Terrorist Attack on the U.S. Within Six Months "a Certainty"
source: http://renovomedia.com/news/terrorist-attack-on-the-u-s-within-six-months-a-certainty/
-
-
- jimhager
- added this
http://renovomedia.com/news/terrorist-attack-on-the-u-s-within-six-months-a-cert...
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, News_Featured
-
-
tommic
-
Walkinstorms, fact are facts and I would not even have answered curtisreed if he were normal but he is not. I called out Bush/ Cheney for what they are and if you did make sacrifices for your country you too would be appalled by their behavior. Democrats were at as much fault as republicans for where we are today and I do not deny that. Those who refuse to acknowledge truth are doomed to see previous lies live again. He called me a coward, he could have called me a son of bitch and I would not have cared but I served my country and risked my life for it and will not accept people calling me a coward when so many others were or are.
My apologies to you - 2 years ago
-
tommic
-
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
tommic: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
-
tommic
-
Walks_in_Storms:
I learned humility through years of intense martial arts.
- 2 years ago
-
tommic
-
-
tommic
-
Curtisreed here are your facts;
Fact sheet for Curtisreed
Fact: George W Bush was absent without leave during his national guard service. If not for family connections, his grandfather was US Senator Prescott Bush and Father George HW Bush. Others who were guilty of same went to jail.
Fact: Dick Cheney received SIX draft deferments during the Vietnam War
Cheney got married immediately after college to qualify for the sixth.
But did not fail to send others into war to die and be maimed.
Fact: Vice President Dick Cheney was CEO of Halliburton who received multiple no bid awards from the defense dept and state dept during the Iraq war. Those no bid contracts cost the US taxpayers extra billions in the war effort.
Fact: Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Pearl were architects of Bush's middle east policy and the Iraq war. Neither never served in the military and just like Cheney were more than willing to send 4000 US soldiers to their death and over 25,000 injured and maimed in Iraq.Now you call me a coward would you like to back that up face to face or are you only full of courage behind a computer screen. I will meet you any place in this country face to face and then you try to call me a coward. You have no idea what courage is. How about crawling down a tunnel with a knife and a 45 not knowing if your coming back out because your country has invaded theirs and the guys down there want to kill you.
To all others who read what curtisreed cut and pasted trying to make himself look big. I spare people vulgarity when possible and my apologies.
Curtisreed you make me sick to think I fought for people like you makes me want to throw up.
Your welcome - 2 years ago
-
tommic
-
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
tommic: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
-
jubal
-
Walks_in_Storms:
Partisanship is a deadlock, agreed. I like the analogy of old women gossiping over the back fence. Great one Walks.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
cztheday
-
I am mystified by those who purport to know how many terrorist attacks have targeted the U.S. and by those who use that figure as the measuring stick for the success or failure of the past two or three presidential administrations.
As to the first, the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with bombs or jumbo jets. One of the most common types of terrorist attacks is the cyberattack, in which terrorists attempt to penetrate or bring down computer networks. Moreover, at least IMHO, some of the most effective attacks are more in the nature of recruiting and spreading misinformation and disinformation both inside the U.S. and abroad.
As to the second, I don't see how any of the administrations can be judged even on this one criterion without adding up ALL of the avenues used by terrorists AND by assigning some kind of effectiveness rating to them. And far more importantly, there are THOUSANDS of variables and attributes by which a presidential administration is open to criticism and judgment. I don't know, for example, whether there even WERE any terrorist attacks during the Nixon Administration, but I would be highly suspicious of any ranking system that placed him above the bottom three presidents in American history.
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
-
curtisreed
-
Walks_in_Storms:
interesting post, WiS.
I've said a number of times that the Palestinians failed when they stopped the mostly-peaceful marches and student protests of the '80s and started bombing cafes and busses. They lost their moral imperative.
