Community | February 25, 2010 | 51 comments

Obama gives health care another shot with summit

Image
afitzgerald
The President is sitting down with a bi-partisan group of lawmakers at the Blair House in Washington and they're talking through health care reform. This could be a big step forward for the Democrats in getting the GOP to articulate their concerns and where they want compromises. But with the covers of The Economist and Time magazine this week saying Washington is broken - does anyone expect this summit to move health care reform along?

The NY Times has a great live blog following the events - with plenty of fact-checking and analysis . They've also got a live-stream of the summit if you're not near a TV. (http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/blogging-the-health-care-summi...)

What do you think? Is this going to do anything for the President's plans?
  1. groups:
    Community,   US Politics,   Current Democrats,   News_Featured,   3 more
  2. tags:
    News Health Obama Congress 3 more
  3.     
    |

51 comments // Obama gives health care another shot with summit

  • lucasives
    • 0
      lucasives  
    • The President: Lets look at the things we all agree on and find some common ground.

      Republicans: Democrats' ideas suck... scrap them.

      Democrats: We agree on X, Y and Z.

      Republicans: All democratic ideas suck... lets start over.

      I listened to hours and hours of C-SPAN today and this is what I heard... mixed with several sad stories about someone who is near death and broke because they can't afford health care.

      First, Americans are tired about politicians talking about their sad stories instead of doing something about them.

      Second, if Republicans deny everything (including Republican ideas) because they are supported by Democrats, we will get nowhere. Of course, this is what they've been doing for over a year. My solution... vote them out of office so we can pass constructive legislation in this country.

    • 1 year ago
  • PigFarmington
  • Argon18
  • Johnll
    • 0
      Johnll  
    • What I see is only a few GOP Members nervous about losing their clout from certain insurance companies that have them on their payroll...They should stand behind the president and let him do his job for the wellness of the country...get off his back just because America is use to only having a white president for all these years...( Take a Quaalude, People and relax)

    • 1 year ago
  • jejujohn
    • +1
      jejujohn  
    • I love Obama, but what irks me is when he repeats the rights talking point that, "America has the best healthcare system". I heard him say it twice. I know he is trying to strike that nationalist sentiment, but it is a bad move. The democrats pulled that pussyfooted approach after 911 and we got stuck with the patriot act. At times Obama is straight and says that every other developed nation is able to provide basic healthcare for all their citizens. This would seem to contradict that earlier manipulative and moronic talking point.

    • 1 year ago
  • PigFarmington
  • medHead
  • PigFarmington
  • jon_foshee
    • +2
      jon_foshee  
    • It's pretty obvious that the republicans have taken so much money from the lobbyists that they will never support anything other than the broken system currently in place. The public option would only offer a solution for those who genuinely need it. The republicans have become sadists - American people need and deserve healthcare and all they care about is making sure the black guy doesn't make progress. This is mental illness, I just can't understand how they can be so cruel and still maintain support.

    • 1 year ago
  • benjamingon
    • 0
      benjamingon  
    • Money aside this will bite everyone in the ass, all each party wants to do is be right, fuck that, get real, its all about money, let's put the shit aside and make health care universal , its something that everyone needs ,

    • 1 year ago
  • jdubsy
  • zeropiate
  • Philip_Robibero
    • 0
      Philip_Robibero  
    • Policy is never made in front of the cameras, its made behind closed doors. Putting cameras in front of politicians going over policy decisions is never a good idea because it directly puts them out there for the audience to critique right away. Politicians don't have the time to deliberate and estimate public reaction. Also, arguments turn into rhetoric as both sides will just spew out empty one-liners to appease the general public, essentially dumbing down the debate into layman's terms.

      Most importantly though, people tend to be different people with a camera lens on them with millions of people watching. That's why you see a whole lot contradictory statements made by senators and so forth.

      Maybe, less cameras the next time around Mr. O.

    • 1 year ago
  • PigFarmington
  • irie_ojo
    • 0
      irie_ojo  
    • too much money from lobbyist to change anything w/o a fight. we "the people" don't make 'em rich. so we are not the number one factor in things changing. money makes the wheels go round.

    • 1 year ago
  • Atalanda_Cameron
  • Davidod
    • 0
      Davidod  
    • Atalanda_Cameron:

      I'm not sure WHY BO decided to host and/or head-line the health-care TV show at this point: he's really upping the ante, letting it all ride on black at this point.

      If nothing else, televising this focus group should shut up the stoopid (sic) critics who've repeatedly called BO out for his lack of transparency (with early promise of televising coverage on C-SPAN).

      Just goes to show though, the fastest way to discourage getting things done in Washington is to provide a camera so politicians can 'grand-stand' and talk tough in front of their constituents: they're campaigning, and not creating legislation (which is what they were ELECTED to do: get RESULTS, and not deliver their same-ol' tired campaign speeches).

    • 1 year ago
  • Argon18
    • +1
      Argon18  
    • Atalanda_Cameron:

      That sounds like the plan to me since that summit looked like it was paving the way to use reconcilliation.

      http://factcheck.org/2010/02/health-care-summit-squabbles/

      "Reid said “since 1981 reconciliation has been used 21 times. Most of it has been used by Republicans.” That’s true, but scholars say using it to pass health care legislation would be the most ambitious use to date of this filibuster-avoiding maneuver.

      So the summit will show that they tried everything they could and the only way to solve the problem was with reconcilliation.

    • 1 year ago
  • ryan8566
    • +1
      ryan8566  
    • Atalanda_Cameron:

      a few weeks ago, when obama went to the capitol and met with the republican leadership,
      which was on C-Span, i actually, and stupidly, thought that the republicans really wanted to work with the democrats...they all seemed to leave on a workable relationship. but that did not last long, and we are back in deadlock.

    • 1 year ago
  • manny0409
    • +2
      manny0409  
    • well, just another example of Obama making the Republicans look like the idiots they are. Their favorite phrases were "start over", "scrap it" and "step by step" and yet, that is what the Dems have been trying to do with them all this time.

    • 1 year ago
  • Argon18
    • +2
      Argon18  
    • As Mister Gibbs said in the movie Pirates of the Caribbean "Aye, leverage says you, I think I feel a change in the wind says I"

      After showing all the efforts Obama put into bending over backwards to work out solutions with both parties this will give him a lot more support for going ahead with getting legislation passed.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/25/for-democrats-the-time-fo_n_477448.html

      "So at the summit itself, the prospect of reconciliation often took center stage, with a host of GOP lawmakers declaring it a massive assault on the U.S. Constitution, and Democrats responding by pointing to its frequent past use.

      The differences between the two political parties -- as even Obama finally admitted -- simply are too vast for the Democrats to pass reform any other way. In his most explicit endorsement of the reconciliation process yet.

      Obama responded to a question from former presidential campaign rival Sen. John McCain by saying: "I think the American people aren't always all that interested in procedures inside the Senate. I do think that they want a vote on how we're going to move this forward, and I think that most Americans think that a majority vote makes sense."

      So as part of that strategy the summit was a great success

    • 1 year ago
  • Darevalo
    • +1
      Darevalo  
    • i have no idea why... but today... i watch about 7 hours of this... just... on... all... day... lol felt like all day...

    • 1 year ago
  • observer2121
  • PigFarmington
    • 0
      PigFarmington  
    • How many fucking summits is this guy going to have? They accomplish nothing.
      Someone, give me an Obama summit that was successful. It's like he keeps letting us know he's working. And that's great, if what he works on actually goes somewhere!

    • 1 year ago
  • observer2121
  • PigFarmington
    • 0
      PigFarmington  
    • observer2121:

      Economic summit
      The "Spring" summit last spring
      Job Summit
      Climate Change summit
      GOP summit
      Entrepreneur summit
      Nuclear (arms) summit
      This is his 2nd health care summit

      So, adding beer summit and 1st health care summit....I listed 10. I would assume there's more.

