Are mandatory vaccines a form of violence against children?
source: http://www.naturalnews.com/028215_vaccines_Merck.html
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
Most modern vaccinations are, of course, a form of chemical violence against children. If they were all formulated without chemical preservatives (like thimerosal) and dangerous adjuvants (which can harm the nervous system), that might be a different story. But far too many of today's vaccines are chemical concoctions that are entirely unnatural to the human body. To force them into the bodies of innocent children is an act of medical violence.
The method of introducing the vaccines is unnatural and highly interventionist: These chemicals and DNA / RNA fragments are injected directly into the tissues and blood, bypassing the skin (a normal protective defense) and bypassing the digestive system, too. An injected mandatory vaccine dumps foreign material directly into the bloodstream of children without the consent of either the child or the parents -- that's what qualifies mandatory vaccines as "chemical violence" against children.
_________
I tend to agree and think more should be put towards disease eradication and education.
What do you think?
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Current Tonight, Earth and Science, 7 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Children, Pharmaceuticals, Profits, 3 more
-
-
cassie2009
-
If people are that crule they should be in jail for killing little children. But if they are using this as a form of killing good for them they should not be getting credit for killing little children. I don't think that little children should die from getting vaccines.
- 2 years ago
-
cassie2009
-
-
common_sense_please
-
This is why now 1 in 109 children in the US are diagnosed with autism or a form of autism. It's not the vaccine itself--it's the crazy seriously poisonous crap they cut the vaccine with and the fact kids are expected to be vaccinated long before their immune system is developed enough to fight off any possible side effects.
- 2 years ago
-
common_sense_please
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
common_sense_please:
Wow, we actually agree on something.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
keithponder
-
Are mandatory vaccines a form of violence against children?
hell yes they are.
- 2 years ago
-
keithponder
-
-
knightlynight200
-
would you rather them be vaccinated and not get the diesease or have them die at a young age because they didn't get vaccinated?
- 2 years ago
-
knightlynight200
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
Jan,
Thank you for this post and strong advocacy on this very important issue.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
JanforGore
-
MotherForTruth:
You're welcome. We need to be very vigilant about what is in vaccines as well as our food, water, and in our environment as a whole, and we also need to continue to fight for proper disclosure regarding all of the above as well. Unfortunately, some here with an ax to grind only read what they want to read and interpret it to suit their own means. When you have children their welfare and health is the FIRST priority, and as such you need to know what you are putting into their bodies to be able to make informed decisions on what to do to maintain their health. In some cases it may be a vaccine, and in other cases it may well be a natural supplement. Preserving the right to make that choice and gather truthful information is the backbone of a democratic country.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
pukemnukem
-
JanforGore:
Amen sister. When someone disagrees with you...they DO have an ax to grind. It's everyone's right in a community to place the rest of that community in danger. Why do you think its called "herd immunity"? Because big medicine, with their cures for diseases and stuff think we are all as stupid as cows.
I don't care if my child becomes a threat to others with weakened immune systems or organ transplant recipients. Its my right to be completely ignorant of the needs of others and put my desires over everyone else just as its my right to spread misinformation about vaccines.
Did you know that vaccines turn babies into trolls? Bet you didn't but if you google it, you'll find some quack...er um...some doctor-ish person not afraid of big Pharma to tell us the truth. POWER TO THE IGNORANT!!!!
- 2 years ago
-
pukemnukem
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
JanforGore:
Absolutely.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
Elligirl
-
I'm all for the tried-and-true vaccines. But new ones I remain very skeptical of, like that Gardasil. Sure, it sounds like a great idea. But when they started issuing it through school systems it felt really wrong.
- 2 years ago
-
Elligirl
-
-
galwayman
-
Elligirl:
It was wrong and the parents of these children were given no option but to go along or their child would have been banned by the school! I'll say it again: no government has the right to decide to force you to do something to your child that you are opposed too!
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
JanforGore
-
galwayman:
Thank you. It's good to know some here knew what this was about.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
chinese_democracy
-
It's entirely situational. You can't lump all vaccines together and say they are all good or bad for infants. I think the biggest problem we laymans have with vaccinations is that we have no way of knowing if they work or not on an individual level. We always run into the correlation not causation effect.
- 2 years ago
-
chinese_democracy
-
-
UndoInfluence
-
"I tend to agree and think more should be put towards disease eradication and education."
We already have a highly effective method of disease eradication available to us. It's called vaccination. The most severe violence that can be inflicted upon a child is by parental negligence of simple preventative measures.
The only consolation here is that if the child does get one of these horribly debilitating and life threatening diseases as a result of their parent's complete ignorance of modern medicine or actions of neophobia, the child probably won't last long enough to pass their parents genes on.
- 2 years ago
-
UndoInfluence
-
-
unimatrix0
-
Children and infants have no choice in the matter, one way or another. Turn the premise around. Is it violence against children to deny them vaccines?
I know I would be pissed off if my parents were such ignorant morons as to refuse to have me vaccinated when I was a child.