Your reference to Ghandi and MLK are perfect. BUt add to that list South Africa's Nelson Mandela. The common thread is that they all believed in and counted on the notion that the majority of humans, regardless of nationality and race, are good. By peacefully protesting injustices, and inviting the violent, abhorent attacks they knew would come from their oppressors, the majority of people were able to conclude who the oppressors were, and who the righteous victims were. The peaceful nature of Hindu and Christian doctrine were their inspiration, and they won their battle of will, thanks to the intervention of good people who recognized the nature of the battle and sided with the righteous.
In my opinion, Islam is at the core of the problem right now, because despite the frequent attempts to portray Islam as a "religion of peace", it is clear that in fact the Surrahs contain far too many calls to war, Jihad, to "terrorize the Infidels", and what's more, it clearly states that the Muslim who does NOT heed those calls to war are "bad Muslims". Hence the change of direction by the Palestinians (I know, there were Palestinian terrorist acts for decades prior to the Intifada, but I think there was a return to that tactic and even an increase in its frequency). More importantly, there is a deeply held belief that these acts will be rewarded in heaven. So we're not battling against rational opponents. I don't see any solution to this from the West until--as you stated--there is a rethinking and a drastic alteration of philosophy from the Muslims themselves.
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
tommic
-
Cheney was a six time draft deferment loser during the Vietnam war, don't equivocate honor and Dick Cheney in any fashon. You do a great dis-service to all who have served and died for your freedom. Even when it wasn't for your freedom, for the freedom of others. Cheney and Bush usurped constitutional rights granted to every American. Dick Cheney is not very bright at all, most Americans are very stupid and gullible people as proven by the fact they surrendered constitutional rights for security and so called freedom. We have less of both today than ten years ago. Only assholes think Cheney is smart or honorable.
- 2 years ago
-
tommic
-
-
curtisreed
-
tommic:
gosh, what a brilliant argument: " Only assholes think Cheney is smart or honorable."
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
curtisreed
-
tommic:
TOMMIC, thanks for the entertaining and enlightening mail you sent me. I think I'll share it so everyone can see what a brilliant philospher you are.
"Dick Cheney asked for and recieved six draft deferment s during the Vietnam war, I didn't run served and went to college and married my HS sweetheart. So don't tell me what he is or isn't and yes if you support someone who would not go fight when it was his turn and went on to send others to death and being maimed in Iraq for haliburton you are an asshole. You are uniformed and stupid and now you are blocked fuck you"
What I especially love is what a clear example of a drive-by personal attack it is. Not only do you resort to insults in your first post, but then you attack me personally again by mail and--like a coward--block me.
Judging by your inability to spell or articulate a single rational argument, I can only conclude that you realize that you cannot hold your own in a real discussion without using vulgarity, personal attacks, and then retreat to your foxhole like a coward.
Hardly the characteristics someone who claims to have served at war.
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
Conniepae
-
curtisreed:
Dick Cheney asked for and recieved six draft deferment s during the Vietnam war, I didn't run served and went to college and married my HS sweetheart. So don't tell me what he is or isn't and yes if you support someone who would not go fight when it was his turn and went on to send others to death and being maimed in Iraq for haliburton you are an asshole. You are uniformed and stupid and now you are blocked fuck you"
I think he pretty much summed you up. I wouldn't have sent you an email, but I do find I am in agreement.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
manny0409
-
you know, I didn't even bother reading the whole thing because think about...what a big friggin surprise! attack on America...what else is new... I hope they have some more accurate and specific info...
- 2 years ago
-
manny0409
-
-
TheArtfulKill
-
I'm not even bothering to take this article seriously. Saying there will be a terrorist attack within 6 months in the US is like saying that the sun will rise on June 3rd 2010 or something. I'm kind of tired of the NSA and CIA pretending they can read the minds of terrorist groups and then publicly announce their new "knowledge". If they're so good at their jobs then tell the public where and when the attack will be. The broader you are with your statements, the more fearful the public will be. I for one am tired of being afraid.
