Obama’s War Speech Wins Over Some Skeptics
source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/us/politics/03poll.html?hpw
-
-
- current89
- added this
Margaret Gilbert, 62, a Democrat from Portsmouth, Va., told the same pollsters that she did not want the United States to send more troops to Afghanistan. But after listening to Mr. Obama, Ms. Gilbert now believes that he has no choice.
And Dave Cegledi, a 66-year-old independent from Olmsted Falls, Ohio, says he does not like Mr. Obama any more today than he did in November. But Mr. Cegledi thinks the president gave a good speech — good enough, indeed, that he might vote for him for re-election if the strategy for Afghanistan works.
Mr. Obama intended his speech on Tuesday at West Point to rally Americans behind his plan to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan and to set an 18-month timetable for starting a withdrawal. And interviews on Wednesday suggested that, while opinions on the war remained wildly diverse, Mr. Obama managed to persuade a significant number of people on both sides of the political aisle, though it was impossible to know how many.
Many Democrats who opposed the war said they now understood the need for escalation, in some cases to the point of supporting it. And Republicans who had thought Mr. Obama unwilling or unable to send more troops praised his decision, though many also criticized him for articulating a timetable for bringing troops home.
“I like the fact that he’s sending more troops,” said George Bronner, 45, a Republican from Knoxville, Tenn. “This speech does change my opinion about Obama, and it changes it for the better. I didn’t think he was going to step up to the plate and get more people over there.”
“Sending more troops is a very bad idea,” said Robert Labar, 60, a Democrat from Modesto, Calif. “But I know that the right guy is in the White House, and we just have to go along with what he wants to do.”
And there were several Democrats who said the president had convinced them of the need to dispatch more troops.
“I believe him; I trust him,” said Dianna Sampson, 60, a Democrat from Dayton, Ky., who a month ago said she wanted to reduce troop levels. “He met in a room with a lot of people, and this is what they came up with. It wasn’t just this idea out of the blue.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/us/politics/03poll.html?hpw
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, US Politics, World Politics, 7 more
-
- tags:
- US Politics, Afghanistan, President Obama, NATO
-
-
neocongo
-
WhiteNoise:
Your video has no off switch so I get to listen to it every time I come to this article. Did you mean it to be so intrusive?
- 2 years ago
-
neocongo
-
-
WhiteNoise
-
WhiteNoise:
oups...sorry..unintentional...let me correct it...
- 2 years ago
-
WhiteNoise
-
-
WhiteNoise
-
WhiteNoise:
There ya go ;)
- 2 years ago
-
WhiteNoise
-
-
resolute
-
WhiteNoise:
We need more people to publicize what they know like you have.
Very interesting. - 2 years ago
-
resolute
-
-
FishaHouse777
-
WhiteNoise:
Your videos are very informative and interesting, but they are nonetheless propaganda and twist facts around please do background checks on these videos before you just pull them off youtube and google video, even current videos are biased to some extent.
- 2 years ago
-
FishaHouse777
-
-
FishaHouse777
-
This war should of never started but i'm glad Obama is trying to end it soon. He knows we can't just pull out and that we can't stay there much longer, this plan seems like a good one to me i just hope it actually sticks and works.
- 2 years ago
-
FishaHouse777
-
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
FishaHouse777:
you seriously think america shouldnt have responded to the 9/11 attacks?
- 2 years ago
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
-
ScorpioGee
-
FishaHouse777:
To tell you the truth I'm beginning to think we shouldn't have gone in Afghanistan. Our main objective was to capture or kill Bin laden. (sp?) And the Military haven't completed that task in 9 years.
And don't say, " We did it to help the Afghani people from tyranny and to have an democracy put in place." That was an afterthought. The US gov does not care about the Afghan people. If the Military got Bin Laden we would have split that place.
- 2 years ago
-
ScorpioGee
-
-
ryan8566
-
FishaHouse777:
because bush and cheney diverted the troops and money to Iraq. this should have been over years ago, but now we pay the price.
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
FishaHouse777:
and i agree Afghanistan should've been the priority.
Iraq was doing a good job of keeping Iran on their toes.
- 2 years ago
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
-
JonRaymond
-
FishaHouse777:
Why do we have to bomb entire countries to go after a few terrorists? Do we bomb L.A. to stop gang violence?
Hello?
- 2 years ago
-
JonRaymond
-
-
jeffissleeping
-
hmm, how about convincing me that we can afford this war...there's a terrible, terrible taste in my mouth from all this...
- 2 years ago
-
jeffissleeping
-
-
shanklinmike
-
-
jeffissleeping:
I hope you research farther....Obama is a fraud....
- 2 years ago
-
shanklinmike
-
-
ryan8566
-
jeffissleeping:
jeff, i agree with you. we were told we would do this in two years for a few million by Bush. then he went to iraq and billions of dollars and 8 years later, thousands of needless deaths,etc.
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
shanklinmike
-
jeffissleeping:
"War is just one more big government program." ~Joseph Sobran
- 2 years ago
-
shanklinmike