RETARDS: What Teabagger Signs Say Vs. What They Mean

What do you get when you cross a liberal / neo-con / leftist / communist / fascist / collectivist (they're all the same) with a monkey?

Are you kidding? No self-respecting monkey would mate with a lying, thieving, lazy-ass snake. The best thing that monkey could do would be to kill it in self-defense before it can eat his and his children's futures and enslave all the other monkeys.

Unlike the Republican snake, which campaigns on a conservative agenda, but then does what that horrid lib monkey would do....

Maybe I'm just unique, but when I vote, I kinda like it when the politician actually DOES "what it says on their tin".

Wow, what is this: the blatant photoshopping thread? I say your average elementary school student could do better than THAT! Weak0sauce!

It was quick to find, amusing, on par with tea bagger art work and I liked it. That is my defense. Jeeze, see the fun. :)

Dude

thats is fucking Chumly from Pawn Stars

Amen, Mike!

IMO, Home-schooling can be a mild form of child abuse, AKA intellectual incest.

"I'm sure some of them are racists, but I love how Obama supporters are so quick to pull the racist card. Just sayin, maybe his policy is wack, and maybe, just maybe, it's got nothing to do with his skin tone."

Uh, the word is "whack"...

If it's got nothing to do with skin tone, then quit bringing it up! Simple enough.

But for many people, it's PRIMARILY about BO's skin tone (and the fact he's half-white has NO bearing on their thinking). Some people will NEVER accept BO as President, since the racism is so deeply embedded in them; they don't want a Black man staining the sheets of the White House.

Which is fine: you cannot easily change people's core beliefs. All you can do is not tolerate the airing of racist ideology, and oppose it whenever people feel empowered to air their racist ideology in public.

Great example is the military: members can think and believe whatever they want, but once they open their big fat mouth to air racist nonsense, they threaten military team integrity and espirit de corps: suddenly THEY become a threat to the mission. Do we want military members carrying weapons to think they can 'stir the pot' amongst their own side? Hell, no. (we've been there, done that: few are aware of race riots that have occurred in the military's past, before the military decided to cut the crap by prohibiting racist talk).

If any military members persists, they'll be explaining to supervisors why they think skin color is more important than keeping the team on mission (where the needs of the military come first, i.e. mission before self). If they continue with the rancor, they'll be discharged (and freed up to join a skin-head group).

Besides, Is there anyone here who DOESN'T know that racist speech is NOT protected under the "Free Speech" clause? It's called "hate speech", and has been outlawed under 'incitement to hatred' laws for decades.

Calling someone a name based on their political beliefs (true or not) is less morally repugnant, since it's a belief. Calling someone a racist name is ridiculous, since no one has control over their skin color (tanners and Michael Jackson aside, that is).

Wow @device80, that was so right on.

Great points.

Although it is a catch-22, because stupid people are often too stupid to realize they're being called stupid, and smarter people will remember that old saying, "sticks and stones". Besides, even smart people do stoopid (sic) stuff, too.

Point being, calling names is rather pointless, a form of ad hominem (personal) attack that MAY or MAY NOT be true. Throwing out labels often says more about the person throwing the label out, as it's not much of an argument (aside from when discussing where superior intelligence might be a reasonable prerequisite: we generally don't allow people of average intelligence to become brain surgeons, but it's seemingly OK for politicians/cheerleaders).

couldn't agree more Unclecharlie. it's funny the same that called for Bush to be thrown in jail, are the some ones that defend our current President without thought. I agree Bush did some things i didn't like, as Obummer is doing now, but to dare say a bad word about him is like we stole their lunch money.

What makes you think we defend him without thought?

personally it was all of the support of things they previously did not support once obama supported them. the troop surge, wiretaps, a free ride for bush and cheney and their crew; amongst other things they all became okay once obama was for them

Yes, I'm also curious. It seems to deplete the argument.

I feel the need to point out that Obama supporters aren't the ones throwing around the Messiah/Jesus rhetoric about their elected president. Can't say the same for Bush Jr. supporters, though.

if you don't like this president or this country i feel my friend that you are simply un-american and maybe you should seek better accommodations for yourself

I agree! remember when Obama forced people to sign "loyalty oaths" before they were allowed to attend one of his speeches?

Oh wait...that was BUSH who pulled that bullshit. Guess you forgot, didn't ya?

