Community | January 25, 2010 | 67 comments

USGS claims Venezuela sits on Earth’s largest oil reserves

Image
bansheewail
Venezuela may have just become the center of an energy-starved world.

The Orinoco Belt, situated squarely underneath the South American nation, may hold some 513 billion barrels of crude oil, according to a new report by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).

That's twice the size of Saudi Arabia's oil reserves, placing Venezuela firmly atop the list of oil-rich nations.

The timing of the USGS announcement is striking. On Jan. 28, international firms will take part in an auction for contracts to drill in the Orinoco Belt. The deadline for auction registration was Jan 18, according to industry publication Petroleum World. Results will be announced on Feb. 10.

However, the USGS did not make an estimate of how much oil is actually recoverable. The Orinoco Belt's reserves are typically thick and tar-like, with some patches difficult to reach with current drilling technology.
  1. groups:
    Community
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Green Tech US Politics 11 more
  3.     
    |

67 comments // USGS claims Venezuela sits on Earth’s largest oil reserves

  • tommic
    • 0
      tommic  
    • The unstated United States policy on oil is, use theirs first and save what we have left for later. We will exploit any country who harbors vast oil reserves or befreind them, which ever best suits our needs and desires. There is a great deal of oil left here in North America and we are just not drilling for it because of this policy. Oil in itself is an evil fuel of choice from the time we take it from the ground, oil as a fossil fuel is responsible for cancers, pollution of the enviorment, we certainly would not have invaded Iraq if it were not for their oil. So we can add military expenditures to the list of cost incurred by using oil.
      World Bank loans are predicated on the country who recieves the loan to allow oil and other minerals to be exploited by major corporations at below market prices. Destroying their enviorment and polluting their countries far worse than we have our own.
      There is nothing good about oil, so buy your SUV's and gas guzzlers and act like you care but you really don't.

    • 2 years ago
  • kingfugazi
  • royulery
    • 0
      royulery  
    • the crude in that area is not sweet, it is low in gasoline components. this type of heavy crude is good for making plastic and chemicals with a whole lot of asphalt left over.
      it may not be worth pumping at all.

    • 2 years ago
  • remanns
  • thewallisgirl
    • 0
      thewallisgirl  
    • Chávez announced Venezuela's withdrawal from the International Monetary Fund and World Bank after paying back all his country's debts to both institutions; he charged them with being an imperial tool that aims to exploit poor countries, news sources reported. (wikipedia)

    • 2 years ago
  • el_chivo
  • GossipandGab
  • CalPal
  • Cynic2
  • Stradius
    • 0
      Stradius  
    • HAHAHAHA! and they HATE the USA. Nice job ex-Bush Administration. Anyway... get smart now and push for solar and wind energy.

    • 2 years ago
  • redmex
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • We have all the natural gas and oil we need right here in the U.S. they don't want us to know that. I have worked in the oilfield before I know for a fact that the oil shortage is a myth.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • bailey78:

      @Bailey, you are correct, brother! These fnuckers have walked over and abandoned enough oil to supply energy needs of the U.S. for many years. However, they want the cheap oil and big reserves, without environmental restraints.
      Moon

    • 2 years ago
  • lizziehoffman
  • thedirtman
    • 0
      thedirtman  
    • The United States of America was fortunate to have four large supplies. We had Pennsylvania, which was gone long ago. Texas and California are almost gone. Alaska, we're holding back. We pretty much drained Mexico and Canada too.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • Good for Haiti! Drill for oil, increase job opportunities, lower our gas prices, decreasing our dependence on the Muslim controlled countries, while stimulating the Global economy and reduce the opportunities for Current nut cases to post their deluded theories. I call this a Win, Win, situation!
      Venezuela, can run a high pressure flex hose up Chavez's ass and use the hot air to reduce the viscosity of their oil to ultimately produce more revenue. Another Win,Win, except for the tender Presidential rectum! I am always suspicious with a man who's eyes are separated by less than the width of a pencil. Surely there is a mental affliction associated with this physical condition?

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
    • 0
      KSirys  
    • No surprise that South America has that type of Oil reserve, but in a few years, the US will find a way to attack Venezuela and say they have weapons of mass destruction.

      I hope not, but I see that happening...

    • 2 years ago
  • Ajil
    • 0
      Ajil  
    • The most responsible thing to do is to cut off any access to these oil reserves. Oil takes millions of years to develop, but only less then a century to consume. We should not be consuming it all right now. If someone would like to argue that the country could use the profits, then they are being extremely short-sighted. There is a definite difference between profits and progress.

