Image
afitzgerald
Post your reaction to the State of the Union address in the comments - our live blog is below.

President Obama asked Congress to work together, to pass health care reform, to end don't ask don't tell and to pass a jobs bill to get Americans back to work.

What did you think? What moments stood out to you? What would you say in response?


----


Image: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/jan/27/state-of-the-union-addresses


Live blog from the event:
"We all hated the bank bailout...I hated i you hated it, it was about as popular as a root canal."

Obama credits the stimulus bill with help to create/save jobs. "Economists on the left and the right..." says it's saved/created jobs.

Obama says jobs are the focus in 2010 and he will ask for a new jobs bill tonight. Start with small businesses...take $30B from the TARP funds and give it to community banks to lend to small businesses.

Obama: "I want a jobs bill on my desk without delay."

"I do not accept second place for United States of America." Obama calls for competition for jobs creating green technology.

Obama hat-tips nuclear power plant creation. Full ovation. Offshore gas and oil drilling. Full ovation. Biofuel, clean coal, etc. And then he lumps in clean energy bill. Half ovation.

Double our exports over the next five years - create 2 million jobs. (Has anyone seen the math on this?)

Education: Community colleges, More financial aid - "No one should go broke because they chose to go to college."

Middle Class - segue into health insurance reform. Loud applause.

Health care: Obama didn't take this on because I wanted an easy victory
Michelle Obama to work on tackling childhood obesity
"I will not walk away from these Americans and neither should the people in this chamber."

Adding another trillion to national debt was right thing to do in crisis, Obama says. Proposes to freeze government discretionary spending for three years starting in 2011. "If I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will."

Obama criticizes the Supreme Court decision to let corporations "spend without limit in our elections." Says it will give more power to special interests. Urges Congress to pass a bill to correct.

Obama calls on Congress to work together. "Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it's not leadership. We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions."

Wars and military: "As we take the fight to al Qaeda, we are responsibly leaving Iraq to its people. As a candidate, I promised that I would end this war, and that is what I am doing as President. We will have all of our combat troops out of Iraq by the end of this August."

Here it is: Obama: "This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are."

And wrapping it up:
"We have finished a difficult year. We have come through a difficult decade. But a new year has come. A new decade stretches before us. We don't quit. I don't quit. Let's seize this moment – to start anew, to carry the dream forward, and to strengthen our union once more."

What did you think?
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics
  2. tags:
    Obama Congress State of the Union Address
  3.     
    |

159 comments // State of the Union: Reactions

  • jimmysemens
  • jimmysemens
  • kennymotown
  • jimmysemens
  • kennymotown
  • ahappymintleaf
    • +1
      ahappymintleaf  
    • I'm kind of stumped of people saying that Obama doesn't do enough. Isn't the real of president supposed to be limited by the two other branches? Other than control of the military, there is very little he can do as quickly as it seems some think he can, and though I feel we should be out of all countries as soon as possible, leaving immediately would lead to consequences much worse than attempting a systematic departure.

      At the same time, I agree he has been allowing the Democratic party to continue being a pack of wusses that fold and needlessly play victim, but then it's his fault for believing in the motivation and proper interests of politicians to do what is best for the American people. The president isn't supposed to be a philosopher king. He may not be flawless, but he is trying and it's clear he does have the best interest of the people of the U.S. at heart, though his best interest may be arguably far off the mark. I think many are failing to put in context the outright lies and deceptions of past presidents. Does Obama's track record really compare, at all? I'm as for some stateless system over this decrepit psuedo-democracy we have as the next guy, but for how the lesser of evils goes, this doesn't merit so much unilateral outrage. I thought that Obama not having the supreme power to do crap effortlessly was supposed to be a good thing.

    • 2 years ago
  • DJverboten
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • ...and I know this has already been addressed by Delia and others...but what IS this deal with the teleprompter? A teleprompter doesn't write speeches...it just allows the speaker to look more directly at his or her audience while still being able to see the text of their speech. I use a teleprompter from time-to-time -- and they're great -- but I still write all my own speeches.

      However, I am not aware of any modern president who did not use several speech writers. Several of Bush's speech writers famously loathed one another. I assume that Obama's chief speech writer is still that twenty-something who was so impressive during his campaign. There are numerous articles in which the guy (I forget his name) talks about how Obama's editing process works and how it took a long period of time before the guy learned how to anticipate Obama's views on the literally hundreds of issues that come up during a presidential campaign.

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
    • 0
      cmdinc  
    • cztheday:

      we can program robots to give a speech. We cannot teach them to speak from the heart. The reason for the ribbing about the teleprompter is that if it is not there, he looks like a bumbling idiot. Really setting up the teleprompter to speak to a 6th grade class for 2 minutes...please

    • 2 years ago
  • DJverboten
    • 0
      DJverboten [removed]  
    • cztheday:

      I agree. What's the big deal with having a teleprompter. People who do newscast read off a teleprompter as well as notes they have. Maybe those notes are just blanks pieces of paper. I don't know. Then there are those that cannot afford teleprompters like poor churches and those Priest (or whatever) read from note cards, but that's like e teleprompter. How about those who graduate high school the valedictorian. They read their speech from note cards. The only people I know that don't use notes on stage while performing for massive crowds are actors. They memorize thousands of words. They could probably memorize Obama's speeches. They don't have difficult words in them.

      Saturday Night Live still uses cue cards. Going to go after them?