Well, remember when Obama's fanatical supporters demanded that anyone who questioned his war strategy be tried for treason and murdered? Can you imagin? Just questioning the President led to people calling for them to be killed.

Ooops! Once again that was BUSH who pulled that bullshit. Do you remember?

And you accuse us of "worshipping" Obama? Bush supporters never got off their knees for 8 years in their embarrassing worship of the dumbest President we ever had!

When we said, "Hey! President Bush! Maybe spending 8 trillion dollars a year fighting a civil war in Iraq might be a bad idea for our economy." we were accused of high treason and the solution was that we should all be lined up and shot. All for daring to question the Conservative god-king known as W.

Yet we get accused of "worshipping" Obama.

Heard Hannity refer to BO as "the anointed one" yesterday. Funny thing is, the more they repeat their insulting diatribes (socialist, etc) the more desensitized they become to their own insult. I've NEVER heard any BO supporter claim BO as their 'savior".

The thing is, the ilk of Beck/Hannity/Rush fail to realize how insulting their comparison of BO to Jesus Christ is to anyone who understands the basics of Christianity. ANY PERSON who claims a politician as the savior is a false prophet themselves, and don't contemplate how insulting this is to God/Christ, and those who know what a 'false prophet' is!

"if you don't like this president or this country i feel my friend that you are simply un-american and maybe you should seek better accommodations for yourself"

...said the bush supporters

Turn up your hearing aids David, there have been many, Oprah for one, I'd continue but I'm getting frustrated trying to cut through your fog.

NO, Oprah referred to him as "the One" (typical announcement hyperbole surrounding famous artists and politicians, e.g. "the one, the only, ELVIS!"). BO haterz came up with some pseudo-intellectual Islamic religious malarkey to transform that into "The Messiah".... Uh, is Oprah a follower of Islam, too, a practicing Muslim in your book?

Nice try, though.

BESIDES, even IF someone like Oprah DID call him "The Messiah", who the hell cares? She doesn't speak for anyone EXCEPT herself. Talk about a double-standard, saying someone cannot speak favorably of BO without facing accusations of trying to make him out as a God (when you clearly think he's a demagogue, a false prophet).

NEWFLASH: BO is none of the above, just a human MORTAL.

Happy now?

My cousin also has Down's syndrome. I take him bowling in prep for the special olympics (he didn't quite make it last year) and a group of teenagers called him that word when he was getting his ball. I invited the group to bowl with us. They left with a much different impression of him. If only we could invite some adults to be in our group so they would understand.

Sure, having the heart of someone with Down's is just fine, as long as we all don't have the intellect of someone with Down's.

I don't suppose you ever considered how different the World would be, if it were populated by only those with Downs? All that tricky stuff like designing planes, trains, and automobiles is a TAD beyond the ability of someone with Down's (as is stuff like driving, etc), and aeronautical engineering and nuclear medicine typically demand an attention to detail that, by definition, is completely lacking in those with Downs.

But anyway, I get your point....

Update on Downs Syndrome. I know 12 couples that are married, both with downs, and have children. They drive and work. Some of those with Downs Syndrome are like autistic people in the way that they can become masters of memory and math. My brother knows 3 languages and sign language fluently. He can tell you every actor and what movies they have appeared in, who was in the movie with them and what year the movie came out. ANY ACTOR/ACTRESS, ALL OF THEM. The major improvement over us that Downs have is the lack of prejudice and hate they show. Other than that, if raised alongside of normal children they only lag behind in some issues and can actually excel in others.

Third lesson complete.

That's a really awful analysis... sounds like something Beck would say.

Its a theory i have, it sure as hell seems like it.

i can see (with the intelligence you've showed in your posts) how you can argue for the gays being against christian (white?) culture so i'm not even going to bother asking.

but please, how is it that blacks, indians, or mexicans, as a people are against christian white culture? btw you can also explain to me what "christian white culture" is. is it different than "christian black culture"? "jewish white culture"?

Why not? its what the leftist thrive on.

Yeah.... no. Actually, leftists are more apt to recognize that the use of "retards" as a negative appellation is extremely problematic and ableist. I think the article is really funny but I also think that Retard shouldn't be used this way. It's offensive.

"Why not? its what the leftist thrive on."

that's really going to start an open dialogue

Yes because that is what the 1st Amendment is all about - Forcing people out who have a different opinion.

