Community | November 26, 2009 | 8 comments

U.S. seeks 10,000 troops from allies for Afghan war

Image
current89
WASHINGTON — The United States is scrambling to coax NATO allies to send 10,000 additional troops to Afghanistan as part of President Obama’s strategy for the region.

NATO members and other foreign allies have expressed reluctance to send more soldiers because of the Afghan war’s growing unpopularity in their countries and increasing concerns over corruption in President Hamid Karzai’s government.

The Obama administration views a substantial contribution from its allies as a way to keep the American troop increase lower and blunt domestic political criticism of the Afghan war. It would also allow the administration to come close to the military’s request for 40,000 additional troops without relying totally on the already stretched American armed forces.

After weeks of deliberation, Mr. Obama is to announce his Afghan war policy on Tuesday. Administration officials say that a strong speech explaining Mr. Obama’s strategy for achieving success would provide them with fresh ammunition to galvanize support in foreign capitals.

Washington has not yet made formal troop requests to allies, but there have been diplomatic and other conversations seeking commitments in principle, carried out by senior American officials; the NATO secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen; and Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain.

Mr. Obama’s aides have signaled that he intends to commit close to 30,000 additional American troops, on top of the 68,000 already there.

The president is likely to ask NATO allies to fill the gap between whatever new American troop contribution he announces and the approximately 40,000 that the NATO commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, favors to carry out his proposed counterinsurgency strategy, according to administration officials. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because the policy had not been formally announced.

After Mr. Obama gives his speech and Mr. Rasmussen delivers a statement of support, NATO foreign ministers are to meet in Brussels next Thursday and Friday to discuss Afghanistan. But troop commitments are not likely to be discussed in detail before a so-called force-generation conference on Dec. 7, also in Brussels, American and allied officials said.

Informal commitments of several thousand additional allied troops have already been made, but they include some of the 10,000 more European troops that were sent to Afghanistan by governments last year, as well as troops sent for the recent presidential election, NATO officials said. While some countries are planning to pull these troops out, “there will be pressure on allies to keep those forces in Afghanistan,” a senior NATO official said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/26/world/asia/26troops.html?_r=1&hp
  1. groups:
    Community,   US Politics,   World Politics,   Afghanistan News
  2. tags:
    Afghanistan Italy France Germany 4 more
  3.     
    |

8 comments // U.S. seeks 10,000 troops from allies for Afghan war

  • hawaiiansharkus
  • hapa8o8
  • dabne
    • 0
      dabne  
    • Don't count on them. Just send the extra 10,000 and do the fucking job yourself as best you can. If you can't do it, pull them the fuck out.

      As a soldier who's been in Iraq, these other nations don't do shit anyway, and just get in the way most of the time.

      These coalitions are bullshit. It's stupid PR. Same with Bush's coalitions. America ends up paying for it and doing all the work. No other nation is capable or willing to step up when we can do it. Everyone hates the lone superpower, no matter what we do. Obama thought HE could change this, he thought wrong and is learning this the hard way.

    • 2 years ago
  • FishaHouse777
    • 0
      FishaHouse777  
    • Come on Obama I like you, don't pull this crap. We started this war so WE need to end it, don't pull foreign nations into it just to boost your PR.

      Pull our troops out now and let afghanistan finish its civil war.

    • 2 years ago
  • tommytripper
  • FishaHouse777
  • doxiesf
    • 0
      doxiesf  
    • The world does not neet this, its pointless to lose one more life in that god forbiden place, the afghans will fight each other and outsiders until the end of time.

    • 2 years ago
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • Mr. Rasmussen spent Wednesday in Rome, for instance, talking to the Italian government about that very topic, and it appeared ready to send more troops, officials said. Mr. Rasmussen has also been to Warsaw, which officials said would contribute more troops.

      Mr. Brown said Wednesday that he was “now optimistic,” after canvassing allies, that a number of countries “will indeed make available increased numbers of troops, and more police trainers and civilian support.” He said he hoped the figure would be 5,000 troops.

      Other NATO officials said that figure was roughly accurate, even low. With new contributions expected from Poland, Italy and Britain, the major exceptions for the moment are Germany and France, the officials said.

      Georgia, which is trying to secure its ties to NATO and its future membership in the group, has agreed to send another company, officials said, and may end 2010 as the largest non-NATO contributor.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos