Community | November 13, 2009 | 175 comments

Death Threats force removal of Atheist Billboard

Image
DeliaTheArtist
"'Don't believe in God? You're not alone' was the message on a billboard put up by the Cincinnati Coalition of Reason (Cin CoR) on Reading Road at 12th Street, one block south of Liberty Street in Cincinnati. It went up on Tuesday but by Wednesday afternoon the group was told it would have to come down again. Lamar Advertising, the company that owns the billboard, leases the land on which it stands and the landowner wanted it taken down. He (or she) had been receiving death threats. Fred Edwords, national director of the United Coalition of Reason, said, "We weren't given the landowner's name or precise details, Nor did we pursue them. It was sufficient to learn that this person had received multiple, significant threats and that Lamar would act quickly to alleviate the problem. Nothing like this has ever happened to us before."

The billboard campaign in Cincinnati is only one of ten going on nationwide this year and, while the current situation is unique, threats are not. Additionally, Atheist billboards have been vandalized recently in Colorado and Idaho. Shawn Jeffers, co-coordinator for Cin CoR, said, "Everything that has happened shows just how vital our message is. It proves our point, that bigotry against people who don't believe in a god is still very real in America. Only when we atheists, agnostics and humanists come together and go public about our views will people have a chance to learn that we too are part of the community and deserve respect... Hopefully this turn of events will cause more and more nontheistic people in Cincinnati to realize how necessary it is to get organized."


http://www.examiner.com/x-8947-LA-Atheism-Examiner~y2009m11d12-Death-threats-for...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight,   US Politics,   Religion,   7 more
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

175 comments // Death Threats force removal of Atheist Billboard

  • Kendall_L
    • 0
      Kendall_L  
    • I totally agree with Found Avenue & Stephanie Taurus. Now....just for the record, I'm not Atheist NOR Christian (...or Jewish or Muslim), so I'm OBVIOUSLY not choosing sides. I do, however, see an injustice here. If there was a Christian advertisement up on that billboard, it would be totally fine and no one would be complaining, but since it's an Atheist billboard everyone wants to say things like "Why make a billboard?" and "Atheists act like little children that don't get their way." Well....those comments can easily be deflected: "Why can Christians make a billboard?" and "What if it was a Christian group writing this article about THEIR advertisement being forced down off of a billboard, would THEY be acting like little children?"...didn't think so.

    • 1 year ago
  • Stephanie_Taurus
    • +1
      Stephanie_Taurus  
    • Wow Spanky07, and others, how selfish of you. Why the double standard, huh?

      If they can't have a billboard then no one should. But Christians have plenty, and everything else, too.

    • 2 years ago
  • loupetho
  • mixmaster
    • 0
      mixmaster  
    • you see god needs mans help, god can betrayed by man, god can be crucified by man, notice allah needs help terrorizing he cant do it himself he needs the taliban

    • 2 years ago
  • Kaotik
  • J_Jammer
    • -1
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • This posting piggybacks on the assumption it was Christians. It does not take the time to make sure that those that do make such assumptions (99% of all atheist) are forced to understand that that is not the case here.

      Otherwise this article and posting would be lost in obscurity because it really isn't anything important.

      It needed the controversy to even float on Current's waters and that's why it wasn't properly presented.

    • 2 years ago
  • Anonymous26
  • royulery
    • 0
      royulery  
    • wow. this post had legs, lot of emotion. reading through this, iv'e seen an evolution of thought, an improvement in perspective ( with only a few exceptions ). the thread seems to be heading toward the fact that; it doesn't matter what the name of a group is, some people are violent and we are all tribally motivated. yea team.

    • 2 years ago
  • Found_Avenue
    • +2
      Found_Avenue  
    • Death Threats. How very "Christian" of them.

      If you believe in heaven and hell, and you decide to make death threats against people who have different beliefs than you do... then I'm pretty sure you've just carved yourself out a little place in hell.

