Russian DNA Discoveries - MIND BLOWING! | AEONIA
source: http://www.aeonia.com/russian-dna-discoveries-mind-blowing
-
-
- Monkey_Films
- added this
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Technology, Right Wing Nuts
-
-
mcwally
-
thanks for this post...my kind of science...more new breakthroughs like this are confirming researches for everyone doing the work..
- 2 years ago
-
mcwally
-
-
royulery
-
dna is all about communication. a generic cell becomes a brain cell or an ass cell by coding but it also is on a timeline. baby brain cell functions are still encoded in all of your cells. a lot of data that changes with time. this potential for communicating with earlier info. to become younger, iv'e usually seen with crystal or magnetic therapies. the laser approach is novel, i hope it works but i'm not holding my pacifier.
- 2 years ago
-
royulery
-
-
02
-
Yes, I think I should make a list of possible culprits. What kinds of poisons, or what kinds and levels of radiation could cause the second chromosome to mutate to create humans?
Was it some volcanic sludge? An asteroid? Hey, Fungus?And how many chimps would have to have been fried to allow how many viable births - that in turn might actually survive? - We know there has been times when human populations were entirely diminished and yet re-populated.
How many mutant chimp numbers could account for survival?
With this, we might actually figure when; - and then, possibly even the event itself.
Yes? :-} huh?
- 2 years ago
-
02
-
-
jahbini
-
Mind blowing? The only person with a blown-out mind seems to be the author of that article.
Let's just leave it like that.
- 2 years ago
-
jahbini
-
-
lookatmypix
-
The cancerous music sounds like the kind you would use for an Alfred Hitchcock film :)
- 2 years ago
-
lookatmypix
-
-
lookatmypix
-
-
This makes me think of those Scientists that find cancer in patients by listening to their molecular patterns which produces actual MUSIC!
When the patient has cancer the music sounds bad and vice versa.
Listen to it. Posted here:
http://current.com/items/91041294_a-cancerous-melody.htmhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObTvZ6KCmSY&feature=player_embedded
- 2 years ago
-
lookatmypix
-
-
Crystal_Moon
-
lookatmypix:
Hey, I like this. Why couldn't different cells have different "tones" if you applied (musical) equations to them? There is SO MUCH we don't know know, like what is the purpose of the unused 90% (or more in somes cases) portion of our brains? I have a great deal of repsect for science but if there is no concrete proof then some of these theories are useless or viewed as "wacked out". Well, I don't think they are. Science is discovering that dogs can detect cancer in humans. Well, I'm sure when that theorgy was proposed there were plenty of people who thought that was as wacked out as it could get.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080826124401.htm - 2 years ago
-
Crystal_Moon
-
-
loupetho
-
What d4rk0ne88 says. It's interesting stuff and plausible but it needs scientific rigor, otherwise your just selling a fantasy ... and there's plenty of people out there who'll go along for the ride, it's human nature ... didn't Sadam have WMDs.
- 2 years ago
-
loupetho
-
-
d4rk0ne88
-
this is bullshit. talks about Russian experiments but what were these experiments where are the results or research papers or has it been published in a reputable scientific journal and are the results repeatable.
these are nice science-fiction fantasies.
- 2 years ago
-
d4rk0ne88
-
-
02
-
d4rk0ne88:
Yes, Money_films, it is obvious you are desirous of attaining a full and robust grasp on the true truth, the inner reality, etc. However, I guess you certainly don't want to turn around and realize, at some point, you were wrong -do you? That you may have wasted too much time with ill-conceived notions before jumping on that stead to not look back? You are trying to find the true truth - yes?
- 2 years ago
-
02
-
-
cephas
-
Not a bad point of view but it reads like a huge used car sells pitch. I'm sure there is some credibility to it. But what exactly is the "human language" they keep refering to? The book was written in German but the scientist were Russian. Those are pretty different languages...
- 2 years ago
-
cephas
-
-
Confucius
-
If you check out the aeonia site it doesn't seem very credible or evidence-based
- 2 years ago
-
Confucius
-
-
Psymoniac
-
if you look at the homepage of the "scientists" (they have no title...guess why) you clearly see that there are two options on this: 1. whistleblowers (or better said they have very good connections (besides they only quote 2 or 3 russian scientists..and theirselfs^^) and talk about things normaly censored by governement/military) or 2. its all bullshit and they are just esotheric freaks....
choose by yourself...maybe someone could check their sources...
- 2 years ago
-
Psymoniac
-
-
cefirak
-
This is incredible!!
- 2 years ago
-
cefirak
-
-
Thargor19
-
all good but leave god the fuck out of the equation and think of everything in existence as "god" instead.
- 2 years ago
-
Thargor19
-
-
abg123
-
this is pure russian propaganda
- 2 years ago
-
abg123
-
-
asherp
-
The article starts off with this:
"clairvoyance, intuition, spontaneous and remote acts of healing, self healing, affirmation techniques, unusual light/auras around people (namely spiritual masters), mind’s influence on weather patterns and much more."Wow, Russian "scientists" discover new-age hippy bullshit!
POWER HEALING CRYSTALS! GO! All our theories are based on a book about quantum physics we read and misunderstood.
- 2 years ago
-
asherp
-
-
sandycubes
-
I feel like this article is a bit less scientific than it should be. Some scientists in Russia studied parts of our DNA and discovered all this? I'll remain a skeptic until i have some more evidence to support these claims. I don't believe that language skills and clairvoyance are genetic in that way.
And God is a bullshit excise for anything.
- 2 years ago
-
sandycubes
-
-
neonbunny
-
This is exactly how propaganda spreads. First off this is old. I have taken many genetics and molecular biology courses and never heard a thing about this. I cannot find any scientific papers in my university database that even remotely support this (as I expected). When I search this on Google all I get are religious nutcases embracing it and scientists laughing at it (which is kind of funny because that's what I did when I read it the first time). This is pure pseudoscience bullshit. Don't believe everything you read just because it contains the word "science". Common sense everyone, use it. Furthermore, junk DNA simply means non-coding DNA, not non-functional.
- 2 years ago
-
neonbunny
-
-
FishaHouse777
-
neonbunny:
This is from a Russian source, not from a US university so I would be surprised if you found this in any database on US soil. Also most scientists and people automatically debunk any evidence of spirituality because they are materialists (atheists or people who follow Darwin's evolutionary footsteps). Materialists believe if you can't sense something (hear, see, taste, smell, or tangibly touch) that it's impossible for it to exist. This isn't true however simply because of things like the human consciousness or the placebo effect for a couple examples. Materialism has stumped the scientific field from exploring the realm of spirituality, which is much more vast and rewarding than the biological or mechanical sciences most scientists pursue today. Open your mind, i'm not saying to believe anything that anybody says but I am saying you shouldn't instantly think something is wrong/untrue until you prove it so.
These russian scientists haven't proven this to me because they lack the data to do so, but I still have hope that they can someday prove it to me. There's no limit to the mind, only a limit on your ego.
- 2 years ago
-
FishaHouse777
-
-
neonbunny
-
neonbunny:
"Also most scientists and people automatically debunk any evidence of spirituality because they are materialists "
We debunk them because they conflict with what we know to be true and lack a little thing called proof. This article has no journals, data or anything at all for that matter to back up its claims. You know why? Because none of the claims it makes are true. Your comment leads me to believe that you do not understand the philosophy of science very well.
"Materialism has stumped the scientific field from exploring the realm of spirituality"
That does not make any sense. Also,
"human consciousness or the placebo effect"
there is nothing spiritual about either of those.
- 2 years ago
-
neonbunny
-
-
ras_menelik
-
beliefs don't need proof(my god doesn't), this is proof on how things work with time there is a word for it evolution
this is proof of earth's evolution
face it we started to read and write as microbes not hominids and all creatures have evolved intelligently to make it to NOW despite the depth of time.
* ras_menelik
* 12 months agohttp://current.com/items/89598071_memories-may-be-stored-on-your-dna.htm#8959938...
- 2 years ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
GrinningSatyr
-
ras_menelik:
"beliefs don't need proof." Meaning that it's perfectly acceptable for me to believe that the fire spitting unicorns from heaven will descend upon us if we give too much money to charity? Sorry, no.
Also, not all animals have "evolved intelligently." A majority of all species that have ever existed have died out.
Learn shit.
- 2 years ago
-
GrinningSatyr
-
-
ras_menelik
-
-
that 90 % junk DNA is ...
- 2 years ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
Crystal_Moon
-
ras_menelik:
She was very good - she had a good way of detailing a complex subject so it could be understood by those of us without a scientific background. Thanks for posting that!
- 2 years ago
-
Crystal_Moon
-
-
Vierotchka
-
You ought to read "The Cosmic Serpent - DNA and the Origins of Knowledge" by Jeremy Narby, in which he posits that the shamans of the Amazon, through the use of Ayahuasca, communicate with the DNA of plants to learn from them which medical properties they have.
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
neonbunny
-
Vierotchka:
So he's mentally retarded then?
- 2 years ago
-
neonbunny
-
-
Vierotchka
-
-
Vierotchka:
Not at all, neonbunny - in fact, he is extremely intelligent and knowledgeable, a leading anthropologist, and probably has twice your IQ.
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
neonbunny
-
Vierotchka:
Alright I'm not taking 38 min out of my day to watch that video. Could you give me a short summary on how a human mind can communicate with a plants genome? Maybe I'm missing something here but the way you stated this makes it sound like a fairy tale.
