Community | March 20, 2010 | 324 comments

Is The Bible More Violent Than The Quran?

Image
Vierotchka
Excerpt:

"Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible," Jenkins says.

Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books dealing with the issue: the recently published Jesus Wars, and Dark Passages, which has not been published but is already drawing controversy.

Violence in the Quran, he and others say, is largely a defense against attack.

"By the standards of the time, which is the 7th century A.D., the laws of war that are laid down by the Quran are actually reasonably humane," he says. "Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find something that is for many people a real surprise. There is a specific kind of warfare laid down in the Bible which we can only call genocide."

______________________________________________

The second article on that same web page, "Excerpt: 'Jesus Wars'", is also very interesting and enlightening.

"Jesus Wars: How Four Patriarchs, Three Queens, and Two Emperors Decided What Christians Would Believe for the Next 1,500 Years"


Click on the link to access the whole lot.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Religion,   Humanism,   books,   1 more
  2. tags:
    Culture Science War Terrorism 20 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

324 comments // Is The Bible More Violent Than The Quran?

  • 02
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • I see no point in a pissing contest to see which holy book is more or less violent.

      Both have been, are, and continue to be sources of oppression, misery and atrocity.

      Like all religious excrement, they stink.

    • 2 years ago
  • RalphWaldoEmerson
  • 02
  • unimatrix0
  • crystalman
  • crystalman
  • Uelthomas
    • 0
      Uelthomas  
    • I would become my own god and defy so called laws of physics, learn to fly, then travel faster than light by tearing through reality itself and explore the universe. Almost like Leonardo Da Vinci would do if he was born around now. If noone tells us what to believe then anything is possible.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • Uelthomas:

      Leanardo was able to express himself because he had some money available to him.
      We have a different society now. The small steal and inhibit progress.

      But he did draw pictures. Mostly mechanical devices.

    • 2 years ago
  • JosephJinx
    • 0
      JosephJinx  
    • "Violence in the Quran, he and others say, is largely a defense against attack."

      Well, this would make quite a bit of sense, now, wouldn't it?

    • 2 years ago
  • nursediesel
    • +5
      nursediesel  
    • Why can't we be adults and agree to allow individuals to decide what they, themselves want to believe in? Both books are violent, violence unfortunately exists.

    • 2 years ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +2
      UtopianSky  
    • nursediesel:

      The problem is most people don't decide what to believe in- they just believe what their parents believe, and what their cultural background believes.

      Putting out info like this is good, so people will learn to examine their beliefs intelligently, based on facts.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
  • 02
    • +2
      02  
    • What would you accomplish and come to in your life - if you weren't bogged down with religion?

      If you were just plain free - what would you do - with all that extra, freed up brain capacity?

    • 2 years ago
  • Viciouspike
    • -1
      Viciouspike  
    • 02:

      So you are saying get rid of religion because it rots the brain?
      Yes of course Einstein was not a Jew at all. Besides that this has to be one of the most ignorant things I have read this year.
      The mind can expand and grasp as much information as it is fed. Attack religion all you want just do not be stupid on your approach.
      While I am on this I might as well add that I believe in God yet I am well on my way to getting a degree in civil engineering. So am I stupid for believing in God? If so, you might want to go read and expand your own knowledge before you begin criticizing people for their beliefs.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
    • +1
      02  
    • Viciouspike:

      It's like saying you're a good lover even though you have a chess game on your ipod.

      More importantly, as you study this life we have, you'll find you are in a universe - that is the very thing you have been hoping to know with your belief in God - only you'll find you have more information than everyone who ever dreampt up the notions placed for their "God"

      You know more. You will begin to acknowledge that the billions of galaxies and the trillions of stars -that you can see are the flesh of any God you were so fervently believing in- so out-weigh in preponderance the little cartoon visions you had been entertaining, that you, yourself could design several equally viable and equally absurd religions to match in veracity those that been taught and believed in by all the millions and millions of unfortunates who threw their lives away believing in them.

      In order words, you will soon see that the "God" that is taught and hoped for - is a complete fabrication and does not amount to anything when compared to what you can understand about the Universe.

      The earnest writers and creators of these religions, simply did not have, remotely the information that is now available - or they would have written things differently.

      Now, this means you're going to have to look at what you know and can come to know about the Universe - because it makes human thoughts and histories really stupid little abstracts. Beyond stupid.

      But know this: you'll be better and happier for it.

    • 2 years ago
  • tommic
    • +4
      tommic  
    • If all religions could just follow a common tennent of tolorance things would be better but that is not the case, history shows religion fosters intolorance and in bad economic times even more, many times looking to place blame. Jews, Kurds,Pagans through history there has always been a scapegoat for religious ferver to exploit and destroy. Religion breeds intolorance, intolorance breeds hate, hate to violence. Religion is bad. Spirituality is fine but organized religion with its intolorance and need for money to exist is a joke.

    • 2 years ago
  • occhipij
  • unimatrix0
  • tommic
    • 0
      tommic  
    • occhipij:

      in your opinion, I am not intolorant o fpeople who practice religion, I do not talk about it with them unless they start the conversation. History speaks for itself regarding religion, I have no more need to defend my statement other than that.

    • 2 years ago
  • UtopianSky
    • +2
      UtopianSky  
    • occhipij:

      First: yes, there religions that advocate good things, and religions that advocate bad things. The end results of religion are not always bad.

      But the core mentality of religion is always bad- the concept of having blind faith in something with absolutely no proof whatsoever. It is ignorance raised to a virtue.

      If you don't know something you don't know it- period.
      To claim that is a fundamentalist stance or closed-minded is completely ridiculous.

      It is the ultimate example of an open mind to admit that there are things you don't know, without having to make something up to fill the void, and cling to that made up thing blindly.

      Second: no, "secular states" have never been responsible for atrocities. Bloodthirsty, power hungry dictators have been.

      Blaming Stalin's actions on the lack of religion is like blaming Hitler's actions on having a tiny mustache.

    • 2 years ago
  • fun_size
    • 0
      fun_size  
    • tommic:

      Religion does breed intolerance absolutely. Its tough to deal with people who believe that by having faith in one ancient book over another makes them superior to you. Every organized religions tells its followers it is the "only Truth" and that any who dont believe are heathens and should be either killed or converted.

      Personally i feel that organized religion as a whole is a sham to put power and money into the hands of the few. But it isnt necessarily bad... it just lends itself to be twisted into something so evil and corrupt that people ignore the good morals the stories are supposed to teach in the first place.

    • 2 years ago
  • unimatrix0
    • +2
      unimatrix0  
    • occhipij:

      your critique of tommic involves 2 fallacies:

      1) ad hominem - you make an unnecessary personal attack with your name calling

      2) red herring - the fact that atrocities were committed for other reasons than religious has no bearing on the fact that religion was, is and continues to be the source of so much violence, misery and atrocity.

      just trying to keep it real little buddy - looks like you are just another pea in a pod as well

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • occhipij:

      Religion is made up of 'people' - it's 100% those people. It is nothing without them. tommic words are good - and wholly truthful and wholly reflective of reality.

    • 2 years ago
301 - 324 of 324
more from Community:

top videos