Community | December 19, 2009 | 118 comments

Army general in Iraq issues pregnancy ban

Image
SleepDirt
The Army general of U.S. forces in Northern Iraq has banned pregnancy among military personnel in his command, NBC News reported on Friday.

Anyone who becomes pregnant or impregnates another servicemember, including married couples assigned to the same unit, could face a court-martial and jail time, according to an order issued by Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo.

More...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Orwellian Nightmare,   Military,   Police State
  2. tags:
    update
  3.     
    |

118 comments // Army general in Iraq issues pregnancy ban

  • ryan8566
  • good_stuff
    • 0
      good_stuff  
    • Seems justifiable. We just need to give them the option to either 1) pay back everything we paid them during basic training, or 2) get rid of the baby.

      The men still have the option to go out and find a nice afgahn/iraqi woman to knock up though. Women kinda get screwed here, but hey there is always a private contractor you can go work for.

    • 2 years ago
  • iknew
    • 0
      iknew  
    • It makes sense... in some weird way.. Like, you can't tell people what to do, but they're soldiers, full docillity is expected..

    • 2 years ago
  • JustJ0hny
    • 0
      JustJ0hny  
    • I can understand where the general is coming from: During the gulf war, I was stationed with an Armor battalion in Germany. The support battalion that shared our base had an explosion of pregnancy's at the start of the war, preventing the unit from being deployable. These were doctors and nurses who were needed in Kuwait, all of whom had signed a contract stating that they would give their lives for our country.
      This is comparable to the soldier who shoots himself in the foot to get sent home, an act of cowardice in the face of adversity.

      I say Kudo's General Cucolo, I salute you.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nettle
    • 0
      Nettle  
    • I asked my mom about this who was in the army when she became pregnant with me and she said that if a woman wanted to escape the sexual harassment and threats of rape from superior officers, one option was to get pregnant. She got preggers on accident, but it is true that women do it.

      I think the punishment is a bad idea. It's sexist by not punishing the soldier who fathered the kid (it takes two) and it's going to encourage risky abortions in unsafe areas of the world.

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
  • libertyforall
    • 0
      libertyforall  
    • Good policy, but the punishment is too harsh. When you are a soldier overseas, your #1 priority is being ready for the mission. If you are a women who is getting knocked up then you aren't going to be mission ready.

      Sucks because everyone needs a release over there, which is why the punishment should be less. The military needs to be mass passing out condoms though because people will not stop having sex.

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
  • navider
  • madjik68
  • Minus5scenePoints
  • SleepDirt
  • extracrazykiwi2008
  • ScorpioGee
    • 0
      ScorpioGee  
    • PhillyPhil: "...Its as if you sign up for the military and you relinquish all rights to be a human. The army is basically taking ownership over woman's sexuality and the right to become a mother. you sign up, you have no more will or rights. but i guess that's nothing new...."

      Hit the nail on the head. Once you sign the dotted line to become a solder male or female you're a indentured servant of the US military (or any country's military) until your dead, severely injured, retired, or dishonorably/honorably discharged. IMO I don't know how any woman or man could get aroused enough in the battle field to have sex. I could understand if they're on a base in Germany or Japan but Iraq?! It would be such a mood killer for me.

      Aside for that one guy on Real Time W/ Bill Mar--and I'm sorry I can't grasp his name-- I'm surprise NO one in the mass media is talking about the frighteningly zealous way the military is pushing religion--mostly Christianity that is very liberal--onto privates.

      I know solders don't have rights like regular US citizens, they should have the right to choose what they believe.

      But when a general is telling his solders that they have a divine right to fight against people who've been using Islam as the sole reason to fight opposing countries with different religious backgrounds, is treading onto a very dangerous territory.

      It's like a ticking time bomb attached to a nuclear warhead.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • Image
    • ScorpioGee:

      "Aside for that one guy on Real Time W/ Bill Mar--and I'm sorry I can't grasp his name-- I'm surprise NO one in the mass media is talking about the frighteningly zealous way the military is pushing religion--mostly Christianity that is very liberal--onto privates."

      Do you refer to Jeff Sharlet?

      http://www.jeffsharlet.com/

      Max Blumenthal does some good reporting on this issue as well.

