100 Million Americans Question Official 9/11 Story

HOLD UP!

Everybody here thinks the Government had something to do with the 9/11 attacks, THINKS, it could've been bush, dick, rumsfeld, CIA or even the FBI.

The government we live under is very secretive and has killed off people in the past to make sure the bottom line stays safe.

Let's not forget JFK! MLK! and Malcom X to name a few, JUST BECAUSE THEY WANTED EQUALITY...

The US has been known to take people to other countries, just to interrogate them...

So please, save it! Until we have FULL TRANSPARENCY from the US... there's no reason to believe anything they have to say!

by the way, still love you bro!! lol..

not until they explain why the laws of physics did not apply on 9/11. It's not just nuts behinds computers that disagree with the "official" story. It's experts, and witnesses, and engineers, and pilots, and scientists, and firemen, and police, and cameramen, and and and.... While I will never have closure until a new, independent and thorough investigation occurs, you will never have the guts to objectively question what happened that day. Always on to the next excuse... Why don't you actually research to see if the is falsified footage as you claim? I did, and I got my answer. The point is that I questioned it and LOOKED for the answer.

Bill Clinton warned the incoming Bush Administration that they suspected al Qaeda was planning an attack but they were not sure where or how. It is a distinct possibility that Bush and Cheney chose not to act in any way knowing that an attack could be used as a pretense for war. This makes more sense than the other conspiracy theories.

Q: Why do you think so many people around the world question the events? A: Because there were way too many coincidences that day and way too many scientific anomalies. If the 911 Commission even came close to the evidence, there would not be as many "holes" with which to fill theories.

I'm tired of people hiding behind the words "conspiracy theory". Conspiracies happen, accept it. 911 was a conspiracy any way you look at it. Either terrorists with box cutters conspired to do it, or the govt conspired to do it to get us into war and pass the Patriot Act, or a combination of the two, or whatever... What is obvious though is that one person did not pull it off, so it is by definition a CONSPIRACY. Stop acting like the phrase immediately disqualifies anyone from a logical argument.
I hope you can calm youself down. You get really worked up.

"50 secs into 2nd EXTREMELY UNFOCUSED clip the voice over dude says "look closely and you will see the shadow of the plane hit the building BEFORE the plane...""

You misquoted the narrator. I wonder if you were even listening....

Ok, but again, it's an opinion and i'm not going to call you names or attack your opinion like others. My point is and I have stressed this before, there's no need to insult others when we are looking for answers. That's all...

I like your opinion and take it into consideration, but i have my own and will continue to think the government at the time of the 9/11 attacks, had something to do with it.

Great video!!

your the man, Like I've said before thats why I like. you you are a reasonable human being

thanks brotha!! I'm always happy to share and discuss things with you!

I'm still trying to figure out where you guys get the idea that explosive charges placed inside a building are going to make any building fall FASTER than the rate of free fall? Not big on physics, huh?

Wow, you guys manage to uphold the fine tradition of "conspiracy theory", worthy of being dismissed out of hand. Go Jesse, go Alex! Insult the gov't for the sake of personal wealth and fortunes!

In physics, it is well known that implosions create a vacuum. The air gets sucked out from the lower floors as they are collapsed, thus creating the "pull". The evidence is that the buildings fell only slightly longer than it would take them to fall in a complete vacuum without air resistance. With air resistance AND the resistance that should have come from each floor in the "pancake theory", it would have taken several minutes (tens at least) for the buildings to collapse (and they certainly would not have fallen the way that they did).

MASSIVE FAIL on your part... perhaps you should research more before you attack my knowledge

http://search.com/reference/building_implosion

"Numerous small explosions are used to catalyze the collapse, having been strategically planned within the structure and timed to occur in concert, often detonating within milliseconds of one another. Days or even weeks of preparation frequently precede such an event. The explosions blow the air out of the building along with the support structures thus leaving a "vacuum" which has the effect of bringing the building down at rapid speeds."

http://apparent.name

Dude, you're talking to someone with a doctorate degree in physical sciences. Your complete lack of having taken ANY physics course is apparent (or, if you did, you didn't PASS!). Notice how they put "vacuum" in quotes?