      Name one that was worth while.
      Economic summit? Economy has rebounded, but only for rich people. Now he's freezing spending except for military and medicare. In other words: "I'm going to be a moderate republican for my last 2 years in office so I may sway some fence riding votes in 2012.
      Spring summit... let's maintain an embargo on Cuba even though communist China has us by the balls.
      Job summit? What a fucking joke. Your tax dollars at work.
      Climate change summit? We can't even get people to look at data, meanwhile people think that since there's snow all is well.
      GOP summit? Why bother? Oh.. let's kiss some GOP ass while they share racist emails and block any and all legislation in an attempt to discredit the current admin.
      Entrepreneur summit, was this even necessary?
      Nuclear arms summit? Obama said we are cutting down our arsnel while his new budget gives more money and more nukes!!!
      Health care summit? Yeah, it was so successful it had to be done twice! How's that "public option" looking?
      Beer summit? PR stunt. A racist cop arrested an innocent man, and Obama wants to buddy up with him? Obama is such a pacifist *sarcasm*

    • 1 year ago
  • Argon18
    • +2
      Argon18  
    • No matter is said at the summit it does give Obama some leverage by showing he kept his promise of televising negotiations on Health Care Reform. That alone retores some much needed credibility.

      By going through all the concerns, proposals and strategies with both parties it shows that Obama has given Repulicans every opportunity to help solve the crisis. If they still refuse to help fix it and try to kill the legislation then Obama can just go ahead without them.

      That's "the trap" of the political circus since it will give open and transparent evidence of all the distractions, evasions and distortions used to delay or defeat the legislation.

      That way it can be used to resolve the differences and get something meaningul passed since more efficient methods can be proven to work better than the ones discussed at the summit.

      For example the "public option" could get a lot more support becaue it would be more effective and less costly than those "pools' and "buy-ins" being discussed so evidence could be gathered for that without the distortions of "socialism" that has been holding it up.

      That would give a lot more leverage to get a stronger bill passed than what has been happening in the last year. Even if reconcilliation has to be used there would be greatersupport for it after it haseen shown that every effort was made work together.

      http://factcheck.org/2010/02/still-on-the-table/

      That page shows the facts and compares al the current bills so that the merits of each can be seen and the best methods can worked out since Obama was clearly open to more ideas being included and changes made.

    • 1 year ago
  • crob80227
    • +8
      crob80227  
    • One of the most brilliant exchanges took place between a Republican (I forget his name) who insisted that everyone already loves their insurance and that we should just use Health Savings Account. Obama pointed out that such options (HSA’s) are worthless to someone making only $40,000 a year. This Republican than ranted and raved that we have the best healthcare in the world because the Prime Minister of Canada once came here for heart surgery – Obama quickly pointed out that 99 percent of Americans are not Sultans nor Prime Ministers and do not have the option of simply going to the Mayo Clinic or John Hopkins and writing a check for $100,000 to get the “best healthcare in the world.”

      This Summit is a brilliant idea.

      Again and again Republicans are trotting out their talking points and presenting their “ideas” which basically boil down to doing nothing and hoping the system just “corrects itself” at some point in the future – and every time the Dems have to basically sit down and EDUCATE these poor people on economic realities and basic math.

      No, I don’t believe that the current bill is a cure-all nor is it the best solution, but throughout this Summit we at least see the reasoning of the Dems and Obama.

      Another great exchange took place when one of the Repubs insisted that all we needed to do was fix medical malpractice lawsuits – Obama then patiently pointed out that the CBO already determined that reform medical malpractice (just putting caps on payouts – otherwise known as “government mandated rationing of jury awards”) would only lower costs by less than ONE PERCENT! Obama acknowledged that it would be helpful, but ONE PERCENT doesn’t really solve the problem or even put a dent in it.

      So basically it was six hours of the Republicans whining, “Why don’t you just…” and then spitting out a really simple “solution” and Obama spending 15mins trying to explain to them why they already thought of that, tried that and/or determined that, no, it doesn’t work which is why they came up with the plan

      I found the whole thing absolutely fascinating.

      Again, I think this whole exchange pretty much killed the Tea Party. The entire (eye roll) movement was based around the idea that Obama was the most evil tyrant in all of human history and was determined to kill us all…but this pretty much showed that he was just an ordinary man who had given a lot of thought to some very, very complex issues and who was for all intents and listening to ideas and actually agreeing with Republicans on a lot of issues.

      Not sure how the red-faced hysterical Tea Baggers can still maintain their fury (the only thing keeping the group unified) in the face of such…normalcy.

    • 1 year ago
  • Davidod
    • +1
      Davidod  
    • crob80227:

      "Not sure how the red-faced hysterical Tea Baggers can still maintain their fury (the only thing keeping the group unified) in the face of such…normalcy."

      To paraphrase PT Barnum, "no one's ever gone broke underestimating the ignorance of the American public". Add 'racism' to that statement, and we're getting closer to the sad truth.

      Trust and believe, the reason most of these Baggers hate BO has NOTHING to do with his being stoopid (sic), but the fact he IS smarter than them: if administered a truth serum (maybe water-boarding, if it actually worked? LOL! ), they'd admit they hate him as in their minds he's a successful uppity-young part-black man. He could discover a cure cancer, and it wouldn't matter to them.

      (As if that charge of being stupid could EVER stick, where it's patently clear the guy is very sharp, a successful and charismatic communicator who graduated from law school to become a professor teaching constitutional law. An idiot, my ass!)

    • 1 year ago
  • ChunkyCheezes
  • PornographyIsArt
  • ryan8566
  • jay_ct
    • +5
      jay_ct  
    • Puppets have no real power.
      Maybe everyone should just stop paying their insurance bills and see what that does.
      Reforming the pharmaceutical and Food industry would do wonders for health care costs... and health in general. But big pharma already cut their deal behind closed doors. And the USDA is a joke.

    • 1 year ago
  • owlman53
  • crob80227
    • +11
      crob80227  
    • Some people are automatically dismissing this as "news" but having actually LISTENED to the Summit I believe that it is critical.

      We get to hear first hand Obama directly discuss issues with Republicans and Democrats. Far from being the most evil tyrant on earth (as depicted by the Republicans every single day) we see a very reasoned and pragmatic President.

      We also get to see how the Republicans actually think. They get to bitch directly to the President about their "concerns" and the President -- in real time -- is able to respond directly to that Senator. It's a real life exchange.

      For example: did you people hear the exchange between Obama and McCain? If you automatically dismissed this event and didn't bother to even watch then you missed a real leadership moment. McCain spent 10mins complaining that Obama didn't televise the healthcare debates 6 months ago and basically didn't say a single substanstive thing about healthcare reform. Obama then told John point blank, "The elections are over. You can stop campaigning now."

      Little Johnny got his ass spanked on national TV. It was beautiful.

      Obama then went on to explain, "I want this Summit to be about SPECIFIC issues with the healthcare bill...not just political gimmicks and speech making."

      When pressed to come up with SPECIFIC objections to SPECIFIC items most Republicans didn't have shit to say and Obama repeatedly spanked their asses.

      Basically this whole thing was important because it allowed Obama to EXPLAIN specific rationals for why XYZ or ABC was put into the healthcare bill and what the thinking was. It also will demonstrat to the retarded Tea Baggers that Obama in not 100x worse than Hitler, but actually a really intelligent and thoughtful President that is trying to solve a deeply complex problem....not a tyrant bent on rounding us all up and putting us into prison camps.

      The bottom line is the Republicans come off looking very petty and deeply uneducated about economic both micro and macro....and Obama looks incredibly intelligent.

      No wonder the Repubs were terrified of debating with the President on live TV.

      if the Repubs ever get away from they're talking points....it's obvious they don't know what they hell they are talking about! John McCain is a good example. They man knows NOTHING and yet he is able to hide behind his 5 preprogrammed talking point responses to hide that fact. In a live exchange between himself and someone much, much more intelligent...he looks like an idiot.

    • 1 year ago
  • Argon18
    • +1
      Argon18  
    • crob80227:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/25/obama-calls-out-lamar-ale_n_476912.html

      It also allows Obama to put things in context to show their meaning like he did with Alexander.

      Obama: "Lamar, when you mentioned earlier that you said premiums go up, that's just not the case, according to the Congressional Budget Office."

      Alexander: "Mr. President, if you're going to contradict me, I ought to have a chance .... The Congressional Budget Office report says that premiums will rise in the individual market as a result of the Senate bill."