Should parents have the right to deny a child vaccines?
Children are not the property of parents. Parents should not be allowed to use children as proxies to indulge their Luddite fantasies. Parents should not be allowed to use children as pawns to indulge their anti-science, conspiracy theory non-sense.
At some point denial of medical care becomes abuse.
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
JanforGore
-
unimatrix0:
This post is not about denial of medical care but the violation of freedom and the lack of disclosure by those making vaccines that does wind up hurting people which you seem totally in denial about.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
unimatrix0
-
JanforGore:
denial of vaccine is denial of medical care
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
eden49
-
JanforGore:
OK...I understand where you're coming from, but I can only comment from a "Down Under" perspective...we just don't have this problem. Pretty much everyone has their kids innoculated...we're not forced, or held to gunpoint, granted, and that's unacceptable. It's just not an issue here...
- 2 years ago
-
eden49
-
-
jubal
-
unimatrix0:
Trusting too much in for profit pharmaceutical companies can be deadly.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
unimatrix0:
http://www.amazon.com/Trust-Us-Were-Experts-Manipulates/dp/1585421391
Read much? You should check out this book.
Fearless investigative journalists Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber (Toxic Sludge Is Good for You! and Mad Cow U.S.A.) are back with a gripping exposé of the public relations industry and the scientists who back their business-funded, anti-consumer-safety agendas. There are two kinds of "experts" in question--the PR spin doctors behind the scenes and the "independent" experts paraded before the public, scientists who have been hand-selected, cultivated, and paid handsomely to promote the views of corporations involved in controversial actions. Lively writing on controversial topics such as dioxin, bovine growth hormone, and genetically modified food makes this a real page-turner, shocking in its portrayal of the real and potential dangers in each of these technological innovations and of the "media pseudo-environment" created to obfuscate the risks. By financing and publicizing views that support the goals of corporate sponsors, PR campaigns have, over the course of the century, managed to suppress the dangers of lead poisoning for decades, silence the scientist who discovered that rats fed on genetically modified corn had significant organ abnormalities, squelch television and newspaper stories about the risks of bovine growth hormone, and place enough confusion and doubt in the public's mind about global warming to suppress any mobilization for action.
Rampton and Stauber introduce the movers and shakers of the PR industry, from the "risk communicators" (whose job is to downplay all risks) and "outrage managers" (with their four strategies--deflect, defer, dismiss, or defeat) to those who specialize in "public policy intelligence" (spying on opponents). Evidently, these elaborate PR campaigns are created for our own good. According to public relations philosophers, the public reacts emotionally to topics related to health and safety and is incapable of holding rational discourse. Needless to say, Rampton and Stauber find these views rather antidemocratic and intend to pull back the curtain to reveal the real wizard in Oz. This is one wake-up call that's hard to resist. --Lesley Reed --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
unimatrix0:
Here is a link to a scholarly paper about misplaced trust in therapeutic research and treatment efficacy.
http://www.genome.duke.edu/education/seminars/journal-club/documents/Beyond%20In...
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
corndog67
-
So when your kid gets polio or TB because of the rampant illegal aliens in this country, and you decided that dumb fucking Jenny McCarthy was right and vaccines were causing everything from Autism to athletes foot, who are you going to sue when your kid get something that was preventable and dies?
- 2 years ago
-
corndog67
-
-
JanforGore
-
corndog67:
Someone else who doesn't read.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
Did we already forget that Polio vaccinations cased many cased of Polio.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
flyingkick
-
MotherForTruth:
Polio vaccinations also virtually eradicated polio in the Western world.
Should we go back to a polio epidemic because the vaccine infected a few people? It's tragic, but you have to think of the greater good to society.
- 2 years ago
-
flyingkick
-
-
unimatrix0
-
MotherForTruth:
"Did we already forget that Polio vaccinations cased many cased of Polio"
that is wrong on so many levels it is funny
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
galwayman
-
unimatrix0:
Really? well do some research and you'll find that the first vaccine DID cause some cases of polio and was recalled and redone because it did.while the number of cases was small by population standards,25 or 30 thousand,it happened! Didn't you ever learn history in school? Now sure the vaccine was recalled and modified, and as a result no new cases appeared, but the point is that children were used to test the first issue of this vaccine and got the disease! My uncle now long dead was one of them! before you make a blanket statement like that do your research first or would you even deny the truth?
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
unimatrix0
-
galwayman:
but did it "cased many cased of Polio?"! lol
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
galwayman
-
unimatrix0:
I don't care if you do the research or not however it did exactly that was recalled then fixed and re-issued! you are so brainwashed if the government told you to kill somebody you'd probably go along and not question it at all!
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
unimatrix0:
Have you noticed you are arguing with every poster here? I do not find that funny.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
flyingkick
-
You've got to be kidding me. Polio is running rampant in 3rd world countries and you think vaccines are child abuse? Vaccines are exactly what they need.
"I tend to agree and think more should be put towards disease eradication and education."
Being anti-vaccine is incredibly naive.
