Community | December 31, 2009 | 1 comment

Court removes McClain County judge from custody case

Image
regjoeschmo
A McClain County judge has been disqualified from hearing a child custody case after the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled he exceeded his authority and abused his discretion in rulings that stretched out over more than 21/2 years.


Mychal Cox, 22, has been battling for nearly three years to regain physical custody of her oldest son, Mason, right. Cox said nobody has questioned her fitness to be a parent to her youngest son, Carter, 2.

Associate District Judge Charles Gray used an expansive interpretation of grandparent visitation laws to give the paternal grandparents of a 4-year-old boy physical custody of the child five days a week while limiting the mother to two days.

"Five days per week of ‘visitation’ is a custody determination, not a determination of reasonable grandparent visitation,” the Supreme Court said in a unanimous opinion.

"What began with the intention of protecting the best interests of the child has become a de facto guardianship with no end in sight.”

The Supreme Court criticized Judge Gray for repeatedly failing to determine whether the mother, Mychal Cox, was a fit parent after she completed a court-recommended improvement plan and sought the restoration of her parental rights in early 2007.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Parents and Parental Rights,   Get Your Justice Live
  2. tags:
    Supreme Court Parental Rights Abuse of Power judicial misconduct 1 more
  3.     
    |

1 comment // Court removes McClain County judge from custody case

  • viva_canuks
    • 0
      viva_canuks  
    • "The moral fitness of the parties ... was indirectly addressed during these proceedings wherein testimony was presented by the mother that she does not attend church, has had a second child out of wedlock and is cohabitating with an individual not her husband. ... The moral fitness factor as regards grandparents was proven to be that the grandfather is a pastor of a church and the child attends regularly with the grandparents and the grandparents maintain a marital relationship wherein the child has resided most of his life.”

      How many parents would be deemed "unfit" if THIS was the criteria used to assess ability to parent????

      I know we do not have the whole story here, but from what I could gather, this custody/ visitation arrangement is based on moral standings and NOT her fitness to provide the necessities of life (as she is not in question for raising her 2 year old).

      This whole thing seems asinine. Except for cases that warrant additional guardians (in lieu of parents), I do not think grandparents should have ANY rights or input on the way that a child is raised. As sad as it may be, if a parent is choosing to keep the child away from the grandparents, it is their right as a parent just as much as it is there right to keep their child away from any other person out there.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:
from the community

top videos