Our "War" With Al Qaeda Is Getting Us Nowhere
source: http://www.alternet.org/story/145225/our_%22war%22_with_al_qaeda_is_getting_us_nowhere_
-
-
- WeAreChangeKy
- added this
Frankly, if I had my wish, we would be on our way out of Afghanistan not in, we would be letting Pakistan figure out which Taliban they want to conspire with and which ones they want to fight, we would be letting Israelis and Palestinians figure out on their own how to make peace, we would be taking $100 billion out of the Pentagon budget to make us independent of imported oil — nothing would make us more secure — and we would be reducing the reward for killing or capturing Osama bin Laden to exactly what he’s worth: 10 cents and an autographed picture of Dick Cheney.
Am I going isolationist? No, but visiting the greater China region always leaves me envious of the leaders of Hong Kong, Taiwan and China, who surely get to spend more of their time focusing on how to build their nations than my president, whose agenda can be derailed at any moment by a jihadist death cult using exploding underpants.
Could we just walk away? No, but we must change our emphasis. The "war on terrorists" has to begin by our challenging the people and leaders over there. If they’re not ready to take the lead, to speak out and fight the madness in their midst, for the future of their own societies, there is no way we can succeed. We’ll exhaust ourselves trying. We’d be better off just building a higher wall.
As the terrorism expert Bruce Hoffman noted in an essay in The Washington Post: "In the wake of the global financial crisis, Al Qaeda has stepped up a strategy of economic warfare. ‘We will bury you,’ Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev promised Americans 50 years ago. Today, Al Qaeda threatens: ‘We will bankrupt you.’ " And they will.
Our presence, our oil dependence, our endless foreign aid in the Middle East have become huge enablers of bad governance there and massive escapes from responsibility and accountability by people who want to blame all their troubles on us. Let’s get out of the way and let the moderate majorities there, if they really exist, face their own enemies on their own. It is the only way they will move. We can be the wind at their backs, but we can’t be their sails. There is some hope for Iraq and Iran today because their moderates are fighting for themselves.
-
- groups:
- Community, Politics, Random, Current Tonight, 7 more
-
- tags:
- Obama, War, China, Governance, 16 more
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
What about when the news tells us that 'Al Qaeda' has taken responsibility for the attack. If we call them that but they don't it seems funny our file name could take responsibility for anything. Unless, it's an inside joke from the CIA. Ha ha ha, dumb Americans think 'Al Qaeda' is attacking them. Additionally, the only names on this original list were Muslims trained by the CIA or paid by the CIA such as Bin Laden.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
bombastinator
-
Dick Cheney is trying like mad to stay out of international court for war crimes. Anything he says is colored by that.
Frankly if I had my wish I'd be ten years younger, a hundred punds lighter, and be Brad Pitt. What's your point? Reality is irrelevant to ones idle dreaming. The fact is that Al Quaeda is not going to leave us alone even if we leave them alone. You can stick your head in the sand all you want but your ass is still up in the air there.
- 2 years ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
bking74
-
We do try and inspire the Afghan government to take control of the own destiny for their country's future. The 10th works closely with the Afghan army, training and arming and accompanying them on patrols and raids. The moderate average Afghan citizen no longer wishes to live under the strict, fanatical, theocracy rule of the Taliban.
- 2 years ago
-
bking74
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
No, do your research, no Islamic organization self-proclaimed themselves Al Qaeda. That name was given to them by the CIA due to the file watching them being called that.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
bombastinator
-
WeAreChangeKy:
So because they refuse to name themselves we aren't allowed to either? We need words to describe what we are talking about. That is the most convenient one. If there were aq better one no doubt the press would be using it. Even the pro Al Qaeda press uses the term now. There is no conspiracy here.
- 2 years ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
Al Qaeda was never the name of an organization. Al Qaeda means "the file" and was and is a CIA file on Muslims. Calling them Al Qaeda is an inside joke from the government against the people.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
lu7cky
-
WeAreChangeKy:
It actually means "the base" or "foundation". Nothing to do with any CIA files.
- 2 years ago
-
lu7cky
-
-
bombastinator
-
and Hey, if they weren't the ones who started shooting at us first, and kidnapping/killing american civilians more or less for pleasure whether we did anything about it or not I'm sure we could just leave them alone. hey, it would probably be even cheaper to try to buy em off, but as they have proved in Pakistan, and several parts of Africa, they don't keep their word, they don't stay bought, and they are quite literally bent national conquest and destabilizing western society.You might be singing a different tune if they spontaneously murdered a bunch of your relatives.
- 2 years ago
-
bombastinator
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
bombastinator:
They wouldn't murder my relatives, we're all armed.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
bombastinator
-
bombastinator:
lol. yeah, that'll help when they blow up a dump truck full of explosives outside a supermarket or drive an airliner into your office building. But hey, clutch that handgun in your pants and feel more secure in your manhood eh?
- 2 years ago
-
bombastinator
