Community | February 17, 2010 | 184 comments

Majority Don't Think President Deserves Second Term, According To CNN Poll

Image
Mariased
What do you think?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Current Tonight,   US Politics
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

184 comments // Majority Don't Think President Deserves Second Term, According To CNN Poll

  • PressCore
  • galwayman
    • -1
      galwayman  
    • He doesn't deserve to finish out this term! Not only did he allow the Patriot Act to remain in force,continuing to violate our constitutional rights,he decided to bring terrorists to the US for trial in federal courts,where all evidence obtained against these scumbags will be surpressed by the court as gotten under torture so even though they are guilty, they beat the charges! Next he uses our money to bail out rich people and corporations without our permission! He promised "change we can believe in" what a crock! Business as usual! The Rich Elite told him what to do,and he did it! Obama is just another puppet!

    • 1 year ago
  • realitybytes
    • -1
      realitybytes  
    • HELLLLLLL NO!but it doesnt matter! corporations/bankers run the world. Obama is just the new face of the white house, just an extension of Bush-look at his cabinet.

    • 1 year ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • http://Current.com

      @ Mariased, the article you posted here on Current.com certainly sparked a lot of discussion. Here we have the 1st President in American History who's wired into the Internet, with this site fostered by Al Gore (who realy was elected President but was preempted by usurper Bush), and yet the idea of using the web to effect the changes we all voted for has still hasn't occurred to anyone. I guess when such an immeasurably valuable communication resource is right under the People's noses they don't see it. Hey. We're the modern decendants of Cro Magnon humans who survived
      because they had communications skills. As in the intro to Steven Spielberg's Amazing Stories, they shared what they'd seen and experienced and learned before campfires.

      Google had a contest in 2009 in which it solicited ideas to accomplish business plans within certain categories. It was well thought out. And the winners would be funded. I had my own futuristic ideas building on the elements I'd seen which would have funded very advanced self sustaining farming communities in poor rural areas. People would have been taught basic organic farming skills, food processing skills, bakery etc..And would have thrived making a life for themselves. Survival is always the name of the game. After blogging recent articles about how the poverty level is rising to 30% and how some parts of the USA resemble 3rd world countries, homelessness & despair rising in the cities.., it's not hard to see the present economic system has been corrupted so badly, with the unequal distribution of wealth and opportunity, that the USA needs something new so that all people who need it can progress forward.

      We need a new web based program that'll solicit ideas from 300 million Americans, filter them, consider them, and use them to invent something bold. It's people who make wealth, and people who are the ultimate resource. The current President would be open to that. The ideas of ingenuous grade school children are valuable beyond price.Specificaly, to put most of the educated people back to work, I suggest we need a Govt.backed system in partnership with Google, where the shelter, food, medical, personal allowances of unemployed college students in all 50 States can be vouchered in return for them contracting themselves to perform higher level community services where they can get practical experience doing a job. That their educational loans payback would be suspended until they can return the public commonwealth invested in them, and that would help them build their credit, and their future employability.

      For 96 years now we've had a credit based monentary system & economy. We need a domestic Peace Corps akin to what JFK and Sargent Schriver invented in the 1960s to carry the unemployed workforce forward to produce again. My dad worked for the WPA back in the 1930s during the Great Depression. He helped build roads to connect the rural poor citizens to the main roads, and the cities. Today, we have safety nets like food stamps, HEAP, and unemployment insurance my dad, and grandfather never had because some souls were positive enough to keep their eyes on making progress happen a little bit at a time beyond the survival they needed to live and breathe. We're coming up on Easter in a couple of months. Ignoring the hypocrisy here from people who likely never cared enough to vote, but pretend to be judges now, as the Christians say : " It's better to light a candle than to curse the darkness " Be positive. And THINK !

    • 1 year ago
  • jubal
  • courage
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  
    • For those too impatient, and intolerant to understand my positive remarks
      about President Obama.., and in a narrower focus, those who are still more motivated by social Justice than negativity and being judgemental, you should always remember this fundamental Bhuddhist principle: In any contest between a rock and the stream, the stream will always eventually prevail. Because either the stream moves the rock along and aside.., or in time, the action of the water against the rock will erode it to grains of sand which fall to the bottom. You should never underestimate perseverance. It's the unwavering constancy of one's purpose that guarantees success. It will take immensely longer than 8 years to complete the change that was promised. But so long as that change has a solid beginning, like the stream against the obstruction lying in its path, it will prevail because it must prevail.

    • 1 year ago
  • JessicaVega7
  • Conniepae
    • +2
      Conniepae  
    • JessicaVega7:

      Voted your comment 'up'. George W. was a 'self-professed' 'decider'. He didn't even try to lead. He just did what he wanted, laws and Constitution be damned. 'Move along, nothing to see here'. His own people left and wrote books about the wrongs of his administration. Everyone just 'move along' as though nothing mattered. Now people care? Where were they when this mess was happening? Watching American Idol?

    • 1 year ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • JessicaVega7:

      Of course they've forgotten the Bush years already. Bush was so unmemorable, he was forgotten even before he was gone anyway. My college degree was in Psychology. I know the harmful effect that vegetating in front of the TV has on people's minds. It conditions people to behave similarly to those afflicted with Alzheimer's disease. When the "news" isn't realy anything new, they tune out what they see & hear, as their unconscious minds are programmed with subliminal messages making them receptive to commericals. Once what they consciously see & hear is out of sight, it's out of mind. Ie forgotten. George Orwell sensed that TV would be abused to socialy control the masses, which is why he called their propaganda doublespeak. The more you're programmed, the less you remember. The less you remember, the more one's open to further hypnotic mind control. That CNN poll is about as much genuine "news" as
      horse hockey is an Olympic event. Needless to say, they don't give out Gold medals for kicking shit around. As Gilda Radner said in the persona of Emily La Tella, we're already drowning in it as it is. The irony of CNN doing a TV poll is that the
      Corporation Party must realy object to him vs McCain/Palin whom their Corporate media owners they represent would have rather played ball with. Corporations see all Government people as their property. So it they don't like him around, as they didn't like Jimmy Carter, and favored Ray Gun instead, ironicaly that's a good sign. To the Corporations, anyone with integrity is seen as a puppet who wants to cut their strings.

    • 1 year ago
  • curtisreed
    • -2
      curtisreed  
    • JessicaVega7:

      why do you bother? because you're very simpleminded in your analysis and you think the truth is just so simple and obvious to you and so you can set people straight in a paragraph or two.

      additionally, your post implies that anyone who believes that Obama is incompetent is just an idiot who doesn't see him for all his glory. What an astonishingly arrogant perspective. How long has it been since you acquired a monopoly on common sense and reason?

      For instance, the notion that ALL of America's problems can possibly boil down to ONE man--George Bush--and you cannot fathom how the hundreds of members of congress and senate played a part in this, people of both parties, and how their bumbling policies set us up for our current struggle.

      And AMONG those bumbling clowns was a Senator from Illinois who you helped elect to the Presidency. The genius who voted against the surge and then said the surge was not working but now wants to take credit for it.

      And yet anyone who can SEE this idiotic policy incoherency is presumed, by you, to be too stupid to "remember George Bush"?!

    • 1 year ago
  • covelogibbs
    • +2
      covelogibbs  
    • Image
    • There is real news happening that's relevant to this discussion, yet much of our attention is on this silly poll. Obama's legacy is turning into one of a nuclear nightmare. Please call, email, and mail Obama and tell him his pushing nuclear power is a disaster of epic proportions.

      We want the green revolution we were promised. Turning to old faulty and dangerous technology to appease Obama's corporate pimps is not why we voted for him. Please speak out in opposition to this administration's nuclear policies.

      http://current.com/items/92154151_nuclear-is-not-clean-green-or-safe-no-nukes.ht...