- 2 years ago
-
TheArtfulKill
-
-
zenwhenicanbe2
-
if that isn't the dumbest fukin statement I've ever heard in my life. Just what in the hell would I do with that piece of information if I chose to digest it? Is that the new job of intelligence agencies? "We can assure that people are going to die". You're doin a hell of a job Brownie, a hell of a job
- 2 years ago
-
zenwhenicanbe2
-
-
CalgarC
-
you can smell the bullshit right in the title :D
- 2 years ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
royulery
-
if there isn't one then they will have to manufacture there own, to be right. it sounds like somebody doesn't want cutbacks.
the attention span of americans is short and just like the movies, it takes a lot of explosions to keep our interest.
- 2 years ago
-
royulery
-
-
vicgal
-
CODE BLUE ! or is it orange... no yellow... what ever, never mind
- 2 years ago
-
vicgal
-
-
jaystyx
-
Stop listening to Dick Chaney people
- 2 years ago
-
jaystyx
-
-
obamaisajoke [removed]
-
jaystyx: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
obamaisajoke [removed]
-
-
ryan8566
-
obamaisajoke:
no, jaystyx is correct. this is one of those 'you win, we lose; we win, you lose' coments that are so inflammatory that it almost...almost calls for another attack, just to prove, Bush, Rove, and Cheney were right. but i would never suggest that any of them would want this. even deep down. they are after all patriots!!
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
curtisreed
-
jaystyx:
learn to spell, people. It's CHENEY.
Cheney is by far more pragmatic and smarter than Obama and his ilk. One year of Obama and we've had 4 terrorist attacks. Bush-Cheney had a much better record.
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
Conniepae
-
curtisreed:
Are you crazy? We lost 3 buildings from two planes, plus they got all the way to the Pentagon and Bush and the Darth Vader's record was better. What did the rest of us miss? You guys are so used to spinning, I think you are starting to believe the shit you spew. Crazy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
jubal
-
ryan8566:
Oh yeah, patriots? To which version of America?
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
curtisreed
-
Conniepae:
Connie, please try to put your thinking cap on. Let me walk you through it.
The 9/11 attacks occured BEFORE we had declared a "war on terror" (which is supposed to mean that we should put ourselves on a war footing in response and treat this as an enemy attack, and not a criminal case). That attack occured after a long series of al Qa'eda attacks to which Clinton failed to take significant action. He even had Bin Laden served up to him on a platter by the Saudi government and failed to accept him. His response to the previous bombing of the World Trade Center was to treat it again as a criminal act, so they failed to "wage war" against al Qa'eda, Bin Laden, and the folks who just regrped and came again.
Once Bush et al took this issue seriously, they managed to stop MANY subsequent attacks and more importantly, thoroughly damaged the al Qa'eda network and put them on the run. It's a fair argument that they "took their eyes off the ball" with the war in Iraq, and this allowed al Qa'eda to restrengthen by hiding in the tribal areas of Pakistan, but it is equally fair to note that the al Qa'eda leadership made a serious error by declaring that Iraq was the chosen battlefield and they invested their time and resources to try to make us lose. Bush doggedly stuck that out and guess what: we pushed them back and they lost. So for many years, the US was not the only one dragged into that "quagmire"--al Qa'eda also was distracted and got a serious ass whipping there.
They gave up and have regrouped.
Meanwhile, Liberals managed to take control here and have again put the USA back into the pre-9/11 mindset. They stopped the interrogations that gave us the Intel necessary to track down all the leaders planning attacks, and that has made us vulnerable again. They also succeeded in inculcating an absurd and suicidal politically correct attitude that cause the military brass to ignore the warning signs in Major Nadal at Ft Hood because the Liberals don't want us to "profile" Muslims, and that cost 13 Americans their lives.Now we had the chance to find out a LOT of information about the Yemeni al Qa'eda network, but the Pansy In Chief let that goofball lawyer up.
