Community | December 27, 2009 | 115 comments

Has anyone heard of the term 'False Flag'? (Opinion)

Image
Monkey_Films
The recent incidents on the Northwest and Delta airlines of 'attempted' terrorist attacks sound suspicious to me. I am talking about the incidents themselves and not the oh too convenient timing for the events. I am also not referring to the attempted terrorist attack on the Northwest Airlines flight Friday falling "almost to the day eight years after another failed solo attack" by the so-called "shoe bomber" Richard Reid. Nor am I talking about the immediate talking points that are coming out that make me wonder if they have an updated 'Patriot Act' already written and ready for signature like the one on 9/11.

“It’s not surprising,” U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra, a Holland Republican, said of the alleged terrorist attempt to blow up a Northwest Airlines flight in Detroit. … “People have got to start connecting the dots here and maybe this is the thing that will connect the dots for the Obama administration,” Hoekstra said.

No, I am talking about the statistical impossibility that the events could occur as the White House is reporting...

If Al Quaeda is so dangerous and supposedly a threat to us, one would assume that they would rehearse and train for these things. Suppose that they do this, train for the attack. They then go undetected or arrested up until the day of their flight. They then pass security, hmm, I've had to go back through or stand to the side for a laptop, a camera, oh, and so a pen could be disassembled. So, they accomplish this with explosives and other items that may draw attention. Then, they board the plane without raising suspicions. Now, they work their way to the bathroom with, I assume, carry-on luggage in tote. Again, they've made it this far. Now, you have to fake an illness to get a blanket to cover your body so you can assemble a 'bomb'. This achieved again but to no avail because over and over again this dangerous terrorist organization and their extensive training falls apart when the 'bomb' malfunctions (?) and all you get is sparks, smoke and a possible ignition of clothing from the heat. The impossibility of this happening over and over again and always at convenient timing for Washington leads me to wonder if this is what is called a 'False Flag'.

From Wikipedia

False flag operations are covert operations which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.

On the night of February 27, 1933, the Reichstag building was set on fire. At the urging of Hitler, Hindenburg responded the next day by issuing an emergency decree "for the Protection of the people and the State," which stated: "Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press; on the rights of assembly and association; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed." The question of who actually started the Reichstag fire is still unknown and occasionally debated.

It's scary how much February 27, 1933 reminds me of September 11, 2001 but that's another article.

I'd love to hear input from both sides of the issue on this one because I just feel the odds alone knock these two incidents out of the legitimate file.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Art and Style,   WTF,   Random,   20 more
  2. tags:
    Obama Funny Barack Obama Bush 43 more
  3. recommended by:
    Monkey_Films
  4.     
    |

115 comments // Has anyone heard of the term 'False Flag'? (Opinion)

  • WeAreChangeKy
    • 0
      WeAreChangeKy  
    • oh, and s_peak you were right to leave JFK out of it. He and his brother planned to buck the whole corrupt system, of course we know what happened to them and their little blonde lover who knew too much.

    • 2 years ago
  • WeAreChangeKy
  • N_Dank
    • 0
      N_Dank  
    • DAMN i always find it crazy that the only ones who know truth and saw its ugly head were those on the plane, and each and every one of them is GONE >:|
      fuck u america and by america i mean our current government thats been ruining shit for decades now

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
  • Monkey_Films
  • opit
    • 0
      opit  
    • Image
    • For those trying to argue pro and con on government lies : get a grip. Lying is what they do. I have never understood how people who stare at the boob tube and its incessant commercials can ever think other than they are being fed a crock from dawn until dusk.
      Even on this thread 'trolls' are making false arguments to derail discussion.
      White Noise and many others are trying to give people the boot in the ass to get up and look around. Education and news are run by the government and corporations - there is no realistic point of division between the two.
      I have not bothered to make the case for 911 : though if I wanted to I would send them to the Existentialist Cowboy - Len Hart - or a multitude of sites. The problem is getting it through one's head that b.s. is a way of life and always has been. Here are articles on just that so hopefully you can see the difference between 'accidents' and 'misunderstandings' or 'stupidity' that all work together in a common pattern. They are not a thesis : just semi-random finds within a category that I thought pointed the way to conclusions. Orwell Today is one of the heritage resource sites posted by old-timers on the web who knew how many beans made five.
      This collection is updated from time to time
      http://opitslinkfest.blogspot.com/2009/07/perception-alteration.html
      The index for more of my files is
      http://my.opera.com/oldephartte/links/

    • 2 years ago
  • WeAreChangeKy
  • WeAreChangeKy
    • 0
      WeAreChangeKy  
    • Yes, jubal, I agree, there is even more information coming out from this couple and a few other witnesses. I am pretty darn sure it's a False Flag. Even more interesting is the fact that the mainstream media is completely ignoring these reports. That's confirmation to me.

