Image
St_Alia_10191
"One of the most prestigious academic journals devoted to Shakespearean authorship studies has just added a new candidate to the centuries-old debate about who else plausibly might have written the works we associate with the little-educated merchant and actor from Stratford-Upon-Avon.

The nominee is a complete shocker: Amelia Bassano Lanier, a converso (clandestine Jew) and the illegitimate daughter of an Italian-born, Elizabethan court musician.

Dozens of luminaries (Sigmund Freud, Charles Dickens and Mark Twain among them) over the years have joined the so-called anti-Stratfordian camp, convinced, as Henry James put it, “that the divine William is the biggest and most successful fraud ever practised on a patient world.”

Until now, most of the proposed alternatives have been aristocrats such as William Stanley, the sixth earl of Derby, and Edward de Vere, the 17th earl of Oxford – championed by the New York-based Oxford Society, publishers of the annual journal The Oxfordian.

“When you look at the plays without preconceptions of the author,” observes the journal's newly appointed editor, Michael Egan, “we'd have to say this is a highly educated person, well travelled, with intricate knowledge of the courts and aristocratic life. Where did an obscure provincial boy gain all this information?”

The Oxfordian's current issue profiles Stanley and de Vere along with another perennial choice, playwright Christopher Marlowe. But it's the addition of the female, Jewish contender – a pioneering woman poet – that will turn heads.

The principal proponent of this theory is 55-year-old John Hudson, a British Shakespeare scholar and director of the New York theatre ensemble the Dark Lady Players. In The Oxfordian, Mr. Hudson argues that if Bassano (Lanier was her married name) did not write all of the plays, she was certainly a major collaborator.

Her name is not new to Shakespeare studies. In 1979, British historian A.L. Rowse suggested that Bassano, with her family's Mediterranean skin colouring, was the famous “dark lady of the sonnets,” Shakespeare's mistress. Ridiculed at the time, that view is now commonplace among scholars.

Mr. Hudson goes further: He maintains that Bassano wrote the sonnets about herself; as with the plays, Shakespeare was simply a front used to hide her identity..."
  1. groups:
    Community,   Art and Style,   Culture,   Current Tonight,   8 more
  2. tags:
    News Culture Art and Style History 11 more
  3.     
    |

12 comments // Was Shakespeare a Woman?

  • JohnHud
    • 0
      JohnHud  
    • Image
    • I would like to briefly respond to LittleDorritt and the magazine article she cites. Amelia Bassano Lanier was indeed the first woman to publish an entire volume of original poetry in England. Isabella Whitney merely contributed to an anthology.

      There is no evidence that the Stratford grammar school trained anyone in Italian or Hebrew.

      The article in Jewish Historical Studies has been refuted by Lasocki, who together with Roger Prior wrote the definitive biography on the Bassano family, and concluded that they were indeed of Jewish origin. Further work has shown that they had close family inter-relationships with other Portugese Marrano families in London.

      LittleDorritt should do her research with the original sources rather than relying on the Internet. I suggest she begins by reading my article published last year in the Oxfordian 'Amelia Bassano Lanier" A New Paradigm'.

    • 1 year ago
  • LittleDorritt
    • 0
      LittleDorritt  
    • Sadly, people like Hudson come to the plays with their own myopic preconceptions: that Shakespeare's education at Stratford was far less extensive than it was; that only a noble (or someone involved with one) could write as richly he did; that books, conversation, imagination, gossip and more couldn't fuel his plays. Most ridiculous of all, they would have us believe that a man could pretend to author these plays and carry off this hoax for decades without anyone discovering it. Because that's what the theory certainly implies.

      Imagine the discussions of scenes in a play at his theatre--does anyone think for a moment that Shakespeare just dropped the manuscripts off and fled, avoiding questions of meaning and interpretation because he would be exposed as a fraud? Or are we supposed to think that Amelia Bassano Lanier tutored him as to what to say in every possible situation? Bollocks. Had he been a charlatan, his colleagues Marlowe and Jonson would have sussed it out in a trice.

      What's alarming is that such arrant nonsense is being broadcast as reasonable. Bassano wasn't even a Jew. It's been disproven in an American magazine on line, and the Hudson theory exposed as fatally flawed:

      http://www.bibliobuffet.com/book-brunch-columns-322/1304-anyone-but-shakespeare-...

    • 1 year ago
  • SamuraiDave
  • pjacobs51
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • I have a way to test and answer whether it is Marlowe or the new proposal, Lanier, or not.
      It is secreted in one of the plays - and very possible to prove out historically. Just a little effort required.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • I suppose if you wanted to you could associate many lines or ideas in his plays to anyone. I myself do not believe the theories surrounding this. How could a man with a 6th grade education write these plays? Does one really need to go to school to be educated? Sorry, to me, flimsy at best.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • JanforGore:

      Yes, brilliant supersedes all formal education. The notion also does not account the social and intellectual exposure of one's youth - the formative environment.

    • 2 years ago
  • John_Hudson
  • SamuraiDave
    • 0
      SamuraiDave  
    • no one ever gets worked up over Ben Johnson or Christopher Marlowe but Shakespeare has been everyone. Next theory - was Shakespeare a time-traveling alien?

    • 2 years ago
  • arash_zlord
  • eden49
  • artemis6
more from Community:

top videos