Community | March 24, 2010 | 253 comments

Legalizing drugs will lead to MORE of this: mother trades daughter for drugs

Image
curtisreed
A number of people have claimed that we should legalize drugs--including cocaine--in order to stop the drug-related crime.

Do you honestly think that just because drugs are legal, it will stop the plague of addiction and subsequent crimes associated with it?!

Police: Woman swapped girl, 10, to man for cocaine


SAGINAW, Mich. (AP) - Police in Michigan say a 45-year-old woman with a cocaine habit let a 67-year-old man have sex with a 10-year-old girl she was caring for in exchange for the drug.
Angela A. Blackwell of Saginaw Township is charged with first-degree criminal sexual conduct and pandering.

She remained in jail Wednesday pending a preliminary hearing set for March 30. Her lawyer did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Police are searching for Johnnie L. Griffin on first- and second-degree criminal sexual conduct and firearms charges.

If convicted, the pair could be sentenced to at least 25 years in prison.

Detective Sgt. Joseph Dutoi tells The Saginaw News that Griffin had sex with the girl between September and February, while she was in Blackwell's care.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EL11701&show_article=1
  1. groups:
    Community,   Law and Justice,   Right Wing Nuts,   The Tin Foil Mafia,   2 more
  2. tags:
    Gender Cocaine Addiction Liberals 1 more
  3.     
    |

253 comments // Legalizing drugs will lead to MORE of this: mother trades daughter for drugs

  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • so its illegality prevented it?no
      so legality plays no role.
      its not like if herion is sold in stores im gunna go out and get me some.
      its the living a miserable life usualy homeless sucking cock for money that turns me off more than its legal status
      but hey thats just me
      i suppose, people who want to suck cock on the street and sleep in thier own waste would have a different take

    • 2 years ago
  • shanklinmike
    • +4
      shanklinmike  
    • Ironic enough, if it was legal, this lady would probably be able to afford it and not have to whore out her daughter. Not only that, the deaths that are caused by prohibition far outweigh the amount of people who die from overdoses every year. What is sad is that people think we can have a free society and end drug trade, but they can't even stop drugs in prisons, let alone in a freer society. All of this happened DURING prohibition, if anything, it proves as another small piece of the puzzle that prohibitions are a failure. Just because you want to believe the government is doing good doesn't make it so. You are inflicting more harm on people who need education more than punishment! Drug laws ruin workforce ability for many. Once they go in to prison, they are introduced to dealers in the prison system, this is how it will always work. The whole reason drugs create back alley deaths is because prohibition suppresses choices into the underground market. All transactions with said goods will have an increase of risk, purely due to prohibitions. Not arresting people who need medical assistance is a wise choice, prohibition is what doesn't work.

    • 2 years ago
  • glabadabadoo
    • +2
      glabadabadoo  
    • shanklinmike:

      As many others are smashing their thumbs, once again, you hit the nail right on the head, mike. How true, that we can't even control drugs within tightly restricted confines of prison, yet we somehow fool ourselves into believing we can do it in a quasi free society.

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
  • Mulers
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • shanklinmike:

      if the movie blow is accurate (and i have no reason to think its not) if marijuana was legal we would never have had a coke problem and probably never heard of crack, or meth.
      but stick to your guns gov.

    • 2 years ago
  • Einsam_Data_Old
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  
    • Einsam_Data_Old:

      actually, yves, the reason I posted this was because so many people actually DO want cocaine and heroine etc legalized.

      read the comments here and see how many morons can't see or refuse to acknowledge the difference between coke, heroine etc and alcohol, marijuana.

    • 2 years ago
  • freecrack
  • eskimoe
    • 0
      eskimoe  
    • Who the heck wants to legalize cocaine? Seems like this is just a way to give a bad light on the legalization of marijuana campaign.

    • 2 years ago
  • serenden68
    • 0
      serenden68  
    • eskimoe:

      of course it is. you know the opposition is going to twist and turn words like they always do to try and skew peoples perception of cannabis.

      ITS NOT A DAMN DRUG!!!!
      ITS A PLANT/HERB!!!!

      shit.. im tired of people calling it a drug. cocaine, heroine, Tylenol, Aspirin, crack, EX... all those and many more of the like are drugs. people say, "well cocaine and heroine were plants". thats right, they "WERE" plants, now they are drugs because they have been chemically altered to provide the psychotropic effects.

      Cannabis is a plant from beginning to end. and it doesn't get chemically altered to do anything. its all natural. the only thing you can do is give it the best climate to grow in, so that it may be potent. other than perfect growing conditions nothing else gets done to the plant except ingestion by either cooking and eating it with something or smoking it... i prefer the vaporizer personally, its the safest way to inhale and you get a way better high, plus it tastes better.

      *not to you eskimoe, to the "writer".
      VVVVVVV
      and when is the last time anyone ever talked about legalizing all drugs.. i mean i do remember something "a long time ago", but all drugs aren't on the ballot. A plant called cannabis is on the ballot. so why are you talking about all drugs.

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • serenden68:

      It is a medicinal herb , like any other medicinal herb . It must be respected , like valerian , where valium comes from , and white willow bark , the origin of aspirin . A little common sense goes a long way .

    • 2 years ago
  • curtisreed
    • 0
      curtisreed  
    • serenden68:

      that is such a bogus argument. psilocibin mushrooms are "natural" but taken in excess they can cause death.

      Mescaline is another. There are MANY, but to offer an overly simplistic view that "it occurs naturally" is childish.

      Here is a short list of naturally occuring toxins
      http://www.ansci.cornell.edu/plants/toxicagents/index.html

      Next, the article was not about marijuana, but about cocaine. It may seem crazy to suggest the legalization of coke, but what I've seen is that many people who promote the legalization of pot also want the legalization of all drugs. Including coke, heroine, opium, etc.

      The legalization proponents make the same specious argument that 1) prohibitiion is not working (even though statistics show that drug use was dropping), that 2) prohibition causes more violence and other negative impacts than legalization would, and 3) if it was legal, there wouldn't be any drug-related crime.

      All three of these assumptions, in my opinion, is false.

      The best argument FOR legalization I've seen on this thread was the example of Portugal, but I've countered that. Drug use in a small, close nit, conservative country will always be less and will be rejected by the vast majority, but in a large, anonymous, and hedonistic society like ours, drug use is very unlikely to decline once it is legalized.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • curtisreed:

      "(even though statistics show that drug use was dropping)" as a Point of fact, this is not a result if the outlawing of narcotics, but instead a more prominent public awareness of the effects of Drug Addiction. In addition to the recognition that Drug Addiction is a Health issue and is more widely treated as such, as opposed to a Law Enforcement issue.

    • 2 years ago
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • hammywill:

      while coke and heroin use is down pharmacutical opiate abuse is on the rise.
      the legality sadly is a driving force.
      better to get caught in posession of oxycodone than heroin.

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • why not look at places where they have revoaked prohibition (on pot)? like oregon, washington... california...? did all hell break lose? did everyone in the state run out and become junkies? NO... stop your slippery slope fear mongering!

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
  • Einsam_Data_Old
  • artemis6
  • dynomitesight
    • 0
      dynomitesight  
    • might I add creepy mcreeperton...of all the evils in the world ('cuz it's gonna happen...realistically)...a kid...no...no :( "The kids don't stand a chance"...Vampire Weekend

    • 2 years ago
  • dynomitesight
    • 0
      dynomitesight  
    • I agree...food for though...since the Reagan era especially...the government's been banging their heads against a wall with the campy just say no campaign or worse and vilifying people with extreme addiction (with possible mental illness)...people trying to pay bills in a defeated job market...any gray areas or not so gray in between addicts and dealers..."busting" crime but not getting to the major roots of the issues.
      Ad campaigns and the like...scratching the surface with billions and billions of our tax dollars...does anyone have any better ideas other than making it taboo and less trackable in terms of studying real numbers and real life experiences?

      I'm not condoning chaos...but shouldn't the we all quit ignoring the elephant in the room and discuss it this theory at least? (that is directed to the people who haven't commented yet...I'd like 2 hear your take on this)

    • 2 years ago
  • fatmonkey85
    • +2
      fatmonkey85  
    • hmmmm legalising drugs will not stop the crime that comes with addiction. however to criminalise some one for taking drugs is stupid, it makes no sense. there will always be addicts, the only way the cycle of addiction can ever be truely broken is through honesty and counceling. Not through being sent to jail that does no good to anyone it just costs the tax payers loads and normally confirms the addicts belief that they will never be able to get out of the terrible situation they find themselves in. Obviously pimping out anyone but particularly kids should result in a hefty sentence in bang up, but all drugs should be legal and down to an adults personal choice; because prohibition never works.

    • 2 years ago
  • phukitol
  • venitreac
    • -1
      venitreac  
    • I couldn't stay away from this one... Does anyone else think that the blame should be placed upon the dealer... i mean that guy has to be the dumbest dealer in the history of drug dealing.. Doesn't he know that having a kid is gonna end up more expensive then any amount of money he would have made off of so crack head bitch! I mean even if your gonna put that kid to work you have years before you can even bank on that... food for thought. : P

    • 2 years ago
  • fatmonkey85
  • CaptSutter
    • +2
      CaptSutter  
    • What a discussion, rather than theorise about what "might happen" you could look at empirical evidence. This kind of thing is much less prevalent in Europe, since they are such soft bleeding heart commie socialist liberals. Perhaps you might try a different approach, like the one which seems to lead to lower crime rates, and less violence??? just a thought.

    • 2 years ago
  • cons_Objector
  • onemalefla
  • KSirys
  • onemalefla
  • glabadabadoo
  • onemalefla
  • glabadabadoo
  • missionaryhunter
  • phukitol
  • jandreola
    • 0
      jandreola  
    • This is the most ridiculous thing I have heard in a long time. Does the legality of a drug really change how a person is apt to treat another? The kid could have been swapped for money or any commodity.

    • 2 years ago
  • PigFarmington
  • missionaryhunter
  • sharksbreath
    • 0
      sharksbreath  
    • So your saying more child molesters will have access to cocaine to give to a cocaine user so they can have sex with a kid the cocaine user is in charge of.

      Cocaine is used all over this country and I see stories like this everyday in the news.

      Step out of the Matrix your living in.

      Seriously you sound like a crazy person.

    • 2 years ago
  • Altero
    • 0
      Altero  
    • I need to relax sometimes and lucky for me I live in a state that's chill....Why can't America jump on the band wagon and see that it's not a drug but the same as wine and beer.Why cant we regain the hemp nation we started with 200 years ago?We can even make fuel from Hemp.I think a world wide understanding to the fact that we can make it being OK stoned and happy.Let us grow.....It's better than cotton!...

    • 2 years ago
  • saidemily
    • +1
      saidemily  
    • People do things for moronic reasons, regardless if something is legalized or not. But legalizing cocaine will not lead to more addicts if there is enough regulation and education on the effects of the drug. Alcohol is legal, but you don't see an increase in alcoholics and you certainly have to pay a hefty tax on cigarettes to keep up your habit-- people aren't driven by curiosity, they're driven by money. Shoot the cost of cocaine high enough and people just won't want to pay for it.

      This situation is unfortunate, but the logic pulling the headline together isn't sound. Making a drug legal doesn't mean we're giving it away like hotcakes. It doesn't mean everyone in the world will suddenly crave cocaine and ravenously pursue it like zombies. If anything, it means there's one more thing that Washington can tax, the revenue of which can be put towards getting that woman the help she needs.

      Also, statistics mean nothing if you don't have a viable source. And no, Glenn Beck & Fox News don't count.

    • 2 years ago
  • vnprado
    • 0
      vnprado  
    • haha come on. to who ever posted this story, first off dont you know that drug dealers are in the buisness for the money? second, addiction is bad. but thats why you dont legalize fcuking super addictive drugs.

    • 2 years ago
  • raylinmarie
    • +1
      raylinmarie  
    • So.... what does legalization have to do with that? A horrible mother trades her daughter??? Call me crazy, but I think the problem here is the mother, not the drug.