      Just like Baby Bush did when he sent thousands of American teenagers out to die in the name of his "Christian" beliefs... Born again, my ass.

      I respect people of other faiths than my own, and I expect the same respect in return. If you cannot show that level of respect to others, your religious beliefs are a sham.

      What would Jesus do? Well, for starters, he wouldn't make death threats.

    • 2 years ago
  • xiola
    • 0
      xiola  
    • Found_Avenue:

      Delia said it best:
      There is definitely no specific reference to Christians or any other religious group in this article. The article clearly states that the atheist alliance did not ask for specific information from the landowner. Any speculations about people behind the threats are just that, speculations.

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • I think if everyone were a Unitarian Universalist , the problem would be solved . Perhaps that should be the only religion allowed to partake in the military and prison complexes . It is the most tolerant , and that is what we all need . They are even cool with atheists . As long as we abide lawfully , it should be OK and not forced on to anyone . Ever heard of Unitarian Universalist terrorist groups ? Even a disrespectful extremist One ?

    • 2 years ago
  • metalcookiesxy70
  • Lecti
    • 0
      Lecti  
    • Hey guys,

      Looks like this discussion has gotten pretty heated. Please keep in mind, while discussing and debating serious topics is encouraged on Current.com, it is important that these debates not veer into lobbing personal attacks at one another. If you haven’t already, go check out our community standards (http://current.com/s/community_standards.htm) for details on what’s acceptable on Current.com.

      Best,
      Brandon
      Online Community Team

    • 2 years ago
  • Chique
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • Lecti:

      Of course they're people's favorite topics. They both put the POW !!! in power. Both
      subjects tap into the brain areas that likely stimulate an adrenalin response or key the production of some endorphin. They have to be people's favorite subjects because they get them high. Anything revolving around a religion, morality or theism
      will stimulate people to compete. Competition brings out the beast,not the best
      in people wherever it centers around power. Humans are all about conquering nature, not living in harmony with it. That's why I rejected religion in favor of a spiritual philosophy which studies nature, and learns how to be in harmony with it.
      It's called Bhuddism but names are only the artifice of a species that hasn't yet evolved to transcend labels. The purpose for transcendental meditation, based on the Kung Fu Meditations, is to get to an alpha brain wave state of mindfulness where you can reach enlightenment. The theory is that with enough brightness, you can see all things illuminated clearly enough to understand them. If you do a Google search for the Bhuddachi meditation, and follow its train of thought you will
      see why Bhuddism is NOT a religion, and won't trigger those negative reactions of
      obsession, extreme competition, "the end justifies the means", warfare, and even death threats that go along with all that insanity that religion breeds..

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Lecti:

      @lecti, you must be new to Current's staff I haven't seen you comment before, don't you think you are over reacting just a tad? The only exchanges that I have seen that came close to personal attacks were the exchanges between two people who are very popular regulars and they have had conflicts about this issue before, but even so, they weren't a fraction as mean spirited or directly personal attacks as many of the comments I have seen on thread dealing with Israel.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • jubal
  • J_Jammer
  • jay77
  • xiola
    • 0
      xiola  
    • jay77:

      DeliaTheArtist wrote:
      There is definitely no specific reference to Christians or any other religious group in this article. The article clearly states that the atheist alliance did not ask for specific information from the landowner. Any speculations about people behind the threats are just that, speculations.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • There is definitely no specific reference to Christians or any other religious group in this article. The article clearly states that the atheist alliance did not ask for specific information from the landowner. Any speculations about people behind the threats are just that, speculations.

    • 2 years ago
  • xiola
  • IngloriousBitch
    • 0
      IngloriousBitch [removed]  
    • Dear sonnicboom, that has to be the most articulate thing I have ever read on current. I am finding so many cool people on this thread. Thank whatever you believe in for this debate.
      It is pretty good mental masturbation.
      Very thought provoking.
      You can see who sees the glass half full vs. half empty and honestly, there are half empties on both sides of the isle and vice versa.

