denial of that fact is pure apologist bullshit.

      -> Jihadi ideology in its most extreme form is fraught with dangerous consequences for the entire world. Its committed, hard-core adherents, as distinct from a larger body of the more traditional Muslims are thought to account for some 20 to 25 of the population.

      *A frequently followed practice by political leaders has been to practice the deceptive art of denial. It is an attempt to avoid direct confrontation with the ideology of Jihadis. Denial is an unrealistic hope that the problems created by the Jihadi terrorists are not serious, and they will go away by appeasement and surrender. Denial is an attempt to cover up their dreadful experience and ease the discomfort by a subtle and ingenious twist of attention.

      Total denial of the heinous Jihadi terrorism and their irrational thought system, in fact, is symptomatic of inadequate thinking on the part of politicians. The practice of denial increases the risk of greater destruction and death and financial loss. Fanatic Jihadis will not go away by themselves just because we do not want to face their dysfunctional thought system head on.

      Denial is deadly and can endanger our very survival. That is not fear-mongering . . . that is fact!

    • 2 years ago
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  

    • I don't think this act was an act of terrorism. Under United States Federal law terrorism is defined as

      "The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property in order to coerce or intimidate a government or the civilian population in furtherance of political or social objectives."

      Unless they can prove he was trying to further a political cause or a social objective, it isn't terrorism.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
  • samthesixth
  • kennymotown
  • FishaHouse777
    • 0
      FishaHouse777  

    • This wasn't a terrorist act but a psychotic breakdown. I almost guarantee after this psychiatrist regains consciousness he will receive a thorough mental evaluation detailing that he has a list of mental problems, and not that he is a sleeper cell or a militant from the middle east. He was born in arlington, texas. Yoiu can't get much more american than that.

    • 2 years ago
  • samthesixth
  • kennymotown
  • kennymotown
more from Community:
from the community

top videos