      BTW, there was a man who traded his daughter for beer and meat (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28629054/)
      ...should those things be made illegal? The logic of this story makes no sense.

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • don't forget cocaine has a LEGAL use. dentists and orthodontists can legally use and 'dispence' cocaine because it's a very good topical anesthetic.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
  • VILEisLEPORE
    • 0
      VILEisLEPORE  
    • can we please stop putting cannabis under the same category as cocaine? just because these crazy coked up scumbags decide that sex with children is an appropriate trade for cocaine should absolutely not persuade you in thinking that cannabis is a horrible drug. dont be fooled!! cannabis is NOTHING like cocaine.

    • 2 years ago
  • dershope
    • 0
      dershope  
    • What defunct rating system does Current use to make this crap #1? All drugs should be legalized. The amount of life and money that will be saved far exceed any of which that might be saved with the way things are now. Think of all the agencies that are around just to thwart drugs use, distribution, etc. The war on drugs is a boogie man just like terrorism. People should be able to do whatever they want with their bodies to include what they put in them so long as it doesn't directly affect anyone around them.

      We've tried the war on drugs for a long time now lets try something different.

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
  • 02
  • dershope
    • 0
      dershope  
    • 02:

      Very true. One of the most important problems with illegal drugs now is the money. If all drugs were decriminalized drug dealers wouldn't have the market cornered any longer thus driving the prices down. Once the aspiration to Tony Montana money status goes away so will the criminal element that pursues the green train.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • dershope:

      I don't know - if you're strung out, you're going to deal it. If you can make money producing it (if you are so inclined) you going to produce it.
      The demand has money to give you.
      If you are a murdering importer and someone is buying, you are importing.

      What are they going to go back to hanging snake-skins on the fence and hoping to get enough money to afford a pig?

      Legalizing means consumers wouldn't be facing such problems with the criminal justice system - but all the problems, while varying in intensity of the public perceptions, will still be there.
      Maybe somewhat less problems - but maybe more.

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • +1
      dariusvons  
    • 02:

      you think they kill anybody over it if they could just go to a smoke shop or pharmacy?

      as I learned in many different history classes, alcohol PROHIBITION caused violence, and after they repealed prohibition nobody was killed over alcohol (anymore) except the people that the DEA shot.

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • 02:

      murder is murder, drugs or not, junkies or not... people kill other people, who cares WHY they killed? there are people who have kill because god tells them to, does that mean we can illegalize god? (as much as I wish I could) no, it wouldnt stop that sort of thing. HELL even BUSH used god to justify killing people! my point is that people kill regardless of laws ALREADY, and to keep drugs illegal only makes users criminals and does NOTHING to prevent violence nor addiction. face it prohibition FAILED.

    • 2 years ago
  • KaisiElizabeth
    • 0
      KaisiElizabeth  
    • this is just sick and twisted human nature. weather or not "drugs" are legal has nothing to do with people being sick and twisted. at least if marijuana is legal people stand the chance to openly chill the fuck out for a second... and whoever says cocaine should be legal needs kicked, forcibly, in the shin. repeatedly if necessary. that is pure nonsense and i will oppose that til death. Not on my watch!

    • 2 years ago
  • wally60
  • piejustisntrational
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • ah the good old slippery slope fallacy...

      I wonder, and ask you then, if drugs become legal would you (curtisreed) run out to traid away your children to become an addict? i doubt it...

    • 2 years ago
  • Inventor
    • 0
      Inventor  
    • If Coca-cola was legalized and a woman swapped her daughter for cocaine, would that prove something about Coca-cola?

      An editor with a functioning brain actually put this up on Current. It's not even April Fools Day yet. How about that as an argument for keeping marijuana possession a felony?

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
  • artemis6
  • hammywill
  • dariusvons
  • hammywill
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • hammywill:

      validity? he thinks that legalization will mean that everyone will run out to become addicts. I asked him if he himself would do just that? adding that for him to say 'no' he would not run out to be an addict then he proves his own argument wrong. he never answered me. I'm just trying to expose the fallacy for what it is.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
  • hammywill
  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • 02:

      lol... there's something feminists couldn't change, he/she/it/they ... sorry it's a flaw of the language. we could just use 'they' but, that's not as accurate as 'he or she'. meh, whatever. sorry for any insult.

    • 2 years ago
  • jiggajigga89
    • 0
      jiggajigga89  
    • Half of the events you just posted have literally nothing to do with drugs, and who in their right mind would want to legalize cocaine? Who is proposing these things? I understand marijuanna may be legalized in California soon, but I hardly think it will have a violent outcome. As a matter of fact I think it will bring the exact opposite.

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • Glad that we're generalizing all drug users based on one idiot.

      I suppose I should generalize everything. I guess all conservatives are over-generalizing fear mongers who like to talk big and not do anything but complain.

    • 2 years ago
  • ii386
    • 0
      ii386  
    • This post is a great example of curtisreed---he claims to think through so much logic but his logic is so twisted/nonexistent that his arguments are like swiss cheese. Thank you for this wonderful example of silliness.

    • 2 years ago
  • EmperorThan
    • +1
      EmperorThan  
    • How many people do you know sell their children for their morning cup of coffee? Pretty sure that's a drug and a chemically addictive one. Legal last time I checked.

      "Your logic appears to be broken. I can fix that for ya?"

    • 2 years ago
  • dariusvons
  • 02
    • -1
      02  
    • Prohibition breeds abuse. Legalizing it would not bring down prices until consumption wanes.
      There may be a temporary shift in perception - and an increased presence of pot related use.

      But soon, it would not be cool in business, not cool operating vehicles, not cool at public occasions - because it's not cool being a loady.

      Any more than being an out and out drug addict is cool. It just isn't.

      So it's importance as a cultural fixture would wane as well. Cause being a loady - for the simple sake of being loaded - isn't a specific social pinnacle.

      At social occasions - family social occasions, being too loaded is not cool. You go to a wedding - the champagne rolls, people are energized. Once people are laying about, too loaded, - well, no body will consider that cool.

      So you can only get so loaded at social events, no matter what you're on - otherwise, - you're not cool.

    • 2 years ago
  • BriKi
    • 0
      BriKi  
    • you can't sell your daughter to just anyone. Especially if they are operating a licensed dispensary. Just saying, drug dealers are a major part of the drug problem.

    • 2 years ago
  • FoosMaster
    • +1
      FoosMaster  
    • This type of behavior will happen no matter what the laws are. Neither tougher drug laws nor complete legalization will stop it. It is about the MONEY!!! She did not have the ‘money’ to get what she wanted so she bartered for it. If she had asked for Money instead then she would have just had to go to a third person to get what she wanted so she just got it directly from the source. The same things happen when people want other things, (Cars, Jewelry, Prescription Drugs, etc…) It’s about the MONEY!!! This has Nothing to do with what will happen if drugs are legalized. Addicts will be addicts no matter what the laws are and tougher laws will Not decrease the number of addicts!
      The Truth is that if All drugs are legalized then they will be cheaper and easier to obtain by ADULTS who want them thus the trading of those substances will not get you nearly as much as it does now. It’s about the MONEY!!!
      Prohibition has created Major crimes due to the Money involved and as long as that money is in the hands of the criminals, things will continue to get worse. Prohibition is a complete FAILURE!!!
      It’s not about the drugs, it’s about the MONEY!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
    • 0
      02  
    • FoosMaster:

      If the prices are supported by a demand market - I do not see anyone lowering prices. Why would anyone lower prices?
      Only if it were distributed by the government to anyone for free on demand. If prices revolve around businesses, they will charge what they can get. If they force out the little smuggler types, they could have a stable market.

      So the only advantage for the cartels would be massive import or slightly lowered street prices, but their quality would remain questionable, as is it today.

      Hard drugs - those addicts are well liable to support their habit by dealing - so legalizing may change the game a little - and give monies to big business - But you'd still have crime and criminals - and dead bodies.

