Community | January 06, 2010 | 29 comments

Stop Healthcare Reform? No 60th Vote, thats How…Must Read This!!!

Image
ctpatriot1970
STOP HEALTHCARE “REFORM”

STOP REID , PELOSI AND OBAMA – Help Scott Brown (R) win back Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat on Jan 19th
Click here to find full story and How To help Stop Healthcare Reform...

http://ctpatriot1970.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/stop-healthcare-reform-no-60th-vot...

The Massachusetts special US senate election is Jan 19th. This is the key vote #41 that gives back the power to the Republicans and allows them to finally filibuster and block cloture.
  1. groups:
    Community
  2. tags:
    Obama GOP Republicans Election 27 more
  3.     
    |

29 comments // Stop Healthcare Reform? No 60th Vote, thats How…Must Read This!!!

  • montesooma
  • tarheelbusiness
  • grassroutes
  • montesooma
    • 0
      montesooma  
    • grassroutes:

      we can start by not using healthcare reform as a ruse to give government total power over the populace.
      We can then institute legislation that will actually do something to reform the few problems with healthcare costs and competition. In other words we could use a little common sense.

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • I'm not particularly fond of Obama or his healthcare "reform."

      But this petty oppositional bullshit from the right is getting old. It's maddening that they have to be dragged by the hair into the next century. And then a decade later they consider it normal and never move against it.

      Literally, this has been the case since we first passed laws banning child labor. No one would advocate for that today, but back then, oh boy it was "socialism" to try and get rid of it..

      Time to grow up guys.

    • 3 years ago
  • bmrabbit
    • 0
      bmrabbit  
    • Saladin:

      TO Saladin: Thank you! Now if JohnA would shut off his tape machine about paying his taxes for everyone's healthcare we'd be halfway to the Tea Party in Boston. I said I wouldn't respond to some people, but his incessant comments about his paying taxes is getting old. Maybe his useless tax money could be used to pave his own driveway or something material and priceless to himself since he's not worried about anyone else. TO JohnA: Have a Happy New Year! anyway!

    • 3 years ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA [removed]  
    • Saladin:

      Maybe if you grew up, become self-reliant, get a job, and join those of us who pay taxes, instead of expecting the government to blow your nose and wipe your ass, you might feel differently.

    • 3 years ago
  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • Saladin:

      The notion that there is any significant fraction of our population that does not wish to work towards being independent, safe, healthy, and wealthy, and instead prefers to live on food stamps and never see a doctor except in the emergency room is a myth.
      Fraud by the poor and 'lazy' is not a significant part of America's health care expense, unless you count the emergency room that is their only option.

      You are describing a place that is not America, JohnA.

      It's a convenient bogeyman though.

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • Saladin:

      You know what's funny about that argument John? People ON welfare have parroted that argument to my mom.

      I call bullshit, you're just an egotistical, self-important ass. Everybody works their fingers to the bone. You're not special other than the fact that you don't give a shit about people who need help.

    • 3 years ago
  • JohnA
  • common_sense_please
    • 0
      common_sense_please  
    • Ugh. Why do Republicans feel the need to filibuster and drag this health care debate out? NOBODY wants this crappy excuse for health care reform to become law--and by continuing to delay and filibuster and now apparently hold a seance to raise the dead--all the Republicans and their Republican leaning Democrat friends in the Senate are doing is creating political theater --and not in a good way-- and pushing us closer and closer to the point where the people will simply demand that the entire Senate should be done away with.

      I say damn it its a new decade -STFU already and just put the bill up for a vote and let the so-called Democrats-and all the Republicans vote it down like they have wanted to all along but just have not grown a pair actually do it. Which is mostly because they are too busy taking money from the taxpayers-via a giant ponzi scheme-where the insurance companies raise rates to cover the lobbying bills.

      Ugh too because our foreign policy for the last 20 years has been to tell native peoples of other countries around the world: take a chance and build a democratically elected government and quit letting your government be run by a bunch of power hungry money grabbing corrupt yahoos. --- Gotta love hypocrisy.

    • 3 years ago
  • sidewayssquare
    • 0
      sidewayssquare  
    • filibusters aside, this is something that alot of people dont want, and the folks that have the most say on the hill at this moment are not LISTNING TO THE PEOPLE.

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • sidewayssquare:

      The problem is the word "it".
      When one says American's don't want it, what are we talking about here?
      Healthcare reform? No, most Americans REALLY REALLY want that.
      A compromise that sucks for everyone? Now that one rings true. I don't think Americans want that.

      But, see, the problem is that the preferred Republican free market system wont happen so long as Democrats are around. And the Democrats' preferred single-payer system isn't faring much better. Both of these are a fantasy. And just about everything in between those two ends is a whole bunch of less-functional crap that's only slightly more beneficial than our current system, and has it's own set of baggage, corruption, exploit, and inefficiency.

      So we can complain all we want about not getting exactly what we want. Either a compromise or nothing is all that's available.

      Unless the Dems in power grew some balls, perhaps.

    • 3 years ago
  • common_sense_please
    • 0
      common_sense_please  
    • sidewayssquare:

      The problem is yes a majority of people want health care reform but no a majority of people do not want this worthless, most likely unconstitutional, not even worth the paper it is printed on bill to become law.

