Culpepper Virginia schools pull the Diary of Anne Frank!

-
-
- marshuck
- added this
A version of an iconic autobiography detailing a young Jewish girl’s two-year experience hiding from Nazis in a cramped “Secret Annex” has been pulled from the shelves of Culpeper County Public Schools.
“The Diary of a Young Girl: The Definitive Edition,” a vivid memoir of Anne Frank’s private thoughts during the German occupation of the Netherlands during World War II, will no longer be assigned to CCPS students, according to Jim Allen, director of instruction for the school system. This book is usually given to eighth-grade middle school English students to read. Apparently, Anne’s father, Otto Frank, the sole survivor of the “Secret Annex,” felt the need to censor his daughter’s most intimate thoughts as well, eliminating about 30 percent of the original diary published in 1947. He omitted parts where Anne criticized her mother and other Jews living in the confined quarters as well as some sexually suggestive references. However, during the 50th anniversary of her death in a concentration camp, the Anne Frank Foundation published the unedited definitive version in 1995.
-
- groups:
- Community
-
-
bike10
-
Baning of books begins the process of mind control.
- 2 years ago
-
bike10
-
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
bike10:
So could deleting post. But we are all happy that that happens here.
- 2 years ago
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
-
marshuck
-
So happy you all care so much to read and comment. I agree with all of of you, especially jubiejanks. I also agree if a school is worried about the material, then teach it in a higher reading level, don't censor!! The father may have censored the book long ago, but it's up to today's teachers to include the real book in their curriculum when they had the option.
- 2 years ago
-
marshuck
-
-
cztheday
-
Perhaps I am mistaken, but there seems to be be a bit of confusion among some of the people on this thread. The Diary of Anne Frank is still part of the curriculum for eighth graders at this school...just not the most sexually explicit version of the book.
That said, I nonetheless concur with what appears to be the consensus here that there should be a very strong presumption AGAINST censorship and that this presumption should be overcome only when there is a clear and compelling reason for it...and even THEN it should be done surgically. So, for example, if this book were taught to THIRD or FOURTH graders instead of eighth graders, I could perhaps see a few sentences being left out or provided separately to parents so they could decide for themselves whether their children were sufficiently mature to handle the bit of additional material.
But I have a difficult time imagining American eighth graders who would be shocked or somehow emotionally scarred by this kind of content. My wife called me into the living room last night to ask me what I thought about some reality TV show about some women in Orange County? I was able to watch almost five whole minutes before I ran screaming into the night...the unedited version of Anne Frank's diary was almost certainly tame by comparison...
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
cztheday:
8th graders laugh when you say penis. I guess laughing at someone who is Jewish and about to die via a hateful group is also ok. I don't think it's a laughing matter. I don't think that they appreciate the depth of the problems she was in. I think removing what she was going through at the time is wrong. I wouldn't mind if all of it stuck around for anyone to read because it is what is needed for people to understand. But when the mentality of a 8th grade is shown as mature, well....I can not do anything but laugh. Middle school is no a time or place for such a book unless the students have been taught respect and actually show respect.
But as I have seen in my life 95% of all middle schoolers are immature and disrespectful towards anyone that isn't them. They are not worse than sixth and seventh graders, but they are still bad and until they get to high school they think they are the cream of the crop. They can't seem to think outside of their narrow minded views of what is and isn't cool.
If a teacher can reach that heart they tuck away behind the pushing of the parents and the ew don't do that in public....just maybe this book would be right for them.
I think that Anne deserves massive respect for doing what she did and what she lived through and I do not think many 8th graders are able to do that. 9th graders are better adapted to show respect or at least fake it.
I mean no disrespect to your way of thinking. You are very smart and I think that you are one of my favorite people before I started posting here. I use to just read a lot. I have much respect for you.