      If he did do this with a sixth grade class with two minute speech that might have been a bit addictive to technology. How many people have texted a friend and they were just in another room instead of get up and speak to them in person? That's really lazy. How can you get on to Obama for being lazy if you are just as lazy? I've done that before. It's not only funny...but convenient and so are teleprompters for him. I see no big deal with having a crutch. We all have one.

      I do think Obama is awesome. He's got a winning smile. How can someone not like that man?

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • cztheday:

      Quite obviously with a teleprompter we get better read speeches if you use them correctly, but if the right wing thinks this is something bad then they should take another look at the people they are trying to sell this falsehood too. Ignorance is bliss, rest my case!

    • 2 years ago
  • DJverboten
    • 0
      DJverboten [removed]  
    • cztheday:

      They are ignorant of many things, but what are you speaking of specifically? I like Obama a lot because he's a great speaker and he fought hard to become President and he's fighting hard (but not hard enough) for America, but he's ignorant too. Everyone is ignorant. But if I were to just say Obama was ignorant I'd have to explain myself and I think it's only fair that you explain what it is that you think that this mostly ignorant right wingers are mostly ignorant of. Thanks.

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • cztheday:

      DJVerboten, the biggest ignorance is the rights view of government. We are the government, Republicans have never been good at running government because they can't stand government. So do you get that one because I have another ignorance in the long line of republican voter ignorance. How about this one, tax cuts for the rich put the country in debt or have you not been paying attention. If you need more examples of ignorance on the right side voters then e-mail me anytime. I can't believe you think a republican politician represents you better than a democrat would. They represent the rich and how too keep their wealth for them and the country suffers for these blood sucking leeches they have become.

    • 2 years ago
  • DJverboten
  • cztheday
    • 0
      cztheday  
    • I was amused by one of the earlier comments regarding comparisons between Obama and the junior Bush because in that commenter's opinion CARTER topped the list of worst presidents. I had to laugh because now that a year has passed, I too have reassessed my views as to whether Bush was the worst president ever...having returned to my view that no president in American history was as bad as REAGAN. Bush was admittedly the second worst, followed by Nixon and then a slew of nineteenth century guys. While Bush and Reagan were neck-and-neck when it came to breathtaking incompetence as evil as Bush was, Reagan was far worse...Carter was admittedly ineffective...but he was a genius compared to those two hacks...

    • 2 years ago
  • DJverboten
    • 0
      DJverboten [removed]  
    • cztheday:

      I am all for disliking all Republicans no matter who or what they have done. I like that you dislike them like that. I'm glad I'm not the only one that just does not like them and think that they can do no good what-so-ever.

    • 2 years ago
  • ahiguy
  • 2hellnwait
    • 0
      2hellnwait  
    • I'll post this again, because imho this analysis is closer to nailing it than any I've seen so far;
      Seven things stood out.

      First, at no point did Barack Obama acknowledge that the promises that he made in campaigning for the so-called stimulus bill have gone unredeemed and that unemployment has continued to grow in a fashion that, he told us, it would not.

      Second, much of the speech consisted in self-praise that, in the grim circumstances that we now face, seemed out of place.

      Third, despite what the Climategate scandal has revealed concerning the dishonesty of those who have shilled for bills like the cap-and-trade measure passed by the House of Representatives, the President insists on our basing American public policy on discredited science.

      Fourth, our President is still telling the same old lies concerning the healthcare reform measures passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives; and, despite everything that has happened, he intends to push for their reconciliation and passage into law by one means or another.

      Fifth, he intends to raise taxes on the investing class — both by means of imposing a tax on the large banks and investment operations which will be passed on to those who make use of the services they provide, and by allowing the tax cuts introduced by President Bush to lapse for those making over $250,000 a year — and he has no appreciation for the role which the investing class, if not denied the rewards for which it has incurred considerable risks, can play in creating new jobs and fostering prosperity.

      Sixth, Barack Obama has a vast array of programs that he wants to put in place, and he provided no information as to how these would be paid for.

      Seventh, he is not in any way serious in the arguments that he makes for fiscal prudence.

      I doubt that President Obama helped himself or his party with his State of the Union Address. A year ago, such a speech might have done him some good and would have done him no harm. By now, however, too many people are aware that they are being had. If anything, his decision to continue pushing his signature measures — cap and trade and healthcare reform — is likely to wreak havoc on his party in November.

      http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/28/what-did-obama-say-in-his-state-of-the-union...

    • 2 years ago
  • DJverboten
    • 0
      DJverboten [removed]  
    • 2hellnwait:

      President Obama is one of the best Presidents to ever be in the White House. The change can be seen and is only ignored by those that allow talk radio to rattle their brains with smaller thinking and shortsighted views. Everyone has faults, but that does not mean that it is equal to failure. One year does not a President make. He has 3 years and change like he lovingly wants to bring to American will not come with so much no's from the Negative Party. Where's the love?

    • 2 years ago
  • ahiguy
  • mitekillem
    • 0
      mitekillem  
    • Easy way to stimulate small banks without help from the government. Step 1. Pull your money from the large bank that holds your accounts. Step 2. Close those accounts permantently. Step3. open an account with a small bank or credit union, and desposit money.
      Done enough times, it will create competition, and shrink larger banks.
      Problem solved.
      Now apply like methods to your shopping, and you've help small businesses grown, and created competition.
      It's easy.

    • 2 years ago
  • DJverboten
  • pandaman2105
    • 0
      pandaman2105  
    • another thing, i feel we should view this past year as Obama getting a feel for what it is like being president and seeing what he needs to do

      he did not do a lot, but i think he has been comprehending all that's going on in the world around him and he is officially ready to make the changes we desperately need.

      people, this country is majorly fucked up, he told us that it would take time.
      i believe the time has come when we'll be realizing the change he wanted, and can, bring!