All the education in the world isn't going to stop someone with the measles from sneezing on you, at which point you would just be happy you were vaccinated.
And, the only reason polio was eradicated in the Western world was because of 2 vaccines. Kids used to die all the time from diseases you and me are vaccinated against. If we stopped all vaccinations, you would see a huge reemergence of deadly diseases.Think of it this way: Vaccines can be dangerous, but the alternative is worse.
- 2 years ago
-
flyingkick
-
-
JanforGore
-
flyingkick:
I guess you didn't understand the thrust of the post nor my comment either(?) so let me explain again. I tend to agree that FORCED vaccinations are violence against children. I also think that more resources should be put into eradicating diseases in the first place, and in educating people about vaccines in giving them the ability to make informed decisions. Just how is that naive? And you say polio in running rampant in 3rd world countries... well then, where are the vaccines saving them? Where is the cure? There will ALWAYS be diseases in this world we will need some "vaccine" for that just won't quite eradicate that disease as long as people make MONEY from them. This is why the same interests pushing all of these vaccines are also squelching ( and stealing) information about natural remedies and cures that can be found in places like the Amazon. Those who believe otherwise are to me the naive ones.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
flyingkick
-
JanforGore:
Some diseases can only be eradicated by vaccination. Polio is one example.
60 years ago, if everyone were as stubborn as you and decided against getting a polio vaccination, we would be in the middle of a modern polio epidemic. That's the truth.Of course Pharmacutical companies are only interested in profits and they're probably subverting alternative cures. However, unless you have that alternative cure, that's a really stupid reason to not get a vaccination.
- 2 years ago
-
flyingkick
-
-
jubal
-
flyingkick:
I guess the point is that if you are already vaccinated, then why worry about those that choose not to get vaccinated. How are they going to get that disease, unless they travel to some place where that disease runs rampant? How are you going to get the disease if you are already vaccinated? In this case there would be no harm in taking the position of live and let live, unless you are making an argument regarding public health and the cost on society to treat the disease.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
Africa has been the guinea pig of the west to test vaccines for generations.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
galwayman
-
jubal:
yes and look how many africans died as a result! Resist at all costs any attempt by the elite to force you to do anything you don't want to do!
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
jubal
-
-
http://current.com/items/92133748_the-origin-of-aids.htm
Here is another example of good intentions gone horribly wrong.
Polio vaccinations may very well be the cause that HIV is now a world wide epidemic. You need to see this documentary and draw your own conclusions.
There are two theories as to the origin of AIDS, One is called the "hunter theory" that states that HIV is a mutated copy of SIV and was passed to humans when hunters ate monkeys. The only thing about this theory that doesn't make sense is that humans have been hunting and eating monkeys for thousands of years in Africa, why would it suddenly jump species in the 1950's?
The second is the Polio Vaccination theory. Which is the one I believe is the cause and is the subject of the documentary. Scientists are well known to cover their and other scientists asses when mistakes are made. There are also well known scientific cover ups that occurred to protect the companies that sponsored and paid for the research. Monsanto is a great example of faked science. What makes you think that a cover up didn't occur with Hilary Karprowski and his team creating the African version of the polio vaccinations?
Even though there is an extremely safe way to create most vaccinations like polio vaccine, companies prefer to use monkeys to create the vaccines, because they are close genetically to humans, and it costs a lot less than creating the vaccines the safe way.
The documentary goes into great detail about how the vaccines are still being made to this very day. Part 6 ends with the horrifying statement by an renowned American pathologist Dr. Cecil Fox who says that there is a safe synthetic and genetic way to produce polio vaccinations but it is not the "cost effective" way to do it for Pharmaceutical companies, they prefer to use "ground up monkey parts and inject them into children."
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
Here is the face of injections gone horribly wrong. How short sighted people are. "Trust the experts! They only have your best interests at hand."
Well all of you are too young to remember the horrible side effects from a drug that doctors said was perfectly safe for women who were suffering nausea due to their pregnancy. It was called Thalidomide and it caused horrible birth defects.
Sure this was eventually pulled from the market but not after many children were harmed. The pharmaceutical companies have a less than stellar history of bringing dangerous and bad drugs to market. There are literally hundreds. What makes any of you think that all vaccinations are safe.
http://images.icnetwork.co.uk/upl/sundaymercury/feb2009/4/2/Louise_Medus_2883228...
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
jubal
-
Forced vaccinations are violence in my opinion.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
unimatrix0
-
jubal:
What would you call it when children are denied vaccinations?
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
jubal
-
unimatrix0:
I would call that neglect. There is a middle ground and its called informed consent. But the argument is valid that children cannot give informed consent so they rely on their parents. It is a slippery slope as you indicated on another post, because there are so many fanatical people who have demonstrated that they cannot see the middle ground, they only know their extreme position and thereby endanger the child in question. It is like the parents in the Oregon case recently that were found guilty of the death of their child for faith healing. That is very different to a case of a parent deciding not to inoculate their child for H1N1.