      Basically the problem is the Democrats are too weak and pansy ass and Harry Reid is too scared of his own shadow to stand up and tell the Republicans in sheep's clothing better known Independents or moderate Democrats and the actual Republicans to f*** off and either propose something useful or STFU and get off the pot if you will. But by the same token the Republicans are being jerks too by being racist, judgmental a**holes who don't even give the President a chance to speak before they attack him and tear him down while at the sme time co-opting the teabaggers true outrage and demands for government reform to raise funds for their re-election campaigns.

      I just wish that members of Congress on both sides of the aisle would pull their heads out of their ass and quit counting their money long enough to realize that the rest of America outside the Beltway just wants ALL of them to actually hold a vote--say no--and move on to actually addressing the real issues like the economy and the lack of jobs so we could pay our health care premiums.

    • 3 years ago
  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • When I was in elementary school, I was taught that legislature was passed via a majority vote by our democratically elected representatives and senators. This is the system that the American people have utilized to make decisions that reflect the will of the majority. This is the basis of our chosen form of governance.

      Were I learning these things in school today, I think the school curriculum may have added an extra day to cover the phenomenon of the filibuster, and how it manages to nullify our system of democratic representation.

      This is frustrating, and naturally it turns me sour to this filibuster trend. People even talk of removing the option to filibuster from our legislative process. Yet, this notion is very fraught with problems, and is very unwise. Just because someone keeps pulling the fire alarm doesn't mean that the fire alarm should be removed altogether.

      So I have a question to those Republicans, and others, who believe the current use of the filibuster is a good idea:
      What will you do when you are eventually in the majority, and the Democrats follow your footsteps? How will you respond when the Democrats escalate the use of the filibuster(and other underhanded tactics), just as the Republicans have recently escalated their use of it?

      We're going down a bad path here, mutually ruining our system of legislation.

    • 3 years ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA [removed]  
    • MOK:

      You act as though the Democrats never used the filibuster when the Republicans controlled the Senate before 2006. They used it so often, then Majority Leader Bill Frist threatened a "nuclear option", changing the rules to disallow filibuster, until John McCain and the gang of 12 persuaded him not to. This is nothing new, for either side.

    • 3 years ago
  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • MOK:

      That's not what I meant to imply - Indeed, Dem's been pulling similar styled of BS, and BS distinctly their own.

      The problem - and my point - is that we're escalating.
      Republicans are using the filibuster far more than Dems did in prior years(point of fact), and when Republicans come back to the majority, it likely that Democrats will begin to filibuster even more than the Republicans are now.

      See what I'm getting at here? We can't keep doing this.

    • 3 years ago
  • MOK
  • JonRaymond
  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • MOK:

      I don't know about that - maybe or maybe not.
      But the filibuster also represents a safety valve for some more reasonably un-good things. The mechanism has it's place... Or at least, could have it's place, if it were better implemented.

    • 3 years ago
  • bmrabbit
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA [removed]  
    • bmrabbit:

      It's not revenge, it's not wanting my taxes to go up to pay for your health care. If they do pass this and raise my taxes to pay for your health care, the revenge part will come next November.

    • 3 years ago
  • Argan
    • 0
      Argan  
    • bmrabbit:

      So I guess you are against taxes paying for my public schooling, or the roads I drive on, or the fire department that will save my house and life if need be, or the police department that will help me if I'm in trouble. In fact, let's just screw taxes altogether. Every time you drive on a road you can pay a toll, every time you send a kid to school you pay a small fee, any time your house is on fire, you pay the thousands of dollars it will cost the fire department.

      Let's screw taxes and pay every time we use a government service. Sounds like a plan to me. I don't mind dragging my wallet out every time I get in my car or call 911.

    • 3 years ago
  • MOK
    • 0
      MOK  
    • bmrabbit:

      Perhaps it might be more accurate to imagine that we'd be paying Prometheus Corp $1,000 above market value for their fire relief services due to their regional monopoly.

      Or pay an additional $300 on your monthly fee to iSafeZone for addressing your security needs at a location outside your proscribed neighborhood.

      Or bump up your rate plan with EduSpace, since little Timmy has recently been found to be dyslexic.

      Or complain to customer service every week at MyTransCare to address the malfunctioning stoplights.

      Because Taxes are BAAAD!

    • 3 years ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA [removed]  
    • bmrabbit:

      Taxes wasted are bad. Me paying for people who have absolutely no intention of contributing and live by scamming the system is bad. Me working to keep my mortgage paid and my utilities on, while others live in public housing I pay for, eat with food stamps I pay for, collect welfare I pay for, and have no intention of ever doing anything else is bad. And now they get to stand in line in front of me to see the Doctor I pay for, that's what is bad.

    • 3 years ago
  • Argan
    • 0
      Argan  
    • bmrabbit:

      There will always be people who "scam" the system or don't try and help themselves, but the truth is that a lot of people do try and have not intention of scamming anything.

      What's that saying? "Better a hundred guilty men go free than one be hanged." Something like that.

      The point is that there thousands of people out there who genuinely need help and we as good citizens should do our small part to help. If that means a small bump in taxes, so be it.

      Having that said, the new healthcare bill is crap. It's better than what we had, though.

    • 3 years ago
  • montesooma
    • 0
      montesooma  
    • bmrabbit:

      we are already doing our part.
      when your statement is examined in light of everything we are already paying for and a few other inconvenient facts, then this fails to be an excuse to give progressives more power and to tear off another piece of the constitution.

    • 3 years ago
more from Community:

top videos