    • 2 years ago
  • DJverboten
  • pmurph364
    • 0
      pmurph364  
    • That explains why fox has been against green energy and conservation.
      Right wing radio turns out works for the enemy I should think that this will wake a lot of Americans to the fact they have been duped.

    • 2 years ago
  • sk8bs55
  • TheEmpireGuy
  • kivol
    • 0
      kivol  
    • Cut the military budget, close the bases, end the wars, open humanitarian aid that gets to the populace what they need to rebuild their life and become sustainable again, don't freeze education make a huge investment in that, make a huge investment in both alternative energy(he's open to dirty energy for lame reasons) and public transportation, break up the banks, fire giether, summers, oust berneke, and bring warren, former ny governor, volcher, stigitilz, krugman, and this guy from missouri all good people to be on the close inside. end corporate personhood, fix campaign finance law, shorten elections, get rid of the patriot act, break up the media, break up monopolized industries(we have many, hard to notice with fake choices) stop the revolving door of public to private sector. create a buy into government health care and affordable prices at any income, should 28 million people control 30 some percent of the nations wealth? again there is aways more.

      i have to let go of being disappointed and expect that this will only be a decent presidency(could be bad for the people though) only the people wanting to get active and organize and have the desire to change how we rule our government and rule our businesses the elite or the oligrahics are going to win.

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
    • 0
      cmdinc  
    • Glad you all took it, hook line and sinker. the only thing missing was the shout of "your lying" from the crowd. but then they would have to say it for the entire speech. My question is, what is the State of The Union?????? He never told us. He actually looked and felt angry. Maybe he has relized his number is up and only the truly intoxicated Kool-aide drinkers are still with him

    • 2 years ago
  • wally60
    • 0
      wally60  
    • i dont think americans get it. everone blames the other party for
      the countrys problems.that is exactly what they want it keeps them in
      power.when will everone get it both partys have been putting it to us for
      the last 20 years.the system no longer works corperations and coruption
      has taken over.and unless we band together and throw all of them out
      all will be lost!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • jimmysemens
    • 0
      jimmysemens [removed]  
    • You don't pick brain surgeons by the color of their skin. You pick them by competence only. Same thing with airplane pilots. But we have allowed the profoundly irrational liberal media to persuade the American public that we are supposed to pick a U.S. president by affirmative action. Obama was elected to universal Hosannas because he is black. It wasn't a secret. That's why the Left around the world went into ecstasies when Obama ran and got elected.

      We've been using affirmative action to hire and promote teachers and cops and to popularize movie stars and media heroes. We've had a generation of affirmative action agitprop, 24/7/365. Hillary Clinton was going to dictate racial and gender preferences for medical school admissions under HillaryCare. You can bet that reverse-racism is all over the 2,200 pages of ObamaCare. It's reverse-racism forever!
      From a temporary policy to give black people a better chance in life, we have now arrived at a Marxist goal of universal equality for everyone -- except for white, male, heterosexual, and excessively normal people. We have reversed racism, but guess what? Reverse-racism is still racism. As a direct result, corruption now pervades the big cities and Washington, D.C. That's because race, gender, and victim status have taken over as the criteria for all the benefits society has to offer.

      Obama's election to the nation's most powerful office is the direct outcome of racial reasoning. It was race that put him over the top against Hillary, in a thousand media endorsements, and finally, against John McCain, who was old, male and white. Three strikes against McCain, who for all his faults is vastly more experienced and knowledgeable than the Obamessiah.

      http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/the_lesson_of_an_affirmative_a.html

    • 2 years ago
  • rick2740
    • 0
      rick2740  
    • My view in behalf of president Obama:

      I don't know what is wrong with Americans; the deficit is George Bush's mess! Obviously republicans are taking controll by turning tables and delivering all the blame toward president Obama. Americans' need to remember; it was the 'republians' who started the US deficit and instilled all the hate towards LGBT people. . . I wish Americans' would think back and get wise! I fear; todays Americans' are so easliy swayed. . .

      Therefor:

      I'm living in fear of hate and our budget,

      Richard

    • 2 years ago
  • bbar
    • 0
      bbar  
    • rick2740:

      It's not the republicans and it's not the democrats; it's the Keynesians (which happens to make up the majority). That also includes both Bush/Greenspan and Obama/Bernanke.

    • 2 years ago
  • rick2740
    • 0
      rick2740  
    • rick2740:

      Obama is a good president. Yes Bush etc, but yes Republicans are responsible and worthless and caniving. Republicans are for the rich and very right wing! I live in fear of Republicans getting back in office. I'm for democarts! I've seen years of Republicans and war, and always a failing economy. . .

    • 2 years ago
  • bbar
    • 0
      bbar  
    • rick2740:

      Obama, if anything, is a "tad" better than Bush. Their foreign policies are the same. In fact, the military spending is now higher. The debt is for sure higher. They're both good at exporting american jobs overseas. Their fiscal policies are the same. Their monetary policies are the same. Both embrace an inflation tax, which hurts the poor the most and only benefits the rich and politically well connected (Cantillon distribution). They both favor big government. They both favor the bankers and big corporations. They both show blatant disregard toward both the constitution and its framers.

      It's not a democrat/republican issue. Both parties are full of jackasses.