Somewhere we need to find a balance, but until we can have full accountability from government and pharmaceutical companies, people are going to be suspicious of what they create. Especially when huge profits and money are involved, people become short sighted and the people they are supposed to help become more valuable being sick than being perfectly healthy. That is criminal. We all know that there have been monstrous things created in labs and weaponized. For most of the weaponized bio agents they have a treatment and or a cure. The same companies that create the treatments and vaccines for childhood diseases are, in many cases, the same companies that create the weaponized biological agents as well. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't put it past these companies to be just as much part of the problem as they are part of the solution. In even plainer words, I wouldn't put it past some of these companies to be actively researching ways to create diseases that they than can treat, thereby ensuring a steady revenue stream.
I will agree that for the most part vaccines are safe and effective. But I would be leery at any vaccination that uses animal parts to be made. That is another big part of "informed consent" that is very important. Patents be damned, we need to know if animal parts are being used to create the vaccines, or if mercury is being used as a preservative or as an ingredient, we should be able to have access to negative reports and results from drug trials or vaccine trials. I just don't trust the experts to be beyond reproach anymore given the environment of corporate greed and government complicity.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
bailey78
-
YES!
- 2 years ago
-
bailey78
-
-
pukemnukem
-
Ahhh the good old days when people were killed, or if they were lucky, only crippled by polio. We should take the lead from New Zealand where vaccinations are not mandatory and now whooping cough deaths are on the rise. If parents want to punish their kids for their own ignorance, who is to blame them. Jenny McCarthy is the voice of reason when it comes to national policy on vaccines and autism.
Let's go full on crazy and adopt the Scientology position on early child development. Let's see just how anti-science we can get this country. Let's due away completely with germ theory and just adopt Homeopathy. Ignorance is bliss....
- 2 years ago
-
pukemnukem
-
-
Elligirl
-
pukemnukem:
Whooping cough is also on the rise in the interior of BC, in communities where vaccination rates are very low.
- 2 years ago
-
Elligirl
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
Being critical of medicine and corporate interest is valid, but I'm not sure that justifies statements like "Most modern vaccinations are, of course, a form of chemical violence against children" - if giving children "unnatural" things is violence against children, many industries are guilty of such. Also, I always wonder about statements like that. To a child, many things are unnatural to their body, and it's not as if chemicals both in the body and in nature can not harm you.The article also states "An injected mandatory vaccine dumps foreign material directly into the bloodstream of children without the consent of either the child or the parents -- that's what qualifies mandatory vaccines as "chemical violence" against children." This may be true in circumstances like the Maryland case, but most of the time parents consent to get their children vaccinated.
I think this issue entangles two other issues: parental rights and social responsibility. On one hand, shouldn't parents be allowed to do what they please with their children? Obviously in many cases they are not, hence our child protection agencies. If you don't get your child vaccinated, and they get something contagious, could you be putting others at risk?
The article also claims "What the CDC and its Big Pharma cohorts want people to mistakenly believe is that vaccines always offer protection against infectious disease. (100% protection)" but I don't think this is true either. I've never heard any doctor or scientist claim 100% effectiveness for vaccines or really any medical treatment.
- 2 years ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
pukemnukem
-
DeliaTheArtist:
The main problem is that the average American has never taken a simple statistics class. Then again, maybe then lotteries would go away. There is so damn much misinformation about vaccines and even the actual process in which the human body interacts with their environment is not understood.
- 2 years ago
-
pukemnukem
-
-
peterzylstramoore
-
Their are chemicals in some vaccinations that certain individuals are allergic to, that can cause more harm then help. Our propensity towards vaccinations and over medication in general is a dangerous pattern. Our over propensity towards a sterilized environment is also dangerous. But this like other issues is about balance. It's clear historically that vaccines have saved a lot of lives. It's also clear that the profit motive can lead to overtreatment or incentivizing numbing symptoms or treating rather than prevention in health generally.
This is why we need to do some drug research and testing outside of the profit system (market) and generally why their is a stronger case for lower cost single payer health systems. This is why we need government testing.
Though I think it is clear that everyone belonging to Big Pharma or the medical system is not out to get us, it is also very clear (and Jan and others are justified in being critical of them) that from the negotiations around healthcare reform, from the fact that Big Pharma is willing to find ways out of costly coverage or dropping coverage for the sick, that ultimately it is the profit motive and not our health that makes a lot of decisions in the medical industry.
In some cases vaccines are a great thing and in some cases their are probably better alternatives. For more efficient and effective ways of funding good drug research see http://www.who.int/intellectualproperty/news/en/Submission-Baker.pdf
- 2 years ago
-
peterzylstramoore
-
-
SuperDPSalex
-
The idea of forcing people to get their children vaccinated at gunpoint seems too ridiculous to actually be true.
I'm sure it's not accurate.
Also, as was said below, while you should be free to choose whether you want the vaccine or not, you should also be held accountable if you refuse a vaccination and your child gets sick.
Remember the story of the woman who refused her son cancer treatment and fled? How did that turn out?
It's really difficult to continue to call myself a liberal when being a liberal includes following this kind of inane bullshit.
- 2 years ago
-
SuperDPSalex
-
-
JanforGore
-
SuperDPSalex:
http://www.aapsonline.org/press/nr-11-16-07.php
It happened. All you had to do was Google. And this isn'[t about being a LIBERAL or anything else politically. I am so sick of seeing politics take precedence in EVERY discussion on this site. And if I refused a vaccination and my child got sick I WOULD HAVE HANDLED IT. There are also other natural ways to keep children healthy, and not all vaccines are good for them. It should be up to the parent's discretion to decide, which brings us back to PROPER DISCLOSURE and information to make INFORMED DECISIONS.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
unimatrix0
-
JanforGore:
"if I refuse a vaccination and my child gets sick I WILL HANDLE IT"
Right, you will handle it when your child gets measles and dies? Easy for you to say. How do you think the dead kid is going to feel?
Do you realize how insane that sounds? What will you do if your child gets measles, polio or some other preventable disease because you refused vaccinations? Lay hands on the child? Anoint him with magic oil? Feed him some organic veggies and make it all better?
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
sidewayssquare
-
unimatrix0:
one of the injections they give to newborns is to prevent hyperbilirubinemia, infants cant produce vitamin k for the first two weeks, because of that they give the mother or the baby an injection of vitamin k, now this is only important if the mother dosent eat alot of green leafy vegtables, then your child might need the shot.
if the mother eats enough leafy greens, she dosent need the shot, if the mother eats enough leafy greens, and the doctors give her the shot anyhow the child then gets a overdose of vitamin k and that causes the same things they were trying to avoid.
i am hard of hearing and my brother is deaf because of this, my mom had two more kids and both were born at home with a midwife, my other two brothers have perfect hearing.
would you like to know the other cure for this for a child? sunlight, FUCKING SUNLIGHT!!! if you dont want your child to stay in a hospitol for two weeks under a growlight, you can buy a grow light and some little protective goggles fot his eyes and presto, cheap and your not injecting poison into your child.
also i sugest you watch the business of birth, its a documentry by ricki lake, i found it higly informative.
- 2 years ago
-
sidewayssquare
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
unimatrix0:
I have once asked my child's doctor if she will give me a guarantee that my child will not be harmed and she said she cannot. So who will be responsible for harm to my child if she gets the vaccine? Pharma? NO. Doctor? NO. Who?
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
galwayman
-
unimatrix0:
You are all missing a key point here and that is anything FORCED by the government is wrong and must be fought no matter the reason! Why? the answer is simple because we all have the right to self determination,to decide for ourselves what we put into our bodies not the government,or the lifestyle police! If jan chooses not to give a vaccine to her kids that is her right as the parent until her children reach the age of majority,just as it is unimatrix's right to decide for herself and her children! While I believe that trusting the government is foolish,and that doing so may harm your children,or you,resistance is the path I'll follow!
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
JanforGore
-
unimatrix0:
Yes, It is easy for me to say because I chose to get the vaccination for measles after educating myself about it. IT WAS VOLUNTARY which is the point. And there were others I chose to not get because I did not feel they were necessary based on my research, and my child is now a healthy adult. Did I ever state anywhere I had not? Again, you missed the entire point of this post because you like some others who are in your group here think you know it all. But yes, if I had chosen to not get that measles vaccine and my child got measles I would have handled it properly and taken care of him and that would not have been ANY of your business. I had mumps when I was four years old and lived to be a very healthy child and my parents were far from negligent. Your sweeping generalizations here are what are negligent and your overwhelming blind allegiance to this because you worship all science blindly is very dangerous. Again, READ the title and my comment in my original post. FORCED vaccinations are violence against children, especially when people are not gvien the proper information to make INFORMED decisions about their child's health.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
unimatrix0
-
JanforGore:
Jan, I am glad you got your kids vaccinated, you did the right thing.
How far are you willing to take this choice thing - how far down the slippery slope are you willing to go? Should parents be free to deny their children other sorts of medical attention?
Are you prepared to see children die because their parents are afraid of big bad pharma, or simply don't accept the validity of western science?
And what do you tell the kid in a wheel chair from polio, or worse? Is it fair to ask a child to risk their life and health because of their parents ignorance and superstition?
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
galwayman
-
JanforGore:
Bravo Jan! that was my point as well.it should be your choice not government as to what gets put into you're body! To anyone who follows science blindly all I can say is its your right to make that mistake but don't belittle others who choose to determine for themselves! Many children got polio from the injection unimatrix0 look it up yourself! even though many people got the flu AFTER getting a shot even though science denies it could ever happen! If you allow government to force you into anything it's not acceptable to me! Government does NOT have your best interests at heart!
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
ryan8566
-
JanforGore:
you might be 'handling it' from jail.
