Bayer must pay $1.5 m to AK ,MS, rice farmers for GMO contamination
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
Friday's verdict was the second against Bayer CropScience for losses sustained by farmers when an experimental variety of rice that the company was testing infiltrated crops.
A jury awarded about $2 million to two Missouri farmers in December, and three additional test cases are scheduled for this year involving farmers from Louisiana and Texas as well as a rice exporter. No punitive damages have been awarded in any of the verdicts.
About 6,000 rice producers have filed claims against Bayer since the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced in August 2006 that trace amounts of the genetically modified Liberty Link rice were found in U.S. long-grain rice stocks, according to Don Downing, lead attorney for the plaintiffs in the first two cases.
Bayer and Louisiana State University had been testing genetically modified rice, bred to resist a Bayer brand of herbicide, at a school-run facility in Crowley, La.
Though the USDA said at the time of the crop contamination that the rice variety posed no health or environmental risk, Japan and the European Union moved to ban U.S. rice, leading to a plunge in rice prices and a drop in U.S. rice exports.
Downing said Bayer's negligence was directly responsible for the loss of the European market.
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Earth and Science, Sustainable Agriculture
-
-
jubal
-
Wow is this turning into a wave or what? This is such great news.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
Peacey
-
By the way, the initials for Arkansas is AR. AK is for Alaska.
Alaska doesn't have any rice farms up here. - 2 years ago
-
Peacey
-
-
bailey78
-
We are all doomed.
- 2 years ago
-
bailey78
-
-
csmonut
-
You have no idea on how this has MADE MY DAY! Thank you!!
I agree, punitive damages should have been paid...however this is a step in the right direction!
And there is no doubt that stealth played a part in nthis....but let's hope this opens the floodgates and these companies begin to get what's coming to them. - 2 years ago
-
csmonut
-
-
JanforGore
-
csmonut:
I am actually hopeful for 2010 ;-).
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/items/91638576_bayer-admits-gmo-contamination-is-out-of-contr...
Previous entry on first verdict.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://current.com/items/89109074_gmo-rice-in-kansas.htm
Farmer talking truth about contamination and disclosure regarding GMOS.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
Amazing how they never know how the contamination occurs. They better start fessing up, because it is effecting global markets now. It also happened a few months ago regarding Canadian flax exports that were found to have "triffid" gm flax in them, even though triffid flax was outlawed years ago. Of course, 1.5 million is a drop in the bucket and I too think punitive damages should be included. But it is a start. I hope we start to see more farmers suing these companies and hitting them where it hurts the most to make them pay for their lies. They know damn well how it got there. This is in my view stealth and deliberate contamination.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
UndoInfluence
-
JanforGore:
Most if not all of grains are air pollinated so cross contamination of all grains will continue until they start growing this crap in a hermetically sealed field (ie: never).
- 2 years ago
-
UndoInfluence