    • 2 years ago
  • iamwilliamhello
    • 0
      iamwilliamhello  
    • All of the emotions put aside, I feel like I/we have to ask the fundamental question: do service persons on combat deployments have the right to impregnate/become impregnated? I asked two of my friends that were deployed and both responded, "the rules were no sex period, technically*." If these are the rules should there be a punishment for breaking them? Should the rules be changed? Are there any solutions out there for the increased workload for the other members in the unit?

      I'm interested in any kind of feedback, apart from the "you liberal shithead/you neocon motherfucker" response.

    • 2 years ago
  • vernajr
  • MotherForTruth
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • vernajr:

      I have no problem with that so long as he can verify he is pregnant or otherwise unable to function as a soldier.

      At any rate, the punishment is way too harsh. I view it as a political attack on women and their place in the military, which is fast becoming predominantly evangelical including much of the top brass (can you say Petreaus?).

      ie: 'no women, no pregnant soldier problems', much like 'no homos, no morality conflicts'.

      Religious fundamentalism and women (substitute gays here) don't like each other too much. The military is not exactly a bastion of tolerance.

      See my post: 'The Original Sin' on Current.

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • @mojojuju,
      Your comment "maybe vasectomies are just what the military needs these days" is outrageous.
      Women have a right to join military, women have a right to have sex and have children, but men should have vasectomies? This is called misandry.

    • 2 years ago
  • Cynic2
  • royulery
  • sedgleyoss
    • 0
      sedgleyoss  
    • royulery:

      I actually know this one. If a baby is born during a war in Iraq then they are both an Iraqi citizen as well as an American citizen as long as the mother is American. It goes by place of birth then by the mother's country of origin or country for which she has applied for citizenship.

    • 2 years ago
  • smallgod
  • common_sense_please
    • 0
      common_sense_please  
    • Geez people its 2009 not 1949. There is absolutely no reason to be pregnant or get pregnant if you don't want to--and there is no reason to bring abortion or sterilization into the picture either.

      Seriously you can have sex all you want and not get pregnant--it's called masturbation. That or if you must include a live partner use one of the several forms of birth control that are legal and easily accessible like birth control pills, condoms, or trying to find a private roomy spot to even have sex in a full barracks with only twin bed cots--and that's if your an officer--otherwise its probably a blanket in a tent.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • A simple solution would be to have abortion clinics in each military base. Alternatively, it should be a requirement for all soldiers - male and female - to be sterilized upon joining the military.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ihatethemall
  • lordsbassman
  • smallgod
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • Vierotchka:

      WOW
      You consider this to be better solution? This solution is clearly civil rights violation. Or in your mind sterilization of men is ok but court-martial of pregnant woman is not ok? Your solution appears to be misandry.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • Vierotchka:

      MotherForTruth - what in "Alternatively, it should be a requirement for all soldiers - male and female - to be sterilized upon joining the military." expresses misandry, according to you?

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
  • dwb2585
    • 0
      dwb2585  
    • wtf?! What's next? THe SAME thing for the American people in the name of climate control? I feel "pregnancy bans" will become more common in the near future.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • I can see the toilet seat and doorknob arguments winding up as we speak.

      This has proved to be a problem in the past in the Navy though, where support ships spent long periods of high danger the pregnancy rate skyrocketed. Sometime folks just need to celebrate still being alive I guess. They're probably only going to prosecute this though if they can prove a soldier purposely got pregnant to avoid duty.

    • 2 years ago
  • desertcat
    • 0
      desertcat  
    • Good for the major. Everyone screams about abortion and the killing of innocents but what about the pregnant soldier putting a innocent into danger. Any one pregnant should of been sent stateside right away. As a former WAC I am all for women fighting alongside her male soldiers and gay soldiers but not pregnant.

    • 2 years ago
  • jewbot
    • 0
      jewbot  
    • It's pretty obvious that women and couples shouldn't be getting pregnant and makin' babies while on duty/on tour/in combat. You can't serve effectively if you're having morning sickness and facing possibly more complications of pregnancy. Plus the psychological stress having a child puts on you detracts your attention from all else. I mean, having babies while on duty is just a bad idea, right? No brainer.
      However, I think this policy is going about the problem in the wrong way. Jail time and a court martial for getting pregnant? Come on. Just send them home. And really, if this is becoming such a problem that they have to come up with a penalty for it, shouldn't they start combating the problem at its source? Prevention not punishment, people!
      I don't know much about the military's sexual conduct policies (besides DADT) but it would be completely unreasonable if the authorities expected all servicemen and women to abstain completely from sex for their entire time abroad, especially if they're married couples in the same unit. People have sex! It's a fact of life, it's human nature. I'm sure most of these servicemembers have enough common sense to not want to have a baby until they get home, but I'm sure they also need and want to have sex just like any other normal person. Make contraceptives available to them! Don't be so lacking in common sense and wisdom as to expect that every single soldier is going to be celibate for months and possibly years at a time! Maybe in an ideal world people would be able to abstain for indefinite periods, but this is the real world, and the military authorities need to start living in it.

    • 2 years ago
  • smallgod
  • EmperorThan
    • 0
      EmperorThan  
    • Ahem, bullshit. The military already has a protocol you can't just make shit up that is courtmartialable that you want to.

      This general just gets his jollies off knowing he's preventing people from having sex. Seen shit like this happen FAR TO MANY TIMES in Oklahoma where I live.

    • 2 years ago
  • smallgod
    • 0
      smallgod  
    • EmperorThan:

      wtf are you talking about? Do you live on a military base? What does 'seeing this in Oklahoma' have to do with army personnel on duty in a war? That was one of the worst analogies I've ever heard.

    • 2 years ago
  • KI4CLZ
    • 0
      KI4CLZ  
    • You can get your ass court marshaled for getting pregnant on a ship at sea... see the PBS documentary "Carrier"...

      this is nothing new...

      You beez gubment prop-o-tee....

      You're in the Army Now!

      ... and Jane Wyman in this film is... WOW... Amazing...

    • 2 years ago
  • common_sense_please
    • 0
      common_sense_please  
    • I will say it is equally applied because anyone who impregnates another gets the court martial/jail time as well.

      That and honestly its a war zone--its no place giving birth or dealing with morning sickness or trying to figure out how to deal with becoming a mother. And if you are a man you have to start worrying about how you are going to support a child or tell your wife or girlfriend or extended family back home you are expecting a child...but the even bigger picture is it sucks to go out every day and put your life on the line to fight a war--its really unfair to ask soldiers to do that carrying the added burden of a unborn or newborn child they will be leaving behind without one parent or the other (or both) if they get killed.

    • 2 years ago
  • Vierotchka
  • Commentor
  • phillyphil
    • 0
      phillyphil  
    • maybe we shouldnt be at war, then these bogus false choices would rectify themselves... another stupid policy in a failed war.

      its as if you sign up for the military and you relinquish all rights to be a human. the army is basically taking ownership over women's sexuality and the right to become a mother. you sign up, you have no more will or rights. but i guess thats nothing new....

    • 2 years ago
  • Commentor
  • phillyphil
    • 0
      phillyphil  
    • phillyphil:

      so we should always follow unjust laws? what happened to dissent and moral discourse? i hope that there are still military people out there that remember its ok to question what is behind some of the "legal" orders handed down.

      sir, yes, sir.

    • 2 years ago
  • ryan8566
  • bombastinator
  • SleepDirt
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • A person should decide to start a family and have children or be in combat but not both at the same time. Solder or a mother?

      Also women want gender equality? Here it is.

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • If they expect people to go without sex , this is going to be way bad for morale ..... It flies in the face of human nature .

    • 2 years ago
  • DEM46
    • 0
      DEM46  
    • This will not fly. Anyone remember when the Marine Commandant banned Marines from getting married? It's funny how the military (I was a member for over 14 years between active duty & ANG) is a very religious organization (overwhelmingly christian) and would even consider this blasphemy! LOL.

      You'll see a retraction soon.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
  • Logos51891
  • Daisy909
    • 0
      Daisy909  
    • I support that there shouldn't be pregnant women on the field, but to court-martial them and the men that impregnated them? That is ridiculous! But give it to the military to come up with a "genius" plan like that...

