Community | January 26, 2010 | 24 comments

Police Speak Out Against Marijuana Prohibition and the Drug War

Image
IMMININT
WHEN THE Assembly's Public Safety Committee voted 12 days ago to approve the legalization and regulation of marijuana in California, knee-jerk reactions were sure to follow.

This was only a first step toward legislation, but San Mateo police Chief Susan Manheimer quickly described the looming possibility as "mind-boggling."

John Lovell, speaking for the California Peace Officers Association, said it was "the last thing our society needs."

It wasn't hard to envision lawmen up and down the state nodding in agreement.

The viewpoint is understandable. It is part of the internal wiring of police agencies. The War on Drugs declared by President Nixon in 1971 has spanned four decades and seven administrations.

The thing is, it has failed. A far better idea is to legalize and regulate marijuana sales.

There are at least 1,500 current and former law enforcement professionals who agree. They are members of LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition), who base their opinions on years of experience.

Jack Cole, co-founder of the 8-year-old organization, is a retired New Jersey State Police lieutenant who served 12 of his 26 years on the job as an undercover narcotics cop. He describes the War on Drugs as "not only a dismal failure but a terribly destructive policy."

Norm Stamper, former Seattle police chief, used to kick in drug dealers' doors early in his 34-year career. His opinion: "It has cost the national treasury obscene amounts of money. And for what?"

James Gray, an Orange County Superior Court judge for 20 years, remembers sentencing one dealer after another to no perceptible end. "The closer you get to the issue," he said, "the more you see we couldn't do worse if we tried."

They liken the ban on recreational drugs to Prohibition, when the government's ill-fated attempt to end the sale of liquor created a lucrative industry for criminals. Sound familiar?

LEAP has packaged its argument in a convincing 12-minute video (www.leap.cc/cms/index.php?name=Content&pid=28), in which Cole explains that an estimated 1.3 percent of the U.S. population was addicted to drugs when the Harrison Act, a national anti-drug law, was enacted in 1914.

And 1.3 percent was believed to be addicted when the War on Drugs was unveiled. And 1.3 percent was addicted when a study was conducted in 2006.

So to sum up the 95-year battle against drugs: Nothing's changed.

The bootleggers and speak-easies that circumvented Prohibition have been replaced by drug cartels and street dealers. Far smarter than banning drugs would be government regulation.

"It's easier for teenagers to get marijuana than alcohol," Gray said. "That's because alcohol is regulated and controlled by the government, and illegal drugs are controlled by drug dealers. They don't ask for IDs."

In addition, dealers often recruit teenagers to sell. And when they do, they sell to other teens. "I've seen this too many times in juvenile court," he said. "I am determined to put an end to it."

James Anthony, a former Oakland prosecutor and member of LEAP, said the government errs in using a criminal justice approach to remedy a public health problem. Police should focus on public safety — stopping major crimes — not chasing bags of marijuana.

"I've worked closely with a lot of police officers who will admit, off the record, that the approach we're taking is not working and never will," Anthony said.

Among the obvious benefits to the proposed Assembly bill:


Law enforcement resources allocated more wisely and a decline in the prison population.


State revenues from sales taxes estimated at $1.4 billion.


An end to the wrangling over medical marijuana.


Revitalization of the hemp farming industry.


Deglamorization of marijuana for recreation.

Gray calls the last bullet point the "Holland effect," noting that legalizing marijuana in The Netherlands has lessened its appeal: Per-capita consumption is only half what it is in the United States.

"They have succeeded in making marijuana boring," he said.

It would be foolhardy to suggest that change will come without cost. Even advocates concede there will be an initial uptick in users. The curious will inhale this opportunity.

Anthony said there might also be a knee-jerk reaction from drug dealers deprived of income.

"If people can't make a living selling marijuana in the underground market," he said, "you may see a spike in other crimes of economic opportunity — muggings, car burglaries, that kind of thing. We have to look at society as a total system."

Legalization represents a major reversal in policy, but that doesn't make it bad. When you find out you've been going in the wrong direction, the smart thing is to turn around.

By Tom Barnidge
Contra Costa Times columnist
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   US Politics,   Progressive America,   5 more
  2. tags:
    Marijuana Cannabis Police California 6 more
  3.     
    |

24 comments // Police Speak Out Against Marijuana Prohibition and the Drug War

  • melynda
    • 0
      melynda  
    • You know who profits from marijuana sales in the U S of A? Everyone involved. People who use it are no longer going to be jailed, peoples businesses will not be broken into unlawfully and ripped up from the ground, sick people will be able to live longer and more fullfilling lives, jobs will be created by farmers, brokers, and retailers alike, while at the same time less people will be losing thier job due to drug tests, easing the burden of government unemployment, which will trickle into welfare, bringing down the percentage of people in the US who are on it, and last ( and probably least in my eyes) the US can tax it and use it to send more of our kids to school so they can work, or whatever they are really going to do with it.