    • 2 years ago
  • IngloriousBitch
    • 0
      IngloriousBitch [removed]  
    • MrJenks, Atheism is a theory of the bigger picture, it's not a theory of one life, it is a theory about the whole universe. That is something BIG. Bigger than you, obviously. Something bigger.

    • 2 years ago
  • xiola
  • jubal
  • xiola
    • 0
      xiola  
    • xiola:

      Hello, jubal, my friend :)

      Yes, you are right. It is an assumption, indeed. That's what I was pointing out. I just know a lot of spiritual people who aren't Christian. And I'm not a fan of assumptions, in any form, or of opinions presented as though they are facts.

      I like the way Delia said it:
      There is definitely no specific reference to Christians or any other religious group in this article. The article clearly states that the atheist alliance did not ask for specific information from the landowner. Any speculations about people behind the threats are just that, speculations.

    • 2 years ago
  • IngloriousBitch
    • 0
      IngloriousBitch [removed]  
    • MAN It would be cool to own a dragon:) I take that back a bit, I meant, spiritual truth is in the eye of the beholder. Although even scientists disagree on truths sometimes. And you can take a verse of any religion and use it how you want to. Therefore; fundamentalism. Which sucks, in general, unless you are a fundamentally spiritual kind loving being.
      Atheists are generally rational, thoughtful, questioning human beings that just don't take everything for granted.
      And my perception of Torah is that if there was a god, he would admire their gusto.
      Even Moses asked questions, especially "why me?"
      I was always taught to ask questions.
      Whatever you are, teach your kids to ask questions, and they will feel empowered.

      And last but not least, I think EVERYONE should study every religion and Atheism at a young age just to get a balanced perspective on humanity and find your own path. How is it that a subject that has soooo much influence isn't even taught in school as a scientific idea until college?

      How are people supposed to ever learn tolerance when ignorance is so prevalent?
      The only way to end religious wars is to find common ground for humanity. For everyone to know where everyone else is coming from.

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • IngloriousBitch:

      If there's anyone who I can understand asking "Why Me?', it's probably Moses!

      I completely agree about introducing children to many worldviews from a young age; I think we could teach about different religions and philosophies in public schools without asserting one of them to be 'true' or better than the rest. I think it would do a world of good, increase tolerance and encourage questions from youth and as you pointed out, focusing on the common ground we all share, which is significantly more prevalent and important than dogmatic disagreements.

    • 2 years ago
  • ruebezahl
    • -1
      ruebezahl  
    • Maybe a person from the Atheist Alliance made the threat? True Christian would not make any death threats unless they have no knowledge of Christian princples. It is possible their reasoning was influenced by agnostic philososphies that believes any thing goes if it feels right.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • -1
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • ruebezahl:

      Very true.

      From what I see of atheist they seem to be very vindictive and vengeful and love making those that are religious the butt of many jokes....and go out of their way to insult them.

      So I wouldn't put it past them if they did it.

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • +1
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • ruebezahl:

      Yeah that makes perfect sense - pay money for a billboard that can help your organization reach hundreds, maybe thousands of people, then deliberately make death threats against the land owner to have it taken down, losing both your money and message. Those atheists, they sure are sneaky...

      Hey Rue, what "agnostic philososphies that believes any thing goes if it feels right" are you talking about?

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • eldamon
    • +1
      eldamon  
    • ruebezahl:

      "true Christians"? Which are the true Christians and why aren't they standing up to stop the UN-true Christians from shooting doctors, terrorizing patients and threatening those they deem unworthy or proselytizing fanatically? It seems to me a "TRUE Christian" wouldn't stand for this behavior perpetrated in their Gods name.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
  • J_Jammer
    • -1
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • ruebezahl:

      What do you want them to do? Kill those that don't abide by their rules?