Didn't actually read the wiki, eh? This shit is basic, dude..... From wiki:

"The term building implosion can be misleading to laymen: the technique is not a true implosion phenomenon. A true implosion occurs when the difference between internal (lower) and external (higher) pressure is so great that a structure collapses into itself.[citation needed]

In contrast, building implosion techniques do not rely on the difference between internal and external pressure to collapse a structure. Instead, the technique weakens or removes critical supports so that the building can no longer withstand the force of gravity and falls under its own weight."

Here's Stacy Loizeaux, someone who knows:

"The term "implosion" was coined by my grandmother back in, I guess, the '60s. It's a more descriptive way to explain what we do than "explosion." There are a series of small explosions, but the building itself isn't erupting outward. It's actually being pulled in on top of itself. What we're really doing is removing specific support columns within the structure and then cajoling the building in one direction or another, or straight down.”

—Stacy Loizeaux, NOVA, December 1

Bring it back to the WTC: even if it WERE technically feasible (name ONE implosive device: I'm waiting), I'm just wondering how you think a glass-paned skyscraper building with pre-existing extensive breakage of windows would possibly allow the creation of a vacuum of such incredible strength as to actually pull the upper levels down in the manner you seemingly propose?

You are freakin' nuts, Dude. Take a course in Physics 101 (which unfortunately doesn't cover vacuums, melting points, pressure, in any way to make you even close to understand what you don't even know) and then we'll talk....

You have a superiority complex. I have taken many physics classes, and I was actually very good at it. I didn't make it my profession, but I am able to research and comprehend. You don't have to take my word for anything though. http://physics911.net/

If you aren't even willing to concede that the a controlled demolition creates a vacuum (no, not a true vacuum such as outer-space) then I am done with you.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/proofs/speed.html

Rate of fall works differently in a vacuum (no air resistance). That was the whole point to this discussion.

WUP, the lack of humility here on current is really disturbing, the way people attempt to assert their own superiority is always amusing. Yo see it all I have a masters I have a doctorate. Though I have refered to my brother and brother in law in past posts I know for a fact what degrees they have and experience. But in the end those who lack humility really aren't at peace inside themselves or they wouldn't attempt such put downs. They should all read and live by this poem

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Guy in the Glass
by Dale Wimbrow, (c) 1934

When you get what you want in your struggle for self,
And the world makes you King for a day,
Then go to the mirror and look at yourself,
And see what that guy has to say.
For it isn't your Father, or Mother, or Wife,
Who judgement upon you must pass.
The feller whose verdict counts most in your life
Is the guy staring back from the glass.
He's the feller to please, never mind all the rest,
For he's with you clear up to the end,
And you've passed your most dangerous, difficult test
If the guy in the glass is your friend.
You may be like Jack Horner and "chisel" a plum,
And think you're a wonderful guy,
But the man in the glass says you're only a bum
If you can't look him straight in the eye.
You can fool the whole world down the pathway of years,
And get pats on the back as you pass,
But your final reward will be heartaches and tears
If you've cheated the guy in the glass.

Voted up!!!!!!

Yawn.... I ask for proof (e.g. the NAME of an IMPLOSIVE device that would cause the failure you noted). Instead, you offer poetry.

You think a MASSIVE vacuum could be created inside, but you'd watch any video of the collapse and not even realize the fine particulate matter is billowing OUT of the collapsing building. You would deny all the papers seen floating AWAY from WTC as it pancakes. Yeah, even the loonie (Rodin) who proposed the implosion concept had quickly back-tracked from the idiotic concept years ago, yet no one told YOU.

My last post on this thread. Here's some poetry for you:

IF YOU DON'T POSSESS A SHRED OF HUMAN DECENCY TO FIGURE THIS OUT YOURSELF, QUIT TRYING TO HAWK YOUR WARES ON TOP OF THE GRAVES OF THOSE WHO'VE LOST THEIR LIVES ON 9/11!