    • 2 years ago
  • JETaylor
  • bashirdr
    • 0
      bashirdr  
    • As much as pot smokers annoy me (sorry Current users) I cannot deny the logic of the pro legalization argument, and have agreed with it for some time. If someone like me believes in decriminalization, I wonder how it could possibly still be an issue.

    • 2 years ago
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • bashirdr:

      Why do 'cannabis smokers' annoy you? Does the conversation annoy you? I hope not. If you met me outside of current, you would have no idea I ever consumed cannabis. Many cannabis users are in the closet. Unless they were honest with you, or you checked their urine, you would never know what they do in the privacy of their own homes, on their own time.

    • 2 years ago
  • bashirdr
    • 0
      bashirdr  
    • bashirdr:

      Hmm, hit a nerve. I should be more specific: pot smokers annoy me when I'm around them. They just get dumb and boring. The worst ones will pause in the middle of an activity to get their fix.

      I like to kayak and ski, and many of my ski/kayak buddies are potheads. Often they will pause during a session to pack a bowl, totally breaking the flow. Face it: that's annoying.

      But where are my props for still being pro-legalization? As haters go, i'm not so bad, am I?

    • 2 years ago
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • bashirdr:

      I guess you're right, you kinda hit a nerve. But, I do express kudos for your willingness to say you are pro-legalization. If cannabis is ever legal again, you may need to choose new friends. Just kidding. We all do things that often annoy others. It's the nature of the beast, we are all different. Potheads annoy you, rednecks drive me crazy. Many are so closed minded, while being so sure they are always right, even when they are wrong.

      Once again, kudos and thanks for participating in the discussion.

    • 2 years ago
  • evanator
  • yaget1chance
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • yaget1chance:

      When will the lies and disinformation stop? Lies, disinformation and spin have ruined the conversation. I do not support legalizing all drugs. I support an 'honest' discussion, where facts and science are used as our guide, not spin, disinformation and 'madness'.

      Ordinary Americans should not be willfully misled. Mothers and fathers were misled into thinking cannabis was something, which it was not. Many adults are now alcohol dependent, due to the lies about cannabis. Many chose alcohol, over cannabis for fear of incarceration and condemnation.

      I think the first place to start would be with honesty! Facts matter! Dishonesty and lies matter more. When our own government choose to follow the course of 'madness', it's pretty hard to trust what they do say.

    • 2 years ago
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • Politicians like Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan were afforded the luxury of lies. Ronald Reagan was allowed to make this statement and no one corrected him. Everyone just moved along.

      "I now have absolute proof that smoking even one marijuana cigarette is equal in brain damage to being on Bikini Island during an H-bomb blast" - Ronald Reagan

      Politicians should be held accountable when they lie! Because the costs are too high, when they are allowed to lie.

    • 2 years ago
  • pvelectric
    • 0
      pvelectric  
    • Political philosopher and right wing conservative hero to millions of PBS TV fans, for 40 plus years, founder of the National Review Magazine William F. Buckley, and Nobel Prise winning economist Milton Friedman, "Father" on today's "let the miracle of the free market rule," both advocated that drugs be legal, sold and taxed like any other products in a capitalistic society.

      After Buckley advocated this I think too strongly, he and his talk show "Fireing Line" was off PBS.

      What Buckley predicted was that if "street" drugs remain illegal, the constantly high demand for them would be so high, and the supply would be so low, the underground ecomomy of those supplying thes drugs would become richer and stronger than many governments. Some governments might end up actually belonging to the drug cartells: either by simple purchase of power by bribery, or through controlling of banks through the weight of their huge off-shore secret laundered deposites.

      I noticed one of the first things the Reagan administration did upon taking office in 1980, was to abolish President Carter's executive order that all banks disclose to the government all deposits and transfers of amounts over 10,000 dollars, for routine checking to discourage money laundering by drug pushsers and suppliers and organized crime. And to help find these criminals to begin with. Reagan agreed with the banks' objections that this was an "invasion of privacy of some of their best customers, and would cost them too much to comply.

      Shortly afterword Nancy came out with her forcefull "Just say no to drugs" public relation's slogan. The Central Intelligence Agency supplied cocain to the United States during this period, and into the George Bush I era even more. Please see the writings of Gary Web regarding Reagan-Bush-CIA drug smuggling during the Reagan-Bush years. Web committed "suicide" by shooting himself twice in the head while investigating this story, not too long ago.