      Sounds too atheist. Actually atheist are worse. Don't abide by their rules they'll pretend you didn't even exist so that they can blame religion for someone's bad ways....even if they were only in that religion for 2 seconds.

    • 2 years ago
  • c0zmo
    • 0
      c0zmo  
    • Seems to be there's the assumption that the people who made the death threats were all Christians. Nice going! These assumptions reveal *your bigotry* against Christianity which you seem to think is okay.

      Lumping all Christians into a group that wants to kill those who disagree is just as idiotic as all other prejudice of which most of you would profess to be completely innocent. Try this if you're able: Next time you hear or read a story like this, fight the instinct of your obvious prejudice and don't assume it's any one group just because that's the group you hate.

      I'm agnostic in the literal sense, so save the labels and flames.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • J_Jammer
  • IngloriousBitch
    • 0
      IngloriousBitch [removed]  
    • Delia, Truth, like Beauty, is in the Eye of the beholder. Not believing in god can be as harmful as believing in god. People who believe in morality can use that morality to screw others whether it is a pro-god- or anti-god type of morality. It depends on what emotions you put behind the idea.
      Ultimately, it isn't about truth as in science, it is about truth as in emotion and for some, a good acid trip or a sweat lodge or a whirling dirvishy kind of sparkly goodness. It's about finding a spot in the sky or on the ground to which you can focus your thankfullness for juicy pears and fluffy kittens and pot plants and the myriad of other wonders we can only describe but not explain.
      People, please don't judge religion by those who have put the wrong emotions behind the words.
      You can't judge Jody Foster by the guy who shot Reagan, (whether you liked Reagan or not which I didn't)
      Those guys in the photo for SURE understood that we should never try to controll each other's beliefs. Whether they were religious or not, they recognised that everyone handles religion and life differently, even the same life, and the same religion.
      And yes, USSR was opressive about religion because they did not believe in it. They criticsed my mom for being a Jew, and later when she moved to the ME they gave her a whole shpeil on how Muslims were going to get her.
      She is Jewish to spite that. Beacuse now she is free.
      I am Jewish because I connect to my ancestors.
      But it doesn't mean we believe in all the orthodox dogma.
      Or that we hate Christians, Muslims or Atheists at ALL.
      Our emotions have been focussed on the positive progressive parts.
      And if you are agnostic or atheist you can do this as well.
      You and I are putting the same emotion behind different beliefs and achieving the same result, LOVE.

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • IngloriousBitch:

      "Delia, Truth, like Beauty, is in the Eye of the beholder."

      Perhaps this is true is some cases, in the more subjective realms of existence, but certainly not everything works that way, right? For example, I could claim I own a dragon, but that doesn't make it true. Nuts who think the world is going to end in 2012 aren't correct just because they believe it (well, we'll see!) My point is, not all truth is in the eye of the beholder; some things are either true or false, real or not.

      I can dig god acid trips and feeling thankful for fluffy kittens (of which I have two and I am indeed very thankful for!), but I don't think it's that kind of spirtuality or religion most people rally against. It's the type that leads to fundamentalism, to radical words and behaviors, to extreme intolerance. Of course this can exist in atheists as well, I just find it less present in human history.

      Ultimately you are right; we all want love. We all want to be understood, feel connected and have our voice heard, which is the reason we are seeing more atheist billboards and such. I hope people understand that atheism itself and the mainstreaming of it is not an attack on religion or people's spirtuality.

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • "And all of this constant trashing of Christianity in general in every one of these threads proves nothing to me but that these threads are posted simply to give those haters of belief in anything a voice."

      This is pure BS. You assume far too much of the motivations behind me posting stories like this one, but again, I'm not surprised. You're like a broken record, Jan. If you are truly a follow of Christ you should try acting like it sometime; consider how you would feel if I made my way into all of your spiritual posts to make personal attacks and implications about your character, then explain why you feel the need to do that to me while touting how much of a moral person you are!

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      If that's what you got from the comment, you clearly missed the point. I asked you to consider, from your own spiritual perspective, what effect your words might have on others - was your response thoughtful, or even relevant? No, it was snarky and childish. This is your moral higher ground? This is where your spiritual path has led you, to a snide superiority complex? This is what you've learned from Christ?

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • The threat if indeed true is criminal and that is why those who issued the death threat should be brought up on charges. However, why aren't atheists more upset with those who actually gave into the threat and took the billboard down? Why aren't you all congregating right now where that banner is/was in standing up for what you believe? You just give in? And all of this constant trashing of Christianity in general in every one of these threads proves nothing to me but that these threads are posted simply to give those haters of belief in anything a voice. I as a believer in Christ and as a moral person regardless of religion would never think to threaten a person or take away freedom of speech or expression.These threads are really very telling regarding their motivations regarding some who claim to be atheists who also wish to do the very same thing to others because of what they believe. There is no religion or non religion that can escape barbarism in history. Look to what Nero did during Roman times in using Christians as human torches to light his garden parties and feeding them to lions in the arena to satisfy the bloodlust of Pagans. I truly think some on all sides need to get beyond their own biases before they can even begin to understand this is about morality much more than religion.

      And actually, based on reading the accounts of this, where does it state the threats came from Christians? There are many religions that believe in God.

    • 2 years ago
  • eldamon
    • 0
      eldamon  
    • JanforGore:

      So in essence do you truly intend to attack the post and those you disagree with or actually defend that which you believe in? The problem with judging morality, as you put it is if one does not subscribe to similar morals they are deemed A moral. Believe what you choose but let others have the same respect in believing as the choose as well.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • eldamon
  • jubal
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • "Religion is the last refuge of the scoundrel" I don't believe in religion myself, never have, never will. When I see the kind of Historic beastiality routinely practiced by so called Muslims, and so called Christians, it's obvious why the evil always hide behind their twisted cross, and call it God. I'm a Buddhist, and I believe in what John Lennon believed in. But whether you are a theist or atheist it really makes no difference in a world where criminal insanity is considered a normal part of the collective human condition does it ? That wasn't meant to be rhetorical. I still maintain, in my humble opinion, that it's as irrelevant and immaterial as we are whether "we" believe in God. It's really whether He believes in us. I collect quotes on my I Google home page...From Confucius, from Einstein etc.. I know for certain that Confucious, Einstein, and Lincoln believed in God, as I do. It's simply that they did not believe in religion. There is a difference you know, despite the logical fallacy which nearly always results in confounding people's minds into confusion. As they say consistency is the hobgoblin of closed, petty minds. The quote posted for today, November 14, 2009 goes like this: "The main source of human wealth is goodness. The qualities of affection & generosity which God admires in a World plagued by greed" Alfred A. Montapert. The Greek cynics were a secular philosophical group who believed that the human capability to become the highest form of life was inversely proportional to our capacity to behave worse than the lowest form of life. And that thus, if we did not conscientiously strive to develop every form of virtue possible, we would always fall prey to our basest animal motivations. So this is your brain on virtue, any questions ?

    • 2 years ago
  • cefirak
    • +1
      cefirak  
    • how many times can you say that a religious billboard got an assortment of atheist death threats?
      and if God does exist, what makes you think that this kind of action would please the omnipotent being who created you? don't you think an OMNIPOTENT BEING CAN FIGHT THEIR OWN BATTLES?

    • 2 years ago
  • Westnewport
  • Aktaeon
  • chaos1
    • +1
      chaos1  
    • i see Christian billboards all the time......... I hate the fact that in America if it aint Christian its wrong. Awhile back there was a huge controversy about Muslim ads being displayed on city buses.