    • 2 years ago
  • manofnomeans
    • 0
      manofnomeans  
    • I am not a racist, and I don't care who wrote the speech. I don't care what color the man is, I just don't want the same song and dance. He also knew what he would be stepping into before he ran for office, you said you could do a better job so stop complaining about what was handed to you and fix it. The little guys are the ones that keep this country running and we don't even have a voice. Mr president you are set for life, we still have to get up and go to work this 4 years, the next 4, the next four etc... I am just say show me don't tell
      and guess what I am not Joe the plummer.

    • 2 years ago
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • manofnomeans:

      look. You don't have to preface that you aren't a racist before criticizing the president. There have been overtly racist statements about the man and there has been a disrespectful tone not afforded the office in generations, those are overt statements and actions that speak for themselves. No reasoning or defense for teabaggers with signs with racial epithets or joke emails with the white house rose garden full of watermelons, dead chimpanzee's as authors of the stimulus bill, or a southern white republican from South Carolina having the thought to be the first person to interrupt a joint address of congress just so happened to do so about the racially charged issue of immigration while it was the first african american president giving the address. And perhaps that last one is stretching the truth or arguing intent were it not for the fact the congressman was a proud member of the sons of the confederate veterans which is listed by the southern poverty law center as having links to hate groups across the southern united states. Those are overt. This is politics putting a disclaimer about racial attitudes doesn't do anything. Most people who say I'm not racist but, follow with a racist comment not a genuine concern. So relax and just talk as if he were any other president. He's the president of every American, not just Hannity's America or Scarborough Country or Clinton Country, all of the country.

    • 2 years ago
  • jdimino
  • SleepDirt
    • 0
      SleepDirt  
    • This is awkward:

      The Real State of the Union
      By Ken Silverstein

      From The Hill:

      A day after bashing lobbyists, President Barack Obama’s administration has invited K Street insiders to join private briefings on a range of topics addressed in Wednesday’s State of the Union. The Treasury Department on Thursday morning invited selected individuals to “a series of conference calls with senior Obama administration officials to discuss key aspects of the State of the Union address.”

      The invitation, which went to a variety of stakeholders, was sent by Fred Baldassaro, a senior adviser at the Treasury Department’s Office of Business Affairs and Public Liaison. The invitation stated, “The White House is encouraging you to participate in these calls and will have a question and answer session at the end of each call. As a reminder, these calls are not intended for press purposes.”

      http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/78509-after-obama-rips-k-street-admin...

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • SleepDirt:

      "On Thursday afternoon, White House spokesman Josh Earnest stated in an e-mail, "As part of our effort to reach out and engage with the public and policymakers, it is standard for our outreach team to organize a conference call, so that we can include people who are not in Washington, after a major speech or announcement through the president's priorities. These calls are targeted at a diverse group of community and government leaders including mayors, governors, faith groups, women's organizations, representatives from the African American and Latino communities to share as much information about the administration's agenda as possible. The calls, which include question-and-answer sessions, typically include hundreds of people from across the country..."

      Whoa how do I get in on that?

    • 2 years ago
  • pandaman2105
    • 0
      pandaman2105  
    • i liked it all!
      these were all real prospects that we never heard from the white guy for 8 years.

      he's really comprehending the realities of the poor and minorities as well as creating these good economic and educational strategies that he clearly wants to see put into effect.

      and the freeze idea is great simply because we've all been budgeting, dealing with a limited amount of money...the government should try it too!

      lastly, i like that he wants to get EVERYone in Washington involved. that's presidency! putting everyone in their place demanding that they all be a part of the progress for the country as a whole

      :)

    • 2 years ago
  • jmb0802
    • 0
      jmb0802  
    • The problem with the SOTU Address was that it's a lot of promises and no one knows if it's ever going to come to fruition. Also, he did not mention what he's going to do to force banks to do loan modifications- there was a little talk about refinancing, but if you have bad credit or high debt, you cannot get approved for a refinance. I hope he was referring to forcing the loan servicers into making more loan modifications, because there aren't strict enough rules for the servicers and they can flat out deny you for no reason at all without providing the proof of how they came to the decision of denying you.

      I think he brought up a good point talking about returning to bipartisan talks, but put too much of the blame on just the Republicans. The Dems having closed door meetings on healthcare is pretty partisan as well. It goes both ways.

      I also don't think loans to small businesses will help. They want to REDUCE debt, not take more on in this economy. You can't rob Peter to pay Paul and make up all this imaginary money for other programs when we have a budget deficit. It will just contribute to our problems. Tax cuts to small businesses that HIRE and give RAISES will help businesses stop using the economy as an excuse to screw the little guy.

    • 2 years ago
  • tenletters
    • 0
      tenletters  
    • Admittidly I'm an independent who'd rather drink beer than kool-aid, but only consider:

      The guy has had a year with an unheard of super majority in both houses, needing NO Republican support, and his signature issues: Cap & Trade; Climate; and Health Care have resulted in....zero. Hence, his step-down to insignificant issues he feels he MIGHT be able to carry, ie the gay/military thingey, demonizing investment banks that didn't write mortgages (which is THE reason for the melt down), etc. We all know he sure as hell isn't going to license any nuke plants nor allow anyone to spud a hole to suck out any oil.

      The rebuke of the signature issues and the political setbacks in NY, Va & Mass can only be a result of the masses sumarily rejecting his "vision" of each issue, it's bullshit to suggest otherwise, however you may personally embrace them. 'Tis time for a personal reality check if you think otherwise.

      If you wish to aplaud his speech, it is your due. He is after all though, only a talker. Realistically, he hasn't accomplished much in life, aside from his education. In his present incarnation every room he walks into he finds himself the least experienced one present, aside from a recording secretary or an aide. This inexperience was his appeal.
      His whole life has been a talker, not a doer, and he talks well, but he can no longer harp on the way things are done in "Washington". After a year, with all his minions in place, he IS "Washington", like it or not.
      Revel in the speech if you will, but I'm becomming ever convinced he's an empty suit leading a party that has become unrecognizable with it's past, and he's heading that party over a cliff, and maybe....just maybe....that's a good thing.

    • 2 years ago
  • jmb0802
  • AlbyFlugzeug
    • 0
      AlbyFlugzeug  
    • Deficit hawks don't care about unemployment. Rampant wage devaluation is good for business for the Top 1%. We are being systematically de-skilled and disinflated to bring us back in line with the rest of the world. Destroying the USD will also destablize China to keep that Tiger down a little longer. Top 1% are already well diversified owning plant and equipment and cashflows in every currency all over this planet. 15K of them allegedly even have accounts at Union Bank of Switzerland. Which is just one bank, in just one tax- money laundering haven.

      The only way investment $$$ are going to come back here is when wages and social costs are on par with other markets. Obama needs his hands tied by this "freeze" bill because otherwise like the Dems and their Super Majority, he has to get too close to redistributing "property" to 99% of US citizens who live off earning wages. That was a close call, so PHEW Coakley a weak candidate finally lost and now we don't have to be under so much pressure between real voters, and Top 1% campaign donors who buys us and own us.

      The Two party system is really a One party system. And it is controlled by the same Top 1% of people who own and control 50% of the NYSE listed shares.

      Fed Reserve data may even say Top 1% own like 70%-90% of all property in the US. That would be only a 30% come down, since the Founders and their small circle owned fully 100% of the 13 colonies at the Founding.

      They created a Constitutional checks and balances that would protect this Top 1% minority from the "tyranny of the majority" the remaining 99% of US citizens. The Senate itself was created to give inordinate minority rule power to southern slave owners in states with few other white men who could vote in a popular election, the Filibuster which reinforce minority rules, and the Electoral College as the final stop gap check on the mass popular voters should they ever take an unexpected turn.

      They do occasionally allow a Democratic President. We've had 8 out of the last 28 years, and the Supreme Court appointments and their votes against us now reflect that.

      In our own lifetimes, the Supreme Court stepped in in 2000 to become that stop gap since even with the electoral college, they didn't get their desired result.

      With Congress, the composition doesn't really matter since with campaign finance they own those who get in, and with Buckley vs Valeo,and now Citizens United, their TV ads will entice and mesmerize even more the "created equal" voters into voting who they want anyway.

      Congress is more of a game where the illusion is created and therefore has to be allowed some sway that the public can believe is their "influence". Like Coakley. In any case, now without Super Majority, Dems and the hidden Donors are off the hook to have to give any redistribution of Top 1% "property" to us. That was close last summer. Blue Dog Dems were a nice stop gap invention. They were biting their nails, like they were in the 1930s. But now Citizens United will make sure we don't get that close to a "socialist" precipice again.

      Now I understand why to this day they refer to FDR as "that dictator". In order to do the re-distribution of their "property" and clipping of wings that he did to his own Top 1% social class, he had to pull dictatorial powers because the checks and balances as he knew them would never have saved this country from a Russian Revolution at that time. Or French Revolution.

      Ours differ from theirs on one important factor. They both threw off ruling elites from among their own people who used techniques like pitting one group against the other, uprooting family units and terrorizing wage earners to keep wages down and workers compliant, big threats from outside enemies, war debts, and devastated economies, etc etc. anything to keep the spotlight off the Royal Family and the Clergy.

      Ours only threw off a foreign occupier who taxed the Top 1%'s "property" too much for said war games. But, exchanged it

    • 2 years ago
  • trut
  • bailey78
  • NuclearLullaby
    • 0
      NuclearLullaby  
    • Strong speech! OH! & It didn't have all the slurs weird faces & boos from the crowd that happened while Bush was in office! Speaking of Bush, did anyone happen to catch the whole thing where Obama was explaining what happened to US budget under Bush??? He basically proved Bush created more problems then he ever solved!!! Obama has some great Ideas for how to fix America & I am positive he will! Just as I'm positive most people in the world hate the fact that we are at war in Iraq!!! I think Obama has a lot of goals for America! That's what we NEED in leadership! We NEED someone with goals!!! Someone who's not afraid to stand up & say "There are many problems with the world right now & I am not about to stand around & let things get worse!" I like that Obama seems to want to build new jobs in clean energy & quit giving oil companies major tax breaks! Under Bush, those guys were basically allowed to create their own wages! Obama's Health care plan might seem like a bad idea to some,but just stop & think about it for a while! This is something that pretty much every wealthy nation in the world has & is why we are NOT at #1 when it comes to health care issues! That honor goes to France! People of course find many things to complain about with EVERYTHING in life & Obama is just another topic people love to complain about! Some hate him because of his skin color(Racist Bastards!!!) some hate him because he seems to set a lot of goals & then there are those who hate him because he's not a Republican! But Obama is a great leader! If people wake up maybe they'll see that!!! Maybe someone could do a little research to find when the last time Republicans did anything good actually was! We've had more wars under Republican leadership then under Democratic! More Budget problems! More security threats! OH! Yeah! Many might have forgot that terrorist bombed a trade center under the first Bush as well as the second!!! Anyway...There are many problems with the world & things will be worse before they get better,but once some of Obama's plans play out, don't be too shocked if they actually do some good in the world!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • pandaman2105
  • oppressed1
    • 0
      oppressed1  
    • NuclearLullaby:

      HOw the hell are you going to say that republicans have started more wars than democrats.? The political spectrum has changed significantly in the last two hundred years. By all accounts lincoln would be a democrat.

