Vierotchka
Eric Margolis: Obama the peace president is fighting battles his country cannot afford

Eric Margolis is a journalist born in New York City and holding degrees from Georgetown the University of Geneva, and New York University. During the Vietnam War he served as a US Army infantryman. Margolis is the author of War at the Top of the World –- The Struggle for Afghanistan and Asia is a syndicated columnist and broadcaster whose articles have appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The International Herald Tribune, Mainichi Shimbun and US Naval Institute Proceedings. Margolis is an expert of military affairs, a former instructor in strategy and tactics in the US Army, and a member of the International Institute of Strategic Studies and the Institute of Regional Studies in Islamabad, Pakistan. Eric Margolis' books have been published in the US, Canada, Britain, and India. He often appears and contributes to national and international news items for outlets such as CNN, ABC,CBC and Voice of America to the Wall Street Journal and Maninichi-Tokyo. He broadcasts regularly on foreign affairs for Canadian TV (TV Ontario and CBC), radio, and has appeared on ABC, CBS, CNN, and PBS.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Afghanistan News
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Economy Barack Obama 8 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

56 comments // Wars sending U.S. into ruin // Video

  • unclecharlie
    • 0
      unclecharlie  
    • To clarify somewhat: I feel the US is incapable of winning this war because if we HAD been capable of winning this war, we would have done so within 3 years or so. The fact that this war has been dragging on for- what- 8 years now? is proof enough to see that this is one war- like Vietnam- we will never win. It pains me to say this. Yet we also see soldiers rigging up their own homemade armor plating to put on their humvees. The govenment is sending troops in to battle poorly trained all ill equipped- like the Germans did when they attempted futilely to conquer Russia. History repeats itself yet again- lessons of past wars are largely lost on those who choose to wage them

    • 1 year ago
  • kennymotown
    • +1
      kennymotown  
    • Corporate investment in military hardware and supply has become our achilles heel that President Eisenhower warned us of years ago, The military industrial complex is killing America and capitalism. I personally can't wait for the final stock on the stock exchange hits zero. Fuck capitalism, bring on the golden age of Socialism for America.

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
    • +1
      bking74  
    • kennymotown:

      The U.S. Government wastes billions of dollars in research and development to Defense Contractors who are still designing obsolete weapons, air craft, missile programs and heavy armored attack tanks that were designed for a large stage conventional war not the small scale down and dirty guerilla warfare we are now engaged in. Corporate welfare at its finest. While billions are wasted on designing new fighter jets that are not need and tanks that will never see combat, soldiers are scourging for spare parts for their HMVV's, personal body armor and night vision scopes.

    • 1 year ago
  • bailey78
  • BarrytheblessedSocialist
  • kennymotown
  • ibrake4rappers13
  • 1_JohnSmith
    • 0
      1_JohnSmith  
    • As far as the spanish empire was able to steal everything they wanted from the occuped territories in America it was a good business both politically, militarly and economic. The current problem for US is that the wars are a bad business politically, militarly and economically.

      It surprises me that US political elite is still so naive to believe they could be an example for other cultures and nations with several thousends of years history. It is like we try to imposse our neighbours our life stile as it would be the only possible.

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
    • 0
      bking74  
    • 1_JohnSmith:

      The U.S. elite and Military Industrial Complex couldn't care less about being an example for other foreign governments and while the nation as a whole is being bleed dry both economically and with the bodies of dead men and women of the U.S. Military

    • 1 year ago
  • obamaisajoke
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • obamaisajoke:

      If I had to choose between a million dead people or paying extra for gas, I'd pay extra for gas every time.

      You really DON'T know human beings as well as you think you do. They aren't all self-absorbed pigs with no regard for their surroundings. By the way, you wouldn't happen to be basing that assumption on personal experience would you?

    • 1 year ago
  • kennymotown
  • bking74
  • obamaisajoke
  • Saladin
    • +3
      Saladin  
    • obamaisajoke:

      Here's another sad fact.

      All the dead empires of the world died not because of "parasites" but because of war hawks who militarily overextended their empire and could not defend or afford it.

      From Rome to Soviet Russia that's been true, and we're next if people like you don't grow up and start thinking for themselves.

    • 1 year ago
  • Prescott_Railey
  • irie_ojo
    • 0
      irie_ojo  
    • obamaisajoke:

      or what breaks a nation may be the rich not paying enough taxes. or the fact that the top 10 percent of earners in America now receive nearly 50 percent of all the income earned in the United States

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
    • 0
      bking74  
    • Saladin:

      I agree with you that most of the powerful ancient empires crumbled due to over reaching and losing grasps of their borders. But it had more to do with ineffective, descendants of the former great leaders who made those Empires in the first place.

    • 1 year ago
  • CarolineS
    • 0
      CarolineS  
    • anyone know what the cost of Iraq and Afghanistan is to the UK? would love to know, as i know i'm never going to read the real figure in any newspapers

    • 1 year ago
  • NuclearLullaby
    • 0
      NuclearLullaby  
    • Bin Laden's plan is working better then he would have ever hoped! THE US gaves him a TON of weapons & then we went & fought a war far away from him while he was able to build an awesome safety "cocoon " & continue to live out his life as an extremely rich man!!! Meanwhile, due to a very much self caused war, the US is now several trillion dollars in debt !!! & We seem no closer to getting out of war then we ever have!!! OH! & here's another nice little fact for people! Many of Bin Laden's family members were escorted out of the US on government air crafts by our government!!! Can the US recover from this war??? No!!! At least not 100%!!! Why??? Because we have pretty much lost the trust of most of the world!!! As many probably know,America is VERY dependent on other nations,so...That pretty much means we have a hell of a lot of explaining to do!!! & will likely have economic problems for at least a decade no matter who's in the white house!

    • 1 year ago
  • Logos51891
    • 0
      Logos51891  
    • War is Hell AND expensive. Obama, cap the military budget! If we restrict resources maybe the people in charge will get things done more quickly, more efficiently and less lives will be lost or ruined.

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
    • 0
      bking74  
    • Logos51891:

      No way logos, military spending needs to be better regulated and funneled to the areas of the military that are accomplishing their mission. Putting a cap on the resources and expecting this policy will end the war is just naive and will cause the deaths of thousand of U.S troops.

    • 1 year ago
  • Logos51891
    • 0
      Logos51891  
    • bking74:

      Perhaps you're right. But one thing is for sure and that is that the U.S's military operations needs to be more efficient; not just with money but with lives as well.

    • 1 year ago
  • Maeveeo
    • 0
      Maeveeo  
    • I think that if we STOP spending like we got it like that ( nmeaning put ah CAP on it ) then we may be better off , like i said may but i could be wrong , why does EVERYTHING HAS TO GO UP WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO IT , an also why
      don't we Stop trying to help EVERYBODY in so many words ! huh ?

    • 1 year ago
  • obamaisajoke
  • irie_ojo
  • bailey78
  • masterzip
    • 0
      masterzip  
    • on dollars and cents, I heard on NPR that the IED's made by Afghanistan rebels are using less metal which makes them harder to detect, because they use less metal, and IED can be made for the equivelant of 0.25cents.
      In order to find and defuse these cheap, effective, exploding devices ,...the US uses a team of bomb detectors, and equipment that is becoming more and more expensive due to the nature of the bombs made with less metal.
      So,..they spend 0.25cents
      and we spend upwards of 1 million to detect and get rid of it.......

      we have already lost by the amount of money we spend, while the rest of America suffers and begs for healthcare, education, and infrastructure

    • 1 year ago
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • masterzip:

      Yep the only ones that make money are the ones supplying the tool of death or the tools to try to survive. Those that sell body armor to those that sell mess kits to Alice packs. Those that supply the the army's are the only one's that benefit.

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
  • bking74
    • 0
      bking74  
    • masterzip:

      You just described a major flaw in the wasteful spending of the U.S War department and the Pentagon. While insurgents are building IED from simple cheap parts the U.S. Military has invested in a new heavy armored anti-mine M1 Breacher know as the Grizzy which cost 3.2 million apiece. Currently 30 are in active service in Afghanistan being tested by the Marines. I think in the cost savings the department the Talibans gets more "banged" for it's buck.

    • 1 year ago
  • bailey78
  • jswiz
  • bailey78
  • 1_JohnSmith
    • 0
      1_JohnSmith  
    • Any body out there ask Israel and its extremely rich citizens to help US with our deficit and with the cost of our wars which ultimately benefit them?

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
    • +1
      bking74  
    • 1_JohnSmith:

      I have to admit that is an unusual leap of logic. Conventional thinking would lead you to believe that directly involving Israel in our "War on Terror" would polarize the entire Middle East into withdrawing whatever support or neutrality and set off a Jihad of such "EPIC" levels of destruction. Zionists already influence U.S. foreign policy to much already.

    • 1 year ago
  • Toughth
    • 0
      Toughth  
    • Again we did not decide to win. We let politicians decide that killing a criminal like Bin laden would not bode well for the US especialy since his family controls so much oil. Afganistan has a history of eating armies and spiting them out no matter how much more advanced they are. They will never get rid of the system of tribalism they use. Go in to win or don't go at all. Capture and hang Bin Laden for the over 3000 dead and injured in New York and don't pay attentiion to the Saudi Royal Family. They have abbrogated there right to speak for him.

    • 1 year ago
  • irie_ojo
  • alf_d_guard
  • obamaisajoke
  • irie_ojo
    • 0
      irie_ojo  
    • obamaisajoke:

      always trying to argue......there are plenty of other fuel sources. one of the main reasons no one uses them is b/c the oil companies buy the patents as soon as they can. competition sucks so why not control it or just get rid of it.

      if you once again take a look at history...you will see that the germans were running their tanks off peanut oil during WWII.

      and i know you are going to hate this one.....

      HEMP for biomass, mid-west great grow area, no need to rotate crops, conditions soil for other crops, and has a low energy input to output ratio (unlike corn that takes like 800lbs to produce enough fuel for one suv). and since we would be growing hemp it will most likely replace trees for paper as well ( less chemicals used in production, no need to bleach pulp). so in the end we will not be cutting down trees (which produce oxygen) and we will be driving cars that now exhaust CO2...... CARS WILL PRODUCE CO2, TREES USE CO2, TREES PRODUCE OXYGEN AND GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCED (which slows down ozone depletion ) thus saving the world and making the the good ol' US of A Self Sufficient for fuel......

    • 1 year ago
  • bailey78
  • irie_ojo
  • thedirtman
    • +1
      thedirtman  
    • Osama bin Laden's idea was that if he could strike America once that America would simply spend itself to death. America being just four percent of the world cannot police the entire world. It makes no sense whatever. There was never a chance.

      Not that like either of these two, but bin Laden was more intelligent than Cheney. It all comes down to that.

    • 1 year ago
  • unclecharlie
    • +1
      unclecharlie  
    • I'm a US Navy veteran, and I have seen the proof that we cannot win in Afghanistan. Never. Does anyone seriously believe that if we continue to pour billions into this money pit, if we continue shipping troops off to the MiddleEast to get blown up by IEDs, that we will win, "eventually"? How long has this debacle been going on- 8 years now? Lets get real. Having an incompetent shallow narcissist who pushes the "nanny state" continuously on the American people, it's no wonder we see people rising up

    • 1 year ago
  • thedirtman
    • +1
      thedirtman  
    • unclecharlie:

      What is surprising though is that people are not rising up to the cost of the wars. Instead, they rise up to the "potential" cost of health care. Though this health care system is only under proposal - it hasn't cost the USA anything yet. If anything the lack of health care planning has cost America a share of industry and its ability to recover from recession.

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
    • 0
      bking74  
    • unclecharlie:

      I respect your opinion and salute your service but it saddens me to hear a former Navy veteran saying that the U.S. Military is incapable of winning the war in Afghanistan. But you have earned the right to believe and say what you want.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
    • +2
      Vierotchka  
    • Wars sending U.S. into ruin Obama the peace president is fighting battles his country cannot afford By ERIC MARGOLIS, QMI AGENCY

      U.S. President Barack Obama calls the $3.8-trillion US budget he just sent to Congress a major step in restoring America’s economic health.
      In fact, it’s another potent fix given to a sick patient deeply addicted to the dangerous drug — debt.

      More empires have fallen because of reckless finances than invasion. The latest example was the Soviet Union, which spent itself into ruin by buying tanks.
      Washington’s deficit (the difference between spending and income from taxes) will reach a vertiginous $1.6 trillion US this year. The huge sum will be borrowed, mostly from China and Japan, to which the U.S. already owes $1.5 trillion. Debt service will cost $250 billion.

      To spend $1 trillion, one would have had to start spending $1 million daily soon after Rome was founded and continue for 2,738 years until today.

      Obama’s total military budget is nearly $1 trillion. This includes Pentagon spending of $880 billion. Add secret black programs (about $70 billion); military aid to foreign nations like Egypt, Israel and Pakistan; 225,000 military “contractors” (mercenaries and workers); and veterans’ costs. Add $75 billion (nearly four times Canada’s total defence budget) for 16 intelligence agencies with 200,000 employees.

      The Afghanistan and Iraq wars ($1 trillion so far), will cost $200-250 billion more this year, including hidden and indirect expenses. Obama’s Afghan “surge” of 30,000 new troops will cost an additional $33 billion — more than Germany’s total defence budget.

      No wonder U.S. defence stocks rose after Peace Laureate Obama’s “austerity” budget.

      Military and intelligence spending relentlessly increase as unemployment heads over 10% and the economy bleeds red ink. America has become the Sick Man of the Western Hemisphere, an economic cripple like the defunct Ottoman Empire.

      The Pentagon now accounts for half of total world military spending. Add America’s rich NATO allies and Japan, and the figure reaches 75%.
      China and Russia combined spend only a paltry 10% of what the U.S. spends on defence.

      There are 750 U.S. military bases in 50 nations and 255,000 service members stationed abroad, 116,000 in Europe, nearly 100,000 in Japan and South Korea.

      Military spending gobbles up 19% of federal spending and at least 44% of tax revenues. During the Bush administration, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars — funded by borrowing — cost each American family more than $25,000.
      Like Bush, Obama is paying for America’s wars through supplemental authorizations — putting them on the nation’s already maxed-out credit card. Future generations will be stuck with the bill.

      This presidential and congressional jiggery-pokery is the height of public dishonesty. America’s wars ought to be paid for through taxes, not bookkeeping fraud. If U.S. taxpayers actually had to pay for the Afghan and Iraq wars, these conflicts would end in short order. America needs a fair, honest war tax.

      The U.S. clearly has reached the point of imperial overreach. Military spending and debt-servicing are cannibalizing the U.S. economy, the real basis of its world power. Besides the late U.S.S.R., the U.S. also increasingly resembles the dying British Empire in 1945, crushed by immense debts incurred to wage the Second World War, unable to continue financing or defending the imperium, yet still imbued with imperial pretensions.

      It is increasingly clear the president is not in control of America’s runaway military juggernaut. Sixty years ago, the great President Dwight Eisenhower, whose portrait I keep by my desk, warned Americans to beware of the military-industrial complex. Six decades later, partisans of permanent war and world domination have joined Wall Street’s money lenders to put America into thrall.
      Increasing numbers of Americans are rightly outraged and fearful of runaway deficits. Most do not understand their political leaders are also spending their nation into ruin through unnecessary foreign wars and a vainglorious attempt to control much of the globe — what neocons call “full spectrum dominance.”
      If Obama really were serious about restoring America’s economic health, he would demand military spending be slashed, quickly end the Iraq and Afghan wars and break up the nation’s giant Frankenbanks.

      Copyright © 2010 Toronto Sun All Rights Reserved

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
    • +2
      bking74  
    • Vierotchka:

      Afghanistan isn't called the "Graveyard of Empires" for nothing, but the U.S. Military is a massive beast that needs to be fed. If not the U.S. has to radically change it's foreign policy. Also with all this money being spent on the Military why am I only getting $3,148.20 a month as a E-6 with eight years of service.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
  • bking74
    • +2
      bking74  
    • I admit Eric Margolis credentials are impressive but his logic is flawed. This summer will be a true test of the future of the war in Afghanistan as the entire 10th Mountain Division and 101st Airborne are heading to Afghanistan in a massive surge of U.S. Military might. Both the 10th and the 101st are light infantry division which excel in the mountainous regions of eastern Afghanistan (the Taliban's hold out).

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • bking74:

      I respectfully disagree - Eric Margolis' logic is very sound. The USA cannot achieve victory in Afghanistan. As soon as it leaves Afghanistan, anything the USA has achieved there (besides untold destruction and untold deaths, especially due to depleted uranium) will be immediately reversed by the Afghans. I have lived in Afghanistan, and I have members of my extended family there (the Pathan relatives of my daughter's father, living in Paktia and in Kabul). Believe me, Afghans resent and hate Americans for what they have done and are still doing, all they want is that all foreign troops get the hell out of their country.

    • 1 year ago
  • bking74
    • 0
      bking74  
    • Vierotchka:

      I can't help but to believe that victory can be achieved in Afghanistan since I will be returning this spring for the fourth time. I have spent time in both Wardak and Logar Valley Province. I will be spending the summer on the eastern border in Khandahar as part of a massive surge with a joint offensive by the 10th Mountain and 101st Airborne. It would be extremely disrespectful to attempt that I could possibly know more about the culture and attitude of the Afghan people then you. But I have seen and experience both hatred and gratitude as well as indifference from the Afghan people. I can say with complete certainty that the Afghan people are among the courageous and proud people I have ever encountered. I feel a bit ashamed expressing my opinions based on my limited contact with the average Afghan citizen when you are so clearly more educated on the subject then myself. So it is with great humble heart that I attempt defeated. At least for the sake of this discussion. My heart does ache for the death and destruction I have witnessed and been involved in your families country and I understand your passion.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • bking74:

      I understand your position, and I wish you a safe return. However, as a member of occupying troops, you will never get any truly sincere positive feedback from Afghans, so you cannot get a true vision of these people, whatever their ethnicity - Hazara, Turkmen, Pathan, etc. They will play you, they will pretend to please you, but they will never show you their true feelings except for hatred. Those whom you perceive as being indifferent are merely hiding their real feelings from you. The only purpose of the foreign military presence in Afghanistan is to try to make it safe for building the pipelines that are to take oil and natural gas from the Caspian Sea Basin down to the Arabian Sea ports in Pakistan and India via Afghanistan and Pakistan. If and when that is achieved - which is very doubtful - the troops will remain there to protect the building of the pipelines, and should that be achieved (most improbable), they will remain there to protect the pipelines. This was the only reason why the USA attacked and invaded Afghanistan in the first place - it had strictly nothing to do with 9/11 (which was brought about so as to get approval from the American people for waging war on Afghanistan) or with defeating the Taliban - American troops in Afghanistan (and in Iraq) are not fighting and dying to protect and defend America, they are being used as henchmen and cannon fodder for the benefit of Big Oil, and nothing else.

    • 1 year ago
more from Community:

top videos