Community | March 20, 2010 | 41 comments

Police officers banned from asking for 'Christian' names

Image
stupidy
Police officers have been banned from asking for a person’s “Christian” name because it might offend people with other religious beliefs.

Officers taking down a suspect’s particulars must now ask them for a “personal and family name” in case the word “Christian” offends Muslims, Sikhs or other faiths, according to the new official guidance.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7472046/Police-officers-banned-from...
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Current Tonight,   World News,   2 more
  2. tags:
    Religion Police
  3.     
    |

41 comments // Police officers banned from asking for 'Christian' names

  • MoxieDynamite
    • +1
      MoxieDynamite  
    • This makes perfect sense. The little summary and the article itself (from a conservative UK newspaper) are misleading. Police have handbooks with protocol and guidelines, it's silly to say a practice was "banned". Maybe the phrase, and things in general, are different in the UK, but in the US we are used to Miranda rights and the pre-written scripts that the police use when arresting and ticketing people. If you look at the article, they are also advised not to use the term "gang rape." I'm glad to know that if I'm assaulted in the UK, I don't have to put up with grotesque, harassing terms from the people whose job it is to help me get justice from the sociopaths that attacked me.

      Personally, I've never heard a person in real life ask about a "Christian name," other than a school production of "The Importance of Being Earnest." The phrase assumes that the person has been christened or baptized, anyway. So, it wouldn't even be appropriate for some heavily religious Christian people, like Amish teenagers.

    • 1 year ago
  • EtVoila
    • 0
      EtVoila  
    • I've read it in my collection of classics but I didn't know they still used the term 'Christian name'. Even if asked for my 'Christian name', I wouldn't be offended by it even though it would be a bit funny. Why not ask for my atheist name or my Wiccan name or perhaps, my scientologist name? Amusing, yes. Offensive, no.

    • 1 year ago
  • torres_tn
    • 0
      torres_tn  
    • It does make more sense to just say your personal name or what have you, but to ban officers from saying Christian name is absurd. Is it a human right to not be offended?

    • 1 year ago
  • ScottSummers
  • donkeyfly69
    • 0
      donkeyfly69  
    • ScottSummers:

      that's a difference between legal name and nicknames. i have friends who have american nicknames that they use in day to day life and chinese legal names that they use at home. then there are some that have american legal names and chinese nicknames that their family call them. a "christian name" (a name "given" to one at christening) could be either of those.

      this is about first/given vs. last name/surname, not legal vs. nickname.

    • 1 year ago
  • BIGDADDYMELVIN
  • donkeyfly69
  • Found_Avenue
  • 2damax
    • +3
      2damax  
    • what wrong with "what's your name?" too non-theocrical?? the same as saying "what is your non-religious name?" gimme a break.
      FUCK those who are offended when asked for their non-delusional name :D.

    • 1 year ago
  • CalgarC
  • BIGDADDYMELVIN
  • donkeyfly69
  • courage
    • -3
      courage  
    • im so sick of people being offended youd think people commiting suicide murders in your religions name would offend more people

    • 1 year ago
  • donkeyfly69
  • corndog67
  • Introspective
    • -2
      Introspective  
    • the only ones offended by this r those freakin muslims...juz another ploy by them to continuosly degrade uk laws!...unfortunately its working thx to the pc crazies!

    • 1 year ago
  • donkeyfly69
  • Introspective
  • donkeyfly69
  • Introspective
  • donkeyfly69
    • 0
      donkeyfly69  
    • i'm not sure anyone actually read the article but some of the guidelines are completely ridiculous:

      "The guidelines warn that officers should not comfort people by “putting their arm around them” as it could be seen as “unprofessional”.

      They also state that the term “mixed race” should be replaced by “mixed parentage” or “mixed cultural heritage”.

      Scotland Yard instructing officers not to use the phrase “gang rape” to describe such crimes because the term is too “emotive”. Sex attacks that involve more than one culprit are referred to as “multi-perpetrator rapes” instead.

      officers in Warwickshire had been warned not to say "Evenin' all" – the phrase made famous by television show Dixon of Dock Green – because it could confuse people of “different cultural backgrounds” as to the time of day.

      Other words now discouraged include, "businessman'', "housewives'' and "child'', all of which organisations argue have negative connotations."

      i think it's completely ridiculous to call someone's first name a "christian name". i thought they called it a given name across the pond.

      but the others are completely ridiculous

    • 1 year ago
  • MoonLoon
  • crispyfritters
    • 0
      crispyfritters  
    • No one even knows what a christian name is anymore. That alone is reason enough to change the wording. Also, unimatrix0 is right -- I'm American, and I don't think I've ever been asked for my "Christian" name.

    • 1 year ago
  • Elligirl
    • 0
      Elligirl  
    • It's an old turn of phrase that no longer applies to a more diverse society. I used to think the "christian" name was my surname, until I was corrected. Just say First, Middle, and Last Name like all the government forms. That works just fine.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptB
    • -1
      CaptB  
    • I don't know if the police were trying to get the citizens to tell them the names on their identification cards, drivers licenses, or passport. I can only assume they said, "Christian Names" in reference to their legal names. Cashes Clay changed his name to Muhammad Ali at some point. I wonder if they were trying to figure out their legal names?

    • 1 year ago
  • MoxieDynamite
  • donkeyfly69
    • 0
      donkeyfly69  
    • CaptB:

      if cassius clay changed his name to muhammad ali, then his "christian name" would be muhammad, not cassius.

      when they ask for christian name they are asking for the first name; not a legal name as opposed to a nickname.

    • 1 year ago
  • CaptB
    • 0
      CaptB  
    • donkeyfly69:

      I guess it would be akin to asking, "what is your slave name to someone in the 60's". Because they are asking Muslims their christian name. That would piss me off, I can see how the police try to incite violence so they can get in a fight.

    • 1 year ago
  • donkeyfly69
    • 0
      donkeyfly69  
    • CaptB:

      "I guess it would be akin to asking, "what is your slave name to someone in the 60's""

      that would be different too. you would only ask for a "slave name" to blacks. they aren't just asking muslims for their "christian name" they are asking everyone; muslims, christians, athiests, pagans.

    • 1 year ago
  • unimatrix0
    • +1
      unimatrix0  
    • This is an issue for the British, and their often peculiar use of the language; American usage does not present a similar problem.

    • 1 year ago
  • GMGVFilm
  • torres_tn
  • irie_ojo
  • timetide
    • +2
      timetide  
    • how often does this problem come up? I've spoken with many law enforcement members over the years and neve have they asked me for my christian name. I didn't know i had one. is it special like a secret name or something?

    • 1 year ago
  • da100thmonkey
    • 0
      da100thmonkey  
    • pc gone nuts - its a terminology.
      I'm not Christian (cant say what I am, burning stakes are not a happy memory!)
      but do get it that in England that word is used for 'forename'.
      Language is constantly changing, which is cool (else we'ld be stuck with words like 'cool' forever) but don't have to be taking a fence about it.

    • 1 year ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +3
      UtopianSky  
    • Why would they ever say "Christian name" anyway?
      That's an archaic term.
      Most people say first name, last name.

      So yes- officers and other public officials should not use archaic bigoted expressions when speaking to the general public.

    • 1 year ago
  • Andrew_Douglas
  • sk0j0
  • Brandon_Fields
  • sk0j0
    • 0
      sk0j0  
    • Brandon_Fields:

      Whoa, I should totally stop commenting right when I wake up (7am before coffee). You're right. I just didn't see the point of the restriction. It seems more like a turn of phrase, not something to get riled over.

    • 1 year ago
  • desertcat
more from Community:

top videos