WHILE YOU MAY ENJOY FREE SPEECH RIGHTS TO DO SO, THIS RANT (9 years after the fact) IS ABSOLUTELY INSULTING TO THE FAMILIES of those who've lost their lives. I can only assume you're genetically related to the Westboro Baptist Church, i.e. those who show up at grave sites of fallen soldiers to tell their families they died because America tolerates gays! However, at least THEY don't try to sell books on their theories: only loonies over the internet would try THAT!

LOOK, I DON"T CARE ABOUT INCREASING YOUR PAGE HITS, REVENUE GENERATED FROM PAGE VIEWS, ETC.

YOU SIR, ARE A TROLL, SOMEONE WHO NEEDS TO GET A LEGITIMATE JOB INSTEAD OF ATTEMPTING TO MAKE A CAREER BY SELLING RANCOR OVER THE NET. I KNOW YOU GET A THRILL, saying how long this thread has been #1 for so many days, etc.

That's it: I'm out. No more page views for you. Put a fork in it, it's dead.

You seem to be confused. I didn't post the poem, tommic did.

You also seem to be confused in thinking that an implosive device is the only thing that can have the effect of a partial vacuum. If you had gone to the link I provided earlier, you would have read this.

http://www.search.com/reference/Building_implosion

"The explosions BLOW THE AIR OUT of the building along with the support structures thus leaving a "vacuum" which has the effect of bringing the building down at rapid speeds."

Controlled demolitions use explosives. I never suggested that implosive devices are used.... and yet you keep asking me to prove to you that they are. The ONLY point I was making was that explosives do create a partial vacuum and that is why most controlled demolitions have a free fall rate just slightly above what would be expected in a vacuum... because air resistance is at a minimum.

I think you could use an attitude adjustment. You make a lot of assumptions about me and you are dead wrong. I recommend that you spend more time discussing the subject matter, and less time attacking people.

And for the record about 911 families... There are many families who are demanding a more thorough investigation. Do not be offended for them. Let them find the answers they need for closure.

I don't mean to be a ball buster but that wasn't funny.... -at all.

and the WTC owner would have to have been in on it too. Building 7 alone is enough evidence, but match that with everything that happened prior to 911 (36 hour power down evacuations, etc.) AND the perfect collapses of 1 and 2... it is not as they told us for sure.

And apparently so much that they don't want to know. They don't care about the evidence and how it completely contradicts the "official" story. The fault mostly lies in the negative connotation of "conspiracy theory". While most are absurd, there are some that actually rely on scientific evidence and sound logic. 911 was a conspiracy any way you look at it. Either it was a conspiracy by terrorists, or a conspiracy by individuals in the govt, or a combination of the two. Whatever it may be, the "official" story is incorrect.

I think the fact that they classified all the evidence, would make one wonder what they want to hide. One would think they would want to clear their names? 100 million questioning the official 911 story, which happened under their watch? Nothing to see here, move along, may not continue forever? Questions, questions, questions???

I think an investigation would not be something for them to fear. It would put them in the clear. Wouldn't it?

Oh really? in what lifetime do you think someone is going to be brought up to trial? and also build another WTC??? Let me know, I'm curious..

Wow .

i think that bush was a puppet just to win votes. not the brains of any of the numerous schemes that were carried out under his presidency. Thats a presidents role, to be a puppet

this video just, owns debunkers...

If anyone bothers to question what they were told, they will find thousands of red flags. This one however is glaringly obvious, and I don't understand why people aren't questioning everything based on this extremely obvious demolition alone.

Great comment!! Voted up!

Extremely eloquent and accurately communicates that it is almost impossible to form an absolute opinion on what happened on 9-11 and that the truth may be more terrifying for the America psyche.

Continuing the occupation does not make the world safer. It makes the world more dangerous.

