Community | March 18, 2010 | 58 comments

The 9/11 Cat is Out of the Bag

Image
rodstradamus
Stewart Ogilby,
Editor of BigEye.com & NewsWatch.org

The lid is blowing off a story broadcast by American TV on September 11, 2001. The question now is whether or not owners and managers of America's mainline media will be able to continue burying facts, questions, controversy, speculations, and conclusions contradicting that day's professionally crafted narrative. When will the American people be given access to documented facts unearthed over the years since that tragic and exceptional day?

We were told repeatedly, even while the towers in New York were still standing, that a man in a cave in Afghanistan was responsible. We were led to believe that he managed a group of Arab terrorists who flew our commercial airliners on 911. As proof, his picture was repeatedly flashed across major TV networks with the smoking buildings in the background. Today, our own FBI claims they lack any evidence linking that man to 9/11.

We are still repeatedly shown, in newspapers and on TV, photos of 19 "Arab terrorists" supposedly on the planes, with no other proof of their even being there. Poorly produced and obviously faked videos of the big boogyman have been trotted out periodically. Where were they produced? The "flying Arabs" keep turning up alive and well. Who stole, forged, and assumed their identities? Other Arabs? Why?

There is evidence that the boogyman was seriously ill with kidney disease requiring dialysis, and that he died late in December, 2001. The CIA knew this because he was one of their assets right up until 911. What an ideal patsy, if there ever was one! Dead men tell no tales and they can never be captured.

We are now told by over a thousand architects and engineers that steel and concrete buildings do not explosively disintegrate due to fires within them. What really happened? Why have our leaders and pundits carefully avoided explaining the obvious demolition of WTC-7 hours later? Many of us think we know why.

Wars, torture, bankruptcy, the Patriot Act's overturning of our cherished Bill of Rights, official lies, scare propaganda, a police-state mentality, are these intended consequences of planning and executing the improbable events of that day?

If H.L. Mencken were alive today and writing for newpapers he would be having a field-day other than for the fact that his articles would never be seen in today's press. As I watch "911 truth" unfold I am reminded of Mencken's comment when asked why he, who was critical of this country, did not simply leave. Mencken quickly replied, "Why do men go to zoos?"

If the consequences to my country were considerably less than those resulting from Sept. 11, 2001, I, like Mencken, would find the spectacle to be incomparably amusing. We will all watch the spectacle unfold because the cat is out of the bag. Nobody and nothing can put it back in. Amusing is one thing it is not.

Some things I do know about my fellow countrymen. We have been free in the past, and have developed a uniquely American sense of personal independence and comraderie. We have historically been slow to rise in anger. TV is powerful but we know it is not real. It is an illusion. In the real world, civilized human beings understand that to conquer lies and murder the forces necessary are truth and justice.

Today we recoil in horror and in anger at those criminally responsible for 911. If we discover that those responsible for the murders of our citizens and the destruction of our heritage are, in fact, among us, we will demand the removal of those directly responsible and of accesssories before and after the fact.

I am turning 77 in two months and I love life. The other day I hired a personal nutritionalist because I want to lose 30-40 pounds which can be life-shortening at my age. I also have a personal trainer, as I want to maintain physical health and stamina. I want to be around to see what happens when Americans repudiate what TV and a controlled press has obliged viewers to believe happened on September 11, 2001.

I will, to the best of my ability, support the identification and prosecution of traitors to the best country in the world, the one in which I grew up. This each of us owes to America's next generation. Any alternative is unacceptable.

TREASON: Treason in America Conference: stating the painfully obvious to save America

Information: The Beginner's Guide to 911 Truth
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Culture,   Opinion,   5 more
  2. tags:
    Obama War Media Iraq 9 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

58 comments // The 9/11 Cat is Out of the Bag

  • frank_runyeon
    • +2
      frank_runyeon  
    • Both the absence of any facts and the style in which this is written makes this simple propagandist screed.

      If you really believe this, write it in an intelligent and persuasive argument filled with compelling facts and an impartial and dispassionate tone.

      Voted down.

    • 1 year ago
  • Ragan
    • 0
      Ragan  
    • Do you know how reliable and honest an investigation by the government is? If there is to be a new investigation it should not be done by the government as the Government will always find in favor of the government. No... An investigation performed by private, civil investigators. Nothing less will produce the truth.

    • 1 year ago
  • Oni_noni
    • 0
      Oni_noni  
    • What makes something newsworthy? Proximity, TIMELINESS, conflict, impact, blah, blah, blah. This is not news. It is an old man babbling on about a subject he can't possibly be considered an authority on (not that I consider an appeal to authority to be a sound argument). It isn't concise, or even coherent at points. He literally sounds like the crazy homeless people you hear on street corners.

      I can't believe anybody with a brain buys into this. Is the government corrupt? Absolutely, they always have been, and I in no way believe that they actually care about what is in the best interest of us citizens. They are human beings acting on their own ambitions and desires. So what? Is this new to you, you poor, pathetic, delusional sheeple? Why act as though the government's failure to be transparent and act with integrity is such a big deal? If we destroyed this one and began a new government, it would be the same thing. We don't live in a perfect world.

      And yes, human lives were lost. I know this sounds calloused, but so? This happens ALL THE TIME. Not thouands, but billions of people have died because of governments, our own and others, which act in the best interest of the government. I'm not saying we shouldn't care, but it surprises me when people are surprised. Do you really think that the US government would have a problem killing their own people? They might object to the bad press it could generate....but that's different.

    • 1 year ago
  • DRudeBoy
    • +1
      DRudeBoy  
    • I never hear reputable sources propagating 9/11 conspiracy theories.... Why is it so easy for conspiracy theorist to trust some guy with a website or a radio show?

    • 1 year ago
  • NaturalAnthem
    • +3
      NaturalAnthem  
    • yea this is shit. I'm an architect and the way the towers were built allowed such a crash to the facade to bring hem down. Pretty sure there's a documentary on this exact subject. But alas, the doubters would just say the documentary is propoganda.

      "OHNOSFEARTHENEWWORLDORDERGOWATCHENDGAME!!"... now thats propoganda... even alex jones voice is propoganda.

    • 1 year ago
  • jahbini
    • 0
      jahbini  
    • NaturalAnthem:

      Thanks for the insight from someone who knows buildings.

      Even if the facade came down, what about the upright supports? Should they not have been huge, long pole like structures that remain after the facade has gone down?

      And what about building #6? I'm still puzzled about that one.

    • 1 year ago
  • NaturalAnthem
    • 0
      NaturalAnthem  
    • jahbini:

      I'm a younger architect but none the less the fall of the WTC is studied as a course of ethics. The facade contributed the structural integrity of the building, and although the architect along with their structural engineers had to address the possibility of airliners crashing into it... the types of airliners at the time of its construction were nothing like they are today.

    • 1 year ago
  • NaturalAnthem
    • 0
      NaturalAnthem  
    • jahbini:

      oh and about the long poles standing alone, scyscrapers rely on their entire integrity. a long pole alone would not be able to resist wind loads by itself. Additionally, the weight of the facade falling would bring it down anyways.

    • 1 year ago
  • jahbini
    • 0
      jahbini  
    • NaturalAnthem:

      Umm. No. the Boeing 707 was gas heavy and was introduced in the late 1950's. The 747 was announced in 1966. Remember gas was cheap back then and fuel tanks were big.

      The big planes were all part of the picture even as the trade center was being erected.

      Please elaborate on your conjecture that the planes of the day were not as "dangerous" as today. It does not correspond with my first hand memory of the planes of the day.

    • 1 year ago
  • jahbini
    • 0
      jahbini  
    • NaturalAnthem:

      I agree they may have been taken down also, but the lengths of the sections of those supports were far smaller than simple "breakage" might indicate.

      The whole argument that the floors "detached" from the supports simply does not make sense.

      And what about building #6 (or was it #7)?

      Too many unanswered questions for my sensibilities. Thanks for suggesting your ideas: keep looking for the answers, and do probe deeply.

    • 1 year ago
  • likeamazing
  • likeamazing
  • Oni_noni
    • 0
      Oni_noni  
    • Wow. Who was this man hiding in a cave who was used as a scapegoat in the 9/11 scare? Why are we just being given this information now? Why did we listen to the television, when obviously the internet is a more reliable source of information? Who wrote this article, which asks so many interesting questions and has so few factual answers? How could we have been such fools not to suspect our own country immediately?

    • 1 year ago
  • laserdog
    • -1
      laserdog  
    • "I am turning 77 in two months and I love life. The other day I hired a personal nutritionalist because I want to lose 30-40 pounds which can be life-shortening at my age. I also have a personal trainer, as I want to maintain physical health and stamina. I want to be around to see what happens when Americans repudiate what TV and a controlled press has obliged viewers to believe happened on September 11, 2001."

      This might as well read "I am 77 and am farking crazy."

      I think there is some evidence that cover-ups happened around 9/11. But I think the extent of the cover-ups is likely just covering up the same gross executive incompetence that prevailed every aspect of government from 2000 - 2008.

      I think the cover-up is people trying to cover their asses who might have done more to stop this, but not an actual change in the mechanics or perpetrators of this crime.

    • 1 year ago
  • laserdog
    • 0
      laserdog  
    • He lost me at "Arab Terrorists".

      Arab != Muslim.

      Yes many of them were from Saudia "Arabia", but they bigger defining characteristic was that they were extremist Muslims.

      Sorry for the nit pick but it is just a pet peeve of mine, since Iraq was filled with largely secular (read: non-Muslim) Arabs. So this strikes me as that same sort of ridiculous Iraq=9/11 equating that led us down the path to war that has caused so much more damage to our country than 9/11 ever did.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • laserdog:

      Interestingly enough, many of the alleged terrorists are still alive and well today. So, if the official story is true, it seems that God was on the terrorists' side since He performed a miracle and spared their lives, allowing them to survive the planes crashing into the towers, into the Pentagon, and into the ground...

    • 1 year ago
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
  • Vierotchka
  • Ragan
    • 0
      Ragan  
    • Other nations in the world hold their leaders and representatives accountable and even execute corrupt leaders, but here in America, the people have known that there leaders and representatives have been corrupt for two hundred years and have done nothing to oversee the Washington system and change it. It will only get worse before it will get better. There have been many travesties and State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD) and they will continue until the people band togethter to stop the senseless killing in this world and hold those wealthy and militants and paid AMerican terrorists accountable.

    • 1 year ago
  • My_America
  • Crenshaw_Brothers
  • idealist
  • st333rn
  • idealist
  • st333rn
    • 0
      st333rn  
    • idealist:

      Yeah, we actually should. Because like the JFK assassination, the truth will never come out. People who have the cunning to plan out conspiracies this large have the ability to hide it also.

    • 1 year ago
  • shanklinmike
    • 0
      shanklinmike  
    • Government is force, it is coercion, it is not peaceful and it is not wise. It is not caring and it is not outside the forces of human nature.

      Hell, even the mafia runs a tighter ship! (That's actually serious). The mafia actually spends it's money better than the government! The difference is, the government can steal from you in the name of charity, it can kill you in the name of peace, and it can do what it wants, outside the realm of the people. If you don't understand this, you haven't been paying attention. Regulations that are placed on the system will go to serve the big corporate players, not the People. You guys keep on trusting the bureaucrats and politicians....I will continue striving for a freer society, one where peaceful citizens are left alone and where the People understand the government can't catch every terrorist, can't bring free healthcare through the political game, and realize that free speech is a cornerstone for anti-tyranny.

      What we are becoming is (just another nation). 1/3 of the world can't even get clean water because of tribal totalitarianism and government oligopolization, the republicans and democrats want MORE of my freedom to "protect" me? I've seen enough in my short life to realize that it's all about the money in the end....not about sound policy. The two party system is destroying our country, and those who are on board and sympathetic to this enslavement system simply aren't getting it!

      Peace

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • -1
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • shanklinmike:

      You are wrong when you say republicans demand more of your freedom to protect you. Republicans favor small government and low government intrusion in the private lives of citizens and businesses, and now strongly favor the repealing of the Patriot Act. Have you not heard of the Tea Party movement or the Oath Keepers?

    • 1 year ago
  • NorwegianHammer
  • Jeremy_Benson
  • jahbini
  • laserdog
    • +2
      laserdog  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      "Republicans favor small government and low government intrusion in the private lives of citizens and businesses"

      That's what they say, but if you look at what they've actually done in the past 10 years, it seems more specifically that they believe in giving money to their friends, lowering taxes on the richest while increasing spending recklessly.

      "Small government" is just the sticker on the box. I dare you to find a legislative example where they've actually implemented that (short of stripping environmental and economic regulatory rules for their friends).

    • 1 year ago
  • Mark701
    • +2
      Mark701  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      Jeremy, It would be more accurate to say that "some" Republicans favor small government, low government intrusion and repealing the Patriot Act. Even as a democrat I am willing to admit this. Those would be the Eisenhower Republicans, of which few are left. The republicans in power are in the game for themselves and corporate America, no one else. Their sole concern is that business be allowed to profit at any expense, including American lives. If that means keeping the Patriot Act, they will push to keep it. If that means repealing the Act, they will do that too. Its all about the money and their friends and no longer about the people they were elected to represent.

    • 1 year ago
  • jahbini
  • idealist
  • idealist
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • 0
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • How the hell can you site 'Beginners Guide to 9/11' as your only source, restate the same crap conspiracy theorists have been crying, and call it a news story?

    • 1 year ago
  • jahbini
    • +1
      jahbini  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      Hi Jeremy! Welcome to Current dot c0m. I see this is your first posting, so what "same crap" are you referring to?

      A rebuttal of these crap arguments should be easy for you to find, and post in your commentary. I would enjoy being enlightened.

      BTW: love your icon. where does it originate?

    • 1 year ago
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
    • -1
      BrushwithDeathToothpaste  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      I'll throw my lot in with Jeremy and Uni. The administration couldn't even torture people or falsify evidence for war secretly . To enlist the cooperation and silence the hundreds of people involved would be beyond their competency level. At best they may have guessed the attack was coming and probably did nothing to stop it.

    • 1 year ago
  • Vierotchka
  • laserdog
  • laserdog
  • jahbini
    • 0
      jahbini  
    • laserdog:

      Thanks for the info! Discordianism seems highly dis-compatible with my position as high-overman in the Church of the Subgenius. I therefore accept it as my Short duration personal savior. The essential Shordurpersav.

    • 1 year ago
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
  • SalvadoreSouza
  • Deltone
  • lizziehoffman
  • unimatrix0
  • jahbini
  • jubal
    • +4
      jubal  
    • unimatrix0:

      Unimatrix worships at the altar to the Bush Family Mafia.

      You are an intelligent person who is followed by a lot of people. On many things you seem reasonable and fair, but on this issue you are drinking koolaid. You should have more of an open mind instead of baa baa baaing like a sheep after the "official 911" myth.

    • 1 year ago
  • BrushwithDeathToothpaste
  • Vierotchka
  • tenletterz
  • blackheartman
    • +1
      blackheartman  
    • tenletterz:

      Riiiight. There has NEVER been any conspiracy against the people by our government or corporate entities EVER before in the history of the nation. Believe all that your government tells you to believe. Go to sleep now, to sleeeep.

    • 1 year ago
  • jahbini
  • Incredulous
  • blackheartman
  • sk0j0
more from Community:

top videos