Major victory for ACORN and the Constitution
source: http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/12/12/acorn/index.html
-
-
- Future_America
- added this
Judge Gershon's opinion is a model of careful and dispassionate judicial reasoning. Rejecting the DOJ's claim that Congress had merely exercised its funding discretion rather than "punished" ACORN, the court wrote: "Wholly apart from the vociferous comments by various members of Congress as to ACORN's criminality and fraud . . . no reasonable observer could suppose that such severe action would have been taken in the absence of a conclusion that misconduct occurred." The court pointed to numerous statements made by Senators, including the bill's primary sponsor (Sen. Johanns), in which they anointed themselves judge and jury to declare ACORN guilty of crimes with which they had not even been charged, let alone convicted. Relying on Lovett -- which held unconstitutional a Congressional act banning specified individuals from government employment based on the unadjudicated finding that they had "subversive beliefs" and "subversive associations" -- Judge Gershon explained that under clear Supreme Court law: "the discretionary nature of government funding does not foreclose a finding that Congress has impermissibly singled out plaintiffs for punishment."
-
- groups:
- Community, US Politics, Law
-
- tags:
- Constitution, ACORN, victory
-
-
Dagum
-
Our constitution says we should provide tax breaks and public funding to groups that turn thirteen year old illegal aliens into prostitutes. God Bless America!
- 2 years ago
-
Dagum
-
-
kennymotown
-
Dagum:
Wa, wa, wa!
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
timetide
-
sweet. maybe now people can start thinking about the "controversy" instead of respewing the 30 second clip on fox news.
- 2 years ago
-
timetide
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
timetide:
Maybe the "controvesy" should have been resolved before they get any more of our hard earned tax dollars.
- 2 years ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
timetide
-
timetide:
by the illegal violation of our constitution? a contracts a contract, unless it had an at-will clause our country is legally and constitutionaly bound to honor it. Especialy when it can be proven that the severence of the contract was in retribution over an incidnt where only one side of the story was plunged down our throats by fox, and anybody who disagrees with their version of the story is and idiot sheeple who supports child rape.
- 2 years ago
-
timetide
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
timetide:
Please show me where exactly it says in the constitution any of the things you have mentioned.
- 2 years ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
2hellnwait
-
Anything to perpetuate the deception that 'Acorn' is a worthy and honorable public service organization.
What focking joke on Americans, along with the fools who support this piece of shit deception. . . - 2 years ago
-
2hellnwait
-
-
Ihatethemall
-

-
I know my constitution says that we should continue to fund acorn.....WTF
- 2 years ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
jubal
-
Bravo.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
nanac
-
December was a very good month for ACORN.......This is a victory for America's poor...Good Post!
- 2 years ago
-
nanac
-
-
kennymotown
-
Yes indeed a great day for freedom. If we used the standards that the Republicans tried to use in defunding ACORN many defense and other contractors would be out of work.
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