    • 2 years ago
  • crispyfritters
  • thedirtman
    • 0
      thedirtman  
    • A Unitarian Universalist has no creed and advocates freedom of belief. More times than not I find myself siding with atheists because of religious extremists. Religious hypocrites refuse to take a stand against extremism in their own religion but are dedicated to pet causes.

      On the other hand, atheists are largely unappreciative that I can still believe in God. I can define God in common terms if I am so inspired. God is not an imaginary friend. Atheists can be like Christians in that they have a creed to defend. I have freedom.

    • 2 years ago
  • AnnaleeNoir
    • 0
      AnnaleeNoir  
    • low I.Q.

      Really???
      You guys will let anyone post anything on here.... including pictures. Nice. Glad CURRENT has become the National Inquirer.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • fun_size
    • +1
      fun_size  
    • J_Jammer:

      Yeah too bad it wasnt the atheists that took it down but the advertising company that owns the billboard. I guess it was just a little too difficult to read the first paragraph of the article.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • EtVoila
  • fun_size
    • +1
      fun_size  
    • Id like to say i cant believe this but... well it makes sense. Atheists try to seek out others with a simple harmless sign and WITHIN A DAY religious people call in enough death threats to get it taken down. Yeah good work. You show those intolerant ignorant atheists the compassion and love that you embrace.

    • 2 years ago
  • mrjenks
    • +1
      mrjenks  
    • "Religion is a tool, like atheism, gets you closer to something bigger by wording it in a way you can understand it."

      I consider myself an atheist, and I've not once thought of atheism as a path to "something bigger". As such, I believe that true atheists believe in what's proven by science and nothing more. Please don't make such bold statements about an entire group of people's beliefs without knowing how each individual thinks. That is how religion was started in the first place.

    • 2 years ago
  • funkymonkey931
    • 0
      funkymonkey931  
    • All religions have thier extremists, Christians, Muslims, and yes there are plenty of Atheist extremists. Atheism has a bad reputation and so does Christianity. The two just need to calm down a little bit.

    • 2 years ago
  • IngloriousBitch
    • 0
      IngloriousBitch [removed]  
    • Delia, this is the first time I disagree with you (wow). The Bolshevic revolution was indeed mostly atheist or agnostic. The USSR really opressed religious freedom. Many, many Germans were atheists during WWII, it was the most liberal time in Germany until the war.
      Although I am a theist who believes in my tribal ancestral culture/religion as a way to connect spiritually, I wouldn't force it on anyone.
      And Judaism in particular DOES NOT seek converts, not by force or preeching.
      Although wars, thousands of years ago, were sanctioned in the torah,
      so were the first written women's rights, the first rights for slaves, and many other positive things. The talmud has interpreted and re-interpreted things to mean something far greater than the text.
      And I would venture to say religion (or non) is only as good as the interpretation.
      Religion is a tool, like atheism, gets you closer to something bigger by wording it in a way you can understand it.
      Either way, you can be fucked up or cool.
      By the way, in general, I think you're pretty cool.

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • IngloriousBitch:

      "Delia, this is the first time I disagree with you (wow). The Bolshevic revolution was indeed mostly atheist or agnostic. The USSR really opressed religious freedom. Many, many Germans were atheists during WWII, it was the most liberal time in Germany until the war."

      My questions are, did these atheistic tendencies motivate their actions? Does atheism "oppress" religious freedom? Did any group cite their ideology of atheism as a cause or reason for what they did?

      I'm not trying to accuse any specific person of any ideology, but modern interpretations of religions are frequently different from the fundamentalist viewpoint. There are many people who don't seek converts to their religion, and many who do, and all day long all of us could argue about the interpretation of ancient ideas- how do we discern who's closer to the truth?

    • 2 years ago
  • Admirable
  • MizPiz
  • rfkolbe
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • "EVERY belief system, atheists included, have their extremists and crazies and people who make the ideas and faith look bad. Extremism in ANY sense is bad."

