Corporations Are Persons, Gitmo Detainees Aren't. Welcome To Our Brave New World.
source: http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/corporations-are-persons-gitmo-detain
-
-
- kennymotown
- added this
-
- groups:
- Community
-
-
phillyphil
-
peeps are fighting the fight against corporate rule in the legal realm.
corporate personhood has to go! there is a push to amend the consititution and create a ground swell of popular demand.
i work for a related collective and i think that there are some real possibilities with their game plan. give a look, yo!
- 2 years ago
-
phillyphil
-
-
kennymotown
-
phillyphil:
Are you willing to fight for it? We have got to stand for those fighting this madness.
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
Commentor
-
@vierotchka The average person who has a 401k for a retirement plan has little choice as to where the money is invested. Think about Retired people whose money is in mutual funds which makes them share holders.
Do you think they should be punished for the Rogue CFO?
- 2 years ago
-
Commentor
-
-
Vierotchka
-
I would never buy shares in a corporation whose activities are basically criminal. Those who invest in such corporations are tainted by the same crimes. I have on many occasions preferred to remain dirt-poor and unemployed rather than accept to work in a corporation whose activities are criminal or harmful to humanity - such as the weapons industry. It all boils down to a matter of personal choices and morals.
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
cztheday
-
V, yes you COULD halt a corporation's activities. Let's go back to that 5,000 employee corporation and the CFO fraud...but let's say that the corporation is large enough to take the 20 million dollar hit and struggle onward. With me so far?
OK, but the 20 million hit devalues shares, so there is a shareholder suit against the corporation and a criminal indictment against it for fraud. The judge rules against it and orders it to cease operations for two years...OK?
Who gets hurt? Well, all the shareholders, right? Whether they are big institutions like pension funds or little old ladies on fixed incomes. The value of the shares is going to drop like a stone to less than a penny a share. A corporation that does not operate has only the value of whaever its property can be sold for...which is usually a very tiny fraction of a corporation's value. Most of that value is anticipated revenues.
Who else? Well, all of the 5,000 employees, of course. The corporation MIGHT be able to pay them for a month or two before they run out of cash...but that's it. A corporation that is not making any revenues cannot pay employees...including those innocent secretaries, janitors, or even the whole marketing department as in my preceding example.
Who else? Well, all of the vendors that provide goods, services or raw materials to that coporation. No money to pay them. In some cases, as in specialty parts, a vendor may only have ONE client...those vendors will, of course go out of business/bankrupt in a few months, more than likely.
Now about the corporation going back into business in two years? Let's say they were really successful and had 20% of the market for whatever their goods or services were. What happens to that market share when they cease operations? I can guarantee you that their customers are NOT going to wait two years to obtain whatever they got from that corporation. WIthin 30 days they will have gone to competitors. And two years later do you really think they will just leave those competitors and go back to the corporation that was their original supplier --- and that just served a two-year criminal sentence.
No. You either kill the corporation or you don't...because ceasing their operations is the same thing.
One thing I have learned in the law. If you think you have a simple solution, you have probably not thought through the ramifications thoroughly enough. I always have to ask myself...OK what are the most likely consequences of whatever course of action I take here. It is a lot like chess. The best players are always thinking ten moves ahead...
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
tomofnorthcal
-
DId you know that a corporation can be executed for breaking the law? However, the law or DOJ or FTC or etc. can't seem to fairly punish any corporation now and for decades.
- 2 years ago
-
tomofnorthcal
-
-
cztheday
-
...and even the upper echelons of the corporation are (very) often unaware of the criminality. I have seen a variation of the following scenario many times. The Chief Financial Officer is cooking the books of the corporation so that each month he can send two million dollars to his account in the Cayman Islands. In ten months he has amassed 20 million, and one day he just doesn't show up for work. The corporation cannot take a 20 million dollar hit and goes under. All of the shareholders are thus burned and sue on the basis of fraud (among other causes of action).
I depose the Chief Marketing Officer and his staff (individually, of course). They seem, even under rigorous questioning to be genuinely baffled. Of course they are. Do you really think the CFO was going to walk over to the Marketing department and say, "Attention everyone! Just so you know, I am ripping off our shareholders blind and in the process jeopardizing all of your careers. That will be all." Of course not. Now, I am not saying that is always the scenario -- but it is one of the most common ones...do we send the marketing department to jail? Even the Chief, if he had no idea what was happening...and is himself out of a job with a resume that lists a corporation of "questionable reputation?"
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
Vierotchka
-
cztheday:
Which is why corporate personhood is a big mistake.
