Pig lung transplants for humans move closer
source: http://www.newser.com/story/80037/pig-lung-transplants-for-humans-move-closer.html
-
-
- unimatrix0
- added this
Previous attempts to combine pig lungs with human blood had failed because the blood formed clots. The scientists overcame this problem by removing a section of pig DNA and adding human DNA to the pigs as they were reared. A medical ethicist who objected to this process said, “It is basically a human-pig, a hybrid. ... It is about whether the community is prepared to accept a part human, part animal."
http://www.newser.com/story/80037/pig-lung-transplants-for-humans-move-closer.ht...
What do you think about inserting human DNA into baby pigs so that they can later be used as spare parts for human beings?
-
-
bethopea
-
So, instead of pigs 'saving' humans lives via staple, they will be saving lives via transplant...to me it is no different than killing it for food.
- 2 years ago
-
bethopea
-
-
Retrograde_Photography
-
this is some pretty cool science but at the same time it makes me wonder how moral this is. it is hard to say where a line should be drawn.
- 2 years ago
-
Retrograde_Photography
-
-
LozRiva
-
Retrograde_Photography:
true yes, i guess it depends what sort of life situation you find yourself in...
- 2 years ago
-
LozRiva
-
-
ilikeike
-
I wonder how much human dna in a pig it takes before its more human than pig and then subject to the rights and responsibilities entailed therein.
- 2 years ago
-
ilikeike
-
-
outtheinside
-
as long as i can still have my bacon, take the rest as you will.
- 2 years ago
-
outtheinside
-
-
02
-
Pigs only live about seven years.
In the future - they'll have piggies built with a custom designed genetic make up that allows their organs to survive a long time in an individual without rejection problems.Widoe piggies.
- 2 years ago
-
02
-
-
maneatingrobot
-
USA! USA! USA!
- 2 years ago
-
maneatingrobot
-
-
jdubsy
-
If it works. Rock and roll.
- 2 years ago
-
jdubsy
-
-
Vierotchka
-
Pig blood vessels have been successfully transplanted into humans for decades, so I am not surprised. If this technology can save lives, why not, considering the number of people who die for want of a transplant that never comes.
- 2 years ago
-
Vierotchka
-
-
LozRiva
-
I think this is good for us, they aren't exactly doing this for fun. If there was enough organ donors i am sure that they would be doing other research, but there isn't they may havesolved a problem that in our growing society will be getting larger.
- 2 years ago
-
LozRiva
-
-
ChunkyCheezes [removed]
-
This can grow into a mutually beneficial relations between animals and humans. We can steal organs from each other juvenile populations and give them to ourselves so we can live longer.
- 2 years ago
-
ChunkyCheezes [removed]
-
-
NuclearLullaby
-
Would be a bit of a costly asthma cure,but for those with more serious problems like lung cancer or something like that,this could be a life saver! For those wondering about the asthma thing in what I wrote here,well...I've had a few MAJOR attacks! Whenever there's a potential cure for ANYTHING I say it's worth trying,because saving lives is a pretty worthy deed !
- 2 years ago
-
NuclearLullaby
-
-
LozRiva
-
NuclearLullaby:
well said...
- 2 years ago
-
LozRiva
-
-
csmonut
-
And....it will be great when science can grow new organs in a petri dish, thereby not killing one animal to save another.
- 2 years ago
-
csmonut
-
-
bethopea
-
csmonut:
I know meat is a muscle not an organ...but they are on the right track.
http://current.com/items/91507439_meat-without-animals-science-says-yes.htm - 2 years ago
-
bethopea
-
-
csmonut
-
I know hybrids have occured in the tree/vegetable world. I suppose the "scary" part is the fact that one day, humans may be comprised of other pieces and parts they were not originally designed for. However, humans weren't designed to NOT have a functioning liver, or functioning kidneys, or good lungs.
I suppose this is inevitable, and it is not all bad.
I knew a lady who refused a heart valve because an animal (pig) would have to be killed in order for her to live. She's dead now, BTW.
So this brings up another ethical question for some people, too. - 2 years ago
-
csmonut
-
-
Boom_King
-
csmonut:
It would certainly be better if we didn't have to sacrifice an animal in order to save a human, but this is better than "not all bad." Cystic fibrosis is a pretty tragic disease that kills young adults. Lung transplantation is often the only life saving treatment for affected individuals.
I find it interesting that your friend sacrificed her own life to save the life of a pig. I certainly support her right to make that decision, and I also support the right of CF patients to choose life by receiving humanized pig tissue.
- 2 years ago
-
Boom_King
-
-
csmonut
-
csmonut:
@Boom_King,
Yes, it is better than not all bad. I suppose I should have said, "It is a good thing." As bethopea stated here, it's no difference than killing them for food. - 2 years ago
-
csmonut
-
-
Laser_PewPew
-
Great maybe in 5 years I can have part of my lung back!
Not kidding. - 2 years ago
-
Laser_PewPew
-
-
pjacobs51
-
This has the potential to go to some very strange places.
- 2 years ago
-
pjacobs51
-
-
eternal_springs
-
pjacobs51:
I agree, it definitely does.
- 2 years ago
-
eternal_springs
-
-
Uncle_B
-
Um, we ARE animals, Mr. Medical Ethicist.
- 2 years ago
-
Uncle_B
-
-
Saladin
-
Uncle_B:
That's exactly what I was going to post, ya beat me to it.
Half-human, half-animal is like saying half-Ford, half-car.
- 2 years ago
-
Saladin
-
-
TravG73
-
I personally do not see anything wrong with it, chickens can be injected with growth hormones for food.
- 2 years ago
-
TravG73
-
-
kurthsb27
-
TravG73:
they can, but they really shouldn't
- 2 years ago
-
kurthsb27