The blood of the next victims will be on the hands of every liberal who elected Obama. Keep that in mind. It's just a matter of time before your poor judgement kills a lot of innocent Americans.
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
Conniepae
-
curtisreed:
Is Rush sharing his Oxy now? Give it up, he lost his hearing. Oxycotin is dangerous stuff to play around with. Maybe your family should do an intervention and get you some help. Just because you spew it, doesn't make it true.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
curtisreed
-
Conniepae:
typical liberal! You can't argue with reason or historical facts, but instead go for a personal attack.
PATHETIC
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
Conniepae
-
curtisreed:
It doesn't matter. President Obama has decided to let George W. and Dick Cheney 'walk off into the sunset' without accountability. So all the facts will probably never be known. Instead we are shamefully 'moving along', giving morons like you room to 'spin'. That fact disappoints me most about President Obama. I would have liked testimony 'under oath'! 'The truth and nothing but the truth'. This conversation should not be opinion based, which is what you are spewing. I don't have all the facts and neither do you!
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
-
TheArtfulKill
-
Walks_in_Storms:
hahahaha you have a serious point. Our country is truly free when we dont even need an excuse to attack anyone at anytime whenever. And you're right, the target has to be small.
- 2 years ago
-
TheArtfulKill
-
-
jubal
-
Walks_in_Storms:
Now that is something I can agree with.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
PigFarmington
-
Let's make sure we re-up on the totalitarian state of fear.
A year ago this month Cheney was saying the same thing.
http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/02/10/cheney-warns-of-another-mass-terror-att...This prediction/warning is like saying, "the sun will rise in the east tomorrow".
"Terrorist" attacks happen to the "US" everyday. It's called war, and when the enemy attacks us, we justify giving up our rights, and theirs by calling them terrorists. "Road side bombing" = terror attack on US.
So, this guy is stating the obvious... the only reason to say it is to remind people be live their lives in fear of what our gov/corporations does to others. - 2 years ago
-
PigFarmington
-
-
obamaisajoke [removed]
-
PigFarmington: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
obamaisajoke [removed]
-
-
Saladin
-
obamaisajoke:
The President does not have direct control over the wishes of the CIA or even certain aspects of the military. And he definitely doesn't have control over Private Military Contractors or News Media who are BEGGING for such an event to happen so they can ignore reform and stir up nationalist tendencies to win elections again.
And if you think we should forget about one of the worst presidents in -decades- less than a year and a half after his departure you clearly have no concept of how politics work.
Obama inherited this mess of a country Bush made, you really think a year can pass and then suddenly all of it is Obama's fault?
Or do you know that and just not care?
- 2 years ago
-
Saladin
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
Saladin:
Neither President has any control over this and yet both are at fault. The corruption continues no matter who's in office.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
Conniepae
-
Saladin:
Knows, but doesn't care. Too busy 'spinning' bull. Trying to move people along, away from accountability for the past.
Peggy Noonan said, some things are better left a mystery when talking about the wrongs of the past administration and torture. Then she went on to say, she would like to see more investigative journalists in the future. How convenient. George W. gets a pass and President Obama get's the microscope.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
PigFarmington
-
obamaisajoke:
I wouldn't know, I didn't vote for him because I thought his "change" was a joke.
Thank you for proving my point, Obama and Bush's state of fear tactics are the same!
- 2 years ago
-
PigFarmington
-
-
Conniepae
-
Saladin:
Voted up (numerous times) :)
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
curtisreed
-
Saladin:
assuming Bush was "one of the worst presidents", I wonder if you feel comforted that you helped replace him with THE WORST president in living memory.
the only thing Obama has accomplished in his first year of office is that Carter can now claim to be the SECOND worst president in living memory.
Good work, ya'll.
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
curtisreed
-
Conniepae:
"How convenient. George W. gets a pass and President Obama get's the microscope." What are you smoking? Seriously?
