Community | March 18, 2010 | 62 comments

Do they have the votes on health care?

Image
afitzgerald
The buzz today is that this weekend is going to see a nail-biter of a vote in the House on health care reform. The Democrats insist they've got the votes to pass the Senate version (but they're going to need every single Democrat to get in line and vote for it). The GOP meanwhile is pledging to do every single thing in its power to block the bill or diminish it.

Is it going to finally pass? Is this version going to be worth the wait?

How has your opinion of the bill shifted/changed over through this process?

From CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/18/health.care.fails/
  1. groups:
    Community,   DEMOCRATS
  2. tags:
    Health Obama Democrats GOP 6 more
  3.     
    |

62 comments // Do they have the votes on health care?

  • CaptB
    • 0
      CaptB  
    • It has to pass. We can change things in the future to tweak it. However, we are headed for disaster if we don't change. Get rid of Homeland Security and that will allow us $54 billion more to spend on healthcare. The FBI and CIA are all we really need.

    • 1 year ago
  • medHead
  • BriKi
  • blackheartman
    • 0
      blackheartman  
    • For those of you out there that do not currently have healthcare insurance, why do you think this is such a good bill? I currently have no health insurance. I am one of these millions of people who don't have coverage because I cannot afford coverage. The insurance bastards want to keep making their millions, so I have chosen 1) to not buy something which I cannot afford (what every single American should be doing regardless of the product or service) and 2) to not give my hard-earned money to some fucker whose only job is to deny my claim and make millions by doing so (which is and always will be their job).

      President Obama feels so bad for those of us in this boat, that he wants to "cover" everyone one of us with his new bill. Unfortunately for us, his idea of "covering" somebody is forcing them by law to give their money to these same pricks who caused the situation in the first place. And what about you and me, us poor bastards who our caring President wants to help? Well if we don't pay our "protection money" to these insurance thugs, eventually our caring President will have our asses thrown into jail.

      I do not have health insurance coverage, and I UNDERSTAND all to well what this bill does, thank you. I hope that all of you DLC pricks who just want to lower your own premiums a little are willing to trade your little savings with losing the support of those of us on the REAL left. Why don't all of you healthcare bill supporters go hug an insurance CEO today. Very shortly, they will be the only friends you have.

    • 1 year ago
  • AldousHuxley
    • 0
      AldousHuxley [removed]  
    • blackheartman:

      Do you pay for cable? Do you pay for car insurance? Do you pay for internet? You don't need those three things. Those are wants. Cars are not a necessity...there is public transportation. People spend their money as they wish, and rightfully so, but if you're going to state you can't afford...you better mean it.

    • 1 year ago
  • blackheartman
    • 0
      blackheartman  
    • AldousHuxley:

      Fuck you Jammer. Why did have to crawl back out of your mommy's basement? Did she run out of cookies?

      I pay for what I use. I don't pay for cable because it is not worth the price, so i don't have cable. I pay for car insurance because I have made the choice to use a vehicle. There have been times in my life when I have not owned a vehicle specifically for the reason that I didn't want to pay insurance fuckers who are only trying to bilk me out of my cash for no return. Currently, I have made the decision to own a vehicle and carry insurance because it permits me to do the work that I want to. My decision.

      As far as medical services go, I don't use them. When I am ill, I don't run to the Dr. I take care of myself. When I have small injuries, I treat them myself. I have indeed refused medical service in the past when I've been in an automobile accident, exactly because I DIDN'T HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE. If, at some future time, I feel that I definitely need medical attention, I will seek out and find what I can afford, or else go without. That is my stand. That is my decision.

      But who the fuck are you to tell me how to prioritize? Fuck you, Jammer. Don't presume to tell me "that I'd better mean it" when I say I can't afford something, you little fucking pussy. Go crawl back down into that hole in your mommy's basement. no one here has missed you, except for maybe chunkycheese. Now go on, hurry and flag this response before anyone else gets to see it so you can continue to hide behind your little Aldous Huxley mask, you maggot.

      And please, don't bother responding to this because I won't waste any more of my valuable time on a little, twisted boy like you. We've been through this before.

    • 1 year ago
  • AldousHuxley
    • 0
      AldousHuxley [removed]  
    • blackheartman:

      You pay for internet because it's more important than your health? I don't know why you bother with congress's idea that fixing insurance solves the problem. getting rid of them solves the problem. Things are only expensive because the insurance company is the middle man. They are totally unnecessary. Keeping them and regulating them is like agreeing they are right to exist.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptB
    • 0
      CaptB  
    • blackheartman:

      The portion of your comments that I do not agree with is you thinking you do not need health insurance. I will see you in the ER sooner or later. You ARE the reason are health insurance is out of control. We have to admit you to the hospital because we have an ethical responsibility to take care of you, regardless of your income. So you will cost the economy more money in the end because of your hubris (pride).

      We have to change something, and I agree with Obama, we should provide you with some form of healthcare, and yes, you are going to have to pay something into it. Because sooner or later you are going to cost us more with your visits to the ER. Heart attack, NASCAR related drunken incident, lawnmower racing, diabetes, kidney failure, liver cancer. It happens to us all. Hence our increasing health cost.

    • 1 year ago
  • blackheartman
    • 0
      blackheartman  
    • CaptB:

      1) As I stated before, I pay for what I use. If I can't afford something I make a different plan. You don't know me, you don't know my lifestyle, you don't know how I treat my body and you especially don't know my interaction history with the medical establishment. Speaking of hubris, don't tell me what I WILL DO if and/or when a major illness or injury befalls me. Or do you propose some sort of "medical police" who will come and drag me out of my bed to force me into a hospital?

      2) If my government is going to force me to throw my cash into the pot for the common good, fine and well. I pay my taxes. I'm not one of these Grover Norquist, drown-the-government yahoos. But don't force me to give my hard-earned cash to some private fuck who already makes way more money than he/she should and who only works to deny me any return on my investment. Fuck that, if you want me to act for the common good, then my money better damn well go to the commons and not some rich bastard's pocket.

      3) Are you trying to tar me as some right-wing, tea-bagging goof with your references to Nascar, drunkenness and lawnmower racing? That's one big problem with the DLC crowd who support this lame bill, you just can't get over the fact that many of us on the left think it's trash,too. If the dems wanted backing from those of us who are truly on the left, they should have just rammed medicare E down the repugs throats. But no, they also sold out to big insurance, big pharma and the hospitals just like the old boss.

      4) I've made this argument twice on current and I hate to repeat it again. Don't try to sell me something by saying that we'll "tweak it" later. Congress lies out of their asses every day. I do not trust them. Obama is a misleading bastard as well. You would never purchase a broken item from a salesman, even if he really promised to come back and fix it in a week. Why would you trust the salesman? Why would you purchase a broken item? There is no reason whatsoever why we can't drop this and come back with a proposal for medicare E. Don't give me that 60 vote bullshit, don't give me any blue dog bullshit, if you want me to support a healthcare bill then just quit fucking around and do it.

    • 1 year ago
  • BriKi
    • +1
      BriKi  
    • blackheartman:

      1. The legislation will not allow the insurance company to deny your claims anymore.
      2. They want everyone to have health insurance because uninsured people have been going to emergency rooms, instead of clinics, for non-emergency treatment. This has had two effects: There are now long wait times at emergency rooms, and the taxpayers are footing the bill, not the people who are using the service.
      3. If you can't afford health insurance, there is a fairly good chance you can go on Medicare. If you can't afford it, but the government denies you medicare, the new legislation provides a tax credit for having health insurance.

      I hope this has made you a little more confident in the bill.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • AldousHuxley
  • blackheartman
  • JonRaymond
    • +2
      JonRaymond  
    • Doesn't matter. If it fails the economy will worsen to the point where this will have to be revisited. If it passes it won't be nearly good enough and again it will have to be revisited. Either way, we are headed for a single payer system (Medicare for all) or else America will fall, and it may fall anyway. Better brush up on your Chinese.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • CaptSutter
    • +1
      CaptSutter  
    • JonRaymond:

      Well anything will be better than what you have, that is for sure.

      But one thing that just doesn't sink in to the American psyche is that there is no magic bullet. Health care will still be a cost. It is a big deal year after year tweaking the system and it even get more press and more real debate than even our participation in your war in Afghanistan.

      You guys will finally regain your sanity when you spend more time and treasure on schools and health care than on your military.

    • 1 year ago
  • BarrytheblessedSocialist
  • courage
    • -3
      courage  
    • LOOK at california it is broke it has been liberal forever look at new orleans it was liberal for ever they never fixed there levies so they got waxed butt thats ok just blame Bush the list goes on every where liberals rule you see bankrupcy and dispare detroit liberals newyork liberals that is where voting democrat is taking the country

    • 1 year ago
  • BriKi
    • 0
      BriKi  
    • courage:

      the issue with new orleans was corruption, not liberalism as you claim. Logically, a more liberal system would raise taxes and then spend that money on the levies. The levies broke from disrepair, caused by lack of money and/or attention, a problem that would've likely been exacerbated by the lower taxes a conservative government would have had.

    • 1 year ago
  • courage
    • -1
      courage  
    • Dont worry Obama will get a few more signed up for the mile high club like Kucinich and wala goverment owns 20 percent of the economy.A few bribes here a couple of threats there maybe we will withhold water rights from your farmers in california unless you find the courage to vote for obama care.Whats in it Mr President ?Shut up scum it will be great it will create 150 new goverment beuracracies and 12000 new IRS agents to keep a eye on the slaves.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • JonRaymond
  • CaptSutter
  • GodsnLiberals
  • JonRaymond
  • JonRaymond
  • CaptSutter
    • +1
      CaptSutter  
    • JonRaymond:

      This waiting list crap is exactly that, it is the rich saying that they deserve to live and the poor deserve to die.
      The crazy thing is they really believe in the "deserve to die".

    • 1 year ago
  • chinese_democracy
  • JonRaymond
  • BarrytheblessedSocialist
  • Tyr
    • -1
      Tyr  
    • BarrytheblessedSocialist:

      I always find it interesting when individuals who have not achieved anywhere even close to approaching the level of success or ability to influence that someone like Nancy Pelosi has achieved...yet feel qualified to post ridiculously photo shopped pictures of her as if that has some effect...you remind me of some kid 10 or maybe 11 years old drawing faces of the school principle with horns or a mustache...all it does is broadcast how impotent you are in the arena of politics.

    • 1 year ago
  • BarrytheblessedSocialist
    • -1
      BarrytheblessedSocialist [removed]  
    • Tyr:

      That’s actually her real photo right after she got her Botox injections in her lips. You are probably not accustomed to seeing her like this, because you are used to seeing Nancy Pelozi in nicely posed, airbrushed photos in TIME magazine.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptB
  • JonRaymond
  • Tyr
  • CaptSutter
    • +1
      CaptSutter  
    • JonRaymond:

      Anonymity has it's place but definitely should not be abused as a shield for name calling.

      My moniker as an homage to Johannes Sutter and shield not to protect me but to make my boss doesn't get associated with my politics. I am certain that if the NSA wants to know who is behind this moniker they already know.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptSutter
    • 0
      CaptSutter  
    • BarrytheblessedSocialist:

      There are many honorable reasons to use a moniker, but if you wear a mask as you throw bricks then you are just common thug.

      I am certain you can come up with some real reasons why you disagree with Nancy and god forbid maybe even the novel solution to all of our health care problems. Why waste your time with non sequitur jpegs?

    • 1 year ago
  • NotFooled
    • -1
      NotFooled  
    • They don't have the MOST important votes for it, and that is the votes of " We the People . . .". There will be hell to pay for forcing something on people who don't want it. Our forefathers revolted for far less.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptB
    • +1
      CaptB  
    • NotFooled:

      So I am gleaning that you are speaking for the majority of Americans? Do you have healthcare? Do you make more than $50,000 a year? I propose that we do something socially responsible and help the poor and needy, and not the smug and greedy.

      Hint, the smug and greedy are the wealthy republicans.

    • 1 year ago
  • NotFooled
    • -1
      NotFooled  
    • CaptB:

      No, I do not have health insurance. I work 3 jobs, 2 are full time and I can not afford higher prices and higher taxes. It is no one else's responsibility to provide anything to me, but the opportunity to make a living, not take it away.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptSutter
    • +1
      CaptSutter  
    • NotFooled:

      Ok you don't have health insurance. And what will happen when as you cross the street someday and are hit by a car or a bus or what ever, what do you expect will happen and who will bear the cost? Should we leaving you bleeding on the side of the road? Pick you up and give you a $2000 dollar ride to the hospital and plunk you down in an overpriced hospital bed until we figure you can't pay your bills?

      Or your heart attack on the way home from your third job? Same story somebody else picks up the bill for your irresponsibility.

      That will never happen to you right? You are are perfect and immortal just like my eighteen year old son.

      The whole point of health reform is that the way it is done now is too damned expensive and too wasteful.

      So the solutions left are make sure everyone is insured
      or
      Provide national health care, no insurance
      or
      Spend money on ER care after its too late to for the cheap solution, like cut out the cancer before it grows too big, change the diet before diabetes sets in, clean the wound or take antibiotics before you have to amputate the leg.

      You just don't understand that by not thinking about tomorrow you are stealing from everyone else.

    • 1 year ago
  • AldousHuxley
  • NotFooled
  • harleyblueswoman
    • +1
      harleyblueswoman  
    • FACT: Nothing in the Democrats’ health insurance reform reduces Medicare benefits for seniors. The reform achieves savings by cracking down on inefficiency, fraud and waste in Medicare – targeted at private insurance companies and providers, not beneficiaries. These savings include cutting large and unnecessary overpayments to private insurance companies that offer Medicare Advantage plans. Rather than undermining Medicare, this bill strengthens Medicare. Much of the cost savings achieved are reinvested into Medicare – improving benefits and extending the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by nine years.

    • 1 year ago
  • blackheartman
  • asherp
  • harleyblueswoman
    • 0
      harleyblueswoman  
    • Nation’s Leading Economists Urge Congress To Pass Health Insurance Reform
      March 11th, 2010 by Karina
      In a letter sent this morning to President Obama and Congress, 41 of the nation’s leading economists – including three winners of the Nobel Prize – urge the swift passage of comprehensive health reform before Congress to slow ‘unsustainable’ health care spending:

      …Without effective reform of the way we pay for health care, growth of health care spending will create unsustainable fiscal burdens, eat into cash compensation, perpetuate waste, and undermine the prospects for universal access to needed care.

      The health care reforms passed by the House and Senate – with recent modifications proposed by President Obama – include serious measures that will slow the growth of health care spending…

      Taken together, these measures are a serious, multi-faceted initiative to improve the quality and efficiency of American medical care, rein in the fastest growing portion of government and private budgets and provide a valuable platform for future cost-control efforts. If this nation is committed to cost containment and deficit reduction we must pass health care reform. If this legislation fails, the chances of reducing the growth of health care spending in the future will be greatly reduced.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptB
  • harleyblueswoman
    • 0
      harleyblueswoman  
    • I hope it passes and all things good come from it!! Get r done!!!
      CUTS THE DEFICIT Cuts the deficit by $130 billion in the first ten years (2010 – 2019). Cuts the deficit by $1.2 trillion in the second ten years.

      REINS IN WASTEFUL MEDICARE COSTS AND EXTENDS THE SOLVENCY OF MEDICARE; CLOSES THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG DONUT HOLE Reduces annual growth in Medicare expenditures by 1.4 percentage points per year—while improving benefits and lowering costs for seniors. Extends Medicare’s solvency by at least 9 years.

      EXPANDS AND IMPROVES HEALTH COVERAGE FOR MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES Expands health insurance coverage to 32 million Americans Helps guarantee that 95 percent of Americans will be covered.

      IS FULLY PAID FOR Is fully paid for – costs $940 billion over a decade. (Americans spend nearly $2.5 trillion each year on health care now and nearly two-thirds of the bill’s cost is paid for by reducing health care costs).

    • 1 year ago
  • Tyr
  • QuinlanT
  • courage
  • CaptB
    • 0
      CaptB  
    • QuinlanT:

      So you are advocating that the privatized insurance companies continue to dictate our healthcare needs? Based on our best interest or their bottom line profit margin?

      I propose that the healthcare bill will help 30 million Americans that do not have healthcare. That the insurance companies will not be allowed to cancel insurance on people at will. Or deny people for pre-existing conditions.

      I think the Govt will do a better job than the fat and greedy Insurance companies.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptB
  • CaptB
  • medHead
  • medHead
    • +1
      medHead  
    • It's all a joke and waste of time, lets just divide the country up and waste time and money on BS. Let.s forget unemployment, DumbAsses trying to blow up shit, foreign debt, housing crisis, not to mention shit others can help me produce for you!

    • 1 year ago
  • blackheartman
    • +3
      blackheartman  
    • Well, Dennis let us down. After his caving it seems like it's all sliding down hill...meaning it will probably pass. I thought that he understood that it would be wrong morally and constitutionally for the government to compel people by force of law to patronize a private industry. How anyone can call it anything other than EXTORTION money paid to the insurance cartel under force from their thug enforcers, the US government is beyond me. These scumbag vampires will never get a penny from me.

      Now I'm no loony right-winger and I'm not a teabagger. Believe me, I'm a lefty and always have been. But right now this healthcare bill fight has turned into nothing more than political party strategy management. The repugs don't want it to pass because A) They don't want the dems to have any successes on their record, especially a big one like overhauling the health insurance industry, and B) they don't want Obama to succeed at anything period. But the dems want it to pass for the exact opposing reasons. Most of them know this is not a good bill. They only want it to pass because a failure, they think, will hurt them politically. However misguided that approach may be, they think it will keep them in power for years to come. Even further, and much more disappointing to me, I think that Obama even realizes that this is a bad bill, he's made so many compromises and not represented the people fairly in his deals made with big industry. But he wants the historical record to show him as the man who saved healthcare in the US. I don't see how this bill will accomplish that at all.

      Obama let us down, Kucinich let us down, the dems are letting us down. All they can offer us is more fear and blackmail: "If we don't pass this "first step" now, the republicans will be back in power, ooooh. You don't want that do you? See, you have to back us regardless. But don't worry, we'll fix it later, wink, wink."

      And believe me, I DON'T want the repugs back in power, but I don't like being blackmailed either. From now on, it's third party for me all the way. The next couple of elections will be very interesting

    • 1 year ago
more from Community:

top videos