PETA Reportedly Killed 2,352 Animals in 2009; Just 8 Adoptions
source: http://www.opposingviews.com/i/peta-reportedly-killed-2-352-animals-in-2009-just-8-adoptions
-
-
- iamfree
- added this
Marlene Foote, president and founder of Animal Ark, Minnesota's largest no kill animal welfare organization suggests that with that kill rate, PETA should be re****fied from an animal rights organization to a slaughterhouse.
"It is an absolute discrace," Foote said.
Dr. Linda Wolf, a Minnesota-based veterinarian that consults with animal organizations nation wide said, "There is just no excuse for numbers like that."
People are rightly shocked, and believe PETA could do better, given their resources.
In fact, PETA reported revenue the same year of $31,053,316 (over $31 million) and assets in excess of $19 million.
Foote added, "Given the size of their budget and their staff, you would think that just among their staff they could adopt more than 8 animals. They don't appear to be even trying."http://www.opposingviews.com/i/peta-reportedly-killed-2-352-animals-in-2009-just...
Thoughts?
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Opinion, Animal Videos and News, 1 more
-
- tags:
- Propaganda, PETA, Misinformation, Smear Campaign
-
-
dariusvons
-
PETA, where killing animals is better than keeping them as pets. crazy assholes. I'm all for treating animals with respect and care but peta are all just nutbags!
- 1 year ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
BTG
-
This is a mind-blowing revelation, and terrible shame on PETA. They should stick to the PR game they're so good at, but they won't be getting another dime from me, and a lot less respect.
- 1 year ago
-
BTG
-
-
sonnnnicboom
-
http://web.me.com/newburyparkpetsupply/Newbury_Park_Pet/Welcome.html
This man alone, over the course of the last 3 years, has saved 2,600 dogs and cats! How is it a multimillion organization has such trouble, and especially one that seems to be on the more extreme side of their spectrum? Peta gives people an identity to belong to and could careless to save animals...
I wonder if anyone at Peta has made the realization that human beings, just like any other mammal, is an animal as well?
- 1 year ago
-
sonnnnicboom
-
-
Xenzaka
-
Wow, people really do not see what is going on? Honestly...are you all robots?
PETA obviously is a business that gets away with the fine print, lol. It's about money people.
You want to save animals, go to a shelter and adopt one, don't finance third-party.
Same deal with the red cross.
Honestly? Where do you think we live? It might "seem free" to some of you, but we're just being misguided.
- 1 year ago
-
Xenzaka
-
-
Sivad2
-
It's ethical to put a dog to sleep if it's in pain or so close to death that it has no substance of life. That doesn't seem to be the case at all in this. Peta needs to get over this "holier than thou" B.S. and stop acting as if they are the only authority on how to treat animals.
I'm all for Ethical treatment of animals myself. But the idea that Peta would take animals without issues, that could be placed in loving and caring homes, and put them to sleep is ridiculous.
Seems to me that Peta has become more of a lobbying group than an animal rights organization.
- 1 year ago
-
Sivad2
-
-
Sivad2
-
It's ethical to put a dog to sleep if it's in pain or so close to death that it has no substance of life. That doesn't seem to be the case at all in this. Peta needs to get over this "holier than thou" B.S. and stop acting as if they are the only authority on how to treat animals.
I'm all for Ethical treatment of animals myself. But the idea that Peta would take animals without issues, that could be placed in loving and caring homes, and put them to sleep is ridiculous.
Seems to me that Peta has become more of a lobbying group than an animal rights organization.
- 1 year ago
-
Sivad2
-
-
feefer2010
-
I'm all for the ethical treatment of animals but I've never been a fan a PETA. They are just way over the top and at times seem to care more about shock value than the lives of animals
- 1 year ago
-
feefer2010
-
-
WrittenWithWit
-
Sometimes it is ethical to put an animal to death, instead of letting it suffer. That being said, PETA should/could definitely do a better job (apparently) at rescuing animals and providing them with the right to a satisfying life. They could open PETA farms in every state for stray animals - no idea if they do this.
They still do a lot for promoting awareness on many animal related issues that most people would normally pay no attention to. So, I guess they have their goods and their bads but overall I would say that they do promote the Ethical Treatment of Animals....
- 1 year ago
-
WrittenWithWit
-
-
bking74
-
WrittenWithWit:
You so eloquently wrote exactly what I was thinking.....with PETA's budget and fund raising they could do much better then this. I don't anyone can argue that but now that this information has been made public what do we do now?
- 1 year ago
-
bking74
-
-
Kyle_Crenshaw
-
Call me crazy, but I think PETA can do a little better than this.
- 1 year ago
-
Kyle_Crenshaw
-
-
itoldyouso
-
I took 1 in last year
- 1 year ago
-
itoldyouso
-
-
Nephwrack
-
soo that's what "ethical treatment" means!
- 1 year ago
-
Nephwrack
-
-
fun_size
-
I thought everyone knew this? PETA cares about animals as much as Bush cared about innocent Iraqis...
- 1 year ago
-
fun_size
-
-
UndoInfluence
-
Brainwashing can work for both sides...
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdfThe above are official state records submitted by PETA. It might be easy to look at those numbers and say, oh look most of the animals they care for do get placed back into their homes. That's because the PETA shelter, unlike any other virginia shelter includes spaying and neutering cases. In an effort to downplay the huge amount of animals they kill they simply add on unrelated, simple vet procedures onto their total number of "shelter cases".
If you look at the official numbers mentioned above you can actually see that PETA does transfer some of the animals to other adoption shelters... a grand total of 31 out of few thousand they put down. Additionally you can see how many get transfered to the PETA shelter by nearby animal shelters, 7. A number far lower than you would expect were it the official "last resort" shelter.
Additionally, for some fun, since they do talk about the animals that they take in and find homes for, go to their site and try to find out how to adopt one of their sheltered animals. Couldn't find it? Ok, try googling it. Can only find more media crap of them bragging about their celebrity backers? Ok, go onto petfinder.com and try searching for animals in their area. Nope, still not there huh?
- 1 year ago
-
UndoInfluence
-
-
mcjk
-
Its actually a rate of %0.34 animals being adopted.
But, that doesn't mean that PETA takes animals in, but doesn't give two cents. These statistics give no account for animals that were horribly abused and on their last legs.
PETA is on one extreme, but that doesn't validate the other extreme.
- 1 year ago
-
mcjk
-
-
unimatrix0
-
PETA is a great and noble organization that has done a great deal to raise public awareness to the sad plight of many animals.
This article and thread is but an example of statistics being twisted so as to demonize PETA.
This is exactly what the meat packing industry, factory farming interests, hunters, furriers, circus owners and others who make a living exploiting and torturing animals want. Those of you who are hating on PETA have been manipulated by these corporate interests. These interests fear the power of PETA to enlighten and inform.
Congratulations kids, you have been astroturfed.
- 1 year ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
lionessgrrl
-
PETA might as well be a terrorist group. Assaulting people, (the infamous paint throwing), and targeting little kids, (handing out those McMurder meals or whatever they called them to kids at McDonalds. Would have gotten a roundhouse to the teeth had they harassed my kids like that.) No better than anti-abortion extremists flying airplane banners of pieces of aborted babies over elementary schools. Terrorists!
- 1 year ago
-
lionessgrrl
-
-
raylinmarie
-
lionessgrrl:
I think you might want to do a little more investigation into what real terrorist groups are...
- 1 year ago
-
raylinmarie
-
-
CarlosIsDown
-
Don't you understand. It's ok when THEY do it, but when YOU infringe on an animals right to eat your cattle or spread diseases all over your food then you are Hitler. /sarcasm
- 1 year ago
-
CarlosIsDown
-
-
GodsnLiberals
-
have your pets fixed...................
- 1 year ago
-
GodsnLiberals
-
-
csmonut
-
GodsnLiberals:
That would eliminate the over population of animals..now about those pesky humans...hhmmmmm
- 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
fun_size
-
GodsnLiberals:
Holy shit! You made a post that didnt involve liberals or some stupid remark. And look you didnt get voted down for once!
- 1 year ago
-
fun_size
-
-
CalgarC
-
GodsnLiberals:
we have messed enough with animals...
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
sergantonio
-
It’s probably a matter of animals like the type rescued by the aspca where it’s a long shot at survival or rehabilitation
- 1 year ago
-
sergantonio
-
-
GodsnLiberals
-
sergantonio:
8 out of 2352 animals rescued??? hahaha yeah..right
- 1 year ago
-
GodsnLiberals
-
-
raylinmarie
-
sergantonio:
You have a good point - while those numbers seem more than disappointing, we have to remember that we are only hearing one side of the story...
- 1 year ago
-
raylinmarie
-
-
csmonut
-
I wouldn't donate a dime to PETA. I don't like radicalism of any sort and PETA stands at the top.
- 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
JanforGore
-
I also saw this reported on CNN with Jack Cafferty the other day. The reason they used was that those animals were already near death. I don't accept that. If this is true, it surely shows them for the hypocrites they are while they wag their fingers at others.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
deezy_duck
-
super sad yo......open ur eyes, who cares whos right or wrong stats an facts, in a world where systematic killing of humans is still tolerated, did you really think animals had or have a chance, all you can do is hold on to the ones ya got...
- 1 year ago
-
deezy_duck
-
-
davzap
-
Statistics alone do not adequately represent the events.
- 1 year ago
-
davzap
-
-
davzap
-
You gotta hand it to Guyatthebusstation - he's a sport.
- 1 year ago
-
davzap
-
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
davzap:
so you can't.
- 1 year ago
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
-
davzap
-
This article is misleading, deliberately, and should not be taken at face value.
- 1 year ago
-
davzap
-
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
davzap:
How, you disagree with it?
- 1 year ago
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
-
buddahla
-
My hometown's adopt-a-pet shelter has an annual budget of $5,000 and manages to find homes for at least a dozen animals MONTHLY!!
Wonder how many PETA members actually know this info, and the one's that do know--how do they spin it in their minds to make it justifiable.
- 1 year ago
-
buddahla
-
-
unimatrix0
-
PETA is not an adoptive agency but a "shelter of last resort," taking in animals that other shelters reject because they are unadoptable and euthanizing those that are suffering. They refer adoptable animals to the nearby Virginia Beach Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
A little fact checking goes along way.
- 1 year ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
Guyatthebusstation
-

-
unimatrix0:
don't like my opinion, vote me down. double lulz.
how much time and effort do they spend on rallies/protests that they could spend with an adopted animal? triple lulz
"shelter of last resort"
8/2352 = .0034% survival rate. the concentration camps of nazi germany had better survival rates. Quad lulz.
- 1 year ago
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
-
Ricky84
-
unimatrix0:
I'm pretty sure all the necessarily fact checking was done by the countless individuals to cover this story seeing as though they somehow managed to quote accurate figures. PETA being a "shelter of last resort" changes nothing. The fact that these people claim claim the life of an animal is the same as a human but then go on to kill animals is incredible. By that measure PETA is the most inept and corrupt organization on the planet since it can't even bring itself to not do what they campaign against.
It's like spearheading an anti-slavery campaign with slave labor, or trying to stop insistences of domestic violence by paying someone to beat your wife.
- 1 year ago
-
Ricky84
-
-
Kizzda
-
Guyatthebusstation:
love it!
- 1 year ago
-
Kizzda
-
-
Ricky84
-
If you really believe, like the leadership of PETA says they believe, that the life of a dog or cat or person is the same then you shouldn’t support PETA. There are plenty of example of no-kill animal shelters that make due without a fraction of the money PETA pulls in a year and they only put down animals with terminal conditions.
- 1 year ago
-
Ricky84
-
-
desertcat
-
I been around long enough to know this happens all the time. One large no kill shelter in the northeast sends animals they cannot adopt to the local SPCA. This way they don't kill them but leave it to the SPCA to do their dirty work. Most people are unaware but up to 85% of all cats and kittens turned into shelters are killed. If the shelter is crowed they will kill up to 30 kittens a day. But who is really to blame. Most shelters are on a tight budget and most of their money is spent on dogs. I worked at a shelter who put a cat with a broken leg down and yet spent over 4500 on medical care for a 12 year old dog. the dog died from old age a couple months later but because a board member had a thing for older dogs it got its injuries fixed. You can compare cats in a mixed shelter to people on death row in Texas. They may be innocent but hell we love to kill in Texas. every time you allow you cat to have a litter of kittens another litter has to die to make room for it. Animal rights groups are not in the business of saving animals but making you aware of the ways it can be done by membership, buying their wares and following them blindly while their profits shoot thru the ceiling. Some are no better than companies like Haliburton. Attend a local meeting of any animal right group and I bet you will have more concerned about circus animals, mouse traps than you will about getting stray animals spayed and finding homes for. Want to really save an animal life, save your money you usually give to groups and spay/neuter a unwanted animal at a shelter, they do not euthanize spayed animals as a rule or your neighbors pet who keeps having litters. Feed stray animals, a cat has to catch up to 11 mice a day to be able to survive. Take a stray in and make it house friendly while trying to find a home for it. Even though shelters do kill they are still the best place for the unwanted, help them with money, buy pet food, donate old towels, blankets, pillows. Many have flea markets that they need help running and getting donations. They do more that the groups with their fancy magazines and pictures.
- 1 year ago
-
desertcat
-
-
ozoneocean
-
desertcat:
Best post here.
- 1 year ago
-
ozoneocean
-
-
bking74
-
desertcat:
Every day, I learn another disgusting thing about humanity. I am rapidly losing faith in the human race.
- 1 year ago
-
bking74
-
-
unimatrix0
-
source is not credible; smells like a smear campaign; voted down
- 1 year ago
-
unimatrix0
-
-
Ricky84
-
unimatrix0:
Smear campaign my ass. Anyone with a basic understanding of PETA could tell you they euthanize animals. In fact PETa itself promotes euthanasia. On top of that PETA’s kill count is public record
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/downloads/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
And this story has been covered by countless news agencies.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/134549
For someone that regularly posts pro PETA stories it sounds like your weaving your own smear campaign.
- 1 year ago
-
Ricky84
-
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
unimatrix0:
don't agree with my opinion = conspiracy. lulz.
- 1 year ago
-
Guyatthebusstation
-
-
desertcat
-
Ricky84:
I REMEMBER WHEN PETA WAS FIRST ORGINAZING IN PHILLY. THE FIRST MEETING OF PHILLY MEMBERS WAS IN MY APARTMENT. IT WAS LED BY A GROUP OF WHAT I CALLED BLEEDING HEART IDIOTS. THEY TALKED ABOUT THE CRUELTY OF KILLING ROACHES, MICE, RATS. WE ARGUED ABOUT WHAT THEME TO USE TO DRAW PEOPLE INTO THE GROUP. USING ANIMALS TO DO TRICKS WAS WHAT THEY WANTED. I ASKED WHAT I THOUGHT WAS A VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION, WHY NOT PET RESPONSIBILITY/ THOUSANDS ARE BEING KILLED IN EVERY SHELTER EVERY YEAR. NO ONE THOUGHT THAT WAS A CAUSE FOR THE GROUP SINCE THERE WERE SO MANY SHELTERS , THE FOA AND OTHER GROUPS. i THEN ASKED "HOW IN THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO GET PEOPLE TO CARE ABOUT SAVING RATTLESNAKES WHEN THEY DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT DOGS AND CATS?" IT TOOK ME ABOUT FOUR YEARS BEFORE I WAS REALLY FED UP WITH THEM AND BY THEN THEY GREW. I DID CALL THEM ONCE TO HELP WITH SOME ANIMALS THAT NEEDED HOMES OR A SAFE HAVEN. EXPLAINED WHERE THEY CAME FROM AND WHY THEY NEEDED SAFE HAVEN. THAT WAS BACK IN THE LATE 80'S, STILL WAITING FOR A RESPONSE. ONE THING THEY WERE RIGHT ABOUT IN THE BEGINNING THEY DO NOT BELONG IN THE BUSINESS OF SAVING PETS AND SHOULD LEAVE IT TO THE PROFESSIONALS AND GO BACK INTO THE ROACH SAVING BUSINESS.
- 1 year ago
-
desertcat
-
-
CalgarC
-
unimatrix0:
we will never know until we hear both sides :D
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
02
-
desertcat:
Using caps lock makes for difficult read. So most don't.
- 1 year ago
-
02
-
-
desertcat
-
02:
I use caps because otherwise I have trouble seeing what I wrote and what others wrote. Will try not but you can use them in responding to me. Wear bifocals as it but the vision is going.
- 1 year ago
-
desertcat
-
-
mindcruzer
-
People who
Eat and
Torture
Animals - 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
Confucius
-
sktechy
- 1 year ago
-
Confucius
