Community | February 01, 2010 | 3 comments

To Curb Climate Change, We Need to Protect Water: Maude Barlow

Image
JanforGore
It is widely acknowledged that greenhouse gas emission-fueled climate change is having a profound and negative impact on fresh water systems around the world. Warmer weather causes more rapid evaporation of lakes and rivers, reduced snow and ice cover on open water systems, and melting glaciers.

What is less understood is that our collective abuse and displacement of fresh water is also a serious cause of climate change and global warming. If we are to successfully address climate change, it is time to include an analysis of how our abuse of water is an additional factor in the creation of global warming as well as solutions that protect water and watersheds.

There are two major factors. The first is the actual displacement of water from where it is sustaining a healthy ecosystem as well as healthy hydrologic cycles. Because humanity has polluted so much surface water on the planet, we are now mining the groundwater far faster than it can be replaced by nature. New Scientist reports of a “little-heralded crisis” all over Asia as a result of the exponential drilling of groundwater. Water is moved from where nature has put it in watershed and aquifers (where we can access it) to other place where it is used for flood irrigation and food production – where much of it lost to evaporation – or to supply the voracious thirst of mega cities, where it is usually dumped as waste into the ocean.

AUTHOR: Maude Barlow, former senior advisor to the UN on water issues, is co-author of the bestseller Blue Gold (New Press) and chairperson of the Council of Canadians.

Water is also lost to ecosystems through global trade – water used in the in the production of crops or manufactured goods that are then exported (known as virtual trade in water). Over 20% of daily water used for human purpose is exported out of watersheds in this way. Water is also piped across long distances for industry leaving behind parched landscapes.

The second factor is the removal of the vegetation needed for a healthy hydrologic cycle. Urbanization, deforestation and wetland destruction greatly destroy water-retentive landscapes and lead to the loss of precipitation over the affected area.

Slovakian scientist Michal Kravcik and his colleagues explain that the living world influences the climate mainly by regulating the water cycle and the huge energy flows linked to it. Transpiring plants, especially forests, work as a kind of biotic pump, causing humid air to be sucked out of the ocean and transferred to dry land. If the vegetation is removed from the land, this natural system of biosphere regulation is interrupted. Soil erodes, reducing the content of organic material in the ground, thus reducing its ability to hold water. Dry soil from lost vegetation traps solar heat, sharply increasing the local temperature and causing a reduction in precipitation over the affected area. This process also destroys the natural sequestration of carbon in the soil, leading to carbon loss.

Of course, these two factors are deeply related. Just as removing vegetation from an ecosystem will dry up the soil, so too will removing water from an ecosystem mean reduced or non-existent vegetation.

Taken together, these two factors are hastening the desertification of the planet, and intensifying global warming. Even if we successfully address and reverse greenhouse gas emissions and our dependence on fossil fuels, Kravcik says, we will not be able to stop climate change if we do not deal with the impact of our abuse of water on the planet.

Unless we collectively address the crisis of fresh water and our cavalier treatment of the world’s water systems, we will not restore the climate to health.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Earth and Science,   Sustainable Agriculture,   3 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Climate Change Global Water Crisis Moral Imperative 8 more
  3.     
    |

3 comments // To Curb Climate Change, We Need to Protect Water: Maude Barlow

  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAPhGmuUlg4
      And yes, HUMANS ARE DOING THIS. It cannot be stressed enough how important this crisis is regarding our future. Even governments in line with corporations are making plans regarding water resources. Much of the water in the US is now privitized as drought still ravages the Southwest and falling water tables and pollution threaten the Great Lakes. Just when is this going to be taken seriously? When there is no more potable water to use? When pesticides, poisons, chemicals and industrial waste along with the effects of climate change have rendered it unusable?

      There are currently 36 states in some level of water scarcity either through drought, waste, climate change, or pollution. The Middle East which was dry to begin with is now drying up. Africa, Asia, South America, all experiencing water shortages and scarcity due to overpopulation, glacier melt, pollution, mismanagement which are bringing on dessertification, crop failures and soil erosion. Sea level rise threatens islands in the Pacific that have begged for help, and the Arctic is still breaking records regarding ice melt and refreeze. And this government and other governments of the world have known this was happening for years and have decided to do NOTHING about it because this scarcity and the effects of climate change are too lucrative to see the moral imperative.

      Haiti, even though its current tragedy was caused by a natural disaster, should be a focal point for understanding just where these kinds of issues can take us. Climate refugees due to lack of water which leads to lack of food, which then leads to conflict is something we must now be very concerned about on a global scale. But who am I kidding? This is Current. Even Copenhagen didn't give a damn about this. Why should I expect a website to. Right?

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Dams are also a very destructive force environmentally, culturally, and economically. Not only do they emit methane through waste, but they are carbon intensive in construction and do much damage to the natural flow of rivers and other bodies of water causing the agricultural repercussions outlined in this article. If we don't start truly paying attention to these things as humans, we will find ourselves looking at a world of immense structures serving no real purpose in a world of drought, famine, and displacement. Where will the hundreds of thousands to millions of people go who are displaced by these huge mega dam projects?

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
more from Community:
from the community

top videos