    • 2 years ago
  • ausetkmt
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • No passport, somebody was filming the incident with a camcorder, lax security in Amsterdam, it smacks of false flag.

    • 2 years ago
  • ausetkmt
  • Monkey_Films
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • @Cztheday, my comparison of fat people and conspiracy theorists was based on the fact that they are both ubiquitous.

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • Jubal, it was not at all my intention to foo foo on your birthday cake. I did not say that a conspiracy in Congress was impossible or even unlikely. I said that I found the notion that the entire U.S. Congress has come together in a conspiracy to be entertaining because those guys and gals can't get together on anything, let alone a complex conspiracy.

      Of course, if one wanted to put together a powerful conspiracy among government types, many (most?) of the most powerful people to involve aren't even IN Congress. You would probably want to gather together a cabinet secretary or three, perhaps an equal number of folks from the clandestine services, perhaps a few highly-placed people from the Pentagon and a "money man" or two. Each of these individuals would be more "powerful" than 90% of the people who serve in Congress. If you could round out your group with four or five Congressional committee chairmen, you're all set...

      So I fundamentally agree with you...although I must admit that I am still pondering the similarities between the persecution of conspiracy theorists and fat people. Many of the latter cannot help their condition, while it would seem like the former have a freer choice...but I am likely missing the thrust of your argument on that point...

    • 2 years ago
  • WhiteNoise
    • 0
      WhiteNoise  
    • Image
    • “The important thing is to never stop questioning.” - Albert Einstein

      My personal reminder that we still don't know exactly what happened on 9-11 and that we really should since we are drilled 24/7 that "everything changed" on that tragic day !

      9-11 HUB
      http://whitenoise.webnode.com/news-summary/

      "We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light." – Plato

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • wayseeker said: So Bush would take the chance that with say 50 - 100 people in on his secret there would not be a leak.// DUH....THERE ARE LEAKS, THAT IS WHAT THE TRUTHERS ARE BASING THEIR INFORMATION ON. BUSH SCREWED UP, CHENEY SCREWED UP AND THERE ARE VIDEOS OF OF INSIDERS AS WELL AS FIREMEN, POLICE OFFICERS, WORK CREWS AND ALL WALKS OF LIFE TELLING THE TRUTH. That is what is in the videos you dismiss and don't bother to watch. The darn members of the 9/11 commission are all but one saying it's a lie and a cover-up. Does the dam have to completely come down and the water flow over your house for you to notice the leaks?

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • So Bush would take the chance that with say 50 - 100 people in on his secret there would not be a leak. In the real world Washington leaks like a sieve, not too mention sources outside Washington.

    • 2 years ago
  • Incredulous
  • jubal
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • All 535 members of Congress and the Senate didn't need to be in on the conspiracy. That is a straw man argument. The conspiracy could easily have been carried out by less than 100 people.

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • My America said: (As far as the 'False Flag' concept being tied to 9/11 belongs in the same category as 'Birthers' and 'Flat Earthers'.) I AGREE LET'S PUT THEM IN THE TRUTH CABINET SINCE THEY HAVE BEEN PROVEN, except for the flat earth, that must be your friends.

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
  • Monkey_Films
  • WhiteNoise
  • My_America
    • 0
      My_America  
    • We are well aware of the 'False Flag' concept. It has really reared its ugly head over the past 11 months. The whole its not me its them concept.

      As far as the 'False Flag' concept being tied to 9/11 belongs in the same category as 'Birthers' and 'Flat Earthers'.

    • 2 years ago
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • My_America:

      The conspiracy theories that i personally find most entertaining are the ones in which the 535 members of Congress are accused either of being unted in a common conspiracy or just blithering idiots.

      As to the first, while there is a CERTAIN amount of collegiality among members of Congress, such feelings are vastly overshadowed by the feelings of contempt, disdain and even loathing that most members feel for certain other members. Even those who manage to rise above such feelings nonetheless consider a fair number of the members of the other party to be so deeply wrong on many issues as to likely be in need of professional counseling. And of course there are the endless petty jealousies and low-level bickering. These men and women could not get together on what to have for lunch, let alond concur on a complex conspiracy. Not. Gonna. Happen.

      As to the second, I personally have never met an unintelligent member of Congress. I have met some who I think are blind to certain realities, some who place partisan politic above the interests of their constituencies and the nation, some who are arrogant and self-centered, some who are rude and obnoxious and some who are ugly in their endless grasp for power, wealth and/or popularity. But while there are undoubtedly a few stupid members, I have yet to meet one. Just sayin'...

    • 2 years ago
  • Incredulous
    • 0
      Incredulous  
    • My_America:

      "while there is a CERTAIN amount of collegiality among members of Congress, such feelings are vastly overshadowed by the feelings of contempt, disdain and even loathing that most members feel for certain other members. Even those who manage to rise above such feelings nonetheless consider a fair number of the members of the other party to be so deeply wrong on many issues as to likely be in need of professional counseling. And of course there are the endless petty jealousies and low-level bickering. These men and women could not get together on what to have for lunch, let alond concur on a complex conspiracy."

      yeah, but CZ, even a cheerleading sqaud can train itself to operate in unison--vanity of course being the uniting principle...just sayin

    • 2 years ago
  • common_sense_please
    • 0
      common_sense_please  
    • I totally agree that 9-11 was a false flag in that Dick Cheney orchestrated the whole thing so he could kick Saddam Hussein's ass and make billions of dollars for Haliburton.

      But I think this latest incident is proof of Al Quaida's ingeniousness--because they let this guy do all the grunt work for them and in essence let him be their false flag knowing full well that our completely inept Senators and Congressmen and FOX news political pundits would never pass up a chance to run down President Obama and blame him for allowing this to happen so he looks like he is weak and unresponsive and not taking the terrorist attack seriously--while actually revealing what a huge joke our Congress and the Homeland Security committee has become. That and they knew they could rely on the rest of the news media to trip over themselves trying to outdo each other to report every single intricate detail of this event by telling them exactly what security breaches this guy was allowed to circumvent and exactly what type of explosive he had--where he got it--what is was called--and how it was made--and what went wrong so that it did not explode--while also mentioning that he was on a terrorist watch list--and which agencies maintain that list--and pointing out the fact that federal marshals were not on the plane--as well as the exact, finite, and intimate details about what new security measures were being implemented in response to this incident and you know basically just giving our enemy every detail they would need to plan a successful attack so they don't have to do any real work-- all they have to do is log onto the internet or watch satellite TV.

    • 2 years ago
  • Patrick_Clarkson
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • jubal you said: (When I was tested at various levels of my education, I was told, by the testers, that I had an uncanny ability to recognize patterns. I would get the answers to problems many others couldn't because of this innate ability. I recognize patterns, even what some would consider abstract sequences.) We have the same brain, I knew there was a reason I like you, lol. Check out my recent post, CIA Omerta, it's basically about what you talked about in your last post. At least the 9/11 stuff with some very new unreleased news video that I had not seen yet. I believe this to be a 'smoking gun' that we've been looking for.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Monkey_Films:

      The things that JFK said about our country being "opposed by a monolithic conspiracy" are chilling. I have listened to that speech about secret societies and proceedings many times. He was warning us about the fact that our government was being subverted by International Interests. That is exactly why he was assassinated, that and the fact that he wanted to give low interest loans to first time home buyers and take the power of printing American currency away from the FED, among other things.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Go ahead and poke fun at the conspiracy nuts...its on the equivalent level as poking fun at fat people. There are all sorts of conspiracies that are going on as we speak. A conspiracy can be any two or more people colluding in secret to accomplish a goal which is generally also secret. There are many unanswered questions and questions whose answers defy reason. So like I said, go ahead and be skeptical and get your jollies poking fun. It doesn't really matter much anyway. Because only time will tell who is going to be living in peace and who will be running for their lives.

      I for one keep an open mind, especially where the government is concerned. Because in the past 40 years of my political consciousness, having the events of the country unfold since the 60's, I can honestly say that appearances can be deceiving. People take advantage of the fact that most people think such things are inconceivable to actually get away with them, because they have everybody looking the other way. This is the common trick employed by an stage illusionist and some would say, the oldest trick in the book.

      I don't know how old many of you are, I guess, but usually I am wrong by more than 5 years or more. The only reason I ask that, and it is a rhetorical question btw. But I believe that when you have longer to look at the circus, you begin to be able to connect the dots a little faster. When I was tested at various levels of my education, I was told, by the testers, that I had an uncanny ability to recognize patterns. I would get the answers to problems many others couldn't because of this innate ability. I recognize patterns, even what some would consider abstract sequences.

      There is another concept that I have learned about watching the political circus and it is that often times their is just enough truth in a so called "conspiracy theory" for it to be plausible, or people just wouldn't buy it. So, that means that there is some truth to it. The trick is sorting out the fact from the spin. That is why the solution will be, an independent fact finding commission that isn't being controlled by the WH or the CIA or the Congress. Empowered to subpoena information and summon testimony. We need to get some very serious questions answered and we may need to be ready to hand out immunity to those that are willing whistle blowers. I have seen hundreds of videotaped testimonies of people who claim that what they saw and witnessed was completely different from the "official story". There are hundreds more that are afraid to come out of the 911 closet because they realize that if the people who pulled this off could subvert our government with impunity, what would stop them from silencing you?

      So until there can be an independent fact finding commission that can grant this kind of protection the majority who can come forward, won't.