    • 1 year ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • Those of you who like to judge a book by its cover, and take things only on their face should read of the life and times of Theodore Roosevelt. He had the same problems with Corporations as Mr. Obama does today. Because the same trend that existed in 1910 still exists, only worse, in 2010. Today the undue influence peddling, bribery, corruption and dominance of Corporations over the Government is still as bad as it ever was. And it's a Herculean task to overcome it. Like me, Theodore Roosevelt was a New Yorker who lived in the West to get tougher, and see both sides, then return to his homeland to apply it. His quote was: " Do what you can, where you are, with what you have " Many might not see why a man whose attitude was direct, realistic, and simple could be great enough to be immortalized on the face of Mt. Rushmore. But Calvin Coolidge studied his life as I have, and was inspired by it too. Coolidge's quote is my personal motto: " Determination & persistence alone are omnipotent. Anyone who constantly maintains both those virtues will accomplish anything that can be " Positive thinking will put you in a positive future. The future is now, and it's still in your hands.

    • 1 year ago
  • curtisreed
    • -2
      curtisreed  
    • PressCore:

      Genius, Roosevelt was not president in 1910.
      And the problems we see today ARE very similar, because of very similar policies promoted by liberals, not the corporations. You people weren't complaining when the economy was roaring and unqualified people were able to buy a $200,000 house on a $40000 salary because the Congress told the banks to rewrite their qualification guidelines.

      You Libs ignored the Republicans starting in 2004 when it became clear that Freddy Mac and Fanny Mae were gooing belly up. No, instead your lib leaders were in ecstasy because they had a "very qualified" (black) man running things, and any criticism of his failures was immediately attacked as "racist". In short, when Republicans--including Bush--were screaming "this guy is driving us toward an ice berg", you Libs replied, "You're only saying that 'cause he's black!"

      And when the ship struck ice, Libs turned to Bush and said, "it's ALL your fault."

    • 1 year ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • Image
    • curtisreed:

      http://current.com

      I'm not a genius. In formal testing, I only measured to the bright, normal caregory. I never claimed T.Roosevelt was President in 2010, and thus you never read that. I counted back 100 years to approximate a time frame of reference to make it easier for current.com
      members to understand my reasoning. I'm also not a liberal. I'm of the Libertarian Party
      which dates back to colonial America. And I associate myself with Progressives well enough. Yet there IS a discernably important difference between liberal and Libertarian, though I doubt seriously you're presently capable of comprehending what it is. I actualy live my life very conservatively. Did you know you arbitrarily lumped me in with "liberals" no less than 3 times in your emotionaly toned story that doesn't apply to me ? I read the text you chose to profile yourself with next to your kayaking avatar. So I understand you associate your former liberal attitude with something you now object to. But you're confused if you simply object to my comment, and grope to lump me in with others who
      don't share my beliefs. Intelligent people learn to ask questions before they make summary judgements about others they presume to know.

    • 1 year ago
  • sidewayssquare
    • 0
      sidewayssquare  
    • the president dosent know anything about the economy, hell i dont know alot about the economy, but i do know that you dont make any jobs of substance by taxing people and then using those funds to pay welfare or anything union based because pensions are designed to destroy companys (how can a business succeed when the ammount of people that need to be paid exceeds the number of people that are working and making goods? unions once were a force of good, but its been corrupted )

      taxes and the economy do not go hand in hand, when theres profit to be made companys will hire and expand, but right now we have a bully saying that the price of energy will go up, carbon credits/popoffsets all of them are scams to get money http://www.popoffsets.com/what_we_do.php

      obama is another monger, and no his ideas would not work even with a good economy

    • 1 year ago
  • CaliCritic
    • 0
      CaliCritic  
    • He was elected at the wrong time in America. If we didn't have the huge amount of problems in our country right now, he could MAYBE do a better job in office.

    • 1 year ago
  • curtisreed
    • -2
      curtisreed  
    • CaliCritic:

      No, he was elected TOO EARLY in his political career. He was not yet ready for prime time, he doesn't have the executive experience, he really didn't have enough experience at all.

      Just accept it. He is bumbling it because he doesn't know how to lead. PERIOD

    • 1 year ago
  • Supertramp_
    • +2
      Supertramp_  
    • This is stupid, It is always easy to blame the president rather then support him. He has only been in office for a year, has little or no support from the republicans, and all the democrats are too worried about getting re-elected to do anything. We elected him, and we did it for change, not to have a new scape goat. Obviously he can't make everything better instantly, Bush left one hell of a mess. HAVE FAITH, and what the fuck else are we going to do?
      elect Sarah Palin, http://www.youtube.com/user/NewLeftMedia#p/u/1/mKKKgua7wQk
      AWESOME

    • 1 year ago
  • curtisreed
    • -1
      curtisreed  
    • Supertramp_:

      maybe when you get a few more years under your belt you will wisen up and realize that one year is PLENTY of time to see if a person is competent but struggling against a difficult situation, or incompetent and making a difficult situation worse.

