Pentagon Considers Climate Change a National Security Threat
source: http://undispatch.com/what-qdr-says-about-climate-change
-
-
- SleepDirt
- added this
In its recently released Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), the DoD states, "Climate change and energy are two key issues that will play a significant role in shaping the future security environment." No debate. According to the U.S. security apparatus, these are issues that the U.S. security apparatus will have to deal with.
The QDR states two "broad" ways in which climate change will affect U.S. security. Global warming will "shape the operating environment, roles, and missions that we undertake", and DoD will be forced to deal with "the impacts of climate change on our facilities and military capabilities."
The QDR doesn't blink:
The U.S. Global Change Research Program, composed of 13 federal agencies, reported in 2009 that climate-related changes are already being observed in every region of the world, including the United States and its coastal waters. Among these physical changes are increases in heavy downpours, rising temperature and sea level, rapidly retreating glaciers, thawing permafrost, lengthening growing seasons, lengthening ice-free seasons in the oceans and on lakes and rivers, earlier snowmelt, and alterations in river flows.
What effects does this have on American national defense? The QDR continues:
Climate change will contribute to food and water scarcity, will increase the spread of disease, and may spur or exacerbate mass migration. While climate change alone does not cause conflict, it may act as an accelerant of instability or conflict, placing a burden to respond on civilian institutions and militaries around the world. In addition, extreme weather events may lead to increased demands for defense support to civil authorities for humanitarian assistance or disaster response both within the United States and overseas.
Note the certainty. Climate change "will" cause resource scarcity and "will" cause the spread of disease. For the DoD, these changes have a two-pronged effect, as an "accelerant" of instability and conflict, as well as an increased burden on the military to engage in humanitarian assistance, limiting its ability to focus solely on defense.
Continued...
-
- groups:
- Community, Politics, US Politics, Progressive America
-
-
eternal_springs
-
I'm very pleased with their certainty. I hope they follow through on it, or are allowed to follow through.
- 2 years ago
-
eternal_springs
-
-
KSirys
-
Just now? wow... and i thought I was late to things...
- 2 years ago
-
KSirys
-
-
Monkey_Films
-
Well, hell, in that case let's just trash the rest of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to save us from Climate Change. It's the only responsible thing to do. I'm sure we'll have to give up our guns so we don't shoot any food when the shortages occur, remember, the wildlife belong to Washington. Don't use a rain-barrel, that would be stealing from the government and they'll need to ration all that water, you know. If you've got land with a well, gosh, we got laws to take away that land now, thank goodness for our wonderful Supreme Court. I love this free, as long as you pay your carbon taxes, country!
- 2 years ago
-
Monkey_Films
-
-
Progresshiv
-
The men and women of the United States armed forces are predominantly honorable, rational, and loyal to the Constitution. Their hard work and sacrifice have enabled us all to confront challenges within an atmosphere of security and trust. It is gratifying to see that they have not abandoned their senses to follow any partisan agenda.
- 2 years ago
-
Progresshiv