- 2 years ago
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
-
Jubiejanks
-
According to the linked article, the full version of Anne Frank's diary will not be used. Instead, the school will use an edited version. Why? Because some stupid parent was concerned "over the sexual nature of the vagina passage in the definitive edition." Are you kidding me?? What world do you live in where you shield your child from sex?? Kids are growing up faster than ever, both physically and mentally. My own niece stopped playing with Barbies when she was about 4, and although she's still in the sixth grade, has already started her period. Now I'm not here to embarrass my niece lol, but children are receiving sexual education as early as fifth grade, and you're worried about the sexual nature of a maturing girl's diary read by an eighth grader? Parents need to stop trying to protect their damn kids all the time.
- 2 years ago
-
Jubiejanks
-
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
Jubiejanks:
They should know about sex way before then, because there are nasty people in the world and the sooner they know about what is what and who can do what, the better.
5th grade is too late.
Why didn't her parents tell her sooner than the school? Protect the child with information. Do not wait for others to do it for you. The school's can't even do it right to begin with no matter if it's a conservative or liberal area. Children don't pay attention anyway. Parents have their attention at a young age and informing them then will allow the information to stick to them for all their lives.
- 2 years ago
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
-
sidewaysclyde
-
I can't believe this. This is a great way that youth are able to feel tangible connection to such a devastation and violation of humanity. Her story is valuable and should be allowed to be read. Banning books doesn't help, and banning this robs students of knowledge of a time period extremely relevant to the United States and to the Jewish community.
- 2 years ago
-
sidewaysclyde
-
-
2hellnwait
-
sidewaysclyde:
Welcome to politically correct mult-culturism!
- 2 years ago
-
2hellnwait
-
-
2hellnwait
-
On the contrary randallr01, I read the article, and it did not imply what the complainants political persuasion were, only that parental concerns were weighed in the censoring process. . . If anything, you'd probably have better placed the blame on the liberal progressive multi-cultural political correctness mania which is so readily embraced by the demoncrats. . . just saying.
- 2 years ago
-
2hellnwait
-
-
CuteBruiser
-
2hellnwait:
How do you figure that?
- 2 years ago
-
CuteBruiser
-
-
2hellnwait
-
2hellnwait:
Easy, public education is the bedrock of liberalism... thats a fact, jack!
- 2 years ago
-
2hellnwait
-
-
eternal_springs
-
2hellnwait:
LOL LOL Banning books is the opposite of education....public or otherwise!
- 2 years ago
-
eternal_springs
-
-
randallr01
-
This is just another example of how sex-obsessed conservatives are.
- 2 years ago
-
randallr01
-
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
randallr01:
Repressed, you mean.
- 2 years ago
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
-
EthicalVegan
-
Such an insensitive approach. Let this young girl's spirit live... the good and the bad (?).
It's difficult for a loving father to read such things of his own daughter, mind you, but his daughter's thoughts and impressions were hers.
Censorship/banning has no place in this world.
- 2 years ago
-
EthicalVegan
-
-
feefer2010
-
How can they pull such a beautifully written book from their school? So it's not all sunshine and rainbows It was written by young girl! Adolescence is can be hard enough by it's self but to go though it in hiding is something I can't even imagine
- 2 years ago
-
feefer2010
-
-
eternal_springs
-
Simple, I do not believe in banning books!
- 2 years ago
-
eternal_springs
-
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
eternal_springs:
I do not believe in banning books either. Do you believe in banning anything?
- 2 years ago
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
-
eternal_springs
-
eternal_springs:
hmmmm.......I would like to ban ignorance, poverty, degradation, evil, racism, sexism, homophobia to name a few
- 2 years ago
-
eternal_springs
-
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
eternal_springs:
Banning doesn't cure anything. It's a matter of removing ideas people have, but not only ideas but the people themselves. So if you're into educating people then you should be into making them aware of what they are doing as wrong. Banning is ignoring such and just discarding who doesn't agree with your way of thinking. As for poverty that would be getting those that are poor out of your sight, not helping them. Banning isn't positive...ever. It's always negative.
- 2 years ago
-
DJverboten [removed]
-
-
eternal_springs
-
eternal_springs:
definition -
as a verb: banning.....to prohibit, forbid, or bar; interdict: example: to ban nuclear weapons; The dictator banned all newspapers and books that criticized his regime.
as a noun: banning....the act of prohibiting by law
Not at all the same as ignoring
- 2 years ago
-
eternal_springs