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
Vierotchka
-
cztheday:
In cases like this, it is not the corporation which has broken any laws, it is not a corporate policy or ation. On the other hand, Union Carbide should be held fully accountable for the thousands of deaths it caused in Bhopal because of its money-saving policies and actions there, and suffer the same sentences an individual would for being directly responsible for many deaths.
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
cztheday
-
cztheday:
V, I concur that the corporation should be held accountable...but I am afraid the example/hypothetical still stands. You can sue the corporation for billions of dollars (SEE, eg, Exxon Valdez). But then you have to go after the specific human beings within the corporation -- and any agents they may have hired -- who were responsible for the negligence or even intentional harm.
Again, it is simply not fair to sue the receptionist for a decision made by the Chief Operating Officer or some dipshit chemical containment supervisor for THEIR negligence. Punish the corporation by making it pay because that is the only way you can hurt a paper entity and then punish the specific humans -- there may be one guy or ten guys or a hundred guys...get 'em all (trust me, I have done this) and then let the chips fall.
If the corporation can struggle on after the payment, why is that a bad thing if the compensation and fines are acceptable to the bereaved and the government? The innocent workers should not be turned out on the street because some asshole(s) in the company or affiliated with the company screwed up and killed people. But the latter -- whoever and however many -- should face prison time so they can consider what they have done...in the UC case, they should consider for a LONG time...
Capisce?
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
artemis6
-
cztheday:
Dear cztheday , This subject is not my area of expertise , and I respect your opinion or I wouldn't ask . This is a subject if interest to me , so please set me straight if i have misunderstood the situation . Are you saying that lawsuits are the only form of law enforcement a corporation has to deal with ? If I break the law , the authorities will investigate and haul me off . It seems there is no equivalent for corporations . Or the ones that exist have no teeth . Am I mistaken ?
- 2 years ago
-
artemis6
-
-
Vierotchka
-
cztheday, one could "jail" a corporation by halting its activities/sales for the number of years a prison sentence would last.
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
cztheday
-
Corporations ARE held legally accountable for their actions. I sue them every day...and my corporate clients are sued as well (though of course THEY never lose...OK I deserved that eye roll...). You can't put a corporation in jail (unless you really think jailing all 5,000 employees of a corporation that has done something wrong makes sense when we all know that the secretaries, janitors, copy asstants, mailroom clerks, etc, etc had nothing to do with the wrongdoing nor even had any knowledge it was happening), but I have sent officers and directors to jail.
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
cztheday
-
I guess I am a little confused by some of this debate. Corporations have been legally considered "persons" for many decades now...since before I was born, in fact, and I am like...um...seasoned. They don't have ALL the rights real persons have...and they never will. But that is the basis of the word Corp-oration (as in "corpus" (the body), corpse, etc)... Furthermore, most businesses (large and itty bitty) in this country -- which in turn provide nearly all of the country's jobs -- are incorporated.
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
Vierotchka
-
cztheday:
Corporations should also be held legally accountable for their actions, just like persons, and be subjected to the same sentences if they break the law - including capital punishment.
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
cztheday:
V, how? kill every share holder for the crimes of the board? id look at your 401k before your willing to die for shares you own.
- 2 years ago
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
-
kennymotown
-
cztheday:
Corporations have more rights than you or me, can they not out live you or me, or if they accidentally make a product that kills 10 people who gets the chair? I have much more ridiculous examples, and can show you that corporations are the main problem that is intertwined in the fall of capitalism. Corporate tax for one, it was at it's high in the 30's at around 35% and now it's at around 7% when you consider that startling fact and they still demand infrastructure (Police, courts, educated employee's, roads) It's gotten completely out of hand and the people who do the work get hosed.
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
It isnt only the Gitmo detainees that arent considered people. None of us are. We are nothing more than pawns in their little game to make them richer and richer. They help corrupt the system that is supposed to protect us from them. The politicians are as bad as the corporations. They allow it to happen so they can line their own pockets.
How many of you trust what your politicians tell you? They will pass a healthcare bill that most of you folks wanted and now many of you are unhappy with because of various reasons. { I dont blame you} They sold you out. I have seen a few say its better than nothing. Is that the best you have. I am not for a heathcare bill but if I was I certainly wouldnt be one of them saying...its better than nothing. Is that why you voted for change? I dont think so. No one should have to settle for...its better than nothing....when you voted for something far greater than that. The corporations AND politicians can only get away with what we the people let them. And we let them get away with murder, figuratively and literally in some cases.
Welcome to our brave New World {Order} indeed.
- 2 years ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
SleepDirt
-
-
Ihatethemall:
Mall
I can't disagree on any of the above points.
BTW, those that support the bill do so for tactical political reasons, ie: if it doesn't pass it's even worse for Democrats in 2010.
