Bailed-Out AIG Forcing Poor to Choose Between Running Water and Food
source: http://www.alternet.org/workplace/144203/bailed-out_aig_forcing_poor_to_choose_between_runni...
-
-
- StrangE2U
- added this
Middlesboro and Clinton are two tiny, impoverished towns in southern Kentucky with a combined population of 12,000. In 2008, Middlesboro's per capita income was $13,189 a year, only a few hundred dollars more than the average worker earned in third-world Mexico. That is if they were lucky to even get a job. Real unemployment hovers somewhere around 30%, and the state is so broke that half the people eligible for unemployment benefits can't receive them. Life may be tough and most people live in poverty, but that doesn't mean they can't be made a little poorer. That's the lesson locals learned after bailed-out insurance villain AIG took over their water utility and instantly raised rates to squeeze an extra $1 million in profits out of its new customers, forcing some to consider choosing between running water and food...
...Here is how the AIG takeover went down: In 2005, flush with cash from its shady dealings in the mortgage derivatives market, AIG announced that it was in the process of acquiring Utilities Inc., a holding company that controlled scores of small water utilities across 17 different states. With just 300,000 customers, the company wasn't huge, but it boasted of being the largest privately held water utility in the country.
"We have long considered water infrastructure as an attractive investment opportunity and an excellent complement to [our] existing energy infrastructure portfolio. Utilities Inc. is a leader in this industry and we are pleased that [we have] the opportunity to acquire this business,” AIG Chairman and CEO Win J. Neuger gloated in a press release.
AIG had reason to be pleased with its purchase. Water utilities are one hell of a profitable business, with international corporations easily making a 20 to 30% profit margin, according to a 2007 report by Food and Water Watch. In the US, federal regulations limit profits to 10%, a pesky rule that companies easily subvert by shuffling their income around and “investing” it in side businesses. These kinds of returns would be the envy of the pharmaceutical and oil industries. How do water companies do it? According to Food and Water Watch, they charge 50% more for services than public utilities and pocket the difference, thereby unleashing the potential of the free market.
-
-
CarlosIsDown
-
You'll never see this in Faux News, Sea of Shit NN or I MisS News BC
- 2 years ago
-
CarlosIsDown
-
-
CarlosIsDown
-
CarlosIsDown:
Well, maybe if Faux News wants to blame the president.
- 2 years ago
-
CarlosIsDown
-
-
CarlosIsDown
-
Corporate Tyranny, ey?
- 2 years ago
-
CarlosIsDown
-
-
Incredulous
-
maybe it is time to replace AIG
- 2 years ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
extracrazykiwi2008
-
Thats strike #2 AIG
- 2 years ago
-
extracrazykiwi2008
-
-
copperdragon
-
two words, water world. Or dune, we will be collecting the water from our breath soon.
- 2 years ago
-
copperdragon
-
-
Pspoon
-
I don't understand how this is freedom, liberty, or justice.
- 2 years ago
-
Pspoon
-
-
EdJoyProductions
-

-
Disgraceful. They sound like the embodiment of Malcolm McDowell in "Tank Girl". Why didn't our corrupt government just let them die?
- 2 years ago
-
EdJoyProductions
-
-
StrangE2U
-
EdJoyProductions:
lol... I don't think Tank Girl has ever been used in an analogy to government before!
2 points for creativity and several million more for the use of Tank Girl!
- 2 years ago
-
StrangE2U
-
-
EdJoyProductions
-
EdJoyProductions:
I love Tank Girl. There are so many lessons that can be gleaned.
- 2 years ago
-
EdJoyProductions
-
-
ChristopherX
-
Change = nickels and dimes in our pockets! Did we waste our vote?
- 2 years ago
-
ChristopherX
-
-
TheCatalystPoet
-
ChristopherX:
First off, don't get mad at the president for what the corporations are doing. He is working on getting legislation passed to fix these problems and make harder for them to screw us over like this.
We should not have NECESSITIES capitalized and put in the marketplace. The second someone stands to make money on your health and other basic essentials they will charge as much as humanly possible. Corporations don't give two sh*ts whither or not you can pay these insane amounts of money. They know you will because you have to survive. And if you don't, other people will so they don't have to worry about losing you as a customer.
The problem isn't with our president - who is working to stop this crap. It is with these idiots who want to point at him and scream "Failure!" before he has the chance to do anything, and in the same breath call him a socialist because he wants to fix the very problem everyone is bitching about in the first place.
F**king morons.
- 2 years ago
-
TheCatalystPoet
-
-
Conniepae
-
ChristopherX:
TheCatalystPoet I agree, I just hope President Obama puts an end to future privatization of utility companies, like water. What can one do without water? I hope this is not a sign of future privatization, cause I like having water and I'm already stretched to the max, trying to pay high gas and electricity bills. Our pay checks have not been going up, but our utility bills sure have.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
RockinCanadian [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
RockinCanadian [removed]
-
-
Confucius
-
RockinCanadian:
these people have had no choice in the matter
- 2 years ago
-
Confucius
-
-
jigsawyouth
-
Great example of the "free market" so adored and cherished by the Sarah Palin party. The free market sounds like such a beautiful thing dosn't it? It contains the word "free", so you can easily trick people into thinking that it has something to do with freedom, liberty and all that America stuff that Obama hates so much. Well, here's the reality folks. I'm sure all these poverty stricken residents without a single penny to their name after paying 50% more for water are wondering.... where is the government? Who is going to put a stop to this?
- 2 years ago
-
jigsawyouth
-
-
sergantonio
-
This is not just another AIG related evil it really puts in perspective the whole theory of free market capitalism While this name says freedom it really means unregulated market capitalism of the type that put lead in our homes and sold cigarettes as supplements for our ”T” zones also produced snake oil. Something’s are to important to leave to profit driven Capitalism like water, electricity, health care, Food quality, production of medicines and Vaccines it seems that profit driven corporations see the ends i.e. profit as justification for abuses in the U.S. and the world as the means
Democracy is a better way to run and hold accountable the results of these most important services if any one is doubtful look at the likely hood that rural Pennsylvania or Kentucky would have gotten electricity in to there rural counties before the New Deal made it a priority - 2 years ago
-
sergantonio
-
-
dershope
-
sergantonio:
You're forgetting this isn't supposed to be a democracy in the US. Its a republic. More govt regulation isn't what's needed. Less govt is the key. Do you think Madolf, AIG, Bear Stearns, etc. could have ever happened if the SEC didn't exist? Who knows but it stands to reason that these govt entities are put in place to give the taxpayer, investor, etc. a false sense of security.
- 2 years ago
-
dershope
-
-
RaceBannon
-
thoughts of the french revolution are entering my mind after reading that article
- 2 years ago
-
RaceBannon
-
-
coffeemusician
-
normally it's rob from the rich and give to the poor, not rich rob the poor
- 2 years ago
-
coffeemusician