Community | April 06, 2010 | 182 comments

Exxon Mobil paid no federal income tax in 2009

Image
WakeUpPeople
The joke goes, The economy is so bad Exxon Mobil laid off 25 Congressmen. If only.

Turns out the economy is never really bad for the oil giant, and the last thing they would want to do is cut off support to members of Congress who allow them to pull off the remarkable trick of making $45 billion in profits last year but paying no federal income tax. Think Progress reports the stunning news, which, sadly, is not a Steve Martin routine:

Last week, Forbes magazine published what the top U.S. corporations paid in taxes last year. “Most egregious,” Forbes notes, is General Electric, which “generated $10.3 billion in pretax income, but ended up owing nothing to Uncle Sam. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1 billion.” Big Oil giant Exxon Mobil, which last year reported a record $45.2 billion profit, paid the most taxes of any corporation, but none of it went to the IRS:

Exxon tries to limit the tax pain with the help of 20 wholly owned subsidiaries domiciled in the Bahamas, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands that (legally) shelter the cash flow from operations in the likes of Angola, Azerbaijan and Abu Dhabi. No wonder that of $15 billion in income taxes last year, Exxon paid none of it to Uncle Sam, and has tens of billions in earnings permanently reinvested overseas.

Mother Jones’ Adam Weinstein notes that, despite benefiting from corporate welfare in the U.S., Exxon complains about paying high taxes, claiming that it threatens energy innovation research. Pat Garofalo at the Wonk Room notes that big corporations’ tax shelter practices similar to Exxon’s shift a $100 billion annual tax burden onto U.S. taxpayers. In fact, in 2008, the Government Accountability Office found that “two out of every three United States corporations paid no federal income taxes from 1998 through 2005.”
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Progressive America,   Humanism,   7 more
  2. tags:
    Taxes Exxon Tax Shelter
  3. recommended by:
    WakeUpPeople,
    julesrs007
  4.     
    |

182 comments // Exxon Mobil paid no federal income tax in 2009

  • etienna
  • Gravity_Man
  • NoJustiCeNoPeaCe
    • +2
      NoJustiCeNoPeaCe  
    • This is outrageous that these large corporations continue to skirt tax law and citizen taxpayers get their wages garnished up to 30%. This is way why need a massive overhaul of the regulations that oversee all industries and a more equitable tax system.

    • 2 years ago
  • Mark701
  • Almibry
    • +5
      Almibry  
    • They've been doing this for years and it's not just Exxon. I remember hearing Obama talk about how he flew over the Cayman Islands (which many corporations claim they are based out of) looking down on a office building that was way too small to hold the number of businesses that have it is supposed to hold, and that was something he said he would change.

    • 2 years ago
  • diabolical44
  • tommic
    • +1
      tommic  
    • diabolical44:

      Offices along with vacation home on private golf courses with butlers, maids, and cooks
      I have been there and rented one of these villas, what a fn life The weed was good too

    • 2 years ago
  • NadiaBadia
  • Darlink
  • CaptB
    • +4
      CaptB  
    • We need to make some laws to make this illegal. The shell game that the companies hide behind are similar to what Enron did. However, these companies do it specifically for tax shelters. It disgust me.

      I talk to the Tea Baggers all the time and their response is that the hard working Americans that are ultra wealthy should not be punished by taxing them. So these countries will invariably go oversees because the govt taxes them to much. I say regulate them and establish laws that if they are based in America they have to pay the taxes here.

      Ironically, the Tea Baggers are primarily people that make less than $250,000. So these unwitting freedom fighters are puppets for the rich republicans that are gleefully high-fiving one another. The more regulatory intervention, the more the republicans will complain that the free market is being altered. Disgusting!

    • 2 years ago
  • diabolical44
    • +1
      diabolical44  
    • CaptB:

      George Carlin used to say that the super rich conned the average Joe this way with the three "G's". God , gays, and guns. now it seems to have shifted. they con the people by giving them the idea that they can become the super rich themselves and then they won't have to pay any tax either.

    • 2 years ago
  • tommic
    • +1
      tommic  
    • diabolical44:

      Its called manipulation of those who are not intelligent enough to see the truth but George Carlin for all his nutiness was right on when it came to the republican party using God, Guns as in the liberals will take them away, and Gays those aids spreading homos.
      Pardon my language there no disrespect meant and I hope none is taken. I support gay rights 100 percent. I am for the second amendment with the caveat that no one should be able to own fully automatic weapons of any kind and there should be mental evaluations on all who wish to own one, and for god that between you who believe and your God. Mine is simply the universe that makes all things possible

    • 2 years ago
  • CaptB
  • tenletterz
  • Saladin
    • +2
      Saladin  
    • tenletterz:

      "Exxon tries to limit the tax pain with the help of 20 wholly owned subsidiaries domiciled in the Bahamas, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands that (legally) shelter the cash flow from operations in the likes of Angola, Azerbaijan and Abu Dhabi. "

      That is not "government sponsored activity," that's called dodging your fucking taxes with offshore accounts.

      But the apologetics sure would have sounded nice to someone who didn't read the article.

    • 2 years ago
  • tenletterz
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • tenletterz:

      "No, it's called lowering your tax consequences by moving to lower offshore exposure. Talk about not reading something."

      That's called DODGING YOUR FUCKING TAXES.

      What is this Orwellian world you live in? It's not tax evasion because there's a legal loophole? Is that really the side you're taking?

      Spin whatever bullshit you want, your argument is that it's ok to exploit legal loopholes in the tax code to dodge taxes and reap in more profits. That's the fucking reality of this situation.

      I would be in favor of laws to fix the code and companies who violate have their corporate charter revoked.

    • 2 years ago
  • Gravity_Man
    • +1
      Gravity_Man  
    • Saladin:

      I wonder how corporations can have individual status yet retain previous corporate loopholes? If they can get away with that they've graduated to something more than either.

      It just hasn't been named yet.

      Dictator?

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
  • 5ka
  • Saladin
    • +3
      Saladin  
    • When Coolidge said "the business of the United States is business," he wasn't just making a joke. And that was 90 years ago now.

      Of course, that doesn't mean -your- business. It means whoever has enough money and influence to either bribe congressmen or run for office themselves.

      In an Industrial economy, big producers inevitably have a lot of power. In the United States especially, they often wield more power than the government (or in some cases, actually run the government like the Bush administration.)

      To some extent, a strong government that kicks people in the ass can prevent stuff like this. But in the long run, if corporations don't cooperate with national interests, there's little or nothing you can do. And in the worst case scenario, when they're running things (like right now), the whole nation goes to hell until they start cooperating again.

      Of course, throwing your hands up in the air and exclaiming nothing can be done is exactly what makes it worse (and exactly what the intelligent people in the right argue in favor of), so a strong government should just be a basic reactionary stance.

      Remember, personhood or not, corporations are public institutions. All it takes is a willing Congress, a hostile population and a shrewd understanding of how they make their profits to bring them under control.

    • 2 years ago
  • randallr01
  • CaptB
    • +2
      CaptB  
    • randallr01:

      It isn't easy livin' on the street. $400 million will barely buy street cred these days. That is a mere pittance compared to other corps. He got dissed, hahaha.

    • 2 years ago
  • shizzam
    • +7
      shizzam  
    • it seems like if we actually regulated what needs to be regulated, we would possibly be in a little less debt than we are now

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
    • +1
      cmdinc  
    • i am sure you all understand commoners like us can own STOCK in Exxon. The management does all it can to show PROFIT for it's shareholders, the shareholders get dividends based upon the profit of the organization. The share holders then pay TAXES on dividends recieved. So really everyone that owns shares are the bad guys???