OTOH, I believe those that ardently oppose it do so on principal and not because of party politics since this is no more than another massive corporate bailout and such a costly one that it precludes the possibility of properly revisiting health reform for another decade if not more. What's more, the actual benefit to the people who have to pay for it, the middle class taxpayer, is so marginal that it would be laughable if it were not so tragic.
The health care system is broken, Obama campaigned on fixing it, which doesn't at all reflect the expected outcome. Yet war funding goes through the Senate like chestnuts through a goose with the expected slab of pork attached.My observation is that 'corporatism', the regime that we all live with today, is literally the polite contemporary expression for 'fascism'.
These corps that determine virtually, if not literally *all* policy-making, foreign and domestic, are multi-nationals who shop around for the lowest corporate taxes and fly the flag of month (see Halliburton moves head office to Dubai) while receiving the benefits of the largesse of taxpayers. ie: corporate welfare.
They have taken power in the White house, the Congress, the media and the Pentagon/security complex and they aren't about to let go.As for the health reform issue, I agree. It's a sell-out, to say the least.
There is more than ample evidence that Obama and Emanuel never had any intention of obtaining a public option clause, without which this bill is simply not 'reform' in any significant way.http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2009/12/16/white_house/index.h...
This corporate personhood status needs to be challenged and campaign finance law needs a major overhaul. Neither seem likely.
- 2 years ago
-
SleepDirt
-
-
Ihatethemall
-
Ihatethemall:
This corporate personhood status needs to be challenged and campaign finance law needs a major overhaul. Neither seem likely.-----------Couldnt agree with you any more bud. and on many of the other issues you pointed out too.
Darn, we agreed on something. COOOOOOL
- 2 years ago
-
Ihatethemall
-
-
phillyphil
-
Ihatethemall:
peeps are fighting the fight against corporate rule in the legal realm.
i work for a related collective and i think that there are some real possibilities with their game plan. give a look, yo!
- 2 years ago
-
phillyphil
-
-
phillyphil
-
-
corporate personhood is the real problem behind our ills
- 2 years ago
-
phillyphil
-
-
kennymotown
-
phillyphil:
I agree and there are groups fighting to end it in court.
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
SleepDirt
-
phillyphil:
Good post.
Corporate personhood and it's evil twin, campaign finance law, are least likely to undergo reform.With eight known Family members sitting in the US Senate (and likely more yet to be outed, plus there are numerous Republicans), that equates to nearly 14% of the Democrats in the US Senate who are being routinely portrayed as 'moderate' Democrats in the media, but who are in fact right-wing religious conservatives, all of them occasional residents of the Family's C Street house.
The list includes Nelson, Stupak, Skelton, McIntyre, Tanner, Davis, Boren, Shuler.
So far.I don't believe most people appreciate what kind of threat this secretive conservative Christian movement poses for democracy, especially when they increasingly dominate the Democratic Party.
It should be noted that this is not a recent phenomenon since the Family (insiders also refer to it as the Christian Mafia) was founded in 1935, according to Jeff Sharlet.
- 2 years ago
-
SleepDirt
-
-
artemis6
-
I hope they will come to realize many of us tried to stop the madness and , that the true evil , is the combined corporate power structures of military and finance that hold us all prisoner . There are good people all over the world . This greed and fear mind poison divides us . United we will defeat them . We may be closer than we think .
- 2 years ago
-
artemis6
-
-
kennymotown
-
artemis6:
I sure hope so!
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
artemis6
-
artemis6:
For this same reason , the people of the U.S. should not allow the government to attack Iran . The good people did rise up . They know their enemy . It is the same with us . Any attack should be military/corporate targets only . We should be very selective and careful . Corporate minions have been itching for us to attack Iran . They must not let them get their way .
- 2 years ago
-
artemis6
-
-
kennymotown
-
This is absolutely incredible, we are living in a topsy turvy world for sure now!
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
nanac
-
Numerous Americans think that these barbaric practices will keep us safe, however we are only creating more enemies.......Most of the people that we detained and tortured, were innocent victims......They were as young as eleven, and as old as ninety two.....Good post
- 2 years ago
-
nanac
-
-
kennymotown
-
nanac:
It is another reason for the rest of the world to hate us.
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown
-
-
nanac
-
nanac:
You would hate too, if someone invaded your Country, stole your natural resources, and killed your family...........
- 2 years ago
-
nanac
-
-
kennymotown
-
Here is the funny thing, many people will go along with this decision as if there is nothing peculiar about it! I am enjoying the ride to the bottom for capitalism and it's corporate handlers.
- 2 years ago
-
kennymotown