      Which, in this case, Obama is clearly making things worse.

      You don't EVER solve an economic crisis and record unemployment by increasing taxes on corporations, bad mouthing the corporations that provide employment, making entrepeneurs out to be "evil" when they are the ONLY ones who will create jobs. And increased jobs = increased income tax = end to the budget woes.

      Obama is instead echoing the socialist mantras of geniuses like Mugabbe and Chavez. He is being compared to Roosevelt, but a cursory examination of history will tell you that MANY economists believe that Roosevelts policies extended the depression, rather than ending it.

    • 1 year ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • curtisreed:

      I never compared Theodore Roosevelt to Barack Obama. I compared T. Roosevelt to some of the parallels in MY life experience. I only mentioned that both had/have problems with Corporate dominance over the Government a century ago as now. Incidentally, it was Franklin Delano Roosevelt, not Theodore Roosevelt who may have prolonged the Great Depression. I don't mind that you believe whatever you want to believe, but at least take care that you don't misrepresent other people will you please ?

    • 1 year ago
  • keanu101
    • 0
      keanu101  
    • This same poll also stated BUSH deserved a second term.....Bush yes and Obama No.....the cnn poll is a sham!!! Neither Bush nor Obama deserve a seond term presidency!

    • 1 year ago
  • observer2121
    • 0
      observer2121  
    • keanu101:

      And why does Obama not deserve a second term? Please be specific and give a somewhat coherent analysis. "He sucks" is not good enough. I don't know how you can say a guy doesn't deserve a second term based on a little over 1 year, that's just moronic.

    • 1 year ago
  • Conniepae
    • +1
      Conniepae  
    • observer2121:

      Add to that, the fact that the Republicans have been abstructing the 'change' we voted for. Mainstream media is not spinning the abstructing being done by the right, they are spinning President Obama being a failure after only one year. They are giving voice to the right-wing nuts, who refuse to address the failings of George W., while spinning the difficulty President Obama is having as a failure.

    • 1 year ago
  • covelogibbs
  • covelogibbs
  • diabolical44
    • -1
      diabolical44  
    • people will suddenly think he does deserve a second term when they see what the republicans have to offer as an alternative. Mitt Romney? Sarah Palin? who are they gonna nominate. giant douche or turd sandwich ?

    • 1 year ago
  • lu7cky
    • -1
      lu7cky  
    • I just don't get what people expected of him or what they are seeing that I am not. As far as I'm concerned he is doing a great job, especially considering the mess he was left to clean up. He's been fought on at every turn, by republican leaders and then blasted for not getting things done in a timely manner.These are the same senators and pundits who accuse him of being weak on defense only to call him a war monger when positve steps are taken in that direction; they vote againts federal stimulus and then show up for photo ops at ribbon cutting ceremonies made possible by said funds; they take advantage of government supplied health care while decrying efforts to provide the same for all.
      Let's face the facts here, our economy was on the brink of collapse and salvaging it was no easy task. The Taliban is on the run and being rounded up, formerly rogue nations are working with the US to weed out terrorists hiding in thier midst, the housing market and auto industries are begining to bounce back due to federal aid and government sponsered programs. He has also reversed a great deal of the damage done to the image of the US during the past 8 years, for that alone he desreves another term, if only to see his goals come to fruition.

    • 1 year ago
  • cmdinc
    • -2
      cmdinc  
    • lu7cky:

      up till very recently he hasn't needed the repulicans to enact his causes, so to be fought by repubs is not a valid arguement.
      Yes our heros overseees are doing a wonderful job, imagine if Obama would have given the surge troops ro our commanders when they asked for them.
      As for image who gives a damn. Vanity is not a term needed for foriegn relations.

    • 1 year ago
  • observer2121
    • 0
      observer2121  
    • cmdinc:

      What are you babbling about. What would this surge in troops have done? Obama sent 30,000 extra troops and what are they doing now? The Taliban leader was caught through cooperation with Pakistan not because of this troop surge. Why do you act as if an earlier surge would have been the holy grail?

