Community | February 27, 2010 | 345 comments

Liberalism, atheism linked to higher IQ's

Image
Bushido
While the differences are not huge, research to be published in March 2010 suggests that liberalism, atheism, and sexual exclusivity in males can be linked to adults with higher IQ's.

"The IQ differences, while statistically significant, are not stunning -- on the order of 6 to 11 points -- and the data should not be used to stereotype or make assumptions about people, experts say. But they show how certain patterns of identifying with particular ideologies develop, and how some people's behaviors come to be."

The study takes the American view of liberal vs. conservative. It defines "liberal" in terms of concern for genetically nonrelated people and support for private resources that help those people. It does not look at other factors that play into American political beliefs, such as abortion, gun control and gay rights."

Among the findings:

"The study found that young adults who said they were "very conservative" had an average adolescent IQ of 95, whereas those who said they were "very liberal" averaged 106."

"Participants who said they were atheists had an average IQ of 103 in adolescence, while adults who said they were religious averaged 97"

Scientists speculate that these traits may be evolutionary trends. What do you think?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Opinion,   Fight Room,   Studies,   1 more
  2. tags:
    Politics Atheism Liberal Intelligence
  3.     
    |

345 comments // Liberalism, atheism linked to higher IQ's

  • Saladin
    • +1
      Saladin  
    • Barbara_Saunders:

      Thanks for posting this barbara, it's a more solid analysis.

      I think that excellence of any kind, be it professional sports, theoretical physics or superb acting, all require a certain amount of intelligence.

      Formulating theories about quantum physics, taking on a different identity or making a triple play all require very specific, albeit different, kinds of pattern recognition.

      Furthermore, your point about separate indoctrination seems right on. I've meant plenty of intelligent conservatives (if only in intellect and not in practice) and plenty of dumb liberals (who, like you've said, just know how to regurgitate the right answers because of their indoctrination).

    • 3 years ago
  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • Barbara_Saunders:

      I have to disagree with you. If I hadn't taken an IQ test and been put in what was once called ALPHA and are now "gifted" classes, I wouldn't have nearly so satisfied with my experience in school and a lot of those adult things they pushed on me when I was a kid actually turned out to be (surprise!) pretty useful. It may have prevented me from making many friends outside of the gifted program, but it was well worth it and I actually was grateful for the separation in high school because the normal classes were a joke. Like watching Barney in slow motion.

    • 3 years ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • artemis6:

      Just for shits and giggles, do a Wikipedia search referencing the Latin word
      for the number 6 in your avatar name. The classic Romans of antiquity spelled
      the number 6 by envisioning the anatomical form of a human by it's clock
      position. Clue: The Latin word is so cognate to the English word, people often
      use the Lain spelling as slang for It. Though it doesn't even make it to a 4 letter
      word, since you're a mom, it should put a smile on your face.

    • 3 years ago
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • Almibry:

      My high school had a lot of very bright overachievers who scored 95
      and above consistently in the New York regents tests, We had excellent
      teachers as nuns, but they made an exception and allowed a protestant
      lady teacher who was worthless in to conduct the elementary & intermediate
      algebra classes. It was such a joke because the valdictorians and
      saluditorians were all seated in the front row seats,and the so called
      instructor would nearly exclusively address her questions to them, and
      ignore any eye contact and questioning the people in the back seats. I liked
      algebra a lot because being a High Q er, I was intrigued with the problem
      solving higher brain function aspects of the homework. But neither the book
      she chose for us to read or she herself were very communicative. I was a
      language major, so I should have done well in those subjects of elementary
      and intermediate algebra/trigometry. Yet I had to obtain a tutor, and pay him
      with my paper route earnings over an extended time to bring my grades up
      from D s to A s. I even had to go to Summer school at the public high school,
      where the male teacher there more resembled her boring, unenthusiastic,
      robotic methods when my tutor wasn't availble. We would have benefited
      greatly from being classified according to our I. Q. scores. And having smaller
      classes. Having 50 people in an hour class was very distracting. Though our
      school standards were higher than the regents State standards, we were
      graded on a curve. Yet I still scored 90 % to 100 % in all my regents test scores,
      once I paid for a private teacher to compensate for the BS. And my regents
      scores in elementary and intermediate algebra were mid 90s too. My brain is
      wired differently than the average person. New York State also did formal testing,
      and I ranked as bright normal even though due to yet other difficult circumstances
      such as having to walk long distances through a Siberian Express when the
      wind chill after insomnia the night before I was half asleep during most of it.

    • 3 years ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • PressCore:

      Ha ! Very fun . I would have spelled it out , but I was trying to be subtle . Very clever of you . ; ) I have had that name so long , I had almost forgotten . My oldest , dear friend gave it to me , in part , I added the 6 . When you are friends for 30ish years , ya get to know each other pretty well . That is how she sees my personality .

    • 3 years ago
  • librelover
    • 0
      librelover  
    • Almibry:

      In high school I took one regular class in my four years... The experience left me with little to recall and even less to develop from. Needless to say, there is a significant difference between AP, or advanced placement,classes and your regular curriculum. Nevertheless, I also know some brilliant people when it comes to music and art that bordered on special ed as children due to problems reading and writing.

      There is validity to the argument that intelligence can manifest itself in many ways beyond what an IQ test can measure. However, there is also validity to the argument that an IQ test can measure one's capacity for learning within the accepted method that the IQ test itself, and thus the culture using it, indicates.

    • 3 years ago
  • UndoInfluence
  • RaceBannon
  • 02
  • EdJoyProductions
  • RaceBannon
    • +4
      RaceBannon  
    • Hmm I think its less of an evolutionary related matter rather than an environmental one. The "culture" war is more a result of how america was built. I'll take a general stab at it..

      Liberal views if you will come from collectivism which commonly come from collective (city) living. Not to say cities in texas doesn't have pockets of liberals but its definitely not the same as new york, or cities like san francisco. Cities tend to foster a collective culture based on a population in harmony with each-other for example new york, montreal, copenhagen, stockholm, paris, milan, oslo, etc. The word city originates from civilized, so chew on that for a minute.
      To be blunt a majority of america is physically engineered whether on purpose or accident to accommodate suburbs which actually separate the people from each-other. This separation of people not only creates insecurity, but a host of social issues are prevalent making it easier for the people living in rural suburbs to harbor false views of their fellow man. The media is more than happy to sensationalize the danger of the world around you, and the more isolated people are from real people the more likely they will "hunker down" in their suburban enclaves while fearing the world along with those who seem different. So its not shocking all of that middle of america fly over country is highly conservative, they don't even know the world around them and they fear it. Which is different in other countries they tend to move as a nation unified with of course the line between liberal and conservative being a difference of cultural pride. Thats why to me at least a conservative in western europe (or canada) is far more liberal than a conservative in america, even the small villages are engineered for collectivism with small roads and centralized building so ideas can spread.

      Ok so to sum it up, culture and ideas spread faster in liberal areas because the people are always in contact with each other whereas in conservative regions nothing really spreads except what the tv tells them. This goes for ideas as well as intellect and I'm going to be honest I've never heard of any conceptual gay artist coming from appalachia .... ever, but every city has at least 1000. So liberals may have higher iqs because of their location, which may foster the spread of ideas while those who consider themselves conservative probably know a few people in their immediate circle. Its not evolution its where we live. I'll post an video semi related to the issue.

    • 3 years ago
  • remanns
  • 02
    • +3
      02  
    • And that's another point - THE bad habit that people have.

      They get an idea - or accept an idea. Like all ideas or understandings, it comes from what was before - it's new to what was understood in the past. It is 'accepted' and then, generally, people go on with other aspects of life and progress no further in that venue of understanding. They have the 'comfort' of having answered that question for themselves.

      They take that understanding and cast it in stone - and often then grind into an entirely HUGE ego trip to hold to it, investing their self-appreciation and even betting an absolute emotional self-respect on retaining those notions.
      As if, their distance from what went before to their acceptance of what was, at the time, a new understanding holds the whole of their feelings of self-worth.

      When the whole time it did nothing except bring them to an intellectual STOP.

      It is the Monkey-trap syndrome. The monkey sticks his hand in the coconut and cannot withdraw for the sake of letting go of the food.

      But in all cases - letting go is EXACTLY what must be done.

      How are you going to be smart with your head stuck in box?

      And it is always a box constructed by you when you were a lot dumber than you are now - think about that.

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
  • librelover
    • 0
      librelover  
    • 02:

      It's easy to do when realm of thought you live in is the most absolute we are aware of. Math is the only place where there can be no argument to 1+1 = 2 (without any qualifiers and using only integers)

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
  • librelover
    • +3
      librelover  
    • So in what way can evolution be tied to cultural and ideological development? The study of intelligence via an IQ test is based upon the selected understanding of intelligence by the producer of said test.

      One's ability to grasp concepts and apply them contextually, or their capacity for intelligence, can be masked by the lack of exposure to information. In more religious and politically conservative cultural groups there is more selective informational exposure. This would no doubt mask capacity for intelligence in individuals of said groups. To me, it would seem far more logical an explanation than evolution as a cause of IQ discrepancy.

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • librelover:

      Masked? Or limit?
      But then the result is the same -
      Anyone should be able to do almost anything. But what happens to potential, when they do nothing?
      In a way, that's what intelligence is, those that do. To whatever degree that a person 'does not', that's their limit.

      Like religion, or science, or anything, you have a need to study to find out, to accomplish - until your brain gets tired of it. Saturation point. You stop.

      You went so far - and then stopped.

    • 3 years ago
  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • librelover:

      Thank you adding this comment. I was going to add something similar if I didn't come across it in any of the existing comments. It wasn't too long ago that IQ was measured by how many words you know, and neurology is by all means still in it's infancy. There is a lot about the brain that we just have no hope of understanding at this point in time.

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • remanns
  • NuclearLullaby
    • +1
      NuclearLullaby  
    • Conservatives are usually dumb as hell! Take Bush for an example! Need I say any more! The man is about as dumb as humans get!!! & as for the Atheist part of this study, well that's clearly a no duh too!!! Religion brainwashes people & some religions pretty much destroy the mind completely !!! Their ARE smart religious people though (Mostly in Eastern religions!) There's the Dali Lama,who's a very wise man! So...I'd say western religious extremes & conservative extremes lead to dumb people! Disprove it if you can! I stand my ground on this one! I'm not the smartest man on Earth,but I knew before America went to Iraq that that was a stupid idea!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • ItsNaYo
    • +2
      ItsNaYo  
    • Makes some sense doesn't it? I mean the very conservative tend to be closed minded only leaving room for them to learn and hear a certain amount of information they want to retain. Set in their ways you can say.

      Liberals are more opened minded allowing much more to soak in from different ideas, people, beliefs....

      I know its not as black and white as that but its a simple way to put it.

    • 3 years ago
  • mojojuju
  • PressCore
    • +1
      PressCore  
    • ItsNaYo:

      Exactly my point. The founding fathers who began the USA were regarded as
      liberals by the Tories who sided with the Brittish crown. We have a democratic
      system because they believed that if all people are equaly represented,have
      their say, and think before they speak, that freedom will prevail over oppression.

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
  • occhipij
  • kennymotown
    • +2
      kennymotown  
    • occhipij:

      We did have our own tea party and it was called an election, and you probably noticed the intelligent candidate won and he is supposedly liberal. FOX news is for the week minded obviously they do eat it up, you nailed that in reverse huh.