    • 2 years ago
  • CaptB
    • +1
      CaptB  
    • cmdinc:

      We do an extent demand higher revenues as investors. Does that mean that the companies have to resort to business practices that are unethical and immoral? Enron skirted the laws, how many other companies practice, "cookin' the books".

      The shareholders do not have rights though that the board and the CEO possess. So the shareholders are in essence just investors with no voice. Except to pull their money out.

      I hope that Obama will be able to convince the republicans that we need some changes in the laws concerning big business. We need some changes so that the banks and car companies do not bring down the system in the future. Is this making the govt stronger? YES it is, and I do support it!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • tommic
    • +1
      tommic  
    • cmdinc:

      If those profits were made offshore through the Bahamas and Caymen Islands you don't get a fn dime. You only share in profits as a shareholder for those profits made here in America.. Now if you invested in Exxon in abu dabi or wherever they are in foriegn countries you would get dividends. Live and learn

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
    • 0
      cmdinc  
    • tommic:

      lol, dude, i own exxon stock. I live and learn every time i get a check from them. So don't act like a smart ass when you dont know what YOUR talking about

    • 2 years ago
  • tommic
    • 0
      tommic  
    • cmdinc:

      you do not get dividends from foriegn companies owned by exxon unless your registered in the American deposit registry otherwise you do not You can call me what you want, you can say what you want its a free country

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
  • hawk5000
  • Dagum
  • nanac
    • +7
      nanac  
    • This is outrageous. The American tax system needs to be restructured to mandate all corporations to pay their taxes....Tax shelters and loop-holes should be permanently outlawed..We Americans should literally lay off all politicians that are in favor of this unfair, unscrupulous system of taxation......

    • 2 years ago
  • LinXitoW
  • Darevalo
    • +3
      Darevalo  
    • i dont get why they cant be like "how much did you make?"
      "ok.. then we need this much from you... no if and or buts.. dont like it? how bout i pull what ever licenses allows you to exist for cheating the tax system"

    • 2 years ago
  • indecisiveh
  • WakeUpPeople
    • +6
      WakeUpPeople  
    • indecisiveh:

      Teabagging. They don't get disgruntled at the disfunction, they only get mad when the govt tries to address the disfunction. They will surely argue that Exxon has liberties that should not be trampled on, and the free market will fix it all.

    • 2 years ago
  • Norther00
    • +3
      Norther00  
    • if this doesnt make your blood boil i don't know what would.

      tax the poor who can hardly make it as is, but dont tax these greedy fat fucks who dont know what to do with their money????? im so ashamed to be an american. although we arent exactly america anymore, were just a big fat corporation.

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
  • CaptB
    • +2
      CaptB  
    • cmdinc:

      Anyone over $250,000 is considered wealthy. Poor for welfare purposes is under $13,000 for a family. The median income is between $20,000 - $30,000. Which I consider poor. We need to bring back the pre-Reagan era taxation of 70% of income of millionaires. How many billions do you need to survive?

    • 2 years ago
  • cmdinc
  • CaptB
  • cmdinc
  • CaptB
    • 0
      CaptB  
    • cmdinc:

      I have already paid my taxes for this year, and more than the majority of what most Americans make. I am happy to pay these taxes to support the United States of America. After visiting other countries for various reasons I love America.

    • 2 years ago
  • Walks_in_Storms
  • Gravity_Man
    • 0
      Gravity_Man  
    • Walks_in_Storms:

      The man's walking on top of the water that's drowning others! Leave him alone Storm. He said he loves it. I think we should take him at his word. It isn't his babies being napalm-melted. He also escaped slavery so perhaps we should bow real low as he walks past. C'mon Storm! You can do it. Bend those old judo-busted knees and find dirt.

    • 2 years ago
  • CaptB
    • 0
      CaptB  
    • Walks_in_Storms:

      Not exactly happy with the IMC, it gets the job done but it is NOT efficient at all. It also costs us a bit tax dollar wise with their spending habits. The military follows what the President and our elected officials say, so I agree with what they do based on our standing in the world.