    • 1 year ago
  • cmdinc
  • fleabird73
  • la_cynique
    • +1
      la_cynique  
    • this mis-information is based on a poll of the yahoos that are dialed into cnn 24/7 and conclusions posted by huffpost; neither are reliable sources of real conscience, does cnn speak for you? then by all means continue extrapolating an entire nations worth of political opinion from one biased survey

    • 1 year ago
  • cmdinc
    • 0
      cmdinc  
    • the problem is he ran telling the people he could fix the mess. Then once elected he has made mistakes ...."we must pass this stimulus bill quickly. If we do unemployment will stay below 8%, if we don't we will face finanacial ruin".....what happened???? HE WAS WRONG!!!!!!!! Blaming Bush is getting a little old also. This is now Obama's economy.

    • 1 year ago
  • diabolical44
    • 0
      diabolical44  
    • cmdinc:

      unfortunately just because he's been in office over a year now does not mean that these things are on him. this economy is Ronald Reagan's economy. It goes back to the 1980's when the neocons began deregulating everything and letting their friends on wall street run wild. every president since then is also complicit.

    • 1 year ago
  • cmdinc
    • -1
      cmdinc  
    • diabolical44:

      lol, now it's Reagan's fault??? lets here the truth you were an airtraffic controller during the Reagan admin right???......ta hell with it lets go back to Lincoln, or Washington for christ sakes. Maybe we should take a look at FDR for bringing in the welfare state and large government

    • 1 year ago
  • diabolical44
    • +1
      diabolical44  
    • cmdinc:

      let me put this to you as simply as I can. The recession was caused by bankers and wall street execs doing things that they were only legally allowed to do because they were unregulated. The lack of regulation of the market is what caused the recession. There is little dispute about that. Deregulation in its current form largely started with the Reagan administration. Their economic policies were to allow the market to self regulate and "take away the burden of gov't." as they like to say. Well, no regulation lead to short selling and banks being "too big to fail" and hedge fund managers losing their minds and lots of very risky dangerous (borderline criminal) behavior on wall street, which in turn lead to the collapse of the system and the various bailouts of goldman and AIG and etc... the bottom line is, there is a direct correlation between the economic policies of the Regan administration and what happened in this past decade. I'm not saying it is entirely his fault, every other president since then including Bill Clinton is also partially to blame, but Reagan ushered in the movement of deregulating all these markets.

    • 1 year ago
  • observer2121
    • 0
      observer2121  
    • diabolical44:

      That is only partly true. A large part of the blame for the recession lies with the American people who allowed themselves to get worked up into a frenzy buying homes and investing in houses like there was no tomorrow. The banks were not holding guns to peoples heads telling them to pay outrageous prices for 2 bedroom condos on the beach. People got greedy and now want to play innocent. People were refinancing their homes and taking out thousands of dollars to go on vacations or renovate their kitchens. People lied about their incomes and got loans they could not afford. 75% of this recession was caused by homeowners period. Blaming the banks for you taking out a loan is kinda stupid.

    • 1 year ago
  • vegazangel0229
    • 0
      vegazangel0229  
    • This really sucks! No matter what he does there were to many people passing judgment on him before he even made his first decision. This is a hard time to be president...no matter who became president it would have been worng. All americans should support their leader. Have some respect for your country! The guys is doing the best he can!

    • 1 year ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • vegazangel0229:

      Thank you for your words. I believe that too. There's a saying: "Everything you say and do is always a reflection of the inner you" Humans forget that they have the power of creation within them waiting to express itself. And that the Karma they create with the positive words/vibes they send out will always come back to them,10 fold too, because everything moves in cycles, and everything gathers momentum as it travels. So all the negative comments expressed here with their summary judgement, rationales,and depressing pessimistic outlook are realy self defeating. Presuming Bush was the same or better is absurd. And thinking Palin or someone else could be better is even more absurd.

      Even if Dennis Kucinnich/Ron Paul ran and got the Dems affirmation in the next primary, do you know what would happen ? The Corporate Party would contribute to them equaly as they would to their opposition, play both sides against each other, and whoever would be siting in he White House in 2013, would have to contend with that. People don't seem to realize that, essentialy, this has been the way it's been since the USA was started.