    • 2 years ago
  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • Marlboro Green does have a nice sound.

      I never thought that there would be a police organization devoted to legalizing pot. That's awesome! I've heard from a small number of individual cops that they're not going to go through any real effort to find a small amount of pot but none that came out and said "This is stupid. Legalize it." I'm going to pray to Bob Marley's spirit tonight and tell him about this.

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
  • thetrimsmith
  • pandaman2105
  • Betico
  • CalgarC
  • ii386
    • 0
      ii386  
    • "It's easier for teenagers to get marijuana than alcohol," Gray said. "That's because alcohol is regulated and controlled by the government, and illegal drugs are controlled by drug dealers. They don't ask for IDs."

      This is so true in my own personal experience. I tried smoking first time when I was 9, I got drunk first time when I was about 12. I consistently smoke from age....ehhh about 15 onwards. I only picked up drinking a little before turning 21. I rarely get drunk, but I always get high. This is the theme for the vast majority of my friends.

      Throughout highschool I had no trouble and any one that looked for it had no trouble getting weed, oxycontin, xanax, and some other goodies. Alcohol was always impossible to get unless you had older siblings or friends.

    • 2 years ago
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • Image
    • "Two of my favorite things are sitting on my front porch smoking a pipe of sweet hemp, and playing my Hohner harmonica." - Abraham Lincoln (from a letter written by Lincoln during his presidency to the head of the Hohner Harmonica Company in Germany)

      "Hemp is of first necessity to the wealth & protection of the country."
      - Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President

      "Make the most you can of the Indian Hemp seed and sow it everywhere."
      - George Washington, U.S. President

      "We shall, by and by, want a world of hemp more for our own consumption."
      - John Adams, U.S. President

      http://current.com/items/89792690_on-role-models-and-their-bongs.htm

    • 2 years ago
  • lopinjop
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • Conniepae:

      Cannabis hemp information was removed from educational material. I'm sorry we didn't learn the facts in school. I was in my 30's before I found cannabis hemp facts, which were documented and well researched. "The Emperor Wears No Clothes", by Jack Herer is amazing. The first half is information and the second half is the documentation to back up the information contained in the first half.

      Many people have been harmed in the 'war on cannabis'. Mothers and fathers were willfully misled. That's one of the saddest facts. Many can't believe they were willfully misled. Richard Nixon knew the facts and chose to spin disinformation instead. Richard Nixon left office in shame, but left his shameful policy behind. Sadly American politicians continued to spin disinformation and 'madness' for political gain.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sublime_Emperor
  • ZomOn
  • Conniepae
    • 0
      Conniepae  
    • Image
    • After watching Robert Reich on the Ed Show, I came on current to see if there was a cannabis post on the front page of the news section. Robert Reich spoke of the need for President Obama to stimulate main-street, not wall-street. I think he could do both. He could lead the way to new industry, by re-classifying cannabis hemp. Cannabis should not be in the same classification as heroin. That's an "Assault on Reason".

      If President Obama would have the conversation today, before all the stimulus is doled out, we could use part of the stimulus to stimulate hemp innovation in America. Hemp has so many uses, it could be an industry unto it's self. Plus, the introduction of hemp into American farms would also work to help the environment at the same time. Hemp eliminates many toxins during it's growth cycle. Hemp can be grown in areas with limited water. Farmers need something, which can withstand the weather. Hemp can do it.

      Cannabis 'is' boring, when you include the possibility of 'hemp' as a tool to stimulate our economy. We need jobs, industry and an improved environment. Hemp is 100% biodegradable.

      It's time for people to take a look at the facts about cannabis hemp. The 'madness' is not working, it's hurting. President Obama is the Commander and Chief and it's his obligation to address the issue. If he wants to hear from the American people, he should ask the question. I don't think his website could handle the amount of traffic it would generate. He could get Americans getting 'on board', instead of 'jumping ship'. It's time to bring main-stream along. Re-classify cannabis and let adult Americans come out of the closet. Re-classify cannabis hemp and let adult Americans work in the 'cannabis hemp industry' and get out of the unemployment line.

      We have so many vacant large stores in America. They could be used for 'indoor cannabis' production. We have farmers who would welcome a plant which has so many uses. Farmers could take to market all that they can grow. I think instead of 'drill baby drill', we should be chanting 'grow baby grow'! It's time to let cannabis hemp grow our economy.

      http://www.jackherer.com/chapters.html
      Read and share the facts. Facts matter!
      http://current.com/search.htm?s=on&v=on&r=off&context=&context_i...

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos