Community | November 17, 2009 | 8 comments

CNN on our new "huge, huge bomb" to use against Iran

Image
WakeUpPeople
Here is Wolf Blitzer and Barbara Starr talking last night on CNN about the Iranians and what the U.S. might to do them; it's really pitch-perfect:

BLITZER: Regarding Iran, a new report raises some disturbing possibilities about its nuclear program, and that's prompting fears from the United States over how to respond.

Let's bring in our Pentagon correspondent, Barbara Starr.

Barbara, what are you learning?

BARBARA STARR, CNN PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT: Well, Wolf, the latest report from the International Atomic Energy Agency suggests Iran could -- could be hiding more secret nuclear sites, and that is raising the stakes on all sides.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

STARR (voice-over): Iran's once secret underground nuclear fuel enrichment plant. The Pentagon is worried Iran is now burying weapons factories so deep, that the current arsenal of bombs can't reach them, leaving the U.S. with no viable military option if a strike was ever ordered.

This new Air Force 15-ton bomb may change that calculation.

JOHN PIKE, GLOBALSECURITY.ORG: We'd certainly be able to take this out with a massive ordnance penetrator, the 30,000-pound boss.

STARR: This is the massive ordnance penetrator, or MOP, now being rushed into development to be carried on B-2 and B-52 bombers. The most likely targets? Iran and North Korea, which are believed to have buried weapons facilities hundreds of feet underground or into the sides of mountains.

PIKE: Some of those would probably require this massive ordnance penetrator simply because they are buried so deep and no other bomb would be able to certainly destroy them.

STARR: At 30,000 pounds, the MOP, some experts say, will be able to penetrate 650 feet of concrete, a significant boost over current bunker-busting bombs like the 2,000-pound BLU-109, which can penetrate just six feet of concrete, and the 5,000-pound GBU-28 which can go through about 20 feet of concrete.

GEOFF MORRELL, PENTAGON SPOKESMAN: This has been a capability that we have long believed was missing from our quiver, our arsenal, and we wanted to make sure we've filled in that gap.

STARR: No air strikes against North Korea or Iran appear to be in the works, but Iran says it could start enriching uranium here in the next two years, and both the U.S. and Israel want to ensure that Iran cannot manufacture and assemble a nuclear weapon.

All of this has now led to more funding for the MOP. The Pentagon plans to have the first bombs available by December 2010, two years earlier than planned.

STARR: Now, the Pentagon likes to say it's not helpful to speculate on future military targets, but certainly this weapon gives the Pentagon, Wolf, an option it hasn't had before -- Wolf.

BLITZER: It's a huge, huge bomb, Barbara. Thanks very much for that.


http://www.salon.com/news/iran/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2009/11/17/iran
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight,   World Politics
  2. tags:
    News US News Military Weapons 1 more
  3.     
    |

8 comments // CNN on our new "huge, huge bomb" to use against Iran

  • ras_menelik
    • 0
      ras_menelik  
    • Image
    • China defines a harmonious relationship with the U.S. as being among its core interests. But China now imports a growing share of Iran's oil output — Tehran is China's third largest foreign supplier (behind Saudi Arabia and Angola), and Beijing has also significantly increased its investments in natural-gas projects in Iran. Being forced to choose between an expanding energy relationship with Iran and maintaining diplomatic accord with the U.S. is precisely the kind of dilemma that makes China's leadership assume the foreign policy equivalent of the fetal position. Thus, Hu's public remarks on Tuesday afternoon, after meeting with Obama: "We both stressed that to uphold the international nuclear nonproliferation regime and to appropriately resolve the Iranian nuclear issue through dialogue and negotiations is very important to stability in the Middle East and in the Gulf region."

      Got that? No talk about "time running out." It's all about "dialogue and negotiations" (even if Iran has been talking to the West for years about its nuclear programs and just rejected the best offer it had ever gotten). The template China would like the U.S. to follow in responding to Iran is the same one that is used in dealing with North Korea — the topic that will dominate the conversation in Seoul, Obama's next stop.

      Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1940222,00.html

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • The real threat too the US is from terrorist who will eventually obtain a nuclear device. Any bomb, regardless of how big it is, will be useless against an enemy who has no specific territory to bomb.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • wayseeker:

      Frontline had a program several years ago about the briefcase nuclear bombs that could easily be deployed in the United States and wouldn't attract any suspicions.

      Also there was an Iman in Kuwait who suggested that terrorists could easily cross the border into America through Mexico and disperse kilos of Anthrax into heavily populated areas.

      The threats are real, there are completely crazy goading people to act in the name of the cause. Unfortunately both sides have their crazies and they push people in their media broadcasts to act up and commit violence.

    • 2 years ago
  • Gravity_Man
  • jubal
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • Why is Iran, one of the richest oil countries in the world, persueing a crash program to persue nuclear power for peacetime use.

      Well, maybe it could be to attack Isreal. Or, on the other hand, maybe there is something that the media, politicians and oil companies don't want you to know about oil. Like maybe it is running out MUCH faster than they want you to know.

      Maybe there is another war coming. And maybe this time it will be a nuclear war. Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and they are fighting being taken over by the Taliban right now.

      Maybe the media, politicians, and oil companies don't want you to know that another war is coming-----maybe they want you to go right on using oil and reaping huge profits----because we have these huge bombs that will solve everything.

      It seems to me like the better thing for us to do would be to use something else so we don't need oil.

    • 2 years ago
  • Wetdog
more from Community:

top videos