The most devastating thing to happen to America was that Obama did NOT get the microscope during the election, because if the press--folks like Noonan--had actually done their jobs, more people would have realized what an incompetent, ill-prepared blowhard Obama was and he would not have been elected.
But they were all so busy trying to assuage their white-guilt they fell in love with a NOTION of a black president and refused to ask the hard questions because they were so scared of being called racist. Chris Matthews even had quasi-hom-erotic reactions to him with his "I get a thrill up my leg when he speaks" comments.
Obama is just now beginning to feel a little pressure and he's crumbling like a wet cookie.
- 2 years ago
-
curtisreed
-
-
Conniepae
-
curtisreed:
Oh bullshit, the media spun a man of color and a woman for the Democratic candidate, because they thought neither could really win. Boy were they fooled. Barack Obama won by a wide enough margin, their electronic voting machines couldn't even steal it.
George W. was sooo bad, we have to wait for history to judge him, cause they couldn't handle the truth. George W. and Dick Cheney should have went to jail, or been run out of Washington on a rail. Scooter Libby was just the tip of the ice burg and he didn't spend a day in jail. Sad, sad, sad!
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
Conniepae
-
curtisreed:
Someone throw some water on this guy, he's out of his mind. I guess when you're making it up, just 'say anything' regardless of facts works. Those days are gone. Facts matter! George W. and Dick Cheney were sooo bad for ordinary Americans. Of course, their base, 'The have's and have mores did pretty good'. Sad, sad, sad.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
jubal
-
curtisreed:
Obama is hardly falling apart like a wet cookie, he is still very coherent and presidential. You are drinking too much media koolaid it seems. Did you even watch the National Prayer Breakfast speeches by both Clinton and Obama? It was the best speeches that pair have given, IMO, since they began office.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
jubal: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
-
jubal
-
Walks_in_Storms:
Indeed Walks, i agree with you. This problem has been brewing for quite some time and I bet Obama is cursing his fate.
I really like your Burns and Allen analogy, very apropos.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
s_peak
-
Just to make sure you're all aware... The American government = terrorists. Soooooo many examples... In fact just recently we sold weapons to Korea who's currently at war with another country we could care less about (read: any country but ours)... and we have done this throughout history to thin the numbers of our neighbors (Read about the Iran contra if you don't know it! This is how crack was brought into the country and used to distract the masses with another internal problem)... ...but the best example of US terrorism is 9/11. If you still don't believe our government AT LEAST had hands in 9/11 then you honestly need to wake up. I would NOT be surprised if the next attack was super suspicious, targeted key infrastructure or a symbol and made everyone on top a LOT of money through war profiteering. Always ask: "where does the money go".
Think about Blackwater (now named XE, right?) They're hired guns in the wild west. Think about Guantanamo... Think about the Gulf of Tonkin... Think about the amount of tax money we've lost to the "failures" of our goverment. The work YOU did to fund a war you don't even know is real. Relief money goes NOWHERE, the contractors sent to Iraq to rebuild have done NOTHING except soak up money.
Seriously. SOMEONE is lying to us for money. Don't buy this bullshit. The next time an attack happens... WE NEED TO ASK QUESTIONS! Just look at the evidence and really think about it. Don't let them pull this shit again. You can think I'm crazy or stupid or unpatriotic... but at the very least... LOOK at the evidence when this next "attack" happens... do some research. Don't drink the kool-aid!
- 2 years ago
-
s_peak
-
-
tommic
-
Its delusional to think your government can prevent or predict every terror attack, the whole concept of terror is never knowing where when how or why. They can attempt to catch or stymie every terror attempt but reality and odds are that the terrorists will succeed again.
- 2 years ago
-
tommic
-
-
manny0409
-
tommic:
thank you for that great comment. unfortunately, you are truly 100% correct.