      While I agree with this and find it to be true, I think it is a bit of an oversimplification. Some extremists are worse than others; some go to more radical methods in the specific name of their ideology. I'm not saying every atheist out there is flawless or even a nice person, but I'm hard pressed to find stories of atheist fundamentalists who threaten, kill, wage war, etc in the name of godlessness- while finding it in the name of religion and god is relatively easy.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      Worse doesn't justify others.

      Worse is nothing but the same danger at a more intensifying degree. Doesn't mean that they are to be used to make others look better like some people try and do.

      With that line of thinking I could make Hitler look pretty using some people in history who were worse.

    • 2 years ago
  • bekah_1984
    • 0
      bekah_1984  
    • I agree completely with arikata. Being religious or spiritual is no more intellectually flawed than being an atheist. Neither side can prove the existence or non-existence of any sort of divine being(s) so bickering back and forth is useless and futile. Science has its faults and flaws just like religion can. But if you expect tolerance and respect from the religious and spiritual, then it is best not to post things like elusive. EVERY belief system, atheists included, have their extremists and crazies and people who make the ideas and faith look bad. Extremism in ANY sense is bad.

      Oh, and half those guys in this original post were not atheists. Most were deists. They believed in something, not necessarily Christian.

      Also, there are other religions and spiritual paths that do not condone violence and killings.

    • 2 years ago
  • Hoax_Productions
    • 0
      Hoax_Productions  
    • Wow, this is atrocious human behavior. And so many christians complain that they are persecuted by people of different belief. We should consider the log in our own eye before we make death threats over the speck in another's.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • JanforGore:

      What kind of proof are you looking for and why do you doubt it's legitimacy? The sponsors were contacted by the landowner - so I guess the story is either "Death Threat forces removal of atheist billboard" or "Landowner lies about death threats to force removal of atheist billboard"...

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • JanforGore:

      No names, no other corroboration of any kind, and you believe it because you want to. I want to know who made the death threats and what action is being taken against them, but this report claims they were not pursued? Sounds fishy to me. Is it ok with you that I think for myself here?

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • JanforGore:

      I believe that the bilboard is being taken down, and that the reason given by the landowner was that he was being threatened. That's the story here, whether or not that landowner is telling the truth. It's rather simple, really.

      Thinking for yourself isn't the problem; it's just hilarious that you will shrug off all sources and evidence provided to you in the name of an asinine point that attempts to discredit the message of the story. Not that I'm surprised!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • eldamon
    • 0
      eldamon  
    • One can believe in whatever arcane, ritualistic, hypocritical, sex offending religion one chooses but why the hell is it so important to try and get everyone else to fall for the same madness?

    • 2 years ago
  • royulery
    • 0
      royulery  
    • my terror alarm went orange. let's follow what homeland security does. my bet is it will be brushed aside by the new crusade.
      i am not an atheist but i despise sectarianisms. any belief that pits us against them. maybe i am foolish, maybe humans need to have enemies.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Who made the threats? Can this be corroborated by another source? And it seems to me that intolerance is on both sides. It also appears tha some will post anything here to take a chance to take a whack at all people who believe in something. That is what I find to be very sad as well as threats. If this is even true. Would be nice to see some corroboration and more information.

    • 2 years ago
  • current89
  • IngloriousBitch
    • 0
      IngloriousBitch [removed]  
    • They need to find this Nidal Hassan of advertising and Jail him, or them. That is why we live in America, to jail nutjobs. Free the potheads, jail the nutjobs. Death threats and violence make any religion or non-religion look bad.
      Let us not forget the Marxist revolution was based upon somewhat atheist beliefs and there was definately violence if you ask Anastasia.
      We are all capable, but fuck those of us who do.

    • 2 years ago
  • Varex_Sythe
    • 0
      Varex_Sythe  
    • IngloriousBitch:

      So are you implying that because someone exercised their freedom of speech and freedom of religion in a way that really does no harm, they deserve to be put in jail because the beginning of Marxism was started with Atheist ideals?