    • 2 years ago
  • calm_incense
  • Ajil
    • 0
      Ajil  
    • Ajil:

      grandavi; out of all the nonsense you wasted sharing, im going to have to agree with one thing;

      "the earth has not been around a million years"

      indeed you are correct. The earth has not been around for one million years, not two or even 10. According to the most accurate studies, the Earth formed about four and half BILLION years ago. As for the development of petroleum, I strongly advise you to use the beautiful world wide web to look into the process. *SPOILER ALERT* Petroleum takes at the very least, 50 million years to develop. I'm sorry, but your pastor is not going to be the right person to ask about this.

      Do you really think the world will sit by as the U.S. occupies another country? Think again. The U.S. might have the strongest military, but they cant fight the entire world. And why should they? To have the right to consume all of the planets valuable resources? Please. You are way over due for your reality check.

    • 2 years ago
  • JonRaymond
  • Animal_Chin
    • 0
      Animal_Chin  
    • Uh-oh! Now just wait for some attack on American soil to be directed towards Venezuela so that we can "liberate" them of their oil...er...I mean...ruthless dictator w/ WMDs...

    • 2 years ago
  • thelastwheeler
  • BigJoeSixPack
  • IMMININT
  • KSirys
  • Nephwrack
  • IMMININT
  • UrbanGypsy
    • 0
      UrbanGypsy  
    • It is amazing that a country like Venezuela, which has such large reserves of oil is having power shortages in its capital of Caracas. After trying to go with a plan to cut power for a few hours every day, Chavez finally had to back down after protests from people all over the capital.

    • 2 years ago
  • norml37
  • ras_menelik
  • device80
    • 0
      device80  
    • well now oil is the new cocaine in central america... why if Chavez supposidly hates america is the USGS in his backyard looking for oil? I think it's just his way of brainwashing central and south american's that we are evil and he is a hero but behind closed doors he is just another opputunistic venture capitalist looking for a handout from the United States, otherwise if he was an actual threat he wouldn't allow us in his country and for that matter wouldn't ship 70% of his GNP to us for opec rates...

    • 2 years ago
  • pennyharford
  • calm_incense
  • JonRaymond
  • CalgarC
  • JonRaymond
    • 0
      JonRaymond  
    • CalgarC:

      But that would put Shell and Exxon out of business. What's wrong with you? Our oil companies have to keep making outrageous profits. Next thing you know you'll start saying we don't need health insurance companies either and that the government can do that. This is America, the socialist corporate welfare state. Profit comes first. Human life means nothing. Get with the program.

    • 2 years ago
  • CalgarC
  • thewarnerla
    • 0
      thewarnerla  
    • This is fantastic news. Now the media can go to war with Chavez because he doesn't like the way US plays aid intervention, or is it because he claim the Haitian earthquake was caused by US weapons testing. They both sound so intriguing--I bet the news will claim him as an oil dictator.

    • 2 years ago
  • IndigoAnonymous
    • 0
      IndigoAnonymous  
    • thewarnerla:

      I heard that the claim that Chavez said about this earthquake weapon only came from one source that is an anti-chavez blog that speculated that it would be likely, due to Chavez' anti-imperialism/Americanism record, that he would somehow blame the U.S. for the earthquake. Other media sources took it without much fact-checking. Although this is just something I heard, not completely sure who is right.

      However, now with the U.S. sending troops, I don't think Chavez would need the excuse of an U.S. owned earthquake-causing weapon since now he could just comment on the U.S. troop presence in Haiti and say it's "an invasion."

    • 2 years ago
  • keithponder
    • 0
      keithponder  
    • Is Obama's Haiti a Rehash of Bush's Iraq?

      In 2004, The US military under the direction of President Bush invaded Iraq, disposing its dictator Saddam Hussein and taking up long term residence within the nation. Although the true ulterior motives of the invasion may never be known, it is frequently speculated that the US invasion was an example of economic imperialism in the false auspice of humanitarian good, with the burgeoning oil market in Iraq as well as neighboring nations being the true motive for the military conflict. Six years later, with the US still occupying Iraq and Afghanistan, Haiti suffers a devastating earthquake and immediately the U.S. government pledges its support in the relief effort but although the earthquake was simply nature taking its course, is the US aid effort and more importantly the apparent military occupation of Haiti by the US more than just a coincidence? Is Obama’s Haiti a rehashing of Bush’s Iraq?