      War of 1812 - Madison
      US Civil War - Lincoln (First Republican)

    • 2 years ago
  • My_America
    • 0
      My_America  
    • He was so good "I forgot he was black for an hour"

      If you get beyond the lies and all the "Me, Myself and I" comments I guess you are left with the standing ovations.

    • 2 years ago
  • ScottyT
  • Toughth
    • 0
      Toughth  
    • As a citizen of this nation I have been alive for over half a century. Since I can remember I have watched men and women of this nation be sacrificed on the alter of special intrest, weather it be financial or by war. Obama is right to say that the high court is going to allow special intrest to rule our nation by proxie. May as well have a king because profit for the few now rules our nation. Men and women will still be sacrificed on the alter of those that sit back here in the States and make the decision that they don't have the right to a decent living. They will still send the jobs to a slave state in preferance to the people that protected their right to do so in the first place.

    • 2 years ago
  • outerbanksmom
    • 0
      outerbanksmom  
    • It was hopeful and that's something everyone likes about Obama. I like the fact that the war is ending soon. I've always been against this war...never understood it and will be glad when it's behind us.

    • 2 years ago
  • bbar
  • outerbanksmom
  • oppressed1
    • 0
      oppressed1  
    • You know when a man beats his wife, and she is thinking about leaving him. Except he keeps telling her that he loves her and it wont ever happen again.

      Thats basically you liberals every time you hear one of his speeches.

    • 2 years ago
  • UrbanGypsy
    • 0
      UrbanGypsy  
    • oppressed1:

      And the republicans? You guys are like the women who get beat and NEVER EVEN think of leaving your husband.

      The GOP has been screwing over the American people for God knows how long, in the name of corporate interests. And you guys defend them, because you swallow their rhetoric.

      I already had enough of Bush the last 8 years. Worst president ever...

    • 2 years ago
  • oppressed1
    • 0
      oppressed1  
    • oppressed1:

      IF we are going for the worst ever Jimmy Carter is going to have to top the chart.

      Your analogy is completely off. The republicans are the actual beater. Not coward little pussies like democrats.

    • 2 years ago
  • jimmysemens
    • 0
      jimmysemens [removed]  
    • I think a collection of President Obama’s speeches translated into Arabic and Urdu would be an effective means of breaking the most recalcitrant Islamist if played to them in a perpetual loop for a week.
      “Nooooooooooooooo, anything but that! I’ll talk. I’ll talk. What do you want to know?” — generic terrorist

    • 2 years ago
  • manofnomeans
  • jmb0802
  • LozRiva
  • LozRiva
    • 0
      LozRiva  
    • Are news sites not allowed to show the recording or video of the speech? All i can find is articles written by people who work for news papers (not usually to be believed as objective)... In this day and age that is useless

    • 2 years ago
  • jimmysemens
    • 0
      jimmysemens [removed]  
    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pB5uR3zgsA&feature=player_embedded

      Likely THE most boring State of the Union Address is over. And the only exciting moment in Barack Hussein Obama’s long, yawnworthy consisted of words mouthed by someone other than the Dullard-in-Chief. Check out Justice Samuel Alito’s mouth (on the left side of the video), when BHusseinO attacks the recent Supreme Court ruling that prohibitions against corporate contributions to political campaigns are an unconstitutional violation of First Amendment speech rights.
      Alito said “that’s not true” to the line from Obumbo which was “this decision overturned a century of laws”. “A century of laws” would be laws that were established in 1910 regarding campaign finance… the recent decision overturned McCain-Feingold, which was 2002, or 8 years ago, not ‘a century ago’. Thus, what Obambi said was ‘not true’, and showed his usual utter lack of historical knowledge.
      Even Alito’s liberal neighbour Sotomayor (that is her, right?) didn’t seem too pleased. Almost everyone got up and applauded, minus the judges, which made it look like a political rally full of Yes Men instead of a speech to the nation. I could see the Judges mentally giving everyone there the middle finger, just look at their faces.

    • 2 years ago
  • jimmysemens
  • Tradiggy
    • 0
      Tradiggy  
    • It wouldn't matter who was President; whoever took office had a very BIG plate to deal with. Obama didn't put us in this situation and we as a country has never seen the problems that we are face'n. It has always been "Tell the people what they want to hear, and let do our thing" gov't. Now we have someone who wants to change that. We as a people fear CHANGE; cuz it's unknown and we don't know what the outcome is goning to be. We as a people have to stop the name call'n, backbitting, and other crap that has been go'n on. If something happens to this country, it's gonna effect everyone. We need to take our government back, we put those people in office and they should work for US. That is what I got from the speech, a man who wants our country to be BETTER!!!
      WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT???!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • jimmysemens
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • More war (and billions more for it despite the rhetoric) the same environmental policy, and a few crumbs thrown out with pretty words to "inspire" the people who his pollsters say are "angry" at him. No other president would have done anything different in this circumstance. It's called damage control. It's like a batterer bringing roses home to his wife and hugging her and saying he is sorry, but it doesn't change the fact he has beaten her and probably will again if it suits him... and she forgives him even knowing that. And because it is an election year, Democrats need some momentum. It is all about politics.