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • (royulery said: something that happens out here in the west is; out of work volunteer firemen will start a wild fire to get the big pay. would a mastermind approve a less than convincing false flag operation? my thoughts are; if it looks unprofessional, it probably is)
      Doesn't it take another mastermind to plan these attacks if they are related to Al Quaeda? New question, would a mastermind approve not one, but several failed terrorist attempts? That makes less sense. Additionally, once 9/11 was finished and they programmed you with color coded alerts it is no longer necessary to actually blow up a plane. Fox, CNN and MSNBC will repeat this over and over for weeks finishing up the little reminder Washington wanted to put out there for us. The terrorists are coming, the terrorists are coming. What about the war on lightning? What ever happened to that? I mean, your risk of getting killed by lightning is much greater than getting killed by a terrorist.

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • corndog67 said: With all due respect. And 911 was an inside job.

      corndog67 Yes, I'm glad you agree that 9/11 was an inside job. After all, there is more evidence, facts, etc. pointing towards that than the story given to us by the White House. As a matter of fact, most of the people appointed to the 9/11 report have now come out to agree that 9/11 was an inside job. If the people that wrote the report on 9/11 claim that the government interfered with their report making it essentially a lie, what would you expect an intelligent person to believe?

    • 2 years ago
  • royulery
    • 0
      royulery  
    • something that happens out here in the west is; out of work volunteer firemen will start a wild fire to get the big pay.
      would a mastermind approve a less than convincing false flag operation? my thoughts are; if it looks unprofessional, it probably is.

    • 2 years ago
  • TranceSendDance
    • 0
      TranceSendDance  
    • False flags were used effectively by the corporate media during the re-false election of Bush II "the lesser" in 2004. Or maybe that happened in 2000, when Jeb's Supreme Court elected Dubya... ( and Al "Current" Gore let it happen. )

      Anyways i am glad the colored threat warnings have disappeared, for now.

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • It's quite obvious that 911 was a false flag event! But most flag waving fools can't seem to get past a six pack and realize it because they really don't mind a million innocent brown people have been killed for world dominance.

    • 2 years ago
  • treewolf39
  • Monkey_Films
  • corndog67
    • 0
      corndog67  
    • Monkey_Films:

      You've proven nothing. I don't have any facts, neither do you, just dangerous rhetoric trying to inflame ignorant people. If you actually believe any of the 5 reposts after mine that you just did, I would respectfully say, that you are nuts. With all due respect. And 911 was an inside job. You guys should get a job with Al Queda, they need propagandists like you.

      These aren't just people with differing opinions, you are just making shit up.

      If shit is that bad in this country, why not leave? You aren't going to change anything in government by making all this bullshit up. At least they aren't doing like they are in Iran and killing all people that disagree with them. Here you are free to make this shit up and find crazy people that agree with you.

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • So long as the struggle against terrorism is conceived as a war that can be won by military means, it is doomed to fail. The more the west emphasises confrontation, the more it silences moderate voices in the Muslim world who want to speak up for cooperation. Success will only come from isolating the terrorists and denying them support, funds and recruits, which means focusing more on our common ground with the Muslim world than on what divides us. - Robin Cook 'The Struggle Against Terrorism Cannot Be Won by Military Means'.

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • "Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians."

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • (corndog67 said: Al Queda is a CIA organization? That takes the cake. Just like they invented crack to keep the blacks down. At least you've got yourself convinced. Hopefully none of the really gullible people that are on here take you seriously. Rhetoric like this can be dangerous if the really stupid people (read fanatics) believe you)

      BBC’s killer documentary called “The Power of Nightmares“. Top CIA officials openly admit, Al-qaeda is a total and complete fabrication, never having existed at any time. The Bush administration needed a reason that complied with the Laws so they could go after “the bad guy of their choice” namely laws that had been set in place to protect us from mobs and “criminal organizations” such as the Mafia. They paid Jamal al Fadl, hundreds of thousands of dollars to back the U.S. Government’s story of Al-qaeda, a “group” or criminal organization they could “legally” go after.

      I'm truly sorry, corndog, but it seems the only people that would believe a statement like that are the BBC, the CIA and anyone else who does their homework and research. Maybe you should try doing this before forming an opinion and lowering yourself to personal, wrongly based and biased attacks.

    • 2 years ago
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • Actually corndog67 Al Quaeda WAS and is an invention of the CIA. Thank you for the uncalled for personal attack with nothing added to base your opinions on. I'm sure it was enlightening for someone, however, I will shortly provide the information that will make you have the need to call to Wizard of Oz and see if he has anything for you.

