Fox News AGAIN accused of airing misleading video

word

Why post here then?

lucky...

This is my daily dose of comic relief. I find it amusing that there are people so wrapped up in themselves and their beliefs that they hold on online pow-wow to collectively attack those who don't share the same beliefs for such petty things.

I'd like to see a link of this, if you could provide it, mgerlach22.

I watched your little video.

Paranoid libertarian claptrap with a partisan slant. I generally view Prison Planet as Glenn Beckville.

While some kernels of truth can be found in almost any myth, the content of this video is laden with distortion and partisanship. It drips with melodrama and is itself a transparently propagandistic film.

The video was unintentional. I didn't even watch it myself. Here is the article with the evidence to back it up.

definitely not on this website...

I saw that story the other day. Guess where? On Huffington Post. NS they didn't have to get exposed by a third perty before they apologosed like Fox did. It was strictly internal.
See the difference? Mistake (MSNBC) vs fraud (Alternate spelling for Fox).

I repeat: I-s-a-w-i-t

They do, that is why they watch Fox, mainstream media has assaulted all reasonable sensibilities and lied to the public beyond rational comprehension.

I wont argue that many various popular media sources mislead, misinform, perhaps even lie. However, you seem to be suggesting that Fox lies.... Less?
Your platform aint to strong, there, Padre.

On a side note, how does one avoid being the mainstream media when they are the most watched news network? That's quite a feat.

MOK,

They are only the most watched station on cable. ABC CBS and NBC all draw more nightly news viewers than FOX.

Good point, thank you for reminding me of that!

If we parse down your unnecessary and obviously intentional verbosity, we get something like "the people telling the truth are being called liars."
In so many words.

Now, if you could somehow provide some substance to this....? That, as opposed to your post, would make for worthwhile reading.

The fact that you only mention Fox News and ignore MSNBC shows you don't know what you're talking about.

And your other bit....reminds me of stories that start off like....."I had to walk 5 miles in the snow barefooted up one hill to get to school...."

or

"....yes the fish was this---------------------------big." Even though the fish gets bigger each time the story is told.

Don't glorify the past.

Wayseeker, as you suspect, at least one of those anchors have lamented as much regarding modern info-tainment.

J_Jammer, I agree with your pursuit with objectivity, but don't overdo it. Prior TV news is very widely considered to have been more reliable than modern cable news outlets. If Wayseeker is glorifying, then the broad consensus is off. That's a lot of people you're arguing against, there.

Also, note that people point at Fox more often due to a higher rate of 'anomalies,' and that they are the most watched. Were MSNBC as popular, you'd see more people pointing fingers at their biases and mistakes. Not as much as Fox though. ;)

Then you're not reading if you think they are clean.

Think what's clean? MSNBC? News outlets of the past? I never even intimated as much.
What we're talking about here is bad, worse, and worst.

No. They are the same "worse."

Be careful....your bias is showing.

Fairness matters more than sides.

i believe the term that suites J_Jammer is a devil's advocate.

Devi's advocate is fun.

What lie? Did Huffopo claim he is really a half-human half- pig?

Hahaha....you think they don't lie?

You stew in that one.

I'm curious as well, because I don't read it. Something to consider before ya get snarky.

That's the point. You don't see stories like that get very high because the majority hate Fox and so the bias scale they complain about---they contribute to on Current. It was posted.

i never knew there was a lie told about Rush from anyone. What was it about J_Jammer? can you find the article or apology? I sure can't.

Poor CNN... You used to be on top, and perhaps even worthy of it. No more....
Apparently, you'd rather spend time twittering about nonsense, and fiddling with gadgets and gimmicks.

That would be rare, unfortunately. I doubt we would find a single day that Fox "news" wouldn't have a "better" idea of how things "really" happened.

Well done cz.

It can easily be said the same of the m-s-m on a daily basis...

Unless you are paying attention to every little word the Huffington Post prints on their website.....you're being melodramatic.

And Jonny Stewart is just a joke.

You wish.

So the left perceive Jon as the be and end all of informative journalism?
-entertaining and provocative ?, yes - - unbiased?, no...

I don't wish for it's already so.

Incorrect - The left does not perceive him as reliable journalism; the vast majority of viewers know better.

However, the fact is that a) he's in tune with his target demographic, and b) he's funny. So of course people will watch him who might not otherwise watch real news(unfortunately). And regarding this topic, yeah, one can generally rely on Jon Stewart's program to pick up on it when Fox tries to pull fast one. It's part of the routine. But it does not translate him into a reliable news source in his viewers eyes. So don't make unreasonable leaps.

One other thing.... If, as J_Jammer suggests, Huffington Post is as devoid of integrity as Fox, there's still the issue of scale. That website cannot compare with Fox.

But for what it's worth, I would like to see a show that picks apart HuffPo if it pulls similar BS. I don't like getting propaganda, even from the spectrum I favor. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of any outlets that would do this with integrity and some semblance of moderation in their partisanship.