    • 3 years ago
  • indecisiveh
    • +2
      indecisiveh  
    • kennymotown:

      This both sides talk is a blatant act of manipulation to downplay the immense atrocities and incompetence and bad governing of 30+ yrs of republican and conservative influence.

      When you here them say "There is blame to go around on both sides" they really mean "Pay no attention to policies of the last 30 yrs."

      The sad part is that it works. It's such a simple statement that appeals to the laziest part of our intellect. Everyone is a bad guy. No one is right everyone is wrong. It's too simple to carry any weight.

      There are such things as good ideas and responsible policies. They just are no where to be found on the right.

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
    • +2
      02  
    • indecisiveh:

      The right, unfortunately at this time, are nothing but blowhards in utter self-service.

      They do want things to be done correctly - but they think it's ok to manipulate others for increased income and lower taxes. It is devolved completely into me, me, me.

      No shepherding of society nor enlightened governance. The higher aspects, unattended.

      The whole time, the function of money does not work that way. It is, in fact, a social instrument. Fruition of an individual happens within fruition of the group.

      A robust economy - where everyone is receiving for their efforts, means the value of money itself becomes strong and gains.

      The me, me, me creates a dissolution of money, a dissolution of economy, a dissolution of civilized progress itself.

      The me, me, me of the right is the reason we have the problems that now face us.

    • 3 years ago
  • ItsNaYo
    • 0
      ItsNaYo  
    • occhipij:

      then why use the time? couldn't help yourself? anything that i may have side about two different groups of people is nothing compared to you judging me as a person. whatever.

    • 3 years ago
  • BIGDADDYMELVIN
  • indecisiveh
  • nursediesel
  • artemis6
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • artemis6:

      No, I was being 'tongue in cheek' humorous. I say "I think" as well as "I feel". But in a humorous twist try looking at a subject by thinking and then by feeling....you might be surprised. What is logical as opposed to what we feel....

    • 3 years ago
  • metalcookiesxy70
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • metalcookiesxy70:

      No humans- as individuals, races, nations were ever meant to be supreme over
      others. They were only intended to be diverse. As Cmndr. Spock said holding
      up his double finged peace sign: Infinite Diversity through Infinite Combinations
      to Live Long and Prosper.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • So tired of these generalizations to demean people of faith. I believe in the word of Christ and in a supreme being and have an IQ of 128. Big deal. Thomas Jefferson was a deist who was a brilliant man. Galileo was a devout Catholic. Carl Sagan was an atheist and also a brilliant man. So was Winston Churchill. It isn't about politics, and all posts like this do is make the divide wider. So if Sarah Palin today decided to switch parties and becone an atheist, her IQ would go up? Please, spare me these exclusive BS tests.

    • 3 years ago
  • Madhatter244
  • JanforGore
  • remanns
  • Madhatter244
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • JanforGore:

      You, it seems to me, enjoy your spirituality. The base of which has been Christianity and therefore you hold to it. But I would put it to you, that it is the aspects of spirituality that are dear.

    • 3 years ago
  • FoosMaster
    • 0
      FoosMaster  
    • JanforGore:

      "if Sarah Palin today decided to switch parties and become an atheist", then I would begin to believe there is actually hope for the far right wing idiots to have compassion for their fellow humans. Until then....

    • 3 years ago
  • Almibry
  • 02
  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • JanforGore:

      I forgot to say earlier that there is no hope for Palin. The world would be a better place if someone would just go ahead use a helicopter to hunt her down and shoot her already.

    • 3 years ago
  • thedirtman
    • +1
      thedirtman  
    • As a scientist I sometimes duck political issues because I don't think that politics helps anyone see truth or reality. Science and politics are two fields that stand at polar ends. The point of politics is to build confidence in people to some extreme even in the face of glaring uncertainty. A politician, couldn't say for example, that there is 90 percent certainty that a climate change event is occuring with a impact rating of substantial to severe. A politician must sound certain to win acceptance and become effective. That's why politicians such as Al Gore and James Inhofe must express unreal certainty in their positions. To a politician climate change is either real or a hoax. To a scientist it is numbers that need interpretation.

      Truth is always unwieldy, complex, time-consuming, especially if it has to do with climate. One can almost tell when politicians lie because that's when they make it sound simple.

      Conservative politics, in particular, stands at such an extreme position of certainty in the face of uncertainty that it seems that they oppose science itself, and oppose my profession too. It's difficult to not take personally.

      There is saving grace for conservatives. Conservatives that I've actually worked with are very credible, responsible and deserving. Conservatives, like James Hansen and James Lovelock are gifted scientists that have contributed immensely to climate change research.

      What conservatives need to do at this point is to totally destroy their agenda and rebuild it from scratch. Conservatives are capable of more than they have been showing. In order to fix it they must build a new agenda that promotes education and welfare for people.

    • 3 years ago
  • remanns
  • ScottyT
  • BIGDADDYMELVIN
  • kennymotown
  • PressCore
    • +2
      PressCore  
    • kennymotown:

      Showing ? ! Man, you're too kind. His I Q is hemmoraging. No one can
      accuse him of even being rational with his appeals to emotion, much
      less intelligent. I'm a man with an IQ in Jan's range. My college degree
      was In Psyche. And one of the first things we learned in Psyche Statistics
      was that genetic traits are distributed according to the " bell shaped curve "
      aka the Liberty Bell curve: That the highest percentage of people will have
      an average IQ which is represented by the domed arch in the bell of the bell
      shaped curve with smarter or less smart people representing 1 standard
      deviation from the mean(middle)... That 1/6 of the People will be advanced
      as very smart and fall under the graphicly illustrated right rim of the bell,
      and 1/6 of the People will be very non smart and represented under the left
      rim of the bell. This is a mathematical fact, repeatedly demonstratable,
      scientificaly, over 6 Billion people all over the world for I. Q. traits.Incidentaly,
      the word liberal is derived from the Latin word Liber meaning "book". We
      see its derivatives as Library, Liberty, liberation. The moral of the story is
      simply, that: Education= Freedom. That should be obvious by now to everyone.
      It's been shown that those who are intelligent will have many varied interests,
      and be naturaly selected to adapt to extremely stressful conditions, and survive.
      That's the purpose of education-to familiarize humans with generously varied
      (liberal) subject matters.

    • 3 years ago
  • Madhatter244
  • BIGDADDYMELVIN
  • kennymotown
  • BIGDADDYMELVIN
  • PressCore
    • +3
      PressCore  
    • BIGDADDYMELVIN:

      This article has nothing to do with your malicious attacks on decent people
      commenting here. I worked my way through college, and with a high school
      scholarship earned because of my high intelligence, I got National Defense
      student loans and grants to supplement college costs, and lived at home as
      much as I could. Despite how much you project the twisted cross on others,
      it's realy a pretty accurate reflection of you isn't it skinhead ? Nazis are vulgar,
      boorish rabble rousers who shout loud trying to drown out the fair minded
      rational people by hysterical appeals to emotion with your hate, and anger.
      That's you all over. Notice that, unlike you, I never had to resort to insults
      to make my point. Take away your extreme prejudice, personal attacks on
      others, and hyperagression and you're realy a very fearful, insecure person
      aren't you ? Your making false presumptions about me shows how short
      circuited your brain realy is with your ignorant, mob attitude. Compared with
      you, anyone's a winner. Attacking the messenger because you can't reason
      with the message shows you to be the real looser, hands down.

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
  • 02
  • PressCore
    • 0
      PressCore  
    • 02:

      FYI, I haven't lost more than 2 days of work in the past 20 years.
      And even those 2 days were due to a fluke. I'd gotten an influenza
      vacination, but while in a walk in care waiting room to get a prescription
      for an antibiotic to resolve a tooth infection, I was exposed to people with
      the flu as carriers waiting to be treated. Our local newspaper featured a
      news article how the flu vacinations weren't working because the flu virus
      mutated,and people who were vacinated like me got the flu anyway.
      Not surprised. Medical statistics have shown that 55 % of those who are
      inoculated get the flu anyway, while the 45 % of those who don't get the
      vacine don't get sick with the flu. Ironicly, the only reason why I got vacinated
      was because my mom insisted. She had blind faith in the medical arts.
      I wouldn't care. I'm as stong and enduring as an ox. I worked when I
      had bronchitis. Incidently, I'n nearly 61 and likely old enough to be
      your grandfather. So the next time you presume to talk down to me don't
      make it personal, bud. It was my mom God rest her soul, who knew that I
      was the brightest one in the family, and insisted that I go to college, where
      I was working my way through it. Also fyi, I've been working since I was
      10 years old, and was an independent contractor working 6 days a week,
      52 weeks a year for 4 years while still in grade school and high school. Satisfied ?

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
  • artemis6
  • PressCore
  • 02
  • EdJoyProductions
  • mojojuju
    • 0
      mojojuju  
    • On another note, how intelligent can a person be who believes that IQ tests are an accurate and reliable means of measuring intelligence? Who believes that intelligence has ever been adequately defined, which would be necessary for there to be any means to accurately measure it?

    • 3 years ago
  • tommic
    • +3
      tommic  
    • mojojuju:

      Most IQ test are mostly deductive reasoning, spacial logic, abstract reasoning. These traits are the ones that determine ones IQ with all three increasing wiith a higher IQ

    • 3 years ago
  • mojojuju
  • 02
  • mojojuju
    • -1
      mojojuju  
    • 02:

      Thanks, LOL. Well, I wasn't referring to myself. I was wondering about a friend of mine, a politically "middle of the road", sexually in-exclusive, and agnostic friend of mine. I'll be sure to relay your answer to him.

    • 3 years ago
  • remanns
    • +1
      remanns  
    • mojojuju:

      Well,...my IQ figures they have sex in the in the middle of the road, with multiple individuals of various colors and genders simultaneously,....but don't really quite trust in god to keep the group from being run over. (But hey,...just brainstorming here.)

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
  • Almibry
    • +1
      Almibry  
    • remanns:

      Well if they were doing all that I would assume their IQ is low because laying down in the middle of any road is really stupid, but you should tell your friend (mojojuju) that he'll probably never see statistics for that in his/her lifetime because it'll be damn near impossible to get results on that kind of demographic simply because they're in the middle. Maybe they'll do one along the lines of atheists vs. bible thumpers vs agnostics but he'll be better off just averaging the high and low scores.

    • 3 years ago
  • remanns
  • librelover
  • mojojuju
    • -3
      mojojuju  
    • Liberal atheists are reveling at the inconclusive findings which suggest that they may be more intelligent than their conservative and religious adversaries.

      EDIT: It looks like my comment was voted down, presumably by some liberal atheists who feel that my comment threatened their newfound supposition that they are highly intelligent by virtue of being liberal atheists.

    • 3 years ago
  • Almibry
  • mojojuju
    • 0
      mojojuju  
    • Almibry:

      Actually, you were unsuccessful in pissing me off. Having one of my comments voted down doesn't piss me off at all. Instead, it amuses me. It especially amuses me to see how easily people on Current get bent out of shape when faced with ideas that differ from their own. And when they get bent out of shape enough to bother with voting a comment down - well, I find that kind of funny.

