Community | March 23, 2010 | 60 comments

Google: China Retaliates

Image
ampersand
China has begun retaliation against Google for embarrassing it by withdrawing censorship from its web search engine. China blocked access to Google's uncensored web site in Hong Kong, blocked users searches in China, and had a China mobile phone company abandon plans to use Google as a search engine.
So the war begins...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/24/technology/24google.html?hp
  1. groups:
    Community,   Technology,   WebCrawler,   Big Business
  2. tags:
    China Google Censorship
  3.     
    |

60 comments // Google: China Retaliates

  • pddd
    • +2
      pddd  
    • I agree with Chinese government. Google has no business disobeying the great Chinese government. Chinese people still need a parenting government who tell them what to do and what not to do. They are not yet responsible people to be given such freedom. China definitely doesn't want its citizens to have westerners' savage ideas - like freedom of press and expression. It is in their best interest to have daddy government tell them what to do and occasional whipping is just a tough love.

    • 2 years ago
  • 2hellnwait
  • UtopianSky
    • 0
      UtopianSky  
    • 2hellnwait:

      No such thing is "emerging" in the US.

      I understand why you think it is- since you have FOX News, a big daddy parenting TV channel telling you what to think. And they told you all kinds of paranoid fears and delusions to keep you up at night, and keep you watching them.

      ... if you like freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, then thank a Liberal. It's those Liberal ideals that this nation was founded on.

      If you want a totalitarian regime where everyone is forced to think alike and all opposition is silenced, take a look at the agenda of the radical right.

      In other words, reality is exactly the opposite of what you have been told.

    • 2 years ago
  • Stradius
  • UtopianSky
    • 0
      UtopianSky  
    • Is it possible for people in China to use proxy servers in other countries to access uncensored content?

      If they can, then I bet most of them are.

    • 2 years ago
  • DRudeBoy
  • DRudeBoy
    • 0
      DRudeBoy  
    • I admire google for such a move, but if you want to change China, shaming it isn't the way. NGOs and our government only have positive results in China when they approach the leaders with respect and candidness.

    • 2 years ago
  • ampersand
    • 0
      ampersand  
    • midsummerman,
      Don't fault yourself for imagination. I like the visual concept of a fractal pattern of human growth you allude to. "Divine" of course, I myself would generally omit as a modifier, except as a metaphor. Our religious past has some fine descriptions of human conditions I hope we don't lose altogether. "State of grace" is a wonderful one in particular.

    • 2 years ago
  • midsummerman
    • -1
      midsummerman  
    • This is all so very interesting with the way our economies are intertwined - and that our cultures and governments are using such dramatically contrasting methods for controlling and manipulating the populace. Who's more effective do you suppose?
      Does entropy nessecitate an eventual levelling of the earthly "standard of living" playing field? Or maybe there is some sort of Divine fractal pattern that can chart growth or "free will" in the unfolding of our new Global Community. I'm being silly and getting a little out there, I know.

    • 2 years ago
  • ampersand
    • 0
      ampersand  
    • Dershope,
      I expect you really didn't really mean to say that Google "is an arm of the NSA." As the title and article in the Washington Post you cited makes clear that Google went to the NSA to get help on the Chinese cyber-attack on their proprietary data systems.
      That attack, which amounts to economic espionage (and perhaps the old fashioned kind, given that the Chinese government was quite likely behind it) is the sort of thing the NSA should be eager to help with, notwithstanding the current usefulness of Google to the U.S. and any projected business with the U.S. government.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nephwrack
  • MoonLoon
  • bking74
    • +1
      bking74  
    • Sure over a period of time China will not be able to completely stop the flow of information but just how much of a difference does this make on China's Domestic policy?

    • 2 years ago
  • passjay
  • Headiesofstate
    • +1
      Headiesofstate  
    • China is powerful, but not a positive power. I am glad that a company as free thinking as Google has put their mighty virtual foot down on China's Internet censorship. You can't censor a World Wide Web. We are no longer individual's or individual states or countries in cyber space. The boarders are no longer valid between computers connected by one almighty internet. The Chinese government may be strong but freedom of information can not be stopped! Their efforts to block free flowing information will only weaken China over time. As always the truth will set them free. Now if only Google could FREE TIBET!!!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • dershope
  • hombre76
  • JonRaymond
  • hombre76
    • 0
      hombre76  
    • dershope:

      One more time with heart FUCK China's version of communism, ie totalitarian regime and their demands that we capitulate to their unjust treatment of 1/3 of this world population. All so we can make a buck? The President said that human rights are not American rights only and then there are a second set of rules we follow for china. you sound like the appeasers of Nazi expansion with that kind of talk.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nephwrack
  • dershope
  • dershope
  • DRudeBoy
  • CalgarC
    • +1
      CalgarC  
    • lol china is fucked! if your gonna pick a fight with someone don't pick it with... i don't think i can find a word big enough to describe google...

    • 2 years ago
  • remanns
  • Almibry
  • hombre76
  • remanns
  • CalgarC
  • donkeyfly69
  • hombre76
  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • I wonder what this means to Hong Kong's relationship with the Chinese? China has been claiming ownership of that particular island since Hong Kong claimed they were a separate country, and I can't imagine China being too happy about their little renegade island giving 'em the finger.

    • 2 years ago
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • Almibry:

      Your thinking of Taipei on the island of Formosa/Taiwan. Hong Kong is on the mainland and was turned over by the Brits.

      Nope. I take it back- its an island as well. Oops.

      Nope. Amending that again,....It is an island AND part of the mainland.

    • 2 years ago
  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • remanns:

      "The territory was settled by Han Chinese during the seventh century, A.D., evidenced by the discovery of an ancient tomb at Lei Cheung Uk in Kowloon. The first major migration from northern China to Hong Kong occurred during the Sung Dynasty (960-1279). The British East India Company made the first successful sea venture to China in 1699, and Hong Kong's trade with British merchants developed rapidly soon after. After the Chinese defeat in the First Opium War (1839-42), Hong Kong was ceded to Britain in 1842 under the Treaty of Nanking. Britain was granted a perpetual lease on the Kowloon Peninsula under the 1860 Convention of Beijing, which formally ended hostilities in the Second Opium War (1856-58). The United Kingdom, concerned that Hong Kong could not be defended unless surrounding areas also were under British control, executed a 99-year lease of the New Territories in 1898, significantly expanding the size of the Hong Kong colony.
      On July 1, 1997, China resumed the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong, ending more than 150 years of British colonial rule. Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China with a high degree of autonomy in all matters except foreign and defense affairs. According to the Sino-British Joint Declaration (1984) and the Basic Law, Hong Kong will retain its political, economic, and judicial systems and unique way of life for 50 years after reversion and will continue to participate in international agreements and organizations under the name, "Hong Kong, China."

      http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2747.htm

    • 2 years ago
  • Almibry
  • UrbanGypsy
    • +2
      UrbanGypsy  
    • Expected from the Chinese regime. What does it say about a government when it is afraid of people who think differently and who criticize it?

      They are not competent enough to challenge them as equals and they continue to treat the Chinese people as children who do not know what is good for them.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
  • ampersand
    • +6
      ampersand  
    • In regard to the comment about "only a matter of time" before the Chinese overthrow their oppressive government, I think the Economist has a fairly accurate view of the Faustian bargain the Chinese people have with their government. As long as the material goods keep flowing, the Chinese people who have suffered through previous generations of starvation westerners can't even imagine, will put up with massive pollution and curtailed liberties.
      The latter, by the way, not something they have every really experienced under any previous government in Chinese history.
      Although it is admittedly a very small sample, the current generation of mainland Chinese I've known here still privately admire Mao and have directly profited from the Maoist government. (Maybe that's why they could afford to make it to this coast.)
      It's an experience to see how uber-calculating the odd sample I've known close at hand. To my rather still rather naive western sense of things they exhibited an unplanetary rapaciousness when push comes to shove.
      The sort of thing, one imagines, that could have only emerged when your grandparents told you tales of fighting over a spoonful of rice; when your parents were either members of the only legal political party, or were publicly humiliated or killed; and when you had to compete with two hundred thousand other applicants for one seat to into college, and either win that seat, or be consigned to a life toxic and miserable beyond imagining.
      However, it isn't just the Chinese that chose a rice bowl over freedom. Wishful thinking aside, that is a more accurate description of the life choices of most humans, and most human societies.

    • 2 years ago
  • bking74
    • +1
      bking74  
    • ampersand:

      I have always been fascinated by modern China but have never found the time to really learn anything of significance. I have absolutely no idea how a communist country has the fastest and largest group of new millionaires and consumers of luxury goods. Yet there are still vast areas in the North that where people live in extreme poverty and ignorance.

    • 2 years ago
  • ampersand
    • +5
      ampersand  
    • bking74:

      China is communist in name only. Its evolved system is a form of totalitarian corporatism. Perhaps the worst of many possible worlds for human liberty and the environment but hell on wheels for getting things done.
      Let's pray this isn't the emerging model for the future of mankind.

    • 2 years ago
  • bking74
  • JonRaymond
    • +1
      JonRaymond  
    • bking74:

      This is what happens when America goes to war to stop something. That something bites us in the ass. Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.

      I suppose the real reason for Vietnam was to stop China's economic growth in it's tracks. Our imperialist Friedmanite warmonger oligarchs thought they might be able to control the world economically by force. Oops.

      By the same logic, I expect we'll pay the same price or worse to Muslims for your mindless indiscretions in following today's military warmonger morons.

      Nothing personal.

    • 2 years ago
  • bking74
    • 0
      bking74  
    • JonRaymond:

      Well, according to the latest news Obama is the Anti-Christ so that makes me one of the soldiers of hell. So I really don't have to worry about my morality now. Wonder if we will get cool new uniforms......but, in all seriousness I don't understand China's huge economic growth and who benefits from these profits. High Level Party Leaders? Private business men. I know I am ignorant as hell about this issue but I just can't seem to find the answers. China's political and economical system makes no sense to me.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nephwrack
  • DRudeBoy
  • bashirdr
    • +4
      bashirdr  
    • I love it. Google has the balls to do what the US won't. Namely, take a major hit in the name of righteousness.

      Google is already far and away the top search provider (sorry Bing, which actually means "disease" in Chinese), not to mention their free mobile app, google docs, chrome, and so on. If you aren't using Google's version of it, you aren't using the best. Now, the fact that they stand so strongly behind their ideal of unfettered access to information makes them nigh unstoppable.

      If only it didn't consume the energy contained in an acre of rainforest every time you did a search.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nephwrack
    • +1
      Nephwrack  
    • bashirdr:

      Obama just met with the Dali Lama not too long ago, and we're poised to sell 6.4 billion worth of weapons to Republic of Taiwan... i wouldnt say google is leading the charge.

    • 2 years ago
  • Maeveeo
  • pjacobs51
    • +3
      pjacobs51  
    • There are "cracks" in the great wall. For those with the inclination and money, the whole network of shutdown sites can be conjured up again through paid virtual private networks (VPN) which essentially allow them to tunnel through the great firewall at will.

    • 2 years ago
  • fun_size
    • +2
      fun_size  
    • Its only a matter of time before the Chinese decide to overthrow their current government. With the censorship and forced evacuations of millions of people to build dams and cities and the like im surprised that people arent up in arms yet. Not to mention the amount of people being poisoned daily by the terrible conditions in China. The Yangtze river is one of the most polluted waterways on earth. It would be amazing if Google was actually the straw that broke the camels back...

    • 2 years ago
  • Toughth
    • +1
      Toughth  
    • fun_size:

      Iminant Domain is the term used to dislocat thousands of land and home owners in the U.S. If a public or private major project needs the property you own the powers that be just throw what they say is fair market value in your face and tell you to move or give up your property. It can also happen that you own the land but don't own the mineral rights. If a corperation decides that they have to gety to the mineral wealth under your house they can bulldoze your home out of the way without warning.

    • 2 years ago
  • fun_size
  • Toughth
  • fun_size
    • 0
      fun_size  
    • Toughth:

      I do believe you are correct. We arent talking about 1930's America though are we? In modern China they dont care what you do so long as you get off the land without making a fuss.

    • 2 years ago
  • Almibry
  • fun_size
  • Toughth
    • 0
      Toughth  
    • fun_size:

      You are right we are not in the thirtys any more. instead it has to be a private corperation deciding that you should ot own your property any longer. like two years ago when the courts decided WalMart could just pay below market value for land so that they could build anouther Supercenter. All power bases have their abuses.

    • 2 years ago
  • ampersand
    • +3
      ampersand  
    • The small object on the Google sign is a bouquet of flowers brought by a grateful Chinese user.
      Google is of course in the right, but in my experience dealing with this particular generation of Chinese, that won't factor into what the Chinese government power clique see as their self interest, or their (usually massive) response.
      It will be a great current history lesson for us all to see how (and if) the people of China themselves can independently respond to this latest effort to continue to keep them constrained and voiceless.
      Sadly, I'd bet on the ones in power (with the guns) to come out on top again, but one never knows.
      History, involving human aspirations can be a trickster from time to time--at least temporarily.

    • 2 years ago
more from Community:

top videos