Community | November 19, 2009 | 18 comments

Spare Sarah Palin the self-righteousness

Image
J_Jammer
WASHINGTON - Sarah Palin hardly needs defending.

She prides herself on being a supportive hockey mom, but she can lace on skates and deliver hard checks into the glass with the best of them.

Still, while watching and listening to a lot of the media discussion of the rollout of her book, I can't help noting that some of the coverage is more than a little selective, and hypocritical..........

.......Still, the widespread suggestion in some of the media commentary that she simply isn’t qualified enough to be considered a viable presidential candidate is ridiculous.

For male politicians, it’s always been a rule of thumb in politics and the media that once you were on a presidential ticket, you were automatically elevated onto the short list of contenders for future races.

If George H.W. Bush had lost in 1988, does anyone think Dan Quayle would not have been talked about as a potential candidate for 1992, even with all the political flaws he revealed in that race? Would the media have taken John Edwards as seriously in 2008 if he hadn’t been John Kerry’s running mate in 2004?

Call it sexism or what you will, but why should the media only compare ambitious women to impressive men, when so many ambitious but underwhelming men get so far in this world?

Media debate about why Palin is getting all this attention is also pretty laughable. Cable and network news producers cover her on television to boost ratings, print editors put her on their front pages and magazine covers to sell newsstand copies, and then everyone turns around and tsk-tsk’s: “What’s all the fuss? Is she good for the GOP? Is she good for America?”

At least in the having-it-both-ways department, Palin is a good match for the media. She is milking all the attention for book sales and political exposure while simultaneously using it to appeal to her base of rural, working-class Americans who feel neglected and disrespected by media elites.

---more at link---

This article is very fair and raises a lot of important points . Some points that people totally ignore on this site. They focus too much on what their party tells them to focus on.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   US Politics,   Opinion,   1 more
  2. tags:
    Media Sarah Palin GOP Elite
  3.     
    |

18 comments // Spare Sarah Palin the self-righteousness

  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • This article loses me when sexism gets brought in. Maybe I'm not hearing the right commentators, but I never see her gender coming up in connection to her viability or ambition. The only critiques, of which there are many, I recall seeing tend to stem from the awful things she says, her vendor-machine-like string of slogans and platitudes, and her half-baked ideas.

      For example, her recent interview with Barbara Walters, where she illustrated her utter illiteracy on the Isreal/Palastine settlements situation.

      Her frequent complaining of mistreatment also aggravate me. Every candidate gets their chance to go through the wringer(some somewhat more than others), but it only stings when a candidate says stupid things. Sarah Palin said stupid things.

      While I'm glad there was an attempt to defend her - Everyone deserves such - I simply do not see where the solid content lies with this particular article.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • MOK:

      Hehe it's not that he minds Fox taking a snipe at him once in a while.
      The problem is that they've made it their 24/7 mandate for about a year now. I'd say he took it in stride up to this point.

      Hey, and Bill OReilly tried to give Obama a grilling. That was a marvelous opportunity for him to go down in flames via a bad interview. That's one example off the top of my head.

      You intimate, though, that there was a positive bias towards Obama, and I agree; More people liked him, so it would naturally follow that he had more fans in the media. This isn't conspiracy, this is simply how popularity contests work. Now, if Palin really turns on the charm and starts hypnotizing everyone, she'll get somewhat more favorable coverage as well. If this is unfairness, then our system of elections are flawed, not necessarily the media, nor that specific election.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • I like that she doesn't allow people to push her down. She and Hilliary stand up strong and they don't cry about how they are treated. They push back. Women are not treated equal in many areas of life.....
      ....ever seen that film Gracie about the girl that tries out to play on the boy's soccer team? When she tires out the boys are vicious towards her. The mentality is if she cannot handle this treatment then she shouldn't be in the game.

      Uh...no. They were not treating her like another boy. They were being far more vicious towards her and then claiming that it was like they were treating her as everyone else. Well that's what they do in politics. They try to take down women in a way that they do not do towards men...this goes for the media and other politicians.

      It's not ok.

      Dislike her for what she says, fine because not all will agree---but don't act like she's nothing because she's a woman. Ick.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • We all know except you Palin was put on the ticket as a desperation tactic to try and draw Hilary supporters but when she couldn't be shielded any longer and had to answer questions she proved to be just that a desperate move by the GOP.

    • 2 years ago
  • arcticspirit
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • kennymotown:

      Disagree thats fine but why else did they put her on the ticket, cause she was from a big state with what 2 electoral votes or because she was anti-choice. What was the reason other than what i said.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • UrbanGypsy
    • 0
      UrbanGypsy  
    • kennymotown:

      McCain was losing steam and his campaign was just plain boring. I think we can all remember the general lack of enthusiasm among conservatives for McCain. She was picked to energize the base and to create a stir. She succeeded... at first.

      Then people began learning more about her. She managed to energize the base, but she turned turned independents off. Thats the biggest problem she poses to the GOP itself; she is a double edged sword. She's built to win the GOP nomination and but also to lose the general election.

    • 2 years ago
  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • kennymotown:

      "We all know except you Palin was put on the ticket as a desperation tactic to try and draw Hilary supporters but when she couldn't be shielded any longer and had to answer questions she proved to be just that a desperate move by the GOP."

      This is about the same thing I recently heard a conservative commentator say. One of the one's who considered McCain a bad republican, or some such. I don't remember who unfortunately....

    • 2 years ago
  • My_America
  • arcticspirit
    • 0
      arcticspirit  
    • What is interesting is 70% of conservatives thought she was the best candidate for president, with 3 other people on the poll. I just saw this on the news today. While the left is trying to shred her, I had just talked to my mom, who lives south from NYC, in a RED state, and everyone LOVES HER there. And if you discount those Americans, then that might be a mistake.

      But keep doing that.

    • 2 years ago
  • JeremyTG77
    • 0
      JeremyTG77  
    • Nice piece.

      But one thing I do take Palin's side on is what I felt was her shabby treatment by the McCain campaign, particularly in how they encouraged her to make controversial statements about Obama on the campaign trail and then hung her out to dry in the ensuing media frenzy over it.

    • 2 years ago
  • Progresshiv
    • 0
      Progresshiv  
    • There is plenty to like about Sarah Palin: she's independent, outspoken, strong-willed, and has the best legs of any presidential candidate ever. She raises her children in an extended family setting (It takes a village to raise a child), keeps physically fit, has a strong marriage, and has the courage to risk censure for her political views. As a person, she has shown both compassion and political acumen.

      I disagree strongly with her foreign and domestic policy views, because she does not support her platitudinous remarks with hard, reliable evidence. She has shown herself to be willing to play upon people's fear to gain political advantage ("Death panels"), and her speaking style suggests she thinks many in her audience are uneducated or naive. Therefore, I can never vote for her, although I wish her well on a personal level.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • MOK
  • Nettle
    • 0
      Nettle  
    • Oh wow, I loved this article! Thanks for bringing it my way.

      "On issues, it’s full of conservative platitudes and seemingly Googled philosophical wisdom. It’s mostly a work of self-mythologizing — Annie Oakley gets her political gun — mixed with bitter political dish. "

      Awesome! But I did also find the sexism to be saddening. Hilary's been through a lot too, just because of the vajayjay...

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
more from Community:

top videos