You see, the Bill of Rights was put there just so people like Obama and yourself could not stifle dissent;
could not invade their homes and rifle through their belongings;
could not enslave people (yes, yes, I know, very unfortunate, because that contradiction, a society where some were slaves, has lead to the current society where most are slaves);
&
could not disarm people to make the rest of the Constitution meaningless.

These among many other rights are being trampled on by YOUR leader and the previous, and the one before that, etc, etc.

"Stop hating on our president, or leave this country."

...said the bush supporters

http://tshirtmaven.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/a812_bm1.gif

i wonder why my comment was down voted.

is it not true that bush supporters said this? seriously? they were telling all those "pot smoking libruls to go live in france." but now if they support your candidate it's ok to tell someone to kick rocks?

real healthy dialogue...

Come on cracker jack, you can't think we're all as dumb as that or wait, is it unethical deception of truth!? Get a life

Wait... what happened to the stereotype that Liberals are all tree-hugging hippies who drive hybrids?

Didn't Bush and company skyrocket the deficit in the first place by fighting a war on two fronts? Didn't they also kill the job market by allowing the business sector to outsource jobs and import materials manufactured in the states from overseas?

Can you give Obama more than a year to fix 8 years of screwed up economics?

*high five*

So because Democrats are just as bad a Republicans, Clinton initiated the downfall of the American economy, and American presidents since the 1960's have all been puppets I'm not allowed to defend the current puppet from unfair blame?

We can blame Obama for all the crap that was done before he got there about a year after he's in office because he's a puppet and his corporate masters won't let him do anything he's not told?

I'm not defending the Democrats from ANYTHING except false criticism. I wouldn't expect even 8 years of problems to be fixed in 1, how do you expect 20 years of problems to be fixed in 1?

Instead of jumping on the back of the Republican badmouthing Obama for not waving his hands and immediately fixing everything, while calling liberals out for voting for him, you get on my case because apparently I'm not allowed to say he deserves a fair shake before we unfairly criticize him.

That said, my expectations are not high, and haven't been for about 6 months. He IS a puppet, but that also doesn't mean I'm just going to blame him for everything because he's the current puppet. I blame him for what he's done or has failed to do when it counts: during the next election (that is, if I'm even allowed to vote by the "corporate people" our supreme court gave rights to).

P.S.- Don't assume that I don't know about the Bi-Partisan party tricks that have been keeping third parties out of office for decades.

Yeah, calling BO a communist, socialist, foreign-born, nigger, etc only distracts from the REAL challenges we face. It's noise, pure and simple, a stoopid (sic) distraction.

It sure seems some would say BO is fiddling while Rome burns, but instead of trying to put out the fire themselves, they are quite content to write music reviews claiming BO's a sucky foreign-born fiddler. Thanks guys, THAT'S really helpful.

Ridiculous, lifestudent and davidod. To admit that Barack is guilty of being a puppet and is no different than past Presidents but then return to say, "But hey, he wants to be good, but his hands are tied!" is infantile nonsense. Like the others, he knew he was to be a puppet when he got in office and would be the 'face' of just as many crimes against Americans and the world. You refuse to allow critique of this man because of a personal desire not to admit that you fell so damn hard for his BS.

You are not protecting the Man, essentially, you are protecting your own pride and thus will ignore all reason and use silly name calling to defend the President (Your own self worth). Those of you who blindly deny the socialist background of his staff and the man, himself, are like mirror images of those who have done so in the past.

The weakest of your defenses is the racist issue. Nobody would be ignorant enough to believe that racism doesn't exist but people of all walks of life feel an uneasiness and are growing impatient with the criminals from both parties and from Wall Street. Throwing names at the Republican party and using silly, baseless claims neither helps this country nor calms the tensions that are sure to get worse in step with the economy.

Your education and logic will always be incomplete until you figure out that it's the People VS Washington, not blue vs red, Democrat vs Republican. The two party system is a psychological ploy to give Washington the upper hand and to keep the peasants arguing over BS. It used to be the difference between the peasants and the upper class was access to books and education. The upper class now keeps the education and knowledge of these things to themselves not by hiding the information but just by entertaining the peasants so they'll be too lazy to understand the truth.

Don't let the knowledge to continue to hide from you. I get so exhausted trying to save peasants from their two-party mental handicap. Please, Davidod, concentrate and print this out so I can spend more time learning and less time teaching.

Being that I've not registered with ANY political party, and don't even consider myself aligned with ANY political party you've got, I'll still keep your lil' edumacation (sic) in mind.