- 2 years ago
-
manny0409
-
-
Varex_Sythe
-
Perhaps this is the best defense strategy that our intelligence agencies can come up with. Hear me out, terrorists want us scared, that is why they terrorize us. But if we are already scared shitless, there's not point in attacking us to incite a reaction of fear and dread. So by keeping us completely brain dead on fear, the intelligence agencies actually think that they are keeping us safe.
Or the other options...
The intelligence agencies are, in a round about way, admitting that they suck at their job and are just telling us that they really don't have the means or motivation to stop a terrorist attack.
The intelligence agencies want us scared so that they'll have an excuse to stir the economy by forcing airports to purchase full body scanners that don't really work any better than what we already use.
And the final option...
They don't want to actually do their job, which would be to find out when and where a terrorist attack might occur, so they give citizens vague answers to the question of when will terrorists attack again so that if terrorists attack again they will not have been incorrect.
- 2 years ago
-
Varex_Sythe
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
Varex_Sythe:
Or.....they are doing the attacks and the fake warnings.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
tommic
-
The war on terror will go on for decades. The government needs to raise awarness when intelligence deems neccessary, Just the same to say nothing would be negligence or worse yet conspiracy. A conundrum for sure. But I have said it before and I'll say it again. I'd rather die at the hands of a terrorist before surrendering any rights to the government in the name on security. Once you get use to surrendering a right, you'll surely be asked to surrender more to insure your security and protection. The only protection we need is from those who would attempt to usurp our rightsand freedoms.
- 2 years ago
-
tommic
-
-
laserdog
-
I just hope this time the gov't goes with the lowest bidder.
Of course then they'll probably be off-schedule, so you might want to revise it more 6 - 9 months out to be safe. =)
- 2 years ago
-
laserdog
-
-
ChunkyCheezes [removed]
-
I can't wait to break out the popcorn to see the aftermath on TV.
- 2 years ago
-
ChunkyCheezes [removed]
-
-
ryan8566
-
ChunkyCheezes:
for the survivors?
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
ScottyT
-

-
I'm sure this will sell plenty of full body scanners while eroding whatever freedom we have left.
- 2 years ago
-
ScottyT
-
-
sgordy1
-
the only thing "certain" is that they are wanting us to continue to be scared!
- 2 years ago
-
sgordy1
-
-
My_America
-
"False Flaggers" are as worthless as "Birthers".
- 2 years ago
-
My_America
-
-
Saladin
-
My_America:
Try the falsified anthrax scare, SAS troops dressed up as Iranian guards and the shoebombers and underwear bombers who both were utterly incompetent and possessed no detonators.
The Maine, the Zimmerman telegram, the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, Weapons of Mass Destruction, etc. etc.
What's useless is being incredulous about the demonstrable fact that your government lies to you on a regular basis to motivate you to fight in wars you'd otherwise never care about.
- 2 years ago
-
Saladin
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
My_America:
Sheep are more worthless than either of those. Baaaaa.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
WeAreChangeKy: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Walks_in_Storms [removed]
-
-
ryan8566
-
Walks_in_Storms:
what are your references, stats, etc. to state that women do not do an equal, or better job, than males?
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
zionoe
-
Terrorist know to kill, wherever! whenever! however!!!
- 2 years ago
-
zionoe
-
-
PirateSauce
-
They gotta keep the false fear of terrorism alive and well to feed the multi billion dollar war machine.
- 2 years ago
-
PirateSauce
-
-
lizziehoffman
-
i kind of doubt it.
- 2 years ago
-
lizziehoffman
-
-
tommytripper
-
the cia is bored again?
not getting enough spy funding to strip freedoms from people?
not enough fear to support the imperialist agenda?
running out of boys and girls to send to their deaths for your buddies profit?
Does someone need to prove nearly improbable physics of a pancake style collapse happening at basically free fall speeds?
or is it just the perfect foot print collapse happening with out explosive aid thing?