- 2 years ago
-
neonbunny
-
-
FishaHouse777
-
Vierotchka:
Here's your short summary on how a mind can communicate with a plants genome, when your IQ is high enough and you change your thinking process (for example taking 38 minutes out of your busy day to watch a video for self-knowledge), you can access quantum levels of thinking. Quantum as in a plants genome that you just ingested containing the powerful hallucinogen DMT, thats the short summary. But if you want an even shorter summary obtain some pure Di-methyl Tryptamine and smoke a full bowl of it. Get back to me on that.
- 2 years ago
-
FishaHouse777
-
-
neonbunny
-
Vierotchka:
"for example taking 38 minutes out of your busy day to watch a video for self-knowledge"
I have 5 final exams in the next 2 weeks. I have enough self-knowledge priorities at the moment.
Your summary made no sense, I don't even know what you were trying to say.
- 2 years ago
-
neonbunny
-
-
02
-
Vierotchka:
I had a girl-friend who told about when she and her girl-friend smoked DMT at a concert. She said floated up to the roof of the place like balloons.
- 2 years ago
-
02
-
-
Vierotchka
-
Vierotchka:
"I have 5 final exams in the next 2 weeks."
Then why are you wasting so much time on Current? Shouldn't you be revising?
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
neonbunny
-
Vierotchka:
On it.
- 2 years ago
-
neonbunny
-
-
Crystal_Moon
-
Borg ants and wormhole DNA - fascinating. I can't believe human scientists are still so clueless as to believe that 90% of our DNA is "junk" just because they haven't figured out what it does. I so look forward to humans evolving.
- 2 years ago
-
Crystal_Moon
-
-
neonbunny
-
Crystal_Moon:
"I can't believe human scientists are still so clueless as to believe that 90% of our DNA is "junk" just because they haven't figured out what it does."
Your understanding of genetics is obviously limited.
- 2 years ago
-
neonbunny
-
-
02
-
Crystal_Moon:
DNA evolves too, of course. However, there are not that many branches. This is so because the different animals that are produced come from only slight variations of a very few segments we call Genes.
Visualize the frayed end of a long rope. Each little gene thread makes each of the animals and plants. Elephants, frogs, mold, eucalyptus, dust mites, chimps - and the chimp variant, humans (from the mutated 2nd chromosome). Importance has no special order. Giraffes, mullberry bushes, you can go on and on.
This one little wriggling worm-like molecule, DNA makes all these stupid animals that eat each other and are also each filled with an imbecilic self-centeredness that helps them strike a strong and enduring position in the world; - so that when natural disasters strike, not every thing will get killed off. There'll be little pieces of stupid, DNA reproducing stuff left to repopulate.
DNA's real job, apparently is eating rock.
Who knows? Maybe the 2nd chromosome mutation wasn't part of DNA's plan. Certainly we can guess the shock of those momma chimps when they had those first, ugly naked babies.
- 2 years ago
-
02
-
-
Crystal_Moon
-
Crystal_Moon:
Why yes, my understanding of gentics is limited. I have no scientific background whatsoever, as you so thoughfully pointed out, neonbunny.
02, thank you for your visual explanation to clarify.
One of my favorite movie quotes of all times sums up my understanding of what we - as the human race - knows about the world. I understand that some are smarter and some understand more than others, nonetheless, this applies to all of us:
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you'll know tomorrow. "
Yes, imagine what we'll know tomorrow.
- 2 years ago
-
Crystal_Moon
-
-
02
-
Crystal_Moon:
That's all I do.
- 2 years ago
-
02
-
-
neonbunny
-
Crystal_Moon:
Alright... sure. What I was pointing out was how you call scientists clueless based on something you read in an article that comes to retarded unscientific conclusions.
- 2 years ago
-
neonbunny
-
-
Crystal_Moon
-
Crystal_Moon:
I acknowledge that I lumped all scientists unfairly into one category, when I should have commented specificially about the scientist(s) that labeled 90% of DNA as "junk DNA". That is not the first time I've heard that term and even though my ability to effectively debate science fact is extremely low, even I, when I read that term used again, marveled at the limited nature of that comment. Because regardless of what any scientist knows, he or she should also be able to admit how much we still don't (know).
- 2 years ago
-
Crystal_Moon
-
-
thewallisgirl
-
Awesome post, I want to do more research on this.. this basically affirms what I do.. i'm a stress reduction specialist and our main tools are big Gongs tuned to planetary frequencies.
- 2 years ago
-
thewallisgirl
-
-
nanac
-
I find this article extremely informative and fascinating...This is a very good post..
- 2 years ago
-
nanac
-
-
ddelazan [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ddelazan [removed]
-
-
InformedTexan
-
ddelazan:
Please keep posting, hoot are you.
- 2 years ago
-
InformedTexan