    • 2 years ago
  • corndog67
    • 0
      corndog67  
    • Al Queda is a CIA organization? That takes the cake. Just like they invented crack to keep the blacks down. At least you've got yourself convinced. Hopefully none of the really gullible people that are on here take you seriously. Rhetoric like this can be dangerous if the really stupid people (read fanatics) believe you.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ihatethemall
    • 0
      Ihatethemall  
    • corndog67:

      Obamas minister said those very same things about crack and aids. So was obama gullible for staying with the church for 20 plus years? Was he a bad church goer and really not hear any of it or is he just a bold faced liar? It has to be one of those. I figure it was a little bit of all 3.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
  • bushama
  • larrysnotes
  • bushama
  • sandspit
  • treewolf39
  • Fordymo
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • Image
    • Yo, Monkey_Films! JonRaymond has commented on something that you posted on Current.com: JonRaymond said: http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine/resources/disaster-capitalism-in-action Naomi Kline has reported as much. "The Federal Reserve Bank of New York gave up much of its power in high-pressure negotiations with the American International Group's trading partners last year, according to a government report made public on Monday.... "The New York Fed, led then by Timothy F. Geithner, who is now the Treasury secretary, therefore had little leverage in the negotiations, according to a post-mortem of what has emerged as the most inflammatory episode in the rescue of A.I.G. "The Fed 'refused to use its considerable leverage,' Neil M. Barofsky, the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, wrote in a report to be officially released on Tuesday, examining the much-criticized decision to make A.I.G.'s trading partners whole when people and businesses were taking painful losses in the financial markets. "There have been suggestions that the Fed chose to negotiate weakly, Mr. Barofsky said, to give a 'backdoor bailout' to A.I.G.’s banks. He said Mr. Geithner and the Fed’s lawyers had denied this, but added that 'irrespective of their stated intent,' there was no doubt about the result: 'Tens of billions of dollars of government money was funneled inexorably and directly to A.I.G.'s counterparties.'"
      I hope you don't mind me moving your quote to this page, John Raymond. Naomi Klein is great and it's amazing how one book answers the questions to both posts.

    • 2 years ago
  • JonRaymond
  • treewolf39
    • 0
      treewolf39  
    • Al Queada exists as a division of the CIA. Oh how I wish you could prove that. I always thought the CIA was supposed to protect us from attacks like 911.

    • 2 years ago
  • JonRaymond
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • diabolical44 said: I'm not honestly sure if there is even really such a thing as Al Queda
      Yes, diabolical, Al Queada exists as a division of the CIA.

    • 2 years ago
  • Seraphina76
    • 0
      Seraphina76  
    • I, too, am suspicious of this attempt. My guess is that it will be used to bring in new and more invasive "security" measures. Just waiting for the appropriate peak of outrage so they can serve us up a solution. Problem-Reaction-Solution.

    • 2 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Seraphina76:

      You are probably right seraphina, they have these new expensive Xray machines that they can xray your whole body and see through your clothes. The companies trying to sell this technology to the TSA are probably making their sales pitch through terror.

    • 2 years ago
  • diabolical44
  • Nephwrack
    • 0
      Nephwrack  
    • diabolical44:

      Al Queda is Arabic for ...wait for it...The Case. they were originally funded by the CIA in the 1980's in Afghanistan to fight the Russians. they were then and possibly still remain a tool of the CIA. no one will ever capture Bin Ladin, he's either dead, or being protected by the bushies. they wouldn't want him ratting them out now would they?

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
  • SleepDirt
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • (Tyr said: I have often wondered why the conspritorists virtually always assume that every event that takes place has some deeply hidden agenda that virtually always ends up with the message that your government is out to get you! )

      The end of my post said: I'd love to hear input from both sides of the issue on this one because I just feel the odds alone knock these two incidents out of the legitimate file.

      It all comes down to free and critical thinking. To not question your government dooms you to live with no control over your life whatsoever. Most tyrannical governments rely on their populations being uneducated and therefore unable to question the events they see take place. You're not suggesting we just turn off the power to our minds and let the government spoon feed us the truth, are you?

    • 2 years ago
  • Tyr
    • 0
      Tyr  
    • I have often wondered why the conspritorists virtually always assume that every event that takes place has some deeply hidden agenda that virtually always ends up with the message that your government is out to get you! I'm in my fifties , fought in VietNam, lived through all the Kennedy assassinations , Mlk assassination, Y2K etc etc etc and I am yet to see these secret one world order armies fill the streets with their tanks and all the other fantasies that you guys dream up. All of you who keep producing these nut case theories make yourselves look foolish...can you not see that? You all remind me of the people who keep popping up saying that they know when the end of the Earth is coming, sell all their worldly belongings and go sit on some mountain waiting for the dreaded hour ..only to have to come down a day or so later looking like the idiots that they are.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • Tyr:

      Perhaps you need to review how we are being played, starting from a strictly factual perspective.

      David Sirota | What Happens When We Can't Trust the Verifiers?

      This month, a British government report admitted that one of the major rationales for invading Iraq -- the claim that Saddam could deploy WMDs in 45 minutes -- probably came from a cab driver. Had the public originally been told about this sketchy sourcing, there may have been a more, ahem, forceful mass opposition to pre-emptive war in the Middle East.

      (...)

      In 2008, the New York Times' David Barstow reported that 75 retired military officers regularly appearing on television "have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air."

      Collectively, the group represented "more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants," and here's the kicker: "Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to viewers."

      Had networks reacted to Barstow's blockbuster with better disclosure, we could have rested easy. Instead, the deceptions persist.

      The Huffington Post recently showed how "major television networks continue to host retired generals as military analysts without alerting viewers to their extensive ties to defense contractors."

      Additionally, Wired magazine reports that neoconservative think-tankers who directly helped craft the Pentagon's Afghan escalation are now appearing throughout the media as allegedly disinterested analysts of the escalation -- again, without any mention of their concurrent work.

      Considering the sometimes murky relationship between advertisers and newsrooms, it's easy to think this opacity is the exclusive transgression of commercial media. Unfortunately, it's not -- it has bled into the country's single most powerful economic institution, the Federal Reserve.

      Cont....

      http://www.truthout.org/topstories/122609vh1

    • 2 years ago
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • Tyr:

      @Tyr, I understand your point but I do not believe there would be a day where we wake up to "one world order armies". Instead the changes happen every day in many subtle ways that many do not even notice. Americans lost many freedoms so many including you have fought for and it did not happen overnight.

    • 2 years ago
  • JonRaymond
    • 0
      JonRaymond  
    • Tyr:

      Have you ever heard of the frog in boiling water experiment? Through a frog into a pot of boiling water and it will immediately jump out to save itself. But put the same frog in a pot of room temperature water then put that pot on the stove and slowly heat it to a boil and the frog will just sit there and die.

      The U.S. is sitting in a pot of water that has slowly been boiling. Our rights have slowly been rescinded. Our democracy slowly taken away to become a corporate oligarchy run by the rich who live off the people with corporate welfare. We go to war in Afghanistan to fight terrorists who exist not in Afghanistan, but on planes in Detroit.

      Wake the fuck up!

      http://stopwar.lafilmonline.com

    • 2 years ago
  • Tyr
    • 0
      Tyr  
    • Tyr:

      jon you and those who share your views often speak of your freedoms that have been taken from you...can you tell me in exact terms which freedoms have been taken. Can you tell me what it is in this country that you want so desperately to do but cannot? I am at a loss, I travel freely, conduct my business profitably, my kids have college degrees, buy houses, own property, belong to diverse political groups...We all live very well, enjoy life, have refrigerators full of food, sleep in comfortable beds heat out homes when it's cold, cool them when it's hot, take trips ...so I just don't get it when I hear you guys talk about how miserable it is to live here and how much better it used to be...I guess that was when black people couldn't go to a movie, school,or restaurant of their choice, women were denied jobs and credit because after all, they might get pregnant, there was a military draft, ...you know the good old days.

    • 2 years ago
  • Coastalgal
    • 0
      Coastalgal  
    • This supposed almost terrorist act was not meant to actually hurt anyone. It was meant to keep the fear alive and well among the american people. An almost threat is just as good as an actual threat. The kool-aid has been treated, prepped and poured and the citizens are drunk with fear and anxiety.This is just another way to keep a tsunami of cash flowing into the " war on terrorism", to garner support for the troop surge in Afghanistan and for the peopole to give up more and more out of fear and manipulation and to legitimize the errosion and corruption of the constitution and bankrupt the bill of rights. The money train is alive and well and speeding fast ahead for those who benefit. You want to know the truth, follow the money and who truly benefits. Plain and simple. The article writer is on point. Get a grip people, your being played by master conductors.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • The Attack on Pearl Harbor, 1941

      The US Administration of FDR sought to involve America in World War II. But the American people wanted to stay out of it. So the Administration provoked Japan, in the hope that they would attack the U.S. The plan worked, and FDR made sure that the attacks took place successfully and had the maximum effect and impact. Believing that it was a surprise and unprovoked attack by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor, Americans now supported U.S. entry into the war.

      Operation Ajax, 1953

      Democratically elected President Mossadeq of Iran was unsympathetic to Western oil interests. So the CIA and MI6 orchestrated a revolt against among the Iranian people. False-flag attacks - including the bombing of a religious leader, attacks on a mosque, and machine-gunning of civilians - were carried out by the CIA and blamed on Mossadeq to turn his people against him. He was successfully overthrown and replaced by a U.S.-backed Shah who began a reign of terror in the country which lasted 25 years. The U.S. then repeated this technique of overthrowing a foreign leader over and over in countries throughout the world.

      The Attack on USS Liberty, 1967

      During the Six Day War between Israel and Arab countries, the U.S. destroyer USS Liberty was sent into the eastern Mediterranean, off the coast of Israel. The plan was to use Israeli forces to attack and sink the ship, killing all it's crew, and then blame the attack on Egypt, to justify the involvement of the U.S. in the war. The Liberty was attacked by three unmarked Israeli fighter bombers, as well as three Israeli torpedo boats. The attack lasted for over 3 hours; help was sent by nearby U.S. aircraft carriers, but incredibly the help was personally recalled by President Johnson, who declared "I want that ship going to the bottom". The attack would have succeeded, but it was spotted by a Russian spy plane, and the Israeli attack was called off. The crew survivors were sworn to secrecy.

      The Attack on South Ossetia, 2008

      On August 8th, Western mainstream news reported that Russia had sneak attacked South Ossetia, a region of Georgia. Evidence quickly emerged however that Georgia had attacked it's own region, in an attempt to put down the growing independence movement. The South Ossetians wanted to re-united with North Ossetia as part of the Russian Federation. Russian forces only entered the region after the South Ossetians and Russian peacekeepers in the region had been attacked by Georgia, who had support from the U.S. and Israel.

    • 2 years ago
  • treewolf39
  • SleepDirt
  • Coastalgal
  • treewolf39
  • Ihatethemall
  • morirjedi
    • 0
      morirjedi  
    • SleepDirt:

      Provoked Japan? What kind of stupid premiseis that. They attacked a military base on US soil. Japan sought to keep us out of the war with the early brutal attack. Does the government lie? Yes. Are things not always as they are told to us? Yes. We are the Rome of this age. Not perfect but neither are our enemys.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • SleepDirt:

      Although FDR desired to directly involve the United States in the Second World War, his intentions sharply contradicted his public pronouncements. A pre-war Gallup poll showed 88 percent of Americans opposed U.S. involvement in the European war. Citizens realized that U.S. participation in World War I had not made a better world, and in a 1940 (election-year) speech, Roosevelt typically stated: "I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars."

      But privately, the president planned the opposite. Roosevelt dispatched his closest advisor, Harry Hopkins, to meet British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in January 1941. Hopkins told Churchill: "The President is determined that we [the United States and England] shall win the war together. Make no mistake about it. He has sent me here to tell you that at all costs and by all means he will carry you through, no matter what happens to him — there is nothing he will not do so far as he has human power." William Stevenson noted in A Man Called Intrepid that American-British military staff talks began that same month under "utmost secrecy," which, he clarified, "meant preventing disclosure to the American public." Even Robert Sherwood, the president’s friendly biographer, said: "If the isolationists had known the full extent of the secret alliance between the United States and Britain, their demands for impeachment would have rumbled like thunder throughout the land."

      Background to Betrayal

      Roosevelt’s intentions were nearly exposed in 1940 when Tyler Kent, a code clerk at the U.S. embassy in London, discovered secret dispatches between Roosevelt and Churchill. These revealed that FDR — despite contrary campaign promises — was determined to engage America in the war. Kent smuggled some of the documents out of the embassy, hoping to alert the American public — but was caught. With U.S. government approval, he was tried in a secret British court and confined to a British prison until the war’s end.

      http://web.archive.org/web/20041011155936/http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2001...

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
  • Nephwrack
    • 0
      Nephwrack  
    • SleepDirt:

      McCain's backers had their slimy paws all over what happened in Georgia. it would have been a bush 3rd term. luckily the populace was already war weary and called bullshit.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • Some of the most heroic and revered moments in history are not always what they seem.

      That said, any false flag ops that may or may not have occurred don't necessarily have the fingerprints of the administration on them since their are government and quasi-government and corporate entities in existence that pull strings unseen and manipulate events.

      But back to my initial point.

      Operation Northwoods

      In 1962, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff unanimously proposed state-sponsored acts of terrorism on American soil, against American citizens. The head of every branch of the US armed forces gave written approval to sink US ships, shoot down hijacked American planes, and gun down and bomb civilians on the streets of Washington, D.C., and Miami. The idea was to blame the self-inflicted terrorism on Cuba's leader, Fidel Castro, so the American public would beg and scream for the Marines to storm Havana.
      The public learned about Operation Northwoods 35 years later, when the Top Secret document was declassified by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board. Among other things, Operation Northwoods proposed:
      - Faking the crash of an American passenger plane. The disaster was to be accomplished by faking a commercial flight from the US to Jamaica, and having the plane boarded at a public airport by CIA agents disguised as college students going on vacation. An empty remote-controlled plane would follow the commercial flight as it left Florida. The commercial flight's pilots would radio for help, mention that they had been attacked by a Cuban fighter, then land in secret at Eglin AFB. The empty remote-controlled plane would then be blown out of the sky and the public would be told all the poor college students aboard were killed.
      - Using a possible NASA disaster (astronaut John Glenn's death) as a pretext to launch the war. The plan called for "manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans" if something went wrong with NASA's third manned space launch.
      - Blowing up buildings in Washington and Miami. Cuban agents (undercover CIA agents) would be arrested, and they would confess to the bombings. In addition, false documents proving Castro's involvement in the attacks would be "found" and given to the press.
      - Attacking an American military base in Guantanamo with CIA recruits posing as Cuban mercenaries. This involved blowing up the ammunition depot and would obviously result in material damages and many dead American troops. As a last resort, the plan even mentioned bribing one of Castro's commanders to initiate the Guantanamo attack. That deserves repeating: the Pentagon considered using our tax dollars to bribe another country's military to attack our own troops in order to instigate a full-scale war.

      Operation Northwoods was only one of several plans under the umbrella of Operation Mongoose. Shortly after the Joint Chiefs signed and presented the plan in March, 1962, President Kennedy, still smarting from the Bay of Pigs fiasco, declared that he would never authorize a military invasion of Cuba. In September, Kennedy denied the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Lyman Lemnitzer, a second term as the nation's highest ranking military officer. And by the winter of 1963, Kennedy was dead... killed, apparently, by a Cuban sympathizer in the streets of an American city.

    • 2 years ago
  • treewolf39
  • MotherForTruth
    • 0
      MotherForTruth  
    • "All truth passes through three stages. First it is ridiculed. Second it is violently opposed. Third it is accepted as being self-evident."(Schopenhauer)

    • 2 years ago
  • ahiguy
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • (neocongo said: From a post on one of your other monkey film conspiracy theory articles: "Nursing and government jobs are about to be the only safe jobs out there. You truckers might want to think about training to be a cop or joining the military, there'll be plenty of those on the streets soon. Plus, I hear they'll take just about anyone in the military these days. 100% complete job security.")
      YOUR POINT NEOCONGO, YOUR POINT, MAKE ONE PLEASE!

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
  • neocongo
    • 0
      neocongo  
    • From a post on one of your other monkey film conspiracy theory articles:

      "Nursing and government jobs are about to be the only safe jobs out there. You truckers might want to think about training to be a cop or joining the military, there'll be plenty of those on the streets soon. Plus, I hear they'll take just about anyone in the military these days. 100% complete job security."

    • 2 years ago
  • JonRaymond
  • Monkey_Films
    • 0
      Monkey_Films  
    • neocongo said (Your message is clearly that we must all band together and fear the coming police state, which ultimately is the message of virtually all conspiracy theorists)

      Gosh, really not sure how you pulled that out of my post but thanks for making it clear the rest of their plan is working. Fear, fear? I'm not asking anyone to be fearful, just to educate themselves and to do what any 'free' person should do and examine the facts to see what it truly going on. To do anything different would be just stupid, don't you think?

    • 2 years ago
  • neocongo
    • 0
      neocongo  
    • Your message is clearly that we must all band together and fear the coming police state, which ultimately is the message of virtually all conspiracy theorists. It is a cliche and a joke, and sad you are one more of it's purveyors.

    • 2 years ago
  • JonRaymond
    • 0
      JonRaymond  
    • neocongo:

      We already live in a police state. Notice how the U.S. was turned down for the Olympics because of it's ridiculous customs security. We're building a wall on the Mexican border and yet just a few decades ago we criticized the very same thing that divided Germany since WWII. There are reports in the news almost daily about the police overstepping their authority with tazers and other unnecessary measures of force to control people. I don't know about other cities but in L.A. there is an unusually high presence of police in the subway and trains. We see education budgets get cut and police budgets increased. The list goes on and on.

    • 2 years ago
  • wayseeker
    • 0
      wayseeker  
    • neocongo:

      It does no good too point out faulty logic to conspiracy theorists. Notice how many of them are on Current neocongo? If the fact that it would have taken the cooperation of several hundred people without a single leak to pull off 9/11 does not affect their opinion what will? "This is already a police state"? I don't think they know what a real police state is like. Oh well, far be it from me too talk sense with the conspiracy experts.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • My response is predictable, of course. Were this to be true, and it was discovered by one of the thousands of investigative journalists in the DC area alone who would love to be the next Woodward or Bernstein (Watergate), it would not only bring down the Obama administration, it would send dozens of Administration officials to prison. From a political perspective, there is absolutely no way the risk is worth the reward.

    • 2 years ago
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • cztheday:

      It's not so simple.
      As so many ordinary lay persons (tens of millions) could see early on that the buildup to the Iraq invasion was full of falsehoods and disinformation, are you suggesting that 99% of the press were unaware of this?
      My point is that in the majority of instances of false flag attacks (which are quite common throughout history, much of it on the record), the press is usually if not always complicit.

    • 2 years ago
  • ahiguy
    • 0
      ahiguy  
    • cztheday:

      Even though the press seems to be complicit in support of the Obama and his agenda, I agree with cztheday, and desperate as some may think government may be to manipulate policies by nefarious means, to go to the extremes suggested here goes beyond the pale.

    • 2 years ago
1 - 100 of 115
more from Community:

top videos