      And what magic that he could actually spin taking 700 billion dollars of our money and handing it over to banks and make us think they all "hated" doing it... so now he talks about some fee that they will only absorb through charging their customers more for their services while still getting away with huge payouts and bonuses and that is supposed to make it all better. I also hope these jobs he hopes to create are more than just minimum wage or temporary dead end jobs.

      And don't get me started on environmental policy. He gets a D from me on that. It is all well and good to say people will be making solar panels, but how long will that job last if we keep kissing the a88 of coal and oil companies while allowing them to drill offshore and pillage our environment, blow up our mountains, and toxify our food system.

      And please, building nuclear plants? Is he for real? Just how far does he have to stoop to kiss the a88es of Republicans? Does he remember that under them and the same enabling Democrats who sat there applauding him in their usual tit for tat clapping and standing competition that our constitution was rendered void? What about the Patriot Act and all of the other civil liberties abuses he has also been party to? Like I said, pretty words mean nothing... except only when you use them to save your own face.

    • 2 years ago
  • Guyatthebusstation
    • 0
      Guyatthebusstation  
    • Different people have very different reactions to President Barack Obama. Those who listen to his rhetoric are often inspired, while those who follow what he actually does are often appalled.

      30k to afgan anyone? Barack Obama policy smells as bad as his initials infer.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nephwrack
  • courage
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • courage:

      This is the worst supreme court since Tawneys day. And Alito and Scalia have both said that had they been on the bench they wouldn't have ruled with the majority on Brown vs. Board of Education. So its not surprising. It was well earned.

    • 2 years ago
  • ryan8566
  • JonRaymond
    • 0
      JonRaymond  
    • Image
    • http://current.com/items/92011937_greenwald-on-oliver-stone-i-f-ked-up-says-ston...

      Screw Obama and his bi-partisan politically correct bullshit speech. If you want to see a great speaker watch Robert Greenwald interview Oliver Stone. This is freaking awesome.

      Robert Greenwald interviews Oliver Stone on the new Wall Street, Stone's new 10 hour HBO series, W, Nixon, his Vietnam experience, his interview and doc on Castro, on Chavez, the economy, and Stone's prediction of the end of America, '....a disaster will happen [to America].' He compares the economic collapse of September 2008 to a heart attack and that the patient went back to eating butter. He says we will never end Afghanistan until the U.S. government economically collapses permanently, which he believes will happen when another currency, like the Yen perhaps, will take over the dollar.

    • 2 years ago
  • UrbanGypsy
    • 0
      UrbanGypsy  
    • The speech was excellent. I was beginning to lose faith in Obama after all that had happened. His speech reassured me that he is still fighting for what I elected him for and he reminded me what made me vote for him again...

      He addressed so many issues that it is hard for me to pick out my favorite part of the speech.

      I hope 2010 is the year we get all of what we want done.

    • 2 years ago
  • CrazyJack
    • 0
      CrazyJack  
    • I have complete and total faith in this administration. No changes are going to happen in a year and with the deficit, I think a 20 year goal is incredible. What he walked into was a bad marriage between the Republican's and the People. The "bad spouse" that leads you on until they have the means to take it all. Bush is a horrible ex and Obama is stuck picking up the piece's, we all are. Without our support and understanding we will do no better than the abused that "loves" the abuser. Amen to President Obama.

    • 2 years ago
  • realitybytes
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • CrazyJack:

      Bush inherited a two hundred billion dollar surplus and a growing economy. His legislative priorities were mostly related to taxation. Bush's tax cut added one trillion dollars to the deficit and affected the richest one percent disproportionate to the other 99 percent of the country. He presided over the first period of economic growth in our history in which the average family actually lost income in this case 1,200 dollars a year, and to make that fact worse energy, healthcare, and food prices all rose above inflation and by the time Bush left office he had presided over two recessions including the deepest since the Great Depression, and during the entirety of his presidency unemployment was higher than the three years prior to his inheriting the office.

      To top it all off, this would have been enough to ensure a drastically tainted legacy Bush was asleep at the wheel during the worst act of terrorism in this nations history. And was unable to protect us two months later from the Anthrax attacks in that same year. Instead he turned his fear and petty hatred towards Sadam Hussein and invaded Iraq under false pretenses of weapons of mass destruction. In that war his administration authorized so called enhanced interrogation techniques, including those utilized at Abu Ghareib and Guantanamo, which clearly violated the Geneva convention and have subsequently made our soldiers and citizens less safe in future engagements and enflamed anti American rhetoric and legislation across the globe.

      During Bush's Watch he allowed three most unstable nation states in their regions to gain nuclear arms. North Korea, Pakistan, and India making us undeniably less safe. Subsequent to North Korea and Pakistan's acquiring nuclear arms we had actionable intelligence that both Syria and Iran were able to move forward on nuclear programs so that by the time Obama took office it was indicated that Iran had acquired enough fissile materials for at least one bomb.

      During domestic crises president Bush was woefully inept. The response to a rash of tornadoes and Hurricanes in the last decade were hampered at the state level because so many national gaurdsmen and women were deployed in Iraq. During Katrina Bush rather than acting proactively remained on vacation during the height of the emergency. In fact Bush spent a record one third of his presidency on vacation. Who amongst us during that time spent more than a year off work getting paid on the tax payer dime?