You mean they are smart enough to think outside the box! AND stop thinking our government is here to help us.

I have to agree with you that the previous Administration and the various national security agency we have are covering up a lot of the truth because of the fear of the level of incompetence was exposed on 9-11

If it was a demolition, the owner of the WTC would have to have been in on it. Lucky for him he purchased a huge insurance policy for the buildings just weeks before the event. Major payday for him.

Don't forget the policy has been paid in full and yet, no new WTC....

I had also heard the twin towers had problems, due to asbestos. It was going to be quite costly to remove asbestos prior to 9/11. Problems solved?

More like problem eliminated.

and he was insured specifically for "aircraft attacks" which he was paid for twice since it was "two separate attacks"

He got paid out TWICE?! WHAT THE F•CK!!! What a scandal.

lol whut david icke got on here

One Love to you, UnclePete813!

unclepete, if I am stateside when the shit hit the fan, come meet me up at Fort Drum so you can hide out with the rest of the 1-89th as we fight a running guerrilla war with the New World Order.

Plus, as the numbers show, 250 million Americans are retards.

why all the genitals in the mouth?

With all due respect, Bullshit. It is not impossible to hide secrets. When is the last time you saw a picture of action on the ground in Afghanistan? Never. They don't let that stuff out. They have tighter control on that shit than anything imaginable. We are talking war tactics at the highest levels of government leading edge technology available in the world. It has been virtually proven since 9/11 that the whole thing was indeed a conspiracy by Bush and his cronies. Bush was just a front man. Wolfowitz et al were the planners behind it. How do I know this? The internet.

That was funny if nothing else.

No, the U.S. would not have invaded those countries. The Bush administration would not have gathered enough public and congressional support to go to war. Maybe 9/11 was a coincidence that the previous administration used to move their agenda. Regardless, they need something at that magnitude to go to war with the middle east.

On another note, why don't people concentrate on the indisputable fact that building 7 was pulled, demolished. As you can see on the picture above, BBC reported on it having collapsed while it stood in the background. If you don't know, it usually takes months to prepare a building for demolition, and this building was obviously demolished or BBC has psychics working for them.

Oh, eventually the truth will out, I am actually surprised that so much was released so quickly after Obama came in, it took a good forty years before most historians were convinced that the Nazis burned down the Reichstag in Berlin, and some people are still arguing about it.

My pet theory has been that It was a terrorist attack and it triggered a self destruct safety process in the two towers. For God's sakes you wouldn't those thing tilting as they come down.
I am afraid the real answer may be closer to a Tom Sharpe novel than to a Tom Wolfe one.

...I like that rationale, Sir...

At least one of the buildings would not have collapsed into it's own footprint. The odds are literally impossible that all could have done so after being struck at the top.
WTC-7, of course, was only struck by debris.

There is no way that the buildings would have fallen into themselves. The odds are astronomical that even one of them would have done it. The ONLY way to keep a building from falling at an angle is to cut the support beams at 45 degree angles throughout the building. The "pancake" theory is absolute rubbish. Even if they did pancake, the building support beams would all have had to fail at the exact same time on every single floor all the way down the building. They also would have to have been "complete" fails with every beam being severed at a 45 degree angle. If any of them had been even slightly stronger than another and thus bent in a different fashion, the building would have had a different falling trajectory. Now we take the odds of that and then consider that 3 buildings managed to miraculously fall in on themselves. Wow. Just wow. This is more miraculous than anything in the Bible.

You should look into it before completely discarding the possibility. Based on your comment, you haven't done your homework yet.

Bin Laden was dead before 9/11 happened. That was a great way to keep the chase going and prevent the possibility of him talking and proclaiming he had no idea what was going on and that he was smoking some hashish when the whole thing went down.

And you know this how exactly? You're a demolition expert?

Only Texans think 9/11 was completely real. But then, their patriotism is actually fascism.

But everyone knows about Marilyn.

Alex Jones is in Austin Texas and they are wide awake to the government and 9/11.