      In barely a week the U.S. government has dispatched to Haiti almost 12,000 troops, multiple C-140 airships, military assessment teams, an aircraft carrier, marine transport ship, and unmanned reconnaissance drones. Furthermore, the Pentagon has announced the re-routing of 3 Persian Gulf bound naval vessels with another 4,000 troops as well as stating that it is considering sending an entire Marine regiment to the Island nation also. Although the news of such a large military force occupying the nation has gone relatively unnoticed compared to aid efforts, people and nations are slowly starting to raise eyebrows with France, Bolivia and Venezuela publicly criticizing the US, claiming it is occupying the nation under the false humanitarian aid pretense.

      President of Bolivia Evo Morales said on January 20th that -

      "The United States cannot use a natural disaster to militarily occupy Haiti,"

      he told reporters at the presidential palace.

      President Chavez of Venezuela stated that "I read that 3,000 soldiers are arriving, Marines armed as if they were going to war. There is not a shortage of guns there, my God. Doctors, medicine, fuel, field hospitals, that’s what the United States should send," Chavez said on his weekly television show. "They are occupying Haiti undercover."

      "On top of that, you don't see them in the streets. Are they picking up bodies? ... Are they looking for the injured? You don't see them. I haven't seen them. Where are they?"

      Haitian student Wilson Guillaume, had this to say-

      "I haven't seen them distributing food in the center of the city, where the people need urgently water, food and medicine. This seems more like an occupation,"

      When people think of Haiti, they picture a troubled nation plagued with extreme poverty rates, high illiteracy rates, multiple coup’s, government corruption and the highest AIDS rate in the western hemisphere. They picture a nation that relies almost completely on the aid of industrialized nations and private benefactors. What they don’t picture though is a nation potentially sitting on an oil field dwarfing Venezuela’s which is the largest exporter of oil in the western hemisphere, a country teeming with precious metals such as Gold, Copper, Uranium 225 and 238, which can be used to power nuclear reactors and the world’s largest supply of a rare mineral used in building spacecraft-iridium. They don’t picture a nation that has been visited by multiple Canadian and American firms in regards to mining these precious metals and that according to scientists, a nation whose oil field in comparison to Venezuela is like comparing a swimming pool to a glass of water.

    • 2 years ago
  • outtheinside
    • 0
      outtheinside  
    • keithponder:

      i could care less about how people perceive an "occupation". the fact of the matter is that we have experience with crises and this is how we've always responded. army, military, navy - they all have a responsibility to protect and help in the case of emergency. we use them here for emergencies the same way we do elsewhere. why would we change and develop an entire new emergency response force on the tax payers dime when we can send in the same tried and true forces? and to the haven't seen them comment - maybe that's because media is selecting what they send over. don't blame the military for not having its own crew to take photo ops. you'd be getting on them for that as well. they are in places that are accessible. is that so hard to figure out? it must be accessible for help to get there. does it seem feasible that after all the buildings falling and roads blocked for miles that the military can just walk into the city center when it arrives? think a bit. on top of that. you'd be arguing along with chavez that the u.s. has taken over the capital if they were all there. accept it as aid and take your conspiracy theories elsewhere. despite what you think, good judgment and morals still exist in humans whether they are in government or not.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ajil
    • 0
      Ajil  
    • keithponder:

      it seems outtheinside is a very trusting fellow. sure the military are very well trained and prepared to handle crisis, but they dont get to decide when they are going to help. So it is the schemers that have been brought into question. Do you seriously trust those higher up in command to be noble in all the planned strategies. We know the U.S. military has been used to protect or even claim resources in so many other parts of the world. Why would the same being done in Haiti be so different? Half my ethnicity is from Kuwait. It would be Iraqi if the U.S. military did not protect their assets. I take humility in acknowledging this. Soon after the Shock & Awe campaign in Iraq, the first U.S. soldiers on the ground headed straight for the oil plants. Not the hospitals, not other parts of the communities through out Iraq. There was the fear that Saddam Hussein would have the oil plants lit up like he had done in Kuwait. It does not change the fact that the U.S. was still more concerned about the resources then the people.

      I think the proper response for the next crisis is for the U.S. to stay out. If the U.S. thinks they obtain the best abilities and equipment to handle every situation, then lets see how the world does with out the help. I have a hunch that people will do just fine without the U.S. military. Wouldn't you agree outhteinside?