    • 2 years ago
  • FoosMaster
    • 0
      FoosMaster  
    • 02:

      It's about Supply AND Demand, not just demand. With a Far larger supply under Legalization the price Will go down considerably. I believe that 95% of the users would not buy from a street dealer if the Legal price is just slightly higher and the profit margins for the street dealers would be so low that it would not be worth the risk thus effectively crushing the black market.
      Through Legalization there would be a far more diverse market with far more competition, which would further lower the prices. Now the only competition is with other drug gangs and cartels and the way they handle their competition is by assassination of their competition so that they do not have to lower their prices to get the business.

    • 2 years ago
  • 02
    • +1
      02  
    • FoosMaster:

      I think you might not have your economics right - Producers will produce for demand.

      If people drink three gallons of milk, they're going gear up for a three gallon demand. Prices will find a market. Demand specifies it.

      You'd have to legalize and place government, by law, to subsidize producers for excessive product.
      That will not happen.
      Also, producers would be trying to make money - that's what they have a career to do - they got houses and kids and social commitments, etc. So there would be a competition between 'legal' producers and illegal producers.

      There would be thriving black market - less money, unless demanded from the legal producers, for abuse problems and continuing, ruthless murders to read about.

      Unless, like prohibition, the whole damn country wants drugs available from every corner liquor store. Then legalizing might reduce a black market.

      Is that what this country is going to sign up for? - I doubt it.

    • 2 years ago
  • imunbalanced
    • +2
      imunbalanced  
    • This is absolutely depressing. Ignoring the ridiculous spin that seems to be the focal point of discussion, I hope that the child is given the proper care and treatment she is going to need. Her childhood has been eradicated by someone she was suppose to trust, someone that was suppose to care and nurture her.

      No child should EVER be used in this fashion, but it is an unfortunate truth far too often.

    • 2 years ago
  • KSirys
  • erikgodinez
  • dariusvons
  • hunzedog
  • ryosama
  • fun_size
  • artemis6
  • 02
    • +1
      02  
    • artemis6:

      That's not such a crazy idea. Society could be organized entirely differently.
      Once we can see that production allows a sophisticated social platform, as we have - it is easy to see that construction and farming and an interchange that we see as taxes right now, could be used for a different social contract - and different back-drop than the present.

      It could, rather easily be possible to have relatively unlimited housing and food source - such that everyone could expect housing and food as a normal part of life.

      Right now, you are expected to think about money, producing money and being especially cleaver in your investments. It doesn't take long under this present social format to become a stingy, self-centered, contrived person at constant war with others over insignificant objectives - and completely a different person than you might have been without all the bad social habits that have necessarily attained.

      Maybe you'd have been a scientist, maybe an opera singer - maybe an aquanaut. Maybe you'd be making films with Jim Cameron.

      Race car driver? How bout spacecraft pilot?

      Maybe you'd be rebuilding Dinosaur DNA for it's unique tendency to produce disease resistant antibodies.

      You know - May be-

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • 02:

      02 , agreed . It just might work , if we give it a chance . It's what I would like to give my kids . I am simply not happy unless I am trying to contribute something to this world . If the survival needs are met , then we can reach our greatest potential .

    • 2 years ago
  • TypicalStereotype
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • This woman needs to be in jail for a long time. She"ll be 'clean' in jail. She's not going to clean up her act on the outside at this late date.... she sold a child for drugs...Jail is where she should be.
      Legalized medical cannabis will not cause cocaine addiction. If you get it for a medical reason, legally there's NO need to meet with the drug dealer....or hang out with crack whores...why didn't the man want her? Is she that bad? Shame! Shame, Shame....

    • 2 years ago
  • tommic
    • 0
      tommic  
    • nursediesel:

      What planet do you live on? There are more drugs in jails than outside of them and you know what? Its the guards who bring it in and sell it. Reality sucks. Get your facts straight.
      She be dried out before entering general population then it will be back in the high again.

    • 2 years ago
  • glabadabadoo
  • nursediesel
  • NothingIsAbsoluteTruth
  • mr_tibbles
  • glabadabadoo
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • glabadabadoo:

      Lennon was so drugged up....he had money from all the years of makin' music and he and his old lady had money comin' out the woozu! They didn't have to worry...about fighting for a scrap of bread...

    • 2 years ago
  • Nephwrack
  • jahbini
  • glabadabadoo
1 - 100 of 253
more from Community:

top videos