    • 2 years ago
  • pukemnukem
    • 0
      pukemnukem  
    • Ummm this is really nothing new. My last command basically did this mainly because we couldn't get 10% of our women to finish a 6 month deployment without getting pregnant.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
  • Theekshani
  • Kontents
    • 0
      Kontents  
    • You guys need to chill and think about why they decided to do this. If you had people sign up to the military only to get pregnant or impregnate another soldier and then have to leave because of safety reasons you are loosing people. I mean how hard is it to either have safe sex or not have sex with soldiers while serving. This implies that you are not in the service for a fun ride, but you are there to serve your country. Pretty logical.

    • 2 years ago
  • JonRaymond
  • Guyatthebusstation
  • illinoisemaker
  • craigsaid
  • MotherForTruth
  • extblues
    • 0
      extblues  
    • The effectiveness of this policy is going to hinge upon what the military is willing to do to keep women in uniform from getting pregnant in the first place. Are they going to promote contraception or are they going take the easy way out by preaching endlessly about abstinence and "personal responsibility" being the preferred method for keeping soldiers, sailors, Marines, and airmen/women from rounding third base and heading for home?

      And, as was mentioned in an earlier post, what happens in cases of rape? As much as the armed forces try to deal with the problem of sexual harassment and exploitation in their respective ranks (...and move past the scandals of "Tailhook", Aberdeen Proving Grounds and the Air Force Academy), the facts suggests that it can never be eliminated completely.

      Frankly the policy strikes me as being an unnecessarily harsh for something that has been happening since men and women started serving together as relative equals since the mid '80's. Along with the arguments for keeping qualified personnel who happen to be homosexuals from serving in the military , the justification for putting a woman in a stockade just for getting pregnant is going to be hard to justify fully.

    • 2 years ago
  • starlightblue
    • 0
      starlightblue  
    • I would not want to be responsible for innocent unborn children in the middle of a war zone in Iraq. If the punishment seems ill fitting then consider a free trip home is not fair to the unit as a whole.

    • 2 years ago
  • Progresshiv
  • bombastinator
  • cztheday
  • Progresshiv
  • liberalelitealien
  • calm_incense
    • 0
      calm_incense  
    • liberalelitealien:

      The obvious reason why this ban was introduced was because women were apparently becoming pregnant as an excuse to leave duty. If desertion can face a court-martial and jail time, then pregnancy, as an equivalent to desertion, can't simply go unchecked.

      Basically, if you were a guy, who had no choice but to stay, but if you were a female, you could get pregnant and legally take a medical leave, which isn't exactly fair.

      This is more of a deterrent against a desertion method than it is a "punishment" for becoming pregnant.

      But MotherForTruth is correct that this adds an additional incentive for women to falsify rape accusations so as to avoid charges.

    • 2 years ago
  • Guyatthebusstation
    • 0
      Guyatthebusstation  
    • liberalelitealien:

      easy, why would you want an expecting mother to be in combat? Simply said, you don't. With a finite number of troops and an ever declining enrollment rate, what are the generals options to generate a more constant warrior base? create a negative incentive to ensure a soilder shows up for duty when they are expected. how i see it, it holds women to the same standard as men, equal treatment. a man doesn't get extended time off for a new born.

    • 2 years ago
  • craigsaid
    • 0
      craigsaid  
    • liberalelitealien:

      Or maybe we shouldn't be in a situation that demands we treat our troops like this. I pledge allegiance to the Karzai of the united states of Iraq. And to the corporation for which it stands one nation under Fox with liberty and justice for the rich.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
  • Guyatthebusstation
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • liberalelitealien:

      "I pledge allegiance to the Karzai of the united states of Iraq. And to the corporation for which it stands one nation under Fox with liberty and justice for the rich."

      Ha! Um...*ZING*!
      Let's get the fuggoutathere and start the healing. There are few tough decades ahead as it is.

    • 2 years ago
  • Future_America
  • Commentor
  • boywhocould
  • viva_canuks
  • CarlosIsDown
  • bombastinator
  • mojojuju
  • lordsbassman
  • ryan8566
  • MotherForTruth
  • nhall6
  • MotherForTruth
  • CuteBruiser
  • KSirys
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • MotherForTruth:

      Here is the Rape report statistics:

      1) The U.S. Air Force studied 556 rape accusations in 1985, 60% of all allegations were found to be false. Of those women who later recanted, many didn't admit the allegation was false until just before taking a polygraph test. Others admitted it was false only after having failed a polygraph test.

