Community | December 09, 2009 | 11 comments

Maddow smacks down Anti-Gay Profiteer,

source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640

indecisiveh
I love Rachel...

Rachel Maddow is quickly becoming the most trusted name in news and for good reason. Even among her peers at Air America she stood out as shining beacon of truth. She reports with such unselfish humility and unparalleled professionalism in away that commands respect rather than feeds her ego, as we can see from other talking heads that make up the landscape cable television news.

In this interview she exposes the anti-gay pseudo-science that contributes to such laws as the recent proposal in Uganda for capital punishment of homosexuality. She successfully shed light on the outright lies that Richard Coen and others push to the point that Coen, himself, actually agrees to take some things out of the book.

We need more people like Rachel Maddow bringing us our cable news.

What do you think?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Women,   LGBTQI
  2. tags:
    Gay,  Civil Rights,  Lesbian,  Uganda,  3 more
  3.     
    |

11 comments // Maddow smacks down Anti-Gay Profiteer,

  • bike10
  • ahappymintleaf
    • 0
      ahappymintleaf  

    • This is so painful. I don't think Richard Cohen is trying to harm anyone, but the extent of the damage he way do could be unprecedented. You can't tell him he's lying to himself, his wife, or anyone else. But believing that sexuality can change is like believing in a bad religion.

      Thank you Rachel Maddow for leading the charging in bringing awareness to the proposed atrocities happening overseas and attempting to shed light on the responsbilities of members of western culture.

      It would have been fair but perhaps fruitless to ask why he was motivated to "become straight". Had he ever had a healthy relationship with another man sexually? I can't believe he lists adoption as a reason why people are gay. I am so glad I never found his organization during my coming out process, even though I did look. I would be so miserable today.

    • 2 years ago
  • indecisiveh
  • ahappymintleaf
  • peterzylstramoore
  • indecisiveh
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  

    • I think she and the rest on MSNBC are completely in the bag for Barack Obama. Any credibility she had she lost during election 2008.

    • 2 years ago
  • indecisiveh
    • 0
      indecisiveh  
    • JohnA:

      It isn't fair at all to lump her in with the rest of them. She is clearly an independent journalist and intellectual powerhouse. Maybe they are bias towards civil rights, equality, and dethroning the republican party. So be it, I am too.

    • 2 years ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  
    • JohnA:

      So was Hillary. But no, the MSNBC bunch just had to have the Messiah, the one that would complete all their dreams. Even though he had no qualifications or experience to do it, which has been plainly be shown.

    • 2 years ago
  • indecisiveh
    • 0
      indecisiveh  
    • JohnA:

      Oh brother, I thought we squashed this argument when Hillary became secretary of state.

      Anyways Rachel didn't even start her show until long after the primaries are over.

      Do you prefer fox news over msnbc?

    • 2 years ago
  • JohnA
more from Community:
from the community

top videos