PS before I forget to say it: thank you for your enlightened insights radiating from such a wise and ancient soul. May I have another one of your masterful lessons, just to be privileged to be bestowed by your truthful words and brilliant insights? : )

In one comment on this post you say.....Your side came up with some malarkey to somehow transform that into "The Messiah".....then minutes later you say.......Being that I've not registered with ANY political party, and don't even consider myself aligned with ANY political party you've got,......

To say 'your side' in one sentence and then in the next claim to be not on sides with any party is asinine.

BTW, I, obviously believe both parties are illegal an not representing the 'People', so the only side I am on is that of the citizenry.

Consider your second lesson complete.

Dude, are you for realzies?

If I were to say that someone who's a huge fan of some African soccer team (e.g. Senegal?) is obviously on their "side", how does that statement imply that I'm taking the side of one of their opponents (whom I'm not even aware of)?

Brilliant assumption, Sherlock. Thanks for the schoolin'.

PS you inability to find any proof where Oprah called BO "the Messiah" is duly noted. So you're zero for two.

References from many people calling Obama, the Anointed one, The One, a Higher Being, etc. are as easy as a google away. I won't waste my time on trivial, easily provable nonsense that will in no way enrich the argument or anyone's mind.

Your posts are all pro-progressive, anti-Christian, anti-Republican, pro-Democrat. So, your statement ...Your side came up with some malarkey to somehow transform that into "The Messiah"...logically implies that you were positioning yourself on a 'side'.

Lesson 4 complete.

PS You inability to to argue anything but LIBERAL points and taking sides in a side-less battle makes your typing a waste of bandwidth.

However, for your entertainment purposes:
http://www.meridianmagazine.com/ideas/090313messiah.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srk18X804hQ&feature=youtube_gdata
http://tomwatson.typepad.com/tom_watson/2007/12/the-messianic-d.html
http://www.oprah.com/world/Oprah-Winfrey-Interviews-Barack-Obama/print/1
http://catholicexchange.com/2008/05/21/112550/

Geesh, I could go on and on but you could just work that brain and do some research before your next fatefully wrong batch of typing.

Good question....it does seem all of the pictures show white folks. And...perhaps some call themselves christians, but they probably don't act like it.

No. Im a mexican one

i really dont get why someone voted this down. must be personal.

your now talking to yourself..................

No, but most of us Tea Party Protesters ( as in the Boston Tea Party, for those who are ignorant of American history ) are American. Some, in other countries are not. But what we all are is sick of being enslaved by the political class for the sake of the corporations that have bought them. Anyone protesting the protesters is just a unwitting slave.

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The Tea Party movement started as a fund raising event by grassroots supporters of Ron Paul's 2008 presidential campaign. The movement has been infiltrated by some Republicans who still believe the Republican vs Democrat false dichotomy. But anyone who believes that there is any difference between the Reps and the Dems is mentally challenged. These infiltrators are not wanted by the Tea Party's founding core - those of us who know that the RepubliCrats are in this together for their own benefit and the benefit of their money masters.

Yes they are. Not exactly a "big tent" rainbow coalition, are they?

Well said, @sabengry. Welcome to the site fellow awakened one.

You don't remember the big deal made of 'Chris', the black tea partier, that showed up with a rifle over his shoulder. It shows a lack of education to make this a racist thing. Funny, that's why most racists are that way, lack of education. Being anti White Christian is racism too and should be looked at with just as much disgust. All racism and sexism is wrong so don't be giving yourself high fives for being 'down' WITH black people if you are also down ON white people.

As far as I can see, the only people who aren't unhappy with Washington are those who are too engrossed in television or too stupid to know any better or in denial.

I know a good shrink for anyone calling a PATRIOT bad names. Believe me, you need one.

And Webgrafix...One of your signs talks about lack of knowledge of world history. Your comments and pictures show to me that you could use a World History lesson. Parroting Presidents and even drawing them in a less than flattering manner IS American History. As a matter of fact the early Presidents endured much worse than this.

Additionally, you should research Obama's history, his staff's history and the books they've written before claiming anyone is wrong about Obama and Socialism. Did you miss the buyout (government) of GM? Did you miss reading the Health Care bill.

I personally don't believe you've read it or the books from Obama's staff.

You're welcome to test my knowledge of this by responding with your typical juvenile, name-calling, information-less diatribe of a post.