How about that whole fire collapsing a steel building when there were building that had been burning longer, and a lot more intensely and yet they are still standing TODAY.Any responsible government with this information would not release it, rather they would simply make those plotting it disappear. Rather then using it as a fear mongering tactic in their WAR OF TERROR. Against their own people and the world, unless the point was to create fear so that people gleefully give up their freedoms and liberties all in the name of security.
But I guess this is what we get, the once proud world leader, bought and paid for by corporations who now use this once great nation to increase its profits through wars of choice or through imposing its values of “corporatism” because what we have today sure as hell is not capitalism. All in the name of democracy and capitalism,
- 2 years ago
-
tommytripper
-
-
Confucius
-
tommytripper:
wars on concepts; eg war on drugs, terror, dont seem to work too well
- 2 years ago
-
Confucius
-
-
slarabee [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
slarabee [removed]
-
-
bbar
-
slarabee:
Or George W Obama needs more money for war spending.
- 2 years ago
-
bbar
-
-
wally60
-
unless it has already been planned.how
would they know.believe nothing investigate everything. - 2 years ago
-
wally60
-
-
Drach
-
of course they think a terrorist act will happen, they planned the last one!
It's easy to predict a terrorist attack if you are planning to carry it out yourself (false flag)
I'm not the only one who thinks this, We need to take our country back.
- 2 years ago
-
Drach
-
-
Conniepae
-
Drach:
Take our country back and give it to whom? We have already taken our country back. The ones in charge during the last attack are gone. What's a person to do? All this 'take our country back' rhetoric is not reality. I fear none of them can actually be trusted.
I had hoped President Obama would investigate the wrongs of the past, but he just moved along, refusing to look back. Less than a decade, I might add. We are supposed to wait for history to judge the wrongs of the George W. and Dick Cheney? Why? Who gains from 'moving along', without closure? What really happened in the lead up to war with Iraq. Why were they allowed to use a forged document in their reasoning for war? Far more questions than answers.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
JETaylor
-
Why would they even bother? they know that if they blow up a building, then we will level their country then level their neibobors country just for good measure. O thats right after that we chopper in palets of cash!
- 2 years ago
-
JETaylor
-
-
ryan8566
-
JETaylor:
you mean like we leveled iraq after they attacked us...oh..wait...sorry.
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
Conniepae
-
I must admit, this does scare me. After 9/11 and our inability to actually investigate how two planes, caused 3 buildings to fall into their own footprints, anything is possible. Now I for one do not have the courage to say things looked fishy and should have been truly investigated, instead of just moving along. But.... it does lead one to worry about the 'threat' of future attacks.
- 2 years ago
-
Conniepae
-
-
kushan
-
Conniepae:
This is true of what you say, but, there are so many mysteries around 9/11 attacks. I really don't know and understand of what to think :(
- 2 years ago
-
kushan
-
-
earls101
-
Their are plenty of "attempted attacks" in the US all the time,the government is going to declare marshall law and strip us of our remaining liberties.
- 2 years ago
-
earls101
-
-
Mark701
-
Um, tell us something we don't know. Lets face it, America is no longer insulated from what happens on the rest of the planet. Our governments actions has consequences and the people will pay the price. The only thing we can hope for is that the Obama Administration doesn't attempt to use these incidents as cynically as the Bushies did, i.e. to pass a radical agenda and strip us of the few liberties we have left.
- 2 years ago
-
Mark701
-
-
TheTops
-
I think the chances of real danger from the government's definition of a terrorist is slim to nil. They are clearly talking about their own plans to keep us afraid and docile. It makes me sick to my stomach and I am really starting to get tired of it. The comment above about police/military spending versus necessity hits it right on the head. This is about moving our wealth, resources (not cash because cash is worthless without our preconceived notions that the wealthy have instilled as a means of keeping resources to themselves) and prosperity into their pockets. The real war is being waged by the rich against the rest of humanity. Even the people in the middle are simply being used for the top 1% to carry out their means. Every single soul on this planet needs to wake up and I am sick of having to say that too. What is it seriously going to take for people to realize they could have it so much better?
