Community | November 09, 2009 | 40 comments

This is Bad in so Many Ways

Image
WASHINGTON - Abortion opponents in the Senate are seeking tough restrictions in the health care overhaul bill, a move that could roil a shaky Democratic effort to pass President Barack Obama's signature issue by year's end.

Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., said Monday it's unlikely he could support a bill that doesn't clearly prohibit federal dollars from going to pay for abortions. His spokesman said Nelson is weighing options, including offering an amendment similar to the one passed by the House this weekend.

The House-passed restrictions were the price Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., had to pay to get a health care bill passed, on a narrow 220-215 vote. But it's prompted an angry backlash from liberals at the core of her party, and some are now threatening to vote against a final bill if the curbs stay in.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight
  2. tags:
    Abortion Roe vs. Wade
  3.     
    |

40 comments // This is Bad in so Many Ways

  • artemis6
  • samthesixth
  • Maitereya
  • Karolein
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • I don't get why so many of you are panicking and acting like this suddenly overturned Roe v. Wade... Relax, it's not happening yet. Some of you are correct in stating that this sets a precedent for private insurers to deny coverage, but it's still not making abortions illegal.

    • 2 years ago
  • aswift1
  • S3th
    • 0
      S3th  
    • aswift1:

      You're killing me aswift1....

      Men sitting up in their ivory towers on the hill, are tyring to pass legislation that will change the face of health care, as we know it, and adding bits and bobs that will help them regulate what you can do with and to your own body....and your okay with that?

      I'm perpelexed, and deeply disturbed by this. As should all men, and women who think government should stay the f@ck out of our personal choices dealing with health and reproduction.

    • 2 years ago
  • aswift1
  • LadybugLady
  • Natalie_Alford
    • 0
      Natalie_Alford  
    • I am saddened that this is happening last minute, and I am also sad about how callously some of the comments say, " It's not my fucking problem you got pregnant. You were careless." or " We should make an exception for rape and incest." I myself got pregnant while using protection, and you can't tell me I should only be allowed a painful operation only after I have been sexually assalted and hopefully not infected with a sexually transmitted disease.

      What I would like to ask is why does it matter? I would be willing to give my tax dollars for men to get a vasectomy, why not abortion? I would be willing to give my tax dollars for someone who gets in motorcycle accident with no helmet, if we are using the logic of " It's their own fault." Don't pull that one out unlesss you are the picture of moral perfection.

      The issue is healthcare, and that involves many procedures that we don't agree with , helping people we probably don't even like, but that is the point. To take one out is to runin the whole Idea of the new healthcare bill.

    • 2 years ago
  • shavfo17
    • 0
      shavfo17  
    • Natalie_Alford:

      i'm with you, Natalie. a friend of mine got pregnant while on the pill and using a condom. sometimes you can do everything possible and one of those suckers still gets through. and if i'm going to have to pay for people for doing stupid stuff then they can pay for me.

    • 2 years ago
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • Natalie_Alford:

      I don't think that ANY elective procedures should be covered by federal insurance. Once this bill gets passed, you will recognize why. I'm not willing to pay for a man's vasectomy or a woman's abortion with my tax dollars.

    • 2 years ago
  • shavfo17
    • 0
      shavfo17  
    • not passing the bill because of abortion is exactly what they want us to do and health care is far too important. i say pass the bill and work on adding abortion to it later. in the mean time its not really affecting abortion accessibility that much.

    • 2 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • GEORGE CARLIN: Boy, these conservatives are really something, aren’t they?

      They’re all in favor of the unborn.
      They will do anything for the unborn.
      But once you’re born, you’re on your own.
      Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with the fetus, from conception to nine months. After that, they don’t want to know about you. They don’t want to hear from you. No nothing. No neo-natal care, no day care, no Head Start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you’re pre-born, you’re fine. If your pre-school, your [bleep].

      Conservatives don’t give a [bleep] about you until you reach military age. Then they think you are just fine, just what they’ve been looking for. Conservatives want live babies so they can raise them to be dead soldiers. Pro-life. Pro-life. These people aren’t pro-life. They’re killing doctors. What kind of pro-life is that? What, they’ll do anything they can to save a fetus, but if it grows up to be a doctor, they just might have to kill it?

      They’re not pro-life.
      You know what they are?
      They’re anti-women. Simple as it gets. Anti-women.
      They don’t like them. They don’t like women.
      They believe a woman’s primary role is to function as a brood mare for the state. Pro-life? You don’t see any of these white, anti-abortion women volunteering to have any black fetuses transplanted into their uteruses, do you? No. You don’t see them adopting a whole lot of crack babies, do you? No, that might be something Christ would do.

      And you won’t see a lot of these pro-life people dousing themselves in kerosene and lighting themselves on fire. You know, morally committed religious people in South Vietnam knew how to stage a [bleep] demonstration, didn’t they? They knew how to put on a [bleep] protest. Light yourself on fire! Come on, you moral crusaders, let’s see a little smoke.

      "The three monotheisms, animated by the same genealogical death instinct, share a series of identical contempt: hatred of reason and intelligence; hatred of freedom; hatred of all books in the name the one & only; hatred of life; hatred of sexuality, of women and pleasure; hatred of feminity; hatred of the body, of desires & impulses. Instead of all that, Judaism, Christianity and Islam defend: faith and belief, obedience and submission, a taste for death and a passion for the beyond, asexual angel and chastity, virginity and monogamic fidelity, the wife and the mother, the soul and spirit. In other words, life crucified and celebrated nothingness" – Michel Onfray

      "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over." -Frank Zappa

    • 2 years ago
  • LadybugLady
  • s0uthc0ast
    • 0
      s0uthc0ast  
    • So, a woman makes a choice to have a relationship with a man. She then chooses to have sex. She gets pregnant. She then chooses to have a government funded abortion.
      Choices, choices, choices.
      Where is my choice in this matter? Why would I have to pay for terminating a pregnancy I did not cause?

      Let's encourage responsible choices.
      If women want abortions, fine.
      Let them choose the payment method, cash or check.
      Keep your ovaries away from my check book.

    • 2 years ago
  • LadybugLady
    • 0
      LadybugLady [removed]  
    • s0uthc0ast:

      Well if you don't want your taxes to not pay for abortion but how much money are you going to give these welfare mothers. Choice abortion 300.00 welfare 20,000.00
      Now if your oppion is the welfare then you can't bitch about the money for it.either way you and I are going to pay for it. 300.00 is my choice.

    • 2 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • All fine for anybody to defend their opinion but isn't a woman the ultimate decider of what she can do or cannot do with her own body ?

      Isn't the role of the state basically to get the fuck out of the way (or provide basic care) but not to prop up the 'Burn the witch' crowd into a frenzy ?

      Separation of church & state is supposed to exist in what remains of this country....

      While zillions of $ go to massacre children in foreign countries some God given authority to save the fetus somehow prevails...

      Can you say... hypocrisy ?

      How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
      By Rachel Morris, Mother Jones Online. Posted November 10, 2009.

      Bart Stupak's last-minute amendment to the health care bill is even more dangerous than you think.
      http://www.alternet.org/story/143849/how_the_stupak_amendment_radically_undermin...

    • 2 years ago
  • samthesixth
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • Image
    • It is already a pain for a women to get an abortion... This is pathetic at best. American is sooo backward I sometimes feel in the middle-ages... Burn the witch !

      Anti-abortion violence is violence committed against individuals and organizations that provide abortion. Incidents of violence have included destruction of property, in the form of vandalism, to crimes against people, including kidnapping, stalking, assault, attempted murder, and murder, to crimes affecting both people and property, including arson and bombings.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence_in_the_United_States#United_...

    • 2 years ago
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • WhiteNoise:

      I understand all this, but how is it relevant to this health care bill? Seriously... I want to know. Is it the precedent and our fear that private insurers will follow suit? I think that any procedure deemed elective should not be covered by federal insurance. Let someone with the desire to get a vasectomy, boob job, or even an abortion, go seek private insurance coverage, or heaven forbid, actually pay for the abortion. They're not that expensive.

    • 2 years ago
  • LadybugLady
  • Kay_Bee
  • aswift1
  • artemis6
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • I understand that abortion should be safe and legal. Its a no brainer. But if we want to have public health care, the price we have to pay is no publicly funded abortions.

      Besides, the cost of most abortions are low, and there is, after all the abortion pill that is very effective. If people are too lazy to use birth control, then they should have to pay to get their own abortion.

      However, I do think they need to make an exception for rape, incest, and when the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother. In these instances the public insurance option or exchanges should cover the procedure.

    • 2 years ago
  • aswift1
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • I don't see anything wrong with stating concisely and clearly that public provided health care not fund abortions. Take the wind out of the anti abortion derailers sails. Give them what they want. Don't let them side track the real issue which is that we need the public option and the exchanges in order to achieve social justice with health care.

    • 2 years ago
  • Chod77
    • 0
      Chod77  
    • jubal:

      We already don't fund abortions with government money. What this amendment is going to do is force private insurance companies in the exchange to not cover abortions either. So women who need an abortion will have to pay out of pocket even if they have insurance. It's a clear attack on the right for women to choose. It's a big step back.

    • 2 years ago
  • aswift1
  • LadybugLady
    • 0
      LadybugLady [removed]  
    • I am very upset with the idea of no Roe V Wade. I faught all my teenage years for women have the rite to legalize abortion. I think the repugs want women to go to allys with hagers up thim like the old days.

    • 2 years ago
  • samthesixth
  • Chod77
    • 0
      Chod77  
    • This really is terrible. It is obvious to me that anti-abortion advocates are really just anti-women. If this is going to be in the bill, then I no longer support it.

    • 2 years ago
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • Chod77:

      I agree with the anti-woman part, but please tell me how this effects the availability and legality of abortions nationally? If only 13% of abortions last year were paid for by private insurance, how do you think this will effect the average abortion recipient? Of that 13%, how many of those women do you think were low income or rape victims? Probably zero. Think about it...

    • 2 years ago
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • There are two Democratic Senators pushing for this (Ben Nelson and Bob Casey). Luckily, two Republican Senators (Susan Collins & Olympia Snowe of Maine) are strongly opposed to any anti-abortion provisions.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ihatethemall
  • 402Chicago
    • 0
      402Chicago  
    • Ihatethemall:

      why are there so many people in this country that think the Federal government need make MORAL decisions nowadays, let the states do it. Last I checked the role of the Supreme Court was to decide constitutionality and to only visit moral issues if the nation were at risk of being destroyed due to them (such as slavery).

    • 2 years ago
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • Ihatethemall:

      wow I actually agree with you, 402. just wait until tax money is being spent on nose jobs for those with 'deviated septums.' I think any procedure deemed elective should not be covered by federal insurance.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
  • LowShred
more from Community:

top videos