      We are similar to Rome in many ways.

      The tax code is easy...if you use Turbo Tax, hahahhaa (joke). I have to hire a tax attorney because of my special case. (I want to try and hide all my money from govt in a legal manner). That definitely is not my forte is tax preparation. I can't say it is easy either.

      I don't know if any law is completely understandable to the lay public. To a lawyer is makes more sense (based on what kind of lawyer you are). Similar to someone presenting to the emergency room, I don't expect a laymen to be able to know what to do with a pulmonary embolism or a trans-ischemic attack. It isn't what they went to college for and prepared to do in life. Just as I know little to nothing about engineering, nuclear power plants, constitutional law, how a bill is passed through the house and all the levels of bureaucracy works. I see what you are saying though, you would like it written in a simpler manner.

      I am a sheep...Baaaahhhh

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
  • CaptB
    • 0
      CaptB  
    • hammywill:

      I agree with your statements. I also believe that something as simple as laws that we have understood for hundreds of years can be contorted. Case in point Cheney stating he was not part of just the executive branch but part of the legislative branch and thus didn't have any authority that could provide oversight. So lawyers can twist things (gasp, lawyers are masters of skullduggery), be very suspicious when they are around, haha.

    • 2 years ago
  • irie_ojo
    • +2
      irie_ojo  
    • holy shit.....where are all the "weak minded"(joke) critics like "godsnliberals" at when stuff like this gets published. conservatives (the right) are always trying to blame our nations debt and problems on the poor and drug addicted "welfare abusers" when we have corporations doing things like this. how is this not a crime?

      Corporations are now running our nation...... we can thank the supreme court for strengthening their powers even more. companies like Exxon can get away with not paying fed taxes and can still contribute what they wish to their favorite politician..... its a fucked up conflict of interest

    • 2 years ago
  • CaptB
  • captainplanet71
  • tenletterz
  • indecisiveh
    • +3
      indecisiveh  
    • tenletterz:

      That's laughable. They don't pay taxes because the tax rate is too high? Fail. You have to make a different argument, it just makes absolutely no sense, even bordering on delusional. A classic example of ass-backward refried capitalist ideology.

      Please go to mexico, good riddance. Forget that we as Americans are the largest consumers in the world and that's part of what gives you a profit.

      Just keep pretending, that it is all your doing. You are such an amazing self sufficient person who uses nothing the government provides to you to become more successful. No one gave you anything and it is all due to your hard work. Very nice fantasy.

      The fact that you admit to paying no taxes and advocate this position highlights a broader mental disease in this country. Newsflash! If you were born ANYWHERE else in the world you wouldn't have anything that you supposedly earned all by yourself.

    • 2 years ago
  • tenletterz
  • cmdinc
  • srart
    • +1
      srart  
    • tenletterz:

      Don't forget those middle classes only exist as long as the US keeps the status quo. We still produce vast amounts of the world's food supply. When it comes to hardball the US is the only place that has the ability to become isolationist and not get decimated in a crunch. For the short term companies can go elsewhere, but those booming markets can't feed themselves, and without jobs, our middle class will eventually become the poor, then wipe out the large Agg companies during the "Kill the rich" populous revolt stage. All in all, it's good for the US to be kept well enough that we don't have the massive social problems that plagues large portions of the world's population. Keeps us out of their business, and keeps them fed.

    • 2 years ago
  • hammywill
    • 0
      hammywill  
    • tenletterz:

      The U.S. right now, consumes more goods than all other nations COMBINED. I think you may be slightly retarded. You are flat out making the case for scorched Earth economic policy. Use one nation until it is sucked dry, and then move on to the next. You do know that you are raping your kids right?

    • 2 years ago
  • Toughth
  • Dagum
    • +6
      Dagum  
    • It’s amazing! No matter how high the income tax rate is, the rich and powerful will always find exemptions, write offs, and other loop-holes to avoid paying the income tax. Why? Because the rich and powerful are the ones who make the tax laws, and will always include a small, ambiguous, escape provision in the legislation that allows them to avoid paying taxes.