- 2 years ago
-
TheTops
-
-
skiersam10
-
oh, so uh, what are they gonna do about it?
- 2 years ago
-
skiersam10
-
-
kushan
-
Really? You think?
- 2 years ago
-
kushan
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
They should know, they're doing the 'False Flag' attacks on us anyway.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
Nephwrack
-
Bullshit.
- 2 years ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
idealist
-
our government is terrorizing our minds!!!! there's nowhere to hide!
- 2 years ago
-
idealist
-
-
ChristopherX
-
Big brother playing mind games or the real deal?
- 2 years ago
-
ChristopherX
-
-
lifestudentno83
-
You know what else is a "certainty"?
It'll be ANOTHER false-flag attack. Like 9-11 and the recent Christmas Scare.
- 2 years ago
-
lifestudentno83
-
-
ryan8566
-
this is one of those 'no-win, no lose' statements---if it happens, we warned you, if not, we stopped it.
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
comicahzy
-
Apparently we need to justify war with someone again. Who is it this time? Iran? Yemen? Belgium?
- 2 years ago
-
comicahzy
-
-
warhawk187
-
They always have been saying this, did you not live in the U.S. for the past 8 years?
- 2 years ago
-
warhawk187
-
-
cztheday
-
I am puzzled as to why this would be considered "stop the presses" news. There have been numerous terrorist attacks and attempted terrorist attacks on the U.S. since 9/11/01. They have just been much smaller in scale -- shoe bombs, underwear bombs, that cab driver from Denver, etc...and those are just the ones about which we have been INFORMED. Why would that activity suddenly cease?
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
pjacobs51
-
Another "slam dunk" I suppose . . .
- 2 years ago
-
pjacobs51
-
-
jubal
-
They have been pushing this new "Imminent Terrorist Attack" pretty hard. They have Evangelical pastors across the country making sure the "Flock" knows what to do, pass it on.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
Tyr
-
Well, support for the "war" against terrorism is losing steam rapidly as the fact that 10 or 12 billion a month being transferred from the treasury to the military industrial complex is bankrupting us begins to sink in on the boneheads. Soooo, time to ramp up the fear! Sad part is this, it will work... always has, always will.
Now let me give you something to consider, the criminals from the middle east, which is all the terrorist are, killed three thousand of us 9 years ago..now consider this..by the FBI's own statistics there are between 16 and 20 thousand murders every year in the U.S. by our own criminals..so lets do the math, mid east criminals 3000 in nine years on U.S. soil.. local criminals , using the lowest number annually 144,000 in the last nine years....now being a rational human being it occurs to me that we are at much greater risk from our own criminals than anyone from the mid east..yet our own police depts are facing cuts because of budget realities created by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan..that is just nuts if you use your head instead of your manipulated fear and anger. - 2 years ago
-
Tyr
-
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
Tyr:
That's not counting how many people are killed by lightning. Lightning is more dangerous than Al Qaeda, maybe we should have a 'War on Lightning'. SUV's too, Blackwater could just drop in and shoot any SUV because it could kill someone.
- 2 years ago
-
WeAreChangeKy
-
-
jubal
-
WeAreChangeKy:
So True WeAreChange, terrorism is more about property than people. If terrorism only killed people, there probably wouldn't be a war on it. But since terrorism destroys valuable property it has to be defended at a greater cost than the property destroyed. They say you can't put a value on human life, so they gave up trying. Human life is collateral damage now.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
MetalestDragoon
-
so is it true that it will be on the london clock tower(big ben)?
- 2 years ago
-
MetalestDragoon
-
-
EdJoyProductions
-
I smell self-fulfilling prophecy.
- 2 years ago
-
EdJoyProductions