      I read an article in Time magazine during the bicentennial year of 1976. It claimed that only 1/3 of the colonial Americans were patriots. They had to contend with 1/3 of their neighbors being Tories loyal to Fascism. And BOTH sides had to deal with the wealthy who owned the arms suppliers selling arms and information about both sides to both sides. They were profiteers, and banksters who cleaned up as double agents. After the Civil War, with the rise of Wall St., the Big Oil Monopoly of Standard Oil, and the Corporations they owned, even Theodore Roosevelt couldn't effect that much change, because they owned nearly everthing and everyone in sight. THAT WAS 100 YEARS AGO !!! Our former Attorney General, and Governor here in New York, Eliot Spitzer's, favorite book is the bio of John D. Rockefeller,owner of Standard Oil, for good reason. He knows the score. He had to prosecute the firms whose abuses defied our laws.

      (John D. Rockefeller donated $100 Million to his foundation(himself) in T.Roosevelt's time. That made him wealthier than Bill Gates is today, way back then. The Rockefellers, Rothchilds, Morgans,and Buiderbergs established the "Fed" 96 years ago. As the first Rothchild said: "Give me control of a nation's money, and I will care not for whoever makes the laws" ) There are 2 things that the USA runs on: OIL, and MONEY. For the first time in the past 150 years of American History, there's finaly someone sitting in the White House who's open to electric cars, and the gradual elimination of the World OIL Monopoly which has been fomenting oil wars since Vietnam. Trying to change what has been so entrenched for 236 years is no different than the Greek legend where the God Hades gave a man the task of rolling a boulder up a hill. Incidentaly, that was 2,000 years ago, and he's still trying.

    • 1 year ago
  • PigFarmington
  • VC1
    • +1
      VC1  
    • It pisses me off that this poll is even brought up. It's not so much that polls don't reflect the truth, it's about promoting an intention. A lot of Americans are followers, and not wanting to take the time out to even think, they'll jump on the bandwagon believing that if others feel he's undeserving, they should too. What's sad is the bandwagon ain't even got wheels.

    • 1 year ago
  • iameam
  • Mark701
  • blackheartman
  • hunzedog
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • Mark701:

      Which is why civilized people's attitudes are oriented toward the head of the horse, rather than his rear. And the saluatation is " ladies & gentlemen " rather than poles & holes.

    • 1 year ago
  • ignignokt
  • blackheartman
    • 0
      blackheartman  
    • Let the football game begin! Once again, this match is between the lesser of two evils. Whatever you do, make sure to make plenty of stops at our concession stand and make sure to pick up a beautiful, full-color program in the lobby. Have fun America, and thank you for participating.

    • 1 year ago
  • inspirationseeker
    • +4
      inspirationseeker  
    • Even the fact that this questions is coming up this early shows that there are strong, negative, prejudices against our president. IT HAS ONLY BEEN A YEAR!!!!!! Give the man a chance and shut up! Sorry if I rant for a minute but I am really getting sick of this crap. President Bush was in office for 8 YEARS!!!! WTF??? And now you have the audacity to question the value of an entire presidency based on what?!? I swear if this ignorant way of thinking infiltrates any more of our society, I'm out. All President Obama has been doing is trying to clean up the mess that was left behind by the Bush Administration and considering how the economy is currently moving forward, I would say that he is at least heading in the right direction.

      I am starting to get the idea that I really live in a racist, small minded country. Because there is no logic behind letting an insane white man run our country for 4 years and do all sorts or horrible stupid things and then reelecting him for another term and yet here people are so quick to question the African American president. Give me a break. This is completely hidden racism. Or at least that is what I am starting to think.

      Ask me again in two years because any opinion now is simply based on nonsense.

    • 1 year ago
  • ssppeencceerr
  • HaloedGriot
  • CarlosIsDown
    • 0
      CarlosIsDown  
    • If the next three years look like the last three, then no. I'm trying to imagine the shit-fest the next president will be. You think you miss bush now? You'll be wanting an Obama/Bush Hybrid once the next prez comes in.