    • 2 years ago
  • indecisiveh
  • hoboninja54
  • WakeUpPeople
    • +1
      WakeUpPeople  
    • I wonder if these 2/3rds of all US corporations that pay taxes to foreign countries still have the rights to give unlimited campaign contributions to US politicians. Thanks SCOTUS! Give them all of the power and none of the responsibility... What could possibly go wrong?

    • 2 years ago
  • Burnside359
    • 0
      Burnside359  
    • governments are afraid of penalizing corporations because they are afraid if they do the big businesses will leave and take their jobs/profits to other more accommodating shores.... but where is the line drawn? what happens when the corporations take what they can from governments but fail to balance the scales by benefiting the system that supported them? this will keep happening until a worldwide agreement on business practices is reached... and that will never happen.

    • 2 years ago
  • NothingIsAbsoluteTruth
    • +4
      NothingIsAbsoluteTruth  
    • and we elect people who do nothing about this.. 100 billion every year. C'mon people. There should be protest! boycotts! but sadly majority of people including myself just sit on the computer and complain about it.

    • 2 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • And? Who's going to do anything about it? This administration is actually allowing them to drill more for MORE profit. Anyone going to boycott driving?

    • 2 years ago
  • Confucius
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • JanforGore:

      How about a tax on oil? $50 to $75 per barrel for offshore oil. The same on imported oil. Use the money to pay the national debt. Mandate that all new cars sold in the US be bi-fuel(compressed natural gas) and flex fuel or biofuel capable.

      If people do not want to pay the tax on oil, they can use CNG. CNG is already cheaper to use than petroleum. Most people will want to use CNG.

      from logicpocket-------" I need a car that doesn't impede the flow of traffic by having sub-standard acceleration."---------

      Bi-fuel cars are common in Europe where the price of gasoline has been high for a long time. They are also used a lot with diesel engine vehicles because they are easy to start in cold weather and run extremely clean. There is no detectable difference in performance when you switch between liquid fuel(gasoline or diesel) and gas fuel(methane).

      --------" I also strongly prefer one that looks aesthetically pleasing because I cultivate my home, put together outfits, and thus would /like/ a car that reflects that."--------

      Any internal combustion engine can use compressed natural gas. There are after market conversion kits that can fit virtually any engine ever made. Factory installed systems are actually after market conversions installed by the factory when the car is manufactured.

      -------" What is really important though is that it cost the same USD$4,000 I would pay for an equivalent gas-burning car, and I need it to pollute as little as possible if at all."------

      A bi-fuel CNG conversion would cost about $1,500 USD. About 1/3 to 1/7th the price difference between a hybrid and the same model gas only vehicle. And CNG already costs about 1/2 the amount to drive the same distance that it does to use petroleum. Depending on how much you drive, pay back period could be as little as one year.
      CNG burns so completely and cleanly that oil does not need to be changed nearly as frequently as with petroleum. Oil changes with CNG are done between 10,000 and 30,000 miles depending on driving conditions. Compared with 3,000 to 5,000 miles recommended for petroleum. Using synthetic oil and mostly highway conditions, with CNG, 50,000 miles would be possible.
      Honda Civic GX has earned the California Air Management Board certification for near zero emissions---the highest possible certification for low emissions.

      -----------" I'd also like a federal ban on plastic bags and the subsequent standardization of plant cellulose-based equivalents."------------

      In most places in Europe, there is a tax on plastic bags. It ranges from about ,10 Lats to .40 Lats where I was at in Riga(about $.20 to $.80 cents) Most people carried their own reusable bags to avoid paying the tax.
      Paper bags are "plant cellulose-based equivalents"----we've had paper bags a lot longer than we have had plastic bags. If you want a "plant cellulose-based equivalent" to plastic bags, use a paper bag----and they are easily biodegradable.

    • 2 years ago
  • Gordie_Caie
    • +2
      Gordie_Caie  
    • While sheeple slept, all the big corporations moved their businesses overseas!LOL!
      Why should they pay federal income tax? They are not American owned companies!!!
      Send the IRS to Israel and Arabia to collect!

    • 2 years ago
  • Wetdog
    • +1
      Wetdog  
    • Gordie_Caie:

      Or...............don't use petroleum. Use biofuels and natural gas that we can produce right here. We can bring jobs back to the US by not buying their petroleum-----we can drive our vehicles with biofuels and methane we produce right here.

    • 2 years ago
  • Derrick_Mastin
  • WakeUpPeople
    • +9
      WakeUpPeople  
    • My mouth dropped when I read this.

      "...big corporations’ tax shelter practices similar to Exxon’s shift a $100 billion annual tax burden onto U.S. taxpayers."

      So from 1998 to 2005, that would be $700 Billion in lost revenue. Super.

    • 2 years ago
  • emarston
  • WakeUpPeople
    • +1
      WakeUpPeople  
    • emarston:

      One could ask whether or not a bailout would have even been necessary if these monolithic corporations were properly regulated. Whether they skip out on the bill or flat out beg for us to pay the bill, either way it's corporate welfare at the taxpayer's expense. Meanwhile they fly in nice jets and live in huge mansions and never worry how they will afford their next filet mignon with lobster garlic butter sauce.

    • 2 years ago
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • WakeUpPeople:

      Yep----I've been telling people this for years. Not only that---that is not counting the money lost to the economy to buy a raw material(crude oil) that is just going to be burned up.

      Try more like, $7 TRILLION lost to the economy.

      Now think where the economy would be if over the last 10 years, we had pumped the equivalent of 7 Economic Recovery Acts into the economy with no new taxes and no debt.

      THAT is why we need to be using biofuels and get rid of petroleum.

    • 2 years ago
  • Wetdog
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • WakeUpPeople:

      Yes. Exactly.

      The only reason they can get away with it is because of the monopoly hold on consumers.

      If we DEMAND cars that are bi-fuel and flex fuel capable-----petroleum will no longer have a monopoly control over consumers fuel choices. Brazil has already done it.

      We need to do it too.

    • 2 years ago
  • Gravity_Man
    • 0
      Gravity_Man  
    • Wetdog:

      Yes, you're right, but No, you're also wrong, because the Gov't is a flexible tool that changes shape on ya. We use less fuel, they and the corporations would be charging a thousand dollars a barrel (= higher taxes), so the individual would be kept in the same stinking losing hand financial condition they are in now.

      And if all vehicles were using CNG, Methane and so on you recommend, once Crude Oil was no longer used the oil companies would be selling those other fuels => $$$$$$

      The rosy picture you paint is a mirage.
      We are dealing with shape shifters
      that serve up quicksand from hell.

      What we can be certain of is they'll never allow a fuel combo of compressed air and steam because then ordinary citizens would be able to pay doctors in cash and pay off their homes in 5 years.

    • 2 years ago
  • captainplanet71
  • CalPal
    • +2
      CalPal  
    • Hopefully, this should be a 'wakethefuckup' call to anyone that is actually concerned about democracy, not just in America but all over the world, where I can imagine other corporations are pulling off the same stunts.

    • 2 years ago
  • Varex_Sythe
    • +9
      Varex_Sythe  
    • ...

      So the United States company that made world record shattering profits did not pay taxes to the United States...

      Seriously, how do these fuckers manage to not get violent threats from teabaggers, but politicians who vote to help the people do?

    • 2 years ago
  • fun_size
    • +1
      fun_size  
    • Varex_Sythe:

      Because Fox News isnt telling them anything about it. All they hear is the "Democrats are trying to jam bills down our throats".

      Seriously though how in the fuck did we mot tax this mega-corporation?

    • 2 years ago
101 - 182 of 182
more from Community:

top videos