- 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
ryan8566
-
SuperDPSalex:
i read through these comments, some from people who rant against Christian Scientists,
Jehovah Witnesses, Scientologists, and others who refuse medical treatment for their children. how did that vaccination program against smallpox work out?
most people don't think twice about dragging the family dog or other pet to the vet for 'forced vaccinations'...and not at gunpoint. - 2 years ago
-
ryan8566
-
-
eden49
-
JanforGore:
...you beat me to that exact statement "U"..."if I refuse a vaccination and my child gets sick I WILL HANDLE IT"...and how will you handle it if others suffer from your ignorance?????????...hopefully, they will have been vaccinated...
- 2 years ago
-
eden49
-
-
galwayman
-
In the case of many vaccines the answer is yes,why because on the face of it preventing disease is something we should all be in favor of,however if you look below the surface you find that harmful chemicals are added and only those in power know what is really in the shots,or whatever other forms used to administer the "vaccine". Any american who is not willing to question the governments motives for anything is deluded or brainwashed! The power elite don't care about us,our our health,and have no problem using our children as test subjects for whatever twisted motives!
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
sidewayssquare
-
vaccinations should be left to the discretion of each individual (children included)
personaly i take huge offense to these clowns forcing anything into anyone, if someone wants me to take a shot at guntpoint, they can inject my corpse all they want, but im going to give someone a bad day before that happens.
also i am concerned about these guys targeting children, if there is something sinister with the h1n1 vaccine's we wolnt know for a long time, if theres anyone out there with access to lab equipment, perhaps you could find some young adults and do tests to see if they are sterile.
it dosent get much better than a bullet that people flock to out of fear.
- 2 years ago
-
sidewayssquare
-
-
unimatrix0
-
"Most modern vaccinations are, of course, a form of chemical violence against children."
Such claims are ridiculous on their face. People who fear vaccines simply do not understand science.
Vaccines have changed our world for the better. Parents who do not immunize their children are guilty of negligence.
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
JanforGore
-
unimatrix0:
Why did you just quote that one sentence? Because you think it validates your ignorance on the topic? Until you become a parent don't dare tell me I am irresponsible or negligent for giving a damn about what is put into my child's body and in voicing my opinion about FORCED vaccinations. Where is your feigned outrage for those who take advantage of our children for profit and who pump poisons into their bodies without our knowledge or consent? Is that negligent?
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
unimatrix0
-
JanforGore:
Jan, do you honestly believe all the scientists and pediatricians do not have the best interest of children at heart? Do you really believe all these people are evil and in cahoots with big pharma? How paranoid is that?
If you don't vaccinate your children you put them and others at risk. Vaccines work, and the world is a much better and healthier place because of them.
I suggest you study a little history as well as science. Childhood mortality before vaccines was through the roof.
Vaccines save the lives of countless children every year.
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
JanforGore
-
unimatrix0:
All you do is spew the same broken record rhetoric in every response. Back it up for once and stop twisting people's words. CONCERN AND LOVE FOR MY CHILD AND OUR FREEDOM OF CHOICE IS NOT NEGLIGENT. And next time read the title. The key word here is MANDATORY. I suppose what happened in Maryland is OK by you? Or didn't you even read it?
Here are the words written by the author right after the line you chose to cherrypick and end it at:
'Most modern vaccinations are, of course, a form of chemical violence against children.
If they were all formulated without chemical preservatives (like thimerosal) and dangerous adjuvants (which can harm the nervous system), that might be a different story. But far too many of today's vaccines are chemical concoctions that are entirely unnatural to the human body. To force them into the bodies of innocent children is an act of medical violence.'
Again , the key word being FORCE.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
lamborghini
-
JanforGore:
Hey Jan, some just refuse to read the words.
- 2 years ago
-
lamborghini
-
-
sidewayssquare
-
unimatrix0:
the doctors themselves barely know whats in the stuff, all the doctors know is they have a sales rep saying this new drug is FANTASTIC, ohh and by the way you get free stuff from us if you push our drugs!
i dont think ALL of them are crooked, but enough of them are.
and if you think our goverment dosent manage how many people die each year your fucking crazy, heres an example, recently there were some ford vehicles that had a great roll-over rating in europe, the same car in america is engineered to a lesser standard and you can die in a roll over, why would the car manufacture build another car to a lesser standard? if the price is the sole reason then theres something seriously wrong.
have you ever paid attention to drug comercials? i think a runny nose is far easier to deal with than organ failure and anal leakage, 9 times out of 10 the side affects are worse than the cure.
medicine started out noble, relying on nature to find cures, but when penicillin came out they thought they had a real cash cow, one drug that cures multiple ailments, well production was slow to start so it cost an arm and a leg at first, new production methods increased output and lowered cost's of manufacture but the price was still high, my father told me that it go to a point where people though the companys were getting to much money for there cure and that they should lower the price.
as a result drug manufatures learned that there is no profit in CURES, profit only exists in TREATMENT aka a life long subscription to the relief from your aliment... how sick and cruel, and if you take one drug for any length of time it sets something else out of wack and then you need another drug, and then another.
when a problem starts, its normaly a vitamin deficincy and that manifests as high blood pressure or it could be migranes ect ect ect, a majority of our problems are due to our lacking diets, and i would also say to many parents shelter thier kids from nature, dirt and bugs are great for your childs immune system just use common sense and dont set them loose in a porta-potty.
- 2 years ago
-
sidewayssquare
-
-
sidewayssquare
-
JanforGore:
well im glad you live in a world where the goverment clearly has your best intrest in heart, because they always tell us the truth as they see fit, they would never lie to us because the cattle need the illusion of security, they would never harm a single one of us because they care what we fucking think and feel, i am SOOOO thankfull that basicly every state in this blessed union isnt going bankrupt, hell infact i think we are underbudget this year same as last year and the year before that and, and, and...
do you even listen to the lies the t.v. and radio tells you any more? i mean hell they have EXPERTS, what do you know? ive got an EXPERT dont challenge me!
in 2006-2007 over 100 million anti-depression perscriptions were filled, are 1/3 of us really that depressed? or do they perscribe just to perscribe? 40% of our GDP is spent on medicine or treatment, we spend more money with big pharma, than we spend on housing, utilities, food, and clothing combined.
life is good, sucker
- 2 years ago
-
sidewayssquare
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
unimatrix0:
Are you really that naive or just ignorant? Did you know who sponsors all medical literature in med school? Here is just a small example…
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
http://www.alternet.org/investigations/144011/pharmaceutical_giant_paid_$500,000_to_psychiatrist_who_used_chicago's_poor_as_guinea_pigs
The Corrupt Alliance of the Psychiatric-Pharmaceutical Industry
http://www.cchrint.org/cchr-issues/the-corrupt-alliance-of-the-psychiatric-pharm... - 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
unimatrix0:
Are you on pharma payroll yourself? Child abuse is to inject our children with mercury and procecute parents for protecting their children.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
unimatrix0
-
MotherForTruth:
Hey cowboy, you might want to learn how to spell and write in complete sentences before you start calling other people ignorant.
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
unimatrix0:
Sorry to disappoint you, but I am a city girl. Please do not try psychoanalyze me, I already have forgotten what you have not even learned.
And I am ok with my spelling and writing. I can speak several languages, how about you? I also traveled all around the world and lived in many countries. How about you? I learned to think and recognize the truth. How about you? I also learned that you are very angry person and I have no idea how you can work with children.
Have some chamomile tea it’s really good for you.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
unimatrix0
-
MotherForTruth:
I was not trying to psychoanalyze you, just advising you that calling people "ignorant" when you yourself are incapable of spelling or writing in complete sentences makes you look rather foolish.
If I were to psychoanalyze you I would say you are an angry middle aged man who hates women. Your posts are always exaggerated claims about how some abusive man is being unfairly treated.
But I am not angry. I enjoy this, I do it for fun.
However, if you want to be taken seriously, I do encourage you to work on your spelling and writing ability.
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
galwayman
-
unimatrix0:
I'd not deny for one second that I'm the king of typos! It might help if spell check was added here so if you were referring to me deal with it! It changes none of what I said on this post! Hey Current add spell check so nobody gets upset!
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
unimatrix0
-
galwayman:
so is galwayman a sockpuppet for motherfortruth?
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
galwayman
-
unimatrix0:
You are beginning to really piss me off lady! am nobodies sockpuppet you brainwashed elitist! having read every post you have done on this story you just repeat the same old song,blind obedience to a government even if they don't care if you live or die,all they care about is the profit these vaccinations bring in for the rich drug companies! your posts show me that you haven't done any research on this subject and are unwilling to learn the facts that may prove you wrong! then when challenged you insult people! forcing our children,and their parents to blindly except this is government terrorism pure and simple! so when will you tire of insulting Jan,or me,or anyone who opposes your viewpoint? I'll take a lot but if someone chooses to insult me,or others,that is beyond the pale! before you flag this,which is what elitists do when opposed,if you insult me you'd best expect I'll react! why is lots of people get the real point Jan was making by posting this except you? why is it you have to insult people who refuse to agree with you?
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
unimatrix0:
I guess the answers to my questions are all NO. I am not surprised. If I remember correctly you are psychologist... Please do those that rely on real help a favor and change your career you are not so good at psychoanalysis.
Now to the subject of this post…You are obviously not a parent and I believe you would never make a good one. Those of us who are loving parents and who put the best interest of our children ahead of ours will do extensive research on benefits and potential harm to the wellbeing of our children. I would not hesitate for a second choosing to lose my life to save my child's. So do not ever question my ability to protect my children. No government sockpuppet like you can ever convince me that I do not know what is in the best interest of my children.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
jcamille
-
JanforGore:
Sooo the problem here is that the vaccines are mandatory...
Well, some things should BE mandatory.
I think it should be mandatory that you feed you children and not starve them, it should be mandatory to give children the opportunity to receive a good education, and it should be mandatory to give children vaccines that will keep them from dying.
However, i understand the issue surrounding NEW vaccines. We don't have enough guarantees about those and until all the side effects and possible results are known, i agree those should NOT be mandatory. But the vaccines that we do know are safe to use and will prevent horrible diseases, those SHOULD BE mandatory.