    • 3 years ago
  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • mojojuju:

      While this study was conducted by Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist at the London School of Economics and Political Science, who is an atheist and a liberal, there is so far no evidence that the data is inconclusive. In fact the study hasn't even been published yet. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly. The only reason people are talking about it so much before it's even been published is because it's a sensitive topic and I assume Satoshi's peers who are supposed to "proof read" the study couldn't keep their mouth's shut. No one likes to think that what they believe isn't true. While you are here, you should read my most recent post listing other studies, individuals and organizations that have corroborated the outcome of this study.

    • 3 years ago
  • GodsnLiberals
    • -7
      GodsnLiberals  
    • I love this one..higher Liberal IQ states that because of global warming we are having severe winter storms...

      here is one for the athiest..if god does not exist...why hang around??
      its like hanging around a star trek convention trying to prove that the USS enterprise will not come..

      MOVE ON PEOPLE..YOU GUYS ARE ACTING LIKE LITTLE BITTER CHILDREN..use that High IQ to a better use than trying to figure out how to be an asshole..

    • 3 years ago
  • MindsiMedia
  • Madhatter244
    • +3
      Madhatter244  
    • GodsnLiberals:

      Why stick around?? Thats rich.

      I can only answer for myself but since you asked.

      I stick around becasue I dont consider my time here on Earth a trial so that I can go to "Heaven" and be judged by an apparently angry deity.

    • 3 years ago
  • Almibry
  • GodsnLiberals
  • indecisiveh
    • 0
      indecisiveh  
    • GodsnLiberals:

      Concerts you speak of are funded and propped up by corporations to create the illusion of caring. While the artists themselves tend to have good substantive messages, the big money makers and beneficiaries here are large multinational corporations who then funnel said money into environmental and labor deregulation, the real agenda.

      You think it's impossible for these corporate interests to mask themselves as every bodies friend? Gimme a break. What's important is what the ultimate result. Follow the money.

    • 3 years ago
  • Almibry
  • 02
  • tommic
    • +6
      tommic  
    • Progressive, to be willing to change, try new things or change course when needs dictate.
      Conservative, resist change, afraid or unwilling to try new things
      Now when you think about those traites its not difficult to understand this study.
      People who have an open mind, and are able to put themselves in the other persons place when evaluating a situation are usually more intelligent.

    • 3 years ago
  • librelover
    • 0
      librelover  
    • tommic:

      As a conservative, I believe that we can be more liberal with a limited government. Further, seeing that government has been progressively getting larger since it's beginning, would it not be more "progressive" to instead change that course?

    • 3 years ago
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • librelover:

      The government is the feed-trough - and not just for underlinings. It is the big till and the real gamers play it. They do not see that their income should be cut - and they control the game from puppet strings.

      So closing down the big spigot is definitely about confronting big-money and mostly on the right. The left is about giving money for people to people services where the right is doing it big-time. It's their complete and total profession.

      So there are no allies. None.

    • 3 years ago
  • GodsnLiberals
    • -5
      GodsnLiberals  
    • are those scores before or after THEY SMOKED DOPE???science once said that the earth was flat..

      did they test cheech and chong?? or maybe its one of those all so famous liberal style tests that you see on most schools..

    • 3 years ago
  • thedirtman
  • 02
    • +3
      02  
    • GodsnLiberals:

      No, that was religion. That's where religion stopped. Last stop on the religion track: "Flat earth, my personal God made the whole universe just for me so I won't have to grow up."

      Santa Claus. 100%.

    • 3 years ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • GodsnLiberals:

      You wish they all smoked dope . Some one tell you and you believed ? Do you smoke cigarets ? I have never smoked them either . Cause I do not believe what the advertisers tell me without checking it out for myself .

    • 3 years ago
  • indecisiveh
  • EdJoyProductions
  • FoosMaster
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • FoosMaster:

      The test was created by stoners?
      Maybe getting stoned was the test!
      Maybe the facilitator got slid an 1/8.
      Maybe you mis-heard the reference to "high" ?

    • 3 years ago
201 - 300 of 345
more from Community:

top videos