    • 2 years ago
  • magnusdeus
    • 0
      magnusdeus  
    • keithponder:

      I have a hunch there would be a massive power vacuum waiting to be filled by someone less preferable.

      Also, the Iraqi oil fields are a hell of a lot more valuable to the Iraqis than us. Granted their security keeps our prices lower, but their existence keeps Iraq running. Protecting them is an obvious practical decision.

    • 2 years ago
  • JCunliffe
  • cracanata
  • BigJoeSixPack
  • keithponder
    • 0
      keithponder  
    • Chavez is far from being crazy, ignorant or stupid. He may be drunk with power, but he did not get to where he is by being crazy.

      People need to stop labeling others as being crazy just because you don't like them.

      The labeling game is used usually by the insecure.

      Why don't you call Tony Blair or Vladimir Putin (mass murderers) crazy ?

    • 2 years ago
  • oppressed1
  • bansheewail
  • thelastwheeler
    • 0
      thelastwheeler  
    • keithponder:

      I think keith is trying to tell you that using vast generalizations wont help to solve any problems. that we must find the root of the issues and stop nonsensical name calling. crazy crazy crazy you are crazy. does that help you? what does mass murder have to do with crazy? I think you are really addressing ethics. and you would know that if you weren't such a crazy gay french jew mexican?

    • 2 years ago
  • mink_Stacktrane
    • 0
      mink_Stacktrane  
    • keithponder:

      Here in the US, this guy in particular gets called a mass-murdering crazy man because of white nationalism. In other regions, it's because his policies are socialist (actually, state-capitalist). That's the short answer.

      @oppressed1 - Lo siento, pero I used to live and work in downtown Caracas. When the f*ck did Chavez ever commit mass (or any other type of) murder?! Please be specific. I will read what you post. I'm not exactly this guys fan, but you've gotta back up implications like that.

    • 2 years ago
  • deadpool
  • BigJoeSixPack
    • 0
      BigJoeSixPack  
    • keithponder:

      Is that what they tell you in the army, guy? Is that what they do with everyone? Tell you they are mass murderers before sending you all in to murder? Ha!

      The man is power drunk and paranoid, but I have yet to hear cries of genocide from South America. He's got political issues, sure. But hes not purify the ppl.

    • 2 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • keithponder:

      Chavez is the perfect politician for his political base of power. Soon to have his decisions challenged for their wisdom. There was an old song; "And another one one bites the dust, and another one, and another one,and another one, bites the dust". Time will tell on his choice of menu! Fidel may be his mentor, however, I do not believe that he is another Fidel. He is an economical and political anachronism. Soon to lead his people to misery and suffering, while he lives in luxury!

    • 2 years ago
  • IndigoAnonymous
    • 0
      IndigoAnonymous  
    • Maybe oil effects the human brain negatively in some undetectable way like in a sci-fi movie...
      Although Chavez isn't as crazy as Ahmedinejad or the Saudi regime. In fact, he's just a bit ignorant/stupid than crazy

    • 2 years ago
  • EmperorThan
    • 0
      EmperorThan  
    • IndigoAnonymous:

      Yeah, I'll pretend for all the dissidents who have been murdered by him you didn't say that. Caracas is the murder capital of the world and Hugo Chavez is the 'King Pin'. He's not stupid he's just a fat Latino Hitler.

    • 2 years ago
  • bansheewail
  • good_stuff
  • thedirtman
  • chmk
  • JonRaymond
  • MoonLoon
  • Saladin
  • MoonLoon
  • raulvalderrama
    • 0
      raulvalderrama  
    • bansheewail:

      Your generalization of Venezuelans based [I pressume] on our idiotic president's performance is extremely rude and deeply offensive.

      Despite what you and the rest of the world might think, Chavez is NOT supported by the majority of our population, and most of us are profoundly embarrased and ashamed of the image he's been spreading for the last ten years.

      Just as I am writting this, there are people on the streets protesting against him and his administration. It is 10:25pm on a Monday.

      Please do try and get your facts straight before posting offensive remarks on a public forum.

      Thank you.

      R.V.
      Valencia, Venezuela.
      --
      Images of the today's protests:
      http://www.twicsy.com/?search=FREEVENEZUELA&sort=date

    • 2 years ago
  • Terrorist
    • 0
      Terrorist  
    • bansheewail:

      @raulvalderrama Yo, guy, he was talking about your government and not your people. Furthermore, don't act like when Bush was in office you didn't think Americans were crazy as hell. Calm your sassy little pants down.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos