I am under the impression that "Ares_God_of_War" was none other than "tnerrucQUF" reincarnate from Current Heaven. Just a hunch! But then AGOW was also sent to the same avatar heaven or river of hell.

This whole thing of banning people has almost become a McCarthyite witch hunt. I'm just sitting back watching the whole comedic process.

A member gets banned, immediately joins under a new name, gets banned again, and the cycle continues. Is it really possible to ban anyone who is obsessed and determined?

i would say some people are scared of uncut watered down info i see and learn from different minds but some people looking for love or smut they get bored then leave to join somewhereelse also some sites do delete your acount after 30 days or whatever i tend not to rejoin with them any way bcause im not in front of the pc every day and night scott probably got bored and deleted his account

I also am surprised to see this still lingering on the main news page 3 days later!

Possibly everyone should step back and read the TOS agreement from Current and educate yourselves on website posting and creating posts. Current.Com can discontinue anyone's services at anytime for any reason it does not require a reason behind it. IF you had posted something they do not like or it does not fit the website criteria they can ban you for that or suspend your account, If you flame or cause conflict with other members they can suspend or ban you for that.

I have my own media networks and i have to ban people or suspend people on occasion as well so its nothing new coming from a website owner point of view, you want everyone to have a fun time on any website and enjoy the people they are around if there was no control the website would be over-taken by hackers, noobs and people who are just here to cause problems or cause fights with different stories. also some of these stories (like this one) is really not a story this is more of a blog and you should put this on your own website.

Why is this still here? While I agree that it is great to celebrate the demise of jammer and all his various incarnations, enough is enough already. We are only feeding the mental illness of this sadly deluded little fellow.

dude, I want to ban you just for posting this....... This certainly isn't news... stop posting this, and just start your own site......

Don't know much about Scott Summers, I only saw a very few of his posts. But in Current's defense, I must say, if they were banning people indiscrimantly because of their views, I would think I'd have been gone a long time ago. Plus, I curse, a lot. I've been called every name in the book on this site, some of them I even deserved, but I'm still here, so they can't be too intolerant. Or maybe I'm just comedy relief.

The very fact that this article is not only allowed to stay up but be in the top 10 leads me to believe that current doesn't just delete without reason. And those that say that conservatives are banned more than liberals, maybe I'm still wet behind the ear but I read A LOT of what I think are offensive conservative comments that go without censorship. I also read ridiculous comments by those that say they are liberal, but I just think sound like idiots that I wish wouldn't associate themselves with the ideology.

I don't love everything current does, no organization can be perfect, but I think they have far more integrity than our usual information outlets.

Magneto gained control of a whole island. How? By convincing the mutants that humans (all) wanted them dead. Facts did not matter to him, just as long as they trusted in him.

Notice the negative comments (Magneto like) and who they mostly agree with...then realize that they never liked JJ. So their opinions are under the influence of being a super villain....total lack of dignity and humanity.

Otherwise they would tell the truth...HI was ban becsuse of opinion and not because of rules or they would share their multiple email warnings and not hide thm like Mole Man or how Gambit does his sex partner count.

PLUS Current could never admit wrong. They are as bad with that as Emma. Shhh don't tell her that.

How long is it going to take this guy to discover proxy sites or better yet an anonimyzer?

Normally it's Jean who comes back because of that phoenix force. I guess with all that sex we were bound to swap something useful. True X-Men never die.

I know this isn't completely related, but how does one delete their own profile on Current? Just wondering.

But anyway, I guess I'm one of the few people here who liked JJ_Jammer.

jammer again huh?

He'll be back.

Scott Summers was awesome and hilarious. JJ was kinda(very) opinionated and sometimes annoying. I guess they were the same person???? I didn't know that but I don't think either should have been deleted.

I will miss both!

It is good to hear all sides whether that side is told in XMEN references or Republican Rants.

They called a troll a troll. What's the big deal?

J_Jammer was banned? Aha! No wonder I've stopped seeing his bitter rantings all over Current.The village idiot has been banished! Toll the bells, this is wonderful news!

Scott Summers was JJ, that's why he got banned.

End of stupid story.

Voted down.

Just a note. I didn't vote for this ten times, even though my activity page shows I did. I hope that kink is worked out soon.

try to look at it this way: if you invite someone into your house anf they do or say something you find offensive are you going to kick them out or invite them to come back anytime they want to? Whether or not your other guests found them offensive is not the point; your house your rules. Now this scott summers/j jammer had offended nearly every person who had came into contact with him, rarely offered any insightful comments, often ranted about subjects having nothing to do with the subject at hand and posted links to racist websites. I'm really surprised he lasted as long as he did.

Current is no different than the new york times online or the washington post online or the boston globe online, all reserve the right to moderate and to not post threads that are off subject or abusive in nature. Its not freedom of speech as it is currents freedom to publish what they want, thats called freedom of the press. So if your here and your not a progressive liberal and your a religious conservative watch what you say, it seems most of the abuse come from those with the most fervent beliefs and believe they are never wrong.
Freedom of the press, freedom of speech but don't tread on me

Were treading on very serious ground here...I'm extremely concerned that any1; whether its current or utube or any other forum can on a whim decide what is deemed offensive or inappropriate...i take what Chomsky said ("If you're in favor of freedom of speech, that means you're in favor of freedom of speech precisely for views you despise") not with a grain of salt...we all have passions that need expression...tis better we fight with words (no matter how appalling) than knives & guns...for what is free speech if we are hemmed in by those on the left or right or that nefarious concept known as political correctness?...we are by nature verbal anarchist!

Are you kidding me? F U C K this Scott Summers. We have more important issues to discuss.

I'm assuming you already asked the staff and this Scott Summers as to what happened. Because if you didn't that would be hilariously presumptuous of you to post this article.

scott really knew his xmen trivia though

I say some pretty nonliberal stuff and im still here maybe its my avatar it makes people love me this isnt canada after all where if you speak outside the lines you can be arrested or just killed by the brainwashed colledge students

http://Current.com

"The Current Staff seems hell bent on terrorizing the Current community and destroying the bonds between its membership."

LOL WUT?!?

Though I've been a little scarce lately, some people would take me as a regular - or a "favorite" if you want to be a dick about it, so what I'm going to say may be taken as a typical bias- .still, allow me to rant a moment about Current and the Current Staff.

The Current staff fostered an environment of discussion and open mindedness. They reached out to community members who were interesting and more importantly, interested in putting time and content in. They sought our input and included us in decision making processes. They offered us opportunities, and if you're smart, Current.com in general is offering you opportunities- to get your voice heard, to hear different opinions, to work on your writing, to learn how to argue, to promote a good cause, to meet awesome people, to be part of something you think is cool.

When the community wants something, Current.com and the staff respond. When we ask them questions they answer. When a group of us wanted to get together they helped us and FLEW a staff member from Cali to NY to hang out with us and throw us a few cool t-shirts. (Anyone could have come, we posted it all over the place.)

The whole point about Current.com was that you don't wait around for it to magically be something it's not. In my experience, the web staff are listening, but they are not in control of every decision made for the franchise and they are not here to cater to every pet peeve and annoying member. Can you imagine what it would really be like if staff took your suggestion of writing detailed explanatory posts for every account they deleted? Would you even really read them?

Be reasonable.

P.S. No one is being banned from Current because they disagree with someone else. Disagreement is not the issue, disagreement is natural and interesting, a path to problem solving and understanding others. How you handle disagreement, yourself and your words, you attachment issues to this site, etc - that's where problems may be. We're all guilty, myself very much included, of fucking up from time to time, and Current actually has a lot of leeway - they don't ban you for bitching and moaning so relax on the paranoia!

This website has a terms of service agreement. Read it and stop decrying free speech. This site isn't the devil because it doesn't value hate speech, threats toward other users, or spam.

what happened to freedom of speech current?
a disappointment really, i thought current was all for freedom of speech and not censorship. Hopefully not going to turn into another case like China, where things that are seen as negative and critical are removed and offenders "banished" or "re-educated". damn anti-revolutionaries these days right? i swear, currents actions are becoming more and more shady by the day.
uh-oh i just criticized them. hopefully i wont be banned...?

I left for a while. I'm back. You can call off the body search. It's all good.

I believe that if this website is to be a success, people should be able to have the freedom of speaking their mind without fear of being removed!!

scott summers played his role to a T, but this is not a role playing community. There are plenty of places for that out there in the internet.

OH,.... and BY DEFINITION,....jammer is "unfeatured". Added.

(we KNOW its a cult)

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,.....a bit of "zombies" to this as well....

Added to "vampires". THIS is a case of the "undead".

people are banned for breaking the rules, thats about it. as far as breaches of CoC, current staff is black and white and fair, as i've dealt with them on both sides of that. it doesnt matter what they did and it's no business of yours. if you're so attached to some of these users why don't you have alternative avenues of communication? just roll with it, people come and go here. it's the way of current. the stories may be magic'd around a bit but when it comes to CoC violations, current staff is spot on