      Or maybe US voters get disenfranchised too easily.

    • 1 year ago
  • John_W
    • -7
      John_W  
    • This gasbag is trying to bring America to her knees. He must be impeached for taking part in the biggest fraud in the history of mankind. Joining the climate con gang makes him outpace Jimmy "Nuts" Carter as the worst U.S. president ever.

    • 1 year ago
  • HaloedGriot
  • Cynic2
    • +1
      Cynic2  
    • First off, he has to help clean up an 8-year clusterfuck (presidents can't do it all); second, presidents are in the power elite's pockets. 'nuff said.

    • 1 year ago
  • Brian_Modest
    • +3
      Brian_Modest  
    • He's only been in for a year there's still time. He's doing his part. When America is so fearful of change it makes the goals that he promised unattainable. We should stop blaming our problems on the government because it's for us by us. We are the problem but even more so the solution.

    • 1 year ago
  • sUnBeAmBeAuTy
    • +3
      sUnBeAmBeAuTy  
    • I don't think that Obama is a jeopardy of losing a second term there's a lot of people who are willing to give him another chance especially if he's running against someone like Palin (but I can't imagine her being a frontrunner in the first place ) and right now he's having to deal with all the crap that bush left behind, which means that his agenda is on the back burner or he has to do less than he wanted to do before in order to get America on track and thats what a lot of us wanted in the first place. For some reason those things are hard for people to believe but ignorance is bliss and in these cases a crutch.

    • 1 year ago
  • crispyfritters
    • +2
      crispyfritters  
    • The guy reminds me of Jimmy Carter, really. As far as a second term goes, it depends on how much he gets done from now till 2012, and whether or not he fulfills more of his campaign promises.

    • 1 year ago
  • cl0udy
  • Aweck
  • Guyatthebusstation
  • Guyatthebusstation
  • blackheartman
  • ignignokt
  • kilo88
    • 0
      kilo88 [removed]  
    • this doesn't surprise me

      - he approved corporate welfare
      - increase troops to die for an unjust war
      - hasn't stopped the fda raids on marijuana sellers
      - could end "dadt" at anytime but doesn't
      - could dismantle nukes and stop the sells but doesn't
      - and increases the national debt

      hot damn

    • 1 year ago
  • joaarias
    • +1
      joaarias  
    • Let me guess: Palin 2012 LOL!! HAHAHAHAHAHA. Seriously man ANYTHING is better than any republican you are thinking about. Your best was a multi-house owning-200-year-old and a running mate who doesn't seem to have paid attention in high school??!! You gotta do better than that, monkeys can beat that... I will loose all faith in humanity if I see Palin get even close to running for presidency. Where was the "majority" the last 8 or so years that our country was REALLY fu**d up. It's funny how we can get a guy impeached for getting a blowjob and completely ignore that W pissed all over the constitution LOL, aahhh well....

    • 1 year ago
  • Varex_Sythe
    • +4
      Varex_Sythe  
    • I think whether or not he gets elected for a second term depends upon how well he does in the next couple of years. So far I don't think that he is off to a bad start, especially considering the mess that he inherited. What could screw him up big time though is if the republicans get a house majority. If that happens then they'll probably fight him tooth and nail just for spite. Then nothing will get done, and he will probably be blamed.

    • 1 year ago
  • joaarias
    • +1
      joaarias  
    • Varex_Sythe:

      " If that happens then they'll probably fight him tooth and nail just for spite. Then nothing will get done, and he will probably be blamed"

      Isn't this what is already happening?

    • 1 year ago
  • runfar334
    • +7
      runfar334  
    • This guy gets elected in one of the roughest times for the US and everyone expects a miracle within the first year. Would any of the other candidates do a better job given the situation our country is in? Probably not, in fact the public would be saying the same things about Mccain had he gotten elected.

    • 1 year ago
  • observer2121
  • runfar334
    • 0
      runfar334  
    • observer2121:

      I guess I understand where you’re coming from. But as I remember it Bush and his cronies put us in this mess. Our country wouldn’t be dealing with these things and perhaps wouldn’t of put hope in an under qualified person had that previous eight years not been such chaos.