      2) In a nine-year rapes reported to the police in a Midwestern city, Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin reported that in 41% - 50 % of the cases the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred. These false allegations appear to serve three major functions for the complainants: providing an alibi, seeking revenge, and obtaining sympathy and attention. False rape allegations are reported in similar numbers at college campuses; approximately 50% of rape charges are admitted to be false by the accuser.

      3) According to a 1996 Department of Justice report, “in about 25% of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI, ... the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing. It should be noted that rape involves a forcible and non-consensual act, and a DNA match alone does not prove that rape occurred. So the 25% figure substantially underestimates the true extent of false allegations.

      Also for more info
      http://www.falserape.net/

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • MotherForTruth:

      @KSirys,
      What is your point? Are Gay rights and Racism more important then Falsely Accused and Incarcerated in this country? Please educate yourself for your children sake. As I learn more and more about Judicial System in America my concern for my young children (both boy and a girl) is growing. I choose to be proactive to create TRUE GENDER EQUILITY for my children and yours. What do you stand for?

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • MotherForTruth:

      I stand for the same thing you do and believe in True Gender Equality as well, but to bash women on every other post is not needed. You seem to take it to another level every single time.

      I didn't say you needed to educate yourself when I made my comment, but if you feel you need to attack that way, sure... I'll go read a book. I'll just say the same thing next time I see you attack women in general when making a statement.

      Not every single woman out there cries rape. Yet you seem to think they all do though..

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • MotherForTruth:

      @KSirys,
      The Judicial system in America has become extremely pro-women. As such many women will not turn down the opportunity for a financial, circumstantial or any other GAIN.
      There is no woman bashing on my part. In my opinion given preferential treatment to any gender, race, sexual orientation, or nationality would create beneficial opportunity for corrupt personal gain. I call to fix Judicial System and removal of Media bashing of men as it provides corrupt benefits to women.

    • 2 years ago
  • Incredulous
    • 0
      Incredulous  
    • MotherForTruth:

      Yes, MFT, but this post was NOT about rape...it was about pregnancy in the military, and as KSirys stated, you have a tendency to read everything through your own heavily biased lens...not saying I might not be tempted to do the same thing were your history my history, but what you are doing tends to make people less, rather than more interested in what you have to say.

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • MotherForTruth:

      Why does everything have to be about rape for you ? This post is not about that . Can you not think of anything else ? As a survivor , I feel you do a disservice . It has been my experience that , some people fear the concept of rape SO much , they cannot admit the possibility , that , it did , in fact happen , even in the face of solid evidence . Do you have any idea how hard people like you , make it for a truly injured and suffering person to come forward ? It is this very belief that a rapist is innocent , that allows so many to go free and assault others . I do not really think you will ever see your place in this . It just reminds me of the "blame the victim" mentality that brings so much more suffering into the world . Maybe you just really wish someone you love wasn't accused of rape , and are trying to convince yourself ...... That is what I , suspect .

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • MotherForTruth:

      @artemis6,
      You have no idea what you are talking about. I have ability for critical thinking and I am not interested in chatting on the internet. I have researched every aspect of the issues I am commenting on and I understand gender issues in America. I hope your brother or your son or maybe you should never become another number in the statistics of abused men who is not taken seriously or a father who is falsely accused of molesting his child, or your son who is a dropout from school just because our education model is promoting education for girls and completely ignoring boys, or a father will suffer because his wife will go free after brutally murdering their children simply because she is a woman.
      I am not interested in convincing the ignorant. I am sure there are people who will not agree with my point of view and no one is forced to read my comments or respond to my comments or posts. But please do not attempt to analyze my views or my personality. And next time you see violence against men by women on TV, in your life or lives of those around you please remember gender equality is when men and women are treated equally with respect and gender equality does not only apply to women.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • Who's the jackass that thought of this? It would be better if they are sent home to spent time with their families, but to be court-martial and sent to jail?? I would have asked Maj. Gen. Anthony Culo to go back and get me the dumb ass that thought of this... That's a CULO!!!

    • 2 years ago
1 - 100 of 118
more from Community:

top videos