      Obama: "No, no, no, no. Let me -- and this is an example of where we've got to get our facts straight."

      Alexander: "That's my point."

      Obama: "Well, exactly, so let me -- let me respond to what you just said, Lamar, because it's not factually accurate. ... Here's what the Congressional Budget Office says: The costs for families for the same type of coverage that they're currently receiving would go down 14 percent to 20 percent. What the Congressional Budget Office says is that because now they've got a better deal, because policies are cheaper, they may choose to buy better coverage than they have right now, and that might be 10 percent to 13 percent more expensive than the bad insurance that they had previously."

      THE FACTS:

      Both are right, but Obama offered important context that Alexander left out.

      The analysis estimated that average premiums for people buying insurance individually would be 10 to 13 percent higher in 2016 under the Senate legislation, as Alexander said. But the policies would cover more, and about half the people would be getting substantial government subsidies to defray the extra costs.

      As the president said, if the policies offered today were offered in 2016, they would be considerably cheaper under the plan, even without subsidies. One big reason: Many more healthy young people would be signing up for the coverage because insurance would become mandatory. They are cheap to insure and would moderate costs for others.

      Moreover, the analysis estimated that almost 60 percent of the people covered under individual policies would qualify for subsidies, bringing their own costs down by more than half from what they pay now.

      Obama was correct that the forecast for higher costs on average is based on the expectation that people would buy better coverage. But that might not be as voluntary as he made it sound. The report said the Senate legislation sets minimum levels of coverage and that would require some people to pay for better insurance than they have now.

      So that the "political theater" aspect is to get people on record in front of TV to coutner the talking points and sound bites that they try to get away with. If they try to spin it by editing then they can show the rest to prove what was actually said in context.

      McCain tried that "reneging on the campaign promise" bit but wasn't that obviously proven false by where he was sitting in front of cameras and negotiating Health Care Reform? No wonder Obama told him to catch up from living in the past.

    • 1 year ago
  • crob80227
    • +1
      crob80227  
    • Argon18:

      Another incident I enjoyed was a Republican (of course) holding up the 2,600 page healthcare bill and saying, "This is ridiculous!"

      Obama actually pointed out that it was political theater and a gimmick (his exact words!) and made the point that if they are going to pass a law that dealt with SPECIFICS then it's going to go into a lot of detail and take up a lot of pages!

      I really loved it. I loved the fact that Obama would just blunting tell the Repubs, "Stop your grandstanding and play acting." The fact that he called them out plainly really impressed me.

    • 1 year ago
  • Snuff99
    • +1
      Snuff99  
    • crob80227:

      logged in just to give you a bump. i watch the whole thing and was dumbstruck by the Republican stubborn, negative, collectively nonconstructive attitude.

      The President, again, showed pose and leadership by rising above partisanship and he got zilch in return. They keep saying "the American people want this thing scraped", well they don't speak for me. We dont' need to start over and squander the year and some change that they've already spent crafting this bill. I say screw them and let's get it done.

    • 1 year ago
  • Guyatthebusstation
  • crob80227
    • +1
      crob80227  
    • Guyatthebusstation:

      Actually, that was discussed at length. Basically they have to do everything at once in order for it to work. If they pass Z without passing Y then all it does it drive up costs and it fails. There is a reason for why they are doing the things they do. Giving them a forum to explain in detail why they are doing what they are doing really cleared a lot of things up and the process makes a lot more sense now.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Another political show for the masses. Pass a bill that actually addresses health and not perks to campaign donors and that might be something worth mentioning.

    • 1 year ago
  • EmperorThan
  • afitzgerald
  • artemis6
  • Argon18
  • EmperorThan
    • -1
      EmperorThan  
    • I hate that stories like this are automatically shot to the top of the front page just because CNN, NBC, or FoxNews thinks it's 'headline' news. When really it's not. It means nothing, just like all the other healthcare debates and summits and dicksucking 'national conversations'. If they PASSED something it MIGHT, I repeat, MIGHT be news. But until then don't mistake their empty gesture for actual actions or real news.

    • 1 year ago
more from Community:

top videos