Community | March 18, 2010 | 3 comments

World votes to continue trading in species on verge of extinction

Image
jefftego
Their sheer size and strength have made them among the most celebrated of endangered species, yet they have all been betrayed — by vested interests at a UN meeting on wildlife protection.

Proposals to ban trade in bluefin tuna and polar bears were overwhelmingly rejected yesterday at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites), meeting in Doha, Qatar.

A plan for a 20-year ban on ivory sales, to protect African elephants, is also likely to fail in the coming days — partly because Britain and other members of the EU are refusing to support it. Delegates are instead expected to approve a weak compromise, which would encourage poaching by allowing the sale of ivory being stored by several African nations.

Feelings were running high yesterday about the failure of measures to protect endangered tuna. Only 20 of the 120 countries at the meeting voted to ban trade in the bluefin. Intensive lobbying by Japan, which consumes 80 per cent of Atlantic and Mediterranean bluefin, meant that a snap vote was held before any debate on scientific reports that show a catastrophic decline in the largest of the tuna family.

Campaigners reacted with dismay. Oliver Knowles, of Greenpeace, said: “It is an own goal by Japan. By pushing for a few more years of this luxury product it has put the future of bluefin, and the future of its own supply, at serious risk. The abject failure of governments here at Cites to protect Atlantic bluefin tuna spells disaster for its future, and sets the species on a pathway to extinction.”

The Cites process, which requires a two-thirds majority for a proposal to be adopted, is vulnerable to well-funded lobbying by countries and industries that depend on trade in a species. The vested interests exploit uncertainties in the estimates of population numbers, and strike backroom deals to secure the votes of developing countries where endangered species are far down the list of political priorities.

A US proposal to protect polar bears fell victim to arguments put forward by Inuit groups that their livelihoods depended on hunting the animals. The vote on protecting elephants is due on Monday, and is viewed by wildlife groups as the last opportunity to protect many of Africa’s most threatened herds.

The few remaining elephants in Sierra Leone were killed in October by poachers serving the thriving black market in ivory, which fetches up to $1,500 (£980) a kilo in the Far East. In the Zakouma National Park in Chad, poaching has cut the population from 3,885 in 2006 to only 617 last year. The number of elephants lost to poaching in Kenya has quadrupled in the past two years. Kenya is one of seven African nations proposing a 20-year moratorium on sales of stockpiled ivory.

read more at article
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Veganism,   Animal Rights
  2. tags:
    United Nations Extinction endangered species Elephants 4 more
  3.     
    |

3 comments // World votes to continue trading in species on verge of extinction

  • captainplanet71
    • 0
      captainplanet71  
    • Hasn't Africa had enough disastrous resource extraction -- from people (slaves) to mining (dirty diamonds) to endangered species (list goes on and on)?

      The UN needs to support African countries who want a moratorium or ban on the ivory trade -- "Kenya is one of seven African nations proposing a 20-year moratorium on sales of stockpiled ivory."

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • jefftego
    • +3
      jefftego  
    • This is sad how so many governments continue to vote for short term profits at the expense of the long term health of our environment. In addition to the polar bears, elephants and bluefin tuna, the UN also voted down protections for sharks. China and Japan both lobbied that there is no evidence that sharks are in danger.

    • 1 year ago
more from Community:

top videos