      And I'd managed to leave out the actions of his senior staff. From a cabinet member whose name I don't recall, to a defense secretary who knew known unknowns, to the Interior secretary who is headed to jail after leading a department in which staff had sexual relations with lobbyists, engaged in drug abuse including literally snorting meth of toaster ovens in the Interior department headquarters. I didn't mention the abuse of our intelligence agencies even to the point where an active covert CIA agent Vallerie Plame was outed for political gain. The crippling affect of Bush's stop loss order, the record amount of army suicides, lying about the cost of the medicare advantage program, the 150 billion dollar medicare doughnut hole, it goes on and on and on.

      In summation, no sir sadly its you who is delusional.

    • 2 years ago
  • leftnva
    • 0
      leftnva  
    • As always, President Obama is a wonderful speaker. He delivered. His message was for his base, to Independants and to Republicans. He covered a lot of territory and he did so with assurance and decisiveness. I can only hope the Republicans can take notes, I for one, am fed up with their brand of politics (as I usually am). I want them to get on board with the administration and get some work done. For one time, you would think the dire situation that this country has been in the last few years would be all the Republicans would need to put politics aside an focus on this country and work with who they have to work with. I know wishful thinking.
      JMHO

    • 2 years ago
  • tenletters
  • esserius
  • Sahuaro
  • bushama
    • 0
      bushama  
    • Here is the speech, I have not watched it and probably won't. Im just posting this in case someone wants to watch it. I am guessing it is more of the same BS. Change, hope and I imagine a bit of terror mixed in

    • 2 years ago
  • ocanada
    • 0
      ocanada  
    • bushama:

      Thank you. Oh and human refuse goes in the toilet don't mistake it for the internet. If you want to complain or be cynical during the most challenging era for America since the depression than you might as well sleep under the newspapers out in the cold tonight so that you can get there sooner than the rest of us. Then you'll have every right to be so cynical to prejudge the actions of those charged with changing this climate of fear and cynicism and to prevent the rebirth of tent cities and wish sandwiches as a daily part of the American consciousness.

    • 2 years ago
  • Allorno1
    • 0
      Allorno1  
    • The speech was inspiring and covered a little bit of something about everything we wanted to hear. While he came across as cool, collected and confident that we're right on track, the partisan line that was visibly shown in the hall tonight only translates to more strung out battles and little if any progress.

    • 2 years ago
  • ChristopherX
  • ibrake4rappers13
  • mikem0487
    • 0
      mikem0487  
    • After listening to his speech, I feel there is hope for our country and feel more optimistic for the future of America. It sounded great in his speech but can he deliver? He has three more years under his belt and I personally think Obama and his administration can do it. We will see though....

    • 2 years ago
  • bbar
  • dwb2585
  • ibrake4rappers13
  • dwb2585
    • 0
      dwb2585  
    • dwb2585:

      ...but unfortunately that's all he is, an image. The policies won't change, nothing will change; the IDEA of Barrack Obama is beyond reality for the American people.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • Sounds like I missed a good speech. I voted for Obama - we're all going to watch what happens.
      I have the new focus that many of us have - that our political infrastructure has been swallowed by corporate intrusion into government. That our very grievous problems, as a country, stem entirely from that.
      This makes up the present landscape of politics - and I believe our political process needs corrective surgery.
      How are we to see change, real change, when all players are playing from within the present system?

    • 2 years ago
  • ScorpioGee
    • 0
      ScorpioGee  
    • Image
    • 02:

      Dont worry 02 you can always catch the speech on Huffingtonpost.com or somewhere on the internet. Google it! :)

      Personal I rather read transcripts for SofTUA due to all the excessive hootin' and clappin' but a video is fine too.

    • 2 years ago
  • richardcorsale
    • 0
      richardcorsale  
    • 02:

      Bravo! See if you look at this page, you see the problem. Rhetoric is not action and his rhetoric is inconsistent with his actions. That said, everyone (including myself) wants to believe him. Out of fifty comments most people are confusing his words with his actions. I mean I can't honestly say that I think he's anything other than genuine and good man. But look at what hes doing. He's paying back political favors to the intellectual property lobbies for insane media coverage during the election. Hes paying back the drug companies for staying out of the health care debate through forcing our hopelessly broken patent system on other countries at the mortal expense of the poorest citizens of said nations??? He (and we by proxy) have been sold a bill of goods. I had hoped that this would end with the previous administration. I had lots of that "hope" he spoke of so often in eloquent speeches like the one he gave tonight. I get it now, he doesn't really run the country. The giants of industry do. The real problem is that they are so much more powerful than the will of the people that they openly defy us and puppet our elected leaders to grant them any power they see fit to protect their business from a free market.

      Lobbies in question RIAA/MPAA the same ones that sue little old ladies for file sharing tu-pac and using exorbitant legal expense as a blunt instrument to force them to settle though they deny any involvement.

      Third party anyone???
      -- Ashamed..

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
  • Elisalouise
  • ZomBelle
    • 0
      ZomBelle  
    • In the words of wimpy; "I will gladly pay you next Tuesday for a hamburger today."

      I'm sure my great grandchildren are looking forward to pay the taxes for all these "incentives."
      Still though, we can only move up from here.

    • 2 years ago
  • pmurph364
    • 0
      pmurph364  
    • ZomBelle:

      Zombe that is fitting, escapes you that the DEBT was anincredible 11.4 trillion the first day President Obama took office?Or UNEMPLOYMENT was AT 9% PLUS.
      Or maybe 6Hours to be moving an Air Craft Carrier group is to slow for you, Or is the contrast too much for some to accept.

    • 2 years ago
1 - 100 of 163
more from Community:

top videos