    • 2 years ago
  • IngloriousBitch
    • 0
      IngloriousBitch [removed]  
    • IngloriousBitch:

      Being a daughter of former soviets, I can assure you that being violently anti-religion was a hugely malevolent cause espoused by many who stood for mother Russia and her power including many of the few who started the revolution.
      That being said, to clarify, we are all capable of being intolerant to the level of wrongness, even Atheists.
      Killing less doesn't necessarily make one better.
      For example: Israel has killed far less Palestinians than the two neighbors Jordan and Egypt, and yet, the world doesn't think that an accomplishment because we still believe Israelis SHOULD be good enough to kill less and that should be a given. Catholics have a fabulous charity arm. Does that make them better than Atheists who don't, hardly. Food not Bombs is trying hard to feed people and they are anarchists.
      Everyone has their positive and negative aspects.
      For every priest who buggared a teen, there was one who saved a teen from gangs or saved a girl from getting knocked up or fed a homeless guy etc..
      To me, god is love, the devil is in the details. But ultimately we are all capable of love too. And all theories of existence are capable of good and evil equally.

    • 2 years ago
  • Varex_Sythe
  • bailey78
  • sonnnnicboom
    • 0
      sonnnnicboom  
    • Again, it seems very blind if we continually bash Atheists or Christians. They are both right and wrong, mostly because truth is entirely subjective...Atheists shouldn't act snobish towards people who believe in religion. It makes sense because atheists believe that they have found the answer through some logistical means, when really they miss the point as much as the religious type (some will get it, some won't get it, but none of us, including myself, have a right to tell them they are wrong). Stop the hate on both sides, for your arguing a mute point. Much love.

    • 2 years ago
  • michail77
    • 0
      michail77  
    • sonnnnicboom:

      I wouldn't say truth is entirely subjective as long as truth remains open to scrutiny and refinement. That's the beauty of scientific though and logic - truth is a refined and evolving target.

    • 2 years ago
  • sonnnnicboom
    • 0
      sonnnnicboom  
    • sonnnnicboom:

      Thus subjective to change, therefore truth is irrelavant. I see the world through my own lens of reality and subjectivey because i have been encultured in a way that is completely different than you. Because of this enculturation, my truth on the world,religion,personal behavior is utterly different than yours. So truth is lost and we can no longer hold on to the dead horse that is the ego.

      I am fearful that "The Science Cult" is getting more and more believers and again they miss the point to. Jung points out in his book Synchronicity "The experimental method of inquiry aims at establishing regular events which can be repeated. Consequently, unique or rare events are ruledout of account. Moreover, the experiment imposes limiting conditions on nature, for its aim is to force her to give answers to questions devised by man. every answer of nature is therefore more or less influenced by the kind of question asked, and the result is always a hybrid product. The so-called "scientific view of the world" based on this can hardly be anything more than a psychologically biased partial view which misses out all those by no means unimportant aspects that cannot be grasped statistcally."

      This is where reasoning gets you....

    • 2 years ago
  • FlexSF
    • 0
      FlexSF  
    • Disgusting christianists; first they facilitate votes to repeal marriage equality, and then threaten to take your life away if you don't believe in their pious garbage. We need to vote against them!

    • 2 years ago
  • ilvta2dboys
    • 0
      ilvta2dboys  
    • Whatever happened to Freedom of Speech??

      An example of censorship at its finest. . . Lamar Advertising should grow some balls and not let bullies determine the messages shown to the American people.

    • 2 years ago
  • elusive
  • ilvta2dboys
  • Chique
    • 0
      Chique  
    • Self-righteousness is what leads to this kind of self-deception which they think justifies the very thing they once thought they stood for. Kind of like the virtue of humility, once you think you have it, it's gone.

    • 2 years ago
1 - 100 of 173
more from Community:

top videos