- 2 years ago
-
jcamille
-
-
Cuddlebones
-
I don't mind vaccines cause some people really think it will protect them but making it mandatory is just wrong. Why is it that the government can force me to put chemicals into my body (that could possibly harm me) but if i want to put some all natural herb in their- I'm fucked? Cause if I don't get vaccinated, I can't return to school. If I smoke some herb I can lose my job. Really? How does this make sense?
- 2 years ago
-
Cuddlebones
-
-
MotherForTruth
-
Great post Jan. Thanks.
- 2 years ago
-
MotherForTruth
-
-
treewolf39
-
Thanks for this post Jan. The Maryland story blew my mind.
- 2 years ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
JanforGore
-
treewolf39:
Hard to believe this happens in America. Amazing too that this isn't considered terrorism.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
treewolf39
-
I think vaccines are important but in the united states we have more shots then any other country. Obviously our for profit system has found another way to make a profit. Vaccinations should come with full discloser and criminal liability if people are poisoned. Evidence of certain genetic differences in people make it highly likely that some vaccinations will have an adverse effect on part of the population. Not enough independent research is funded to truly know all the ramifications of constant mass vaccinations.
- 2 years ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.vitalearth.net/vaccinations.html
What is in your child's vaccinations?
Excerpt:
The top 10 detox foods:
1. Green Leafy Vegetables
Eat them raw, throw them into a broth, add them to juices. Their chlorophyll helps carry out environmental toxins (heavy metals, pesticides) and protects the liver.2. Lemons
You need to keep the fluids flowing to wash out the body. Vitamin C is considered the detox vitamin. It helps convert toxins into a water-soluble form that’s easily flushed away.3. Watercress
Put a handful into salads, soups, and sandwiches. The peppery little green leaves have a diuretic effect that helps move things through your system. And watercress is rich in minerals too.4. Garlic
Add it to everything -- salads, sauces, spreads. In addition to the bulb’s cardio benefits, it activates liver enzymes that help filter out junk.5. Green tea
This antioxidant-rich brew is one of the healthiest ways to get more fluids into your system. Bonus: It contains catechins, which speed up liver activity6. Broccoli Sprouts
Get them at your health-food store. They pack 20 to 50 times more cancer-fighting, enzyme-stimulating activity into each bite than the grown-up vegetable.7. Sesame Seeds
They're credited with protecting liver cells from the damaging effects of chemicals.8. Cabbage
There are two main types of detoxifying enzymes in the liver; this potent veggie helps activate both of them.9. Psyllium
A plant that's rich in soluble fiber, like oat bran, but more versatile. It mops up toxins (cholesterol too) and helps clear them out. Stir powdered psyllium into juice to help cleanse your colon.10. Fruits, Fruits, Fruits
They're full of almost all the good things above: vitamin C, fiber, nutritious fluids, and all kinds of antioxidants.Whatever your personal vaccination decision, make it an informed decision as it’s your right and responsibility. Use this article as a starting point to begin your own research. Remember that it’s your right to choose whether you child is vaccinated or not.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
Yes, and the fact that we don't see any definable progress on eradicating disease in the first place only lends to the theories of what this is really all about.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
unimatrix0
-
JanforGore:
Yes, polio and measles are just as common as they always were. Kids still die all the time from measles and polio, don't they? Those vaccines, they just don't work at all. /sarcasm off
catch a clue, your claim is ridiculous. vaccines work.
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
JanforGore
-
unimatrix0:
What claim? That FORCED vaccinations are violence? That we don't see any real progress on eradicating disease as a whole and simply prefer to defer to medications and vaccines to make others money? You deny that? If so you are truly naive. How come you aren't addressing that? I never stated vaccines as a whole don't work for some. I stated that there should be FREEDOM OF CHOICE. Stop putting words in my mouth to validate your obvious loathing of people who dare to question what you worship.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
unimatrix0
-
JanforGore:
This claim: "the fact that we don't see any definable progress on eradicating disease"
We have made incredible progress. We have wiped out polio and measles for a start. For you to deny this is dishonest or uninformed.
Again, your idea of freedom of choice sounds like "I am free to risk my child's life" And that kind of freedom does not impress me.
- 2 years ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
galwayman
-
unimatrix0:
your type of freedom which is too let the rich elite or government to make your choices for you doesn't impress me either! That is whats wrong in this country the majority believe everything they are told and just blindly follow without question!
- 2 years ago
-
galwayman
-
-
JanforGore
-
unimatrix0:
Well you have certainly proven here you are anti-freedom of choice. And that does not mean what you are skewing it to mean to suit your own atheist agenda here which is always at the core of how you respond to others in your arrogance. You think all people who believe in the choice to make informed decisions are all Christian fanatics who would let their children die. You need to go back to that other thread you talked about because THIS isn't it. NOTHING like that was even intimated in this thread.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
lamborghini
-
how many do they really need? big moneymaker.
- 2 years ago
-
lamborghini