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
    • -1
      shanklinmike  
    • It doesn't matter....we'll just get another warmongering, tax and spend, anti-civil liberties, anti gay rights, anti-Liberty, anti-Freedom, neocon or Keynesian candidate.....

      republicans, democrats, purple people.....they're all the same to us real Freedom lovers at this point....

      You're either for individual rights and minimizing statism slavery, or you're a part of the problem....

      http://mises.org

    • 1 year ago
  • Guyatthebusstation
  • QueenGloria
  • joaarias
  • VoyagerFilms
  • Guyatthebusstation
  • ladyjayne
    • +4
      ladyjayne  
    • I think this is so stupid, it almost makes one believe in monarchy. The majority didn't think much of Bill Clinton after his first year in office, either, and Clinton went on to be one of the best presidents this country has had. He had a great vice president, too, of course, who should of been the president instead of George W. Bush.

      Posts like this one argue in favor of bringing back Bush/Cheney in drag---Sarah Palin

    • 1 year ago
  • JohnA
  • covelogibbs
  • jubal
    • +3
      jubal  
    • Obama will win a second term, especially when the GOP puts up Palin as the alternative. HAHAHAHAHA

      But seriously folks, Obama is going to get reelected, there is still two and half years to go. A lot can happen between now and then.

    • 1 year ago
  • aflaus
  • obamaisajoke
  • aflaus
  • wally60
  • fun_size
    • +11
      fun_size  
    • People have been saying he doesnt deserve a second term before he even started the first one. Give it a chance. You cant fix something as extraordinarily complex as the economy in just on year let alone one term.

      Americans are just impatient ignorant and intolerant so it doesnt really surprise me that so many want to can him. I just fear that people will actually vote in a worse candidate out of spite next election. Wouldnt be the first time...

    • 1 year ago
  • obamaisajoke
  • observer2121
  • fun_size
    • +3
      fun_size  
    • obamaisajoke:

      So please pray tell what would Mccain have done differently in this position? Would he not have bailed out the American auto companies and banks as well? Or maybe you could tell me who he should have given "trillions of dollars"(not really but ok) to instead? It sure sounds like you are a master of commercial commerce.

      Where did hollywood come into this? Youve lost me completely here... This whole post was just one conservative talking point after the other... do you actually have an opinion of your own or do you really just like being told what to think?

    • 1 year ago
  • Guyatthebusstation
  • dalistuff
    • 0
      dalistuff  
    • what a dumb ass question. as they say it in the hood :"Give the brother a break" how we criticize a man whose trying but we gave a retard eight freakin ez years of mass destruction.

    • 1 year ago
  • shakes_head
    • +1
      shakes_head  
    • If Obama can end the occupations, declare marriage equality, legalize marijuana, enact a universal health care plan, decrease defense spending, fund actual clean & safe energy projects, and create jobs, then he'll get my vote. If not, I'll be looking for any candidate who will...

    • 1 year ago
  • obamaisajoke
  • covelogibbs
  • shakes_head
    • +1
      shakes_head  
    • obamaisajoke:

      I guess this isn't the best forum for subtle sarcasm, but that's my point exactly. He isn't Superman. Of course there is more he can do, but it's going to take more than one man and one year to do it. Whether you think he's doing a good job, or a bad one, there wasn't too many bright people seriously up for the challenge. People have trouble managing their households, let alone an entire country. Talk to your representatives, senators, mayors, and governors first. Writing on a discussion wall won't change anything. This isn't one man's burden...

    • 1 year ago
  • fun_size
    • 0
      fun_size  
    • shakes_head:

      No it really isnt. You should try to throw in a /sarcasm or something to try to make it more obvious... some people on this site actually mean it when you say things like that

    • 1 year ago
  • joaarias
  • trut
    • 0
      trut  
    • I agree, Obama should be given the boot at the next Democratic primary. Kucinich/Sanders or just hand it to the Cons.

    • 1 year ago
  • Philip_Robibero
    • +4
      Philip_Robibero  
    • This poll is idiotic and only exacerbates the problem. The second any politician looks at this or any other poll, their going to go into campaign mode; worried about securing their job for the next election. The politicians are playing to the media, not the other way around.

    • 1 year